129.125.102.126

See also User talk:Erik Warmelink

FIAV

Hello,

The FIAV is a worldwide organisation for the flag regulation, and they have a color code in purpose to unify the flag colours in which are not specified. They are some flags whose colours are fixed (i.e. the scotland flag law says that its blue is Pantone 300) but the ones who are not specified, should be standarised. --Mutxamel (talk) 04:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any law or something who indicates the exact match colour to be used with Gelderland flag? --Mutxamel (talk) 18:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, flag do have laws to regulate its colours. Take a look, i.e., at the scottish flag:

in 2003 a committee of the Scottish Parliament met to examine a petition that the Scottish Government adopt the Pantone 300 colour as a standard. (Note that this blue is of a lighter shade than the Pantone 280 of the Union Flag). Having taken advice from a number of sources, including the office of the Lord Lyon King of Arms, the committee recommended that the optimum shade of blue for the Saltire be Pantone 300.

. Or in the spanish flag, which colors are also regulated. If there is no law who regulates the colors of an especific flag, FIAV colours must be used. In fact, the Nederlandse Vereniging voor Vlaggenkunde is federated to the FIAV, and I haven't found any special instructions ahead. I encorage you to write your own country flag experts (NVVV) and tell them about the colors they reccomend for gelderland flag, or search for some law who regulate them. By now, we dont have any official (government) or unofficial (NVVV) recommendation so FIAV colors are likely to be used. --Mutxamel (talk) 22:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry but this is not a matter of personal opinions. In Wikipedia, if there is no official color, FIAV colours are the base. There are several thousands of flags on Commons and if we let people to paint their flags wisely, we would have thousands of different yellows, reds... For that, FIAV colors are used by default if there are no references about other colors to be used. The only reference you have is a little 16x16 pixels image, Its not enough. I have argued more than I wanted about this topic, I think its not so hard to understand. I don't speak or understand dutch, but I think I've found some official stuff about the flag. Could you please take it a look? it's called 'Provinciale Staten van Gelderland (15 april 1953): Vaststelling van een vlag voor de provincie Gelderland, Provinciaal Blad van Gelderland , nummer 66.'. I think that's the law who regulates the size, colours and proportions of Gelderland flag. Let's find it out --Mutxamel (talk) 00:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

This isn't (the US-centric version of) the English wikipedia, these are the wikimedia commons, Dutch "geel" in flag descriptions isn't the same as FIAV "yellow" (because "orange" is quite a common colour in a country ruled by the house of Orange-Nassau). --129.125.102.126 02:44, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Misleading block log entry

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "At least use the proper preposition in the block reason ("intimidation/harassment: of", not by "blocked editor User:Erik Warmelink")" Decline reason: "The three-day-block of 129.125.102.126 has already expired. Trijnsteltalk 18:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

It would be nice too if the undeletion request for User:129.125.102.126 would be restored[1]. --129.125.102.126 16:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Anonymous user

This is not the discussion page for an anonymous user, this is the discussion page for the user of 129.125.102.126, who doesn't want a pseudonym. I am Erik Warmelink (officially Hendrik Barend Gerhard Warmelink, locally Hendrik van Meisters Ghendrik). --129.125.102.126 05:10, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome again, Erik. Trijnstel_talk 18:01, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, thanks, I think. Deleting Creating Category:Heilige Martinus te Gendt was friendly, but you haven't spoken with me on commons before and your welcome on nds-nl and meta was I bit too warm for my taste. --129.125.102.126 18:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 month

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 month for the following reason: Block evasion by User:Erik Warmelink, I suggest that you use the correct channels to get unblocked rather then use an IP to evade the block.. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Bidgee (talk) 07:44, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

I suggest you read Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Abigor, using the "correct channels" got me blocked in the first place. Have a nice life. --129.125.102.126 09:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Unless you mean those #NAME channels on IRC. --129.125.102.126 16:31, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Category:Maps_of_the_Netherlands_as_imagined_by_wikipedians

Category:Maps_of_the_Netherlands_as_imagined_by_wikipedians has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lord Belbury (talk) 19:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)