Boenj

Hallo Boenj,
auch im Zeitalter der Globalisierung finde ich eine "gemischtsprachliche" Category:Justizpalast in Munich wenig sinnvoll. "Greeßings" --Bubo bubo 19:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Bubo bubo, Deine Aversion gegen Denglisch teile ich; nur kenne ich zwei Möglichkeiten: entweder den deutschen Eigennamen als Eigennamen im Englischen übersetzen oder ihn korrekt übersetzen. Die genaue offizielle Übersetzung des Begriffes Jusitzpalast kenne ich nicht; daher Verwendung als Eigennamen. Für Anregungen bzw. Übersetzung bin ich offen, solange es kein Filser-Englisch ist. Boenj 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)--Reply

Die Category:Courthouses of Germany habe ich jetzt in die Category:Buildings in Germany gestellt. Als Unterkategorie zu Category:Courthouses of Germany könnte man eine Category:Courthouses of Munich anlegen, und diese dann zusätzlich in die Category:Buildings in Munich einsortieren. Das hätte auch den Vorteil, dass nicht nur die Justizpalast-Bilder gut aufgehoben wären, da es auch von anderen Münchener Gerichten noch ein paar Bilder gibt. Einverstanden? Gruß --Bubo bubo 19:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Einverstanden. Danke für Deine Hilfe Boenj 19:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Immer wieder gerne. Danke für die Kooperation :-) --Bubo bubo 20:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Muenchen N Rathaus 1922.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Muenchen N Rathaus 1922.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 20:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kategorisierung edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Die englischen Kategorien in allen Ehren - aber ein deutscher nutzer wird nicht auf die Idee kommen, Category:Basilika of Our Mother of Perpetual Help in Munich zu suchen, wenn er die Mariahilfkirche sucht. In diesem Sinne fände ich persönlich eine deutsche Kategorisierung vorerst sinnvoller; - vielleicht kommen ja irgendwann mal die versprochenen mehrsprachigen Kategorien. Andererseits bin ich heilfroh um jeden, der im Raum Bayern mitkategorisiert - sei es deutsch oder englisch. In diesem Sinne: Keep Working! 217.80.54.88 20:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hallo 217.80.54.88, grundsätzlich stimme ich Dir zu. Ich halte mich aber an die Commons:Language policy, die ausdrücklich vorschreibt: So far, Categories are in English. Nicht nett, denn bis ich die korrekte Übersetzung für Mariahilfkirche gefunden habe, habe ich ganz schön gegoogelt und recherchiert. Nun ja, die Kollegen von en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Munich werden es hoffentlich danken. Boenj 20:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

sorry, - ich hab oben versehentlich uneingeloggt geschrieben. Die Sache mit den Übersetzungen kenne ich zu genüge, und bezüglich der Kategorienamen halte ich es bisher mit einem Konsens der deutschen Geografen hier und vor allem der alten WP-Regel Ignoriere alle Regeln. Aber wie gesagt, wie fasta alle hier bin prinzipiell froh über jedes kategorisierte Bild! Liebe Grüsse, Thomas Springer 20:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reverts edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

You don't give any reason for your reverts such as [1] or [2], and don't even warn me, which is quite unpolite. I must assume they are not correct, as there is one and only one official name for these institutions. Do you also intend to rename the cats in Category:Buildings in Paris—I would not do that if I were you... Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 20:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

it is quite unpolite, to revert the work of a lot of hours without warning or discussing. Most of the terms are the official English names of theses institutions. The Commons:Language policy are cleary: So far, Categories are in English, So I hope, that you didn't intend to rename the cats a third time. I'm an Bavarian and I work in the Category:Munich - and You a French and work in Your special room. Paris isn't my working place - and I notice, that Munich and Bavarian Institution isn't Your Place - because You didn't know one moment the official English Names and Translation Boenj 20:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Munich edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,

I actually renamed some Munich cats; as there were different case, there are different reasons for this. I precise that I put some moving requests on some of these which could be judged problematic, and as I got no reaction, I assumed it was OK.

All these renamings were normally approved by at least one admin, since they were deleted using the badname template. If there was a real opposition, I believe that no admin would have done the deletion. Nevertheless, if you don't agree with some particular cases, don't hesitate to point them out, since it's not possible to discuss on generalities. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 11:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Category:Saint_Peter's_church_in_Bavaria edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Saint_Peter's_church_in_Bavaria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

GFreihalter (talk) 06:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Pasinger Markt 1907.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Pasinger Markt 1907.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

188.104.120.84 20:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic