Template talk:Volare
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Herzi Pinki in topic source-only template
Bookmarklet
editIch habe ein de:Bookmarklet zum Vereinfachten Upload von Bildern erstellt: https://simon04.github.io/imgs2commons/ – Simon04 (talk) 12:38, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
source-only template
edit@Herzi Pinki: Haven't images on Volare been released under different licenses, some unfree? If so, we should remove the {{Attribution}} tag (and check files ending up without a license). FDMS 4 18:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- do you have an example? we do only upload files that are free, do we. It depends on the collection, so afaik some collections are free (as a whole), while others are not. We could make a check on the collection? --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed I haven't found any image from the unfree Ignacio Martinez collection. Most other collections have been released under the CC BY 4.0, though, which is a different license from {{Attribution}}. I like the idea of a license tag being displayed based on the collection, will implement that now/today. FDMS 4 06:17, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- the attribution is necessary as it is because of the source. So that's why I put the attribution to this template to ease the correct import of images from volare. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- I think you're confusing {{Attribution}} (a separate license, like {{PD-self}}) with {{Credit line}}. Either way, I have already rewritten the template as suggested, and will save the revision as soon as I have converted and uploaded the state logo of Vorarlberg, which I would like to use instead of the coat of arms. FDMS 4 08:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- the attribution is necessary as it is because of the source. So that's why I put the attribution to this template to ease the correct import of images from volare. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed I haven't found any image from the unfree Ignacio Martinez collection. Most other collections have been released under the CC BY 4.0, though, which is a different license from {{Attribution}}. I like the idea of a license tag being displayed based on the collection, will implement that now/today. FDMS 4 06:17, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Now we have duplicate, slightly different licenses e.g. File:Lingenauer Hochbrücke.jpg. Can we solve this by removing the later? --Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Done for most files, skipped files uploaded by Simon04 tagged as under CC BY-SA 4.0 (?). FDMS 4 14:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- @User:FDMS4, the CC-BY-SA-4.0 originates from a mistake/typo of mine in the bookmarklet I wrote for transferring files to commons (https://simon04.github.io/imgs2commons/). Is there an automated way to fix 124 affected files? – Simon04 (talk) 15:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- I fixed the bookmarklet: https://github.com/simon04/imgs2commons/commit/8820414ae88573ed8155b23da21909007fdaa377 – Simon04 (talk) 15:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Done now as well (using VFC). FDMS 4 16:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- I fixed the bookmarklet: https://github.com/simon04/imgs2commons/commit/8820414ae88573ed8155b23da21909007fdaa377 – Simon04 (talk) 15:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- @User:FDMS4, the CC-BY-SA-4.0 originates from a mistake/typo of mine in the bookmarklet I wrote for transferring files to commons (https://simon04.github.io/imgs2commons/). Is there an automated way to fix 124 affected files? – Simon04 (talk) 15:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
For Sammlung Rhomberg vs Sammlung Risch-Lau please see User_talk:Plani#Volare. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)