User talk:Ardfern/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

File:Craft_Workshop,_Belfast,_October_2010_(04).JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Craft_Workshop,_Belfast,_October_2010_(04).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 03:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Big_Day_Out_stalls,_Cambridge,_July_2010_(12).JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Big_Day_Out_stalls,_Cambridge,_July_2010_(12).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Powers (talk) 17:08, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Ulster_Museum_(39),_October_2009.JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ulster_Museum_(39),_October_2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 20:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Banska-Bystrica-Pope-John-Paul-II-plaque.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I think that the user meant to categorize the image with respect to the year, carved on the stone, and not the year of taking the photography. It is the event of placing the plaque that is worth criterion for categorization, rather than the date of taking the shot. That's why I return the previous year, 2003. →Spiritia 19:40, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Ice_cream_van,_Cambridge,_July_2010_(01).JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ice_cream_van,_Cambridge,_July_2010_(01).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 21:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re bot

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Doh, that was pretty stupid(!) Fixing it now. By the way, noticed your cat work on my watchlist a lot today, good to see and thanks for efforts :)--Nilfanion (talk) 23:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Audley's_Castle_(09),_August_2009.JPG

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Audley's_Castle_(09),_August_2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 04:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bank of Ireland,Belfast

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Many thanks for this delightful portfolio.I see that the light was fading when you'd finished the excellent overview (which could be usefully repeated as time change)of shops in Lisburn. Any chance of another visit.I would especially like a series of the Nichol bronze and the stunning Angel on the war memorial.I have other wants too, eg. Crozier in Bannbridge and the War memorial in Ward Park Bangor.Do you use the Ulster Architectural Society publications to find hidden gems? I have a notion some are on the web. All the best Notafly (talk) 14:11, 26 March 2011 (UTC) I see you focused on Sinclairs on North Street as well.As you see I haven't visited you page for some months.I spend quite a time with some pics so it will be a while before I get to the end.Notafly (talk) 14:20, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Carrick

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Nice to be by the seaside. Here is an October breeze in Portrush [1] Notafly (talk) 20:13, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Geograph files

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When removing {{Uncategorized-Geograph}} from files, can you try to ensure meaningful categories are applied? The Uncategorized template both enables bots to locate the file (which makes future bot runs to improve categorisation possible), and because it contains the grid square info ties the image to a specific 1km square area (which enables a decent standard of localisation).

Edits like this are not particularly helpful at all, as instead of knowing the image is of Category:Barra (as its NF7006), all that can be worked out from the description is that its in Scotland. That will make "proper" categorisation of that image much harder.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Holywood

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Ardfern I need a distant photo of Holywood without any clear view of modern buildings.Maybe from the Exchange Side and showing the spire. Really an isn't Ireland nice? pic from the world that never was. It's for the top of this page [2] See him on Wiki[3]. Any chance? Best regards Robert Notafly (talk) 14:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Used one of your pics here [4] Many thanks and all the bestNotafly (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Littleham

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,

Please note Category:Littleham is "Littleham is a village and civil parish in North Devon". The files you have been moving from Category:Exmouth, Devon are all in East Devon - for an entirely seperate Littleham. Please stop further moves like this, thanks.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Location categories.

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,

Please note that this image - File:Fields near East Bridge Farm - geograph.org.uk - 697796.jpg is not of Bulkworthy. Its clearly in the neighbouring Newton St Petrock parish.

Likewise File:RJ's Cafe, Aller, Newton Abbot, Devon - geograph.org.uk - 77911.jpg is in Aller - which is part of Kingskerswell not Coffinswell.

If the location category is GeographBot's best guess, it may be reasonable to change it if wrong. However, if a human has manually located it, do not just change it without thinking about why they have placed it there.-Nilfanion (talk) 15:35, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Aviation Wikiproject on Commons?

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey mate, I've had an idea of starting an Aviation WikiProject on Commons. I have created a page at User talk:Russavia/Proposal where I hope that if other editors think this is a good idea, we can all come up with ideas, etc. Please keep all comments on that page for time being, and if you know of other editors on Commons or on other language projects who might be interested in commenting, coming up with ideas, etc, please let them know of the discussion. Let's see if this could be a workable project. russavia (talk) 12:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)Reply