Thiago Temer Santos

edit

O usuário Thiago Temer (talk · contribs) é um contumaz violador de direitos autorais, mas é um cara inteligente e foi melhorando com o tempo. Das imagens que carregou tenho certeza que 90% é "chupada" de sites da internet. O problema é que ele foi se aprimorando, aprendendo a jogar a fica cada vez mais difícil pegá-lo em flagrante. Infelizmente, não tenho como gastar vinte minutos pesquisando na internet para verificar se uma mísera fotinho é copiada, ficamos à mercê de pessoas desonestas como ele, que ademais usa vários nomes diferentes (arrisco dizer que mais de dez contas de usuário). Dantadd 16:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Olá Giro720,

tenho tido alguns problemas com o Thiago Temer na Wikipedia, principalmente em sites que tenham informações sobre Uberlândia. Este senhor tem uma fixação ou alguma necessidade de estima de acreditar que Uberlândia é uma grande metrópole. Não quero entrar no mérito de grandeza de Uberlândia, a qual não conheço e não tenho nada contra mas a todo momento ele inventa uma foto de Uberlândia ou então um mapa horroroso no artigo de Minas Gerais ou então altera informações sem nenhuma verificabilidade na página de Belo Horizonte. Assim, tenho procurado cercá-lo legalmente para que, pelo menos, diminua o seu ímpeto vândalo nos artigos de geografia, os quais pessoalmente considero o~s mais importantes desse projeto. Sou novato na Wikipedia e no Commons e ainda tenho algum tempo e disposição disponíveis para procurar a origem dessas fotos. No mais, gostaria de deixar aqui a minha disposição de atuar neste sentido. -Talk2lurch 21:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Lazio-Bandiera.png

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lazio-Bandiera.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Lazio-Bandiera.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)


 
File:Toscana-Bandiera.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 20:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 
File:Sardegna-Bandiera.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 20:42, 18 November 2009 (UTC)