User talk:Cmglee/archive2012

2O11 2O12 2O13 2O14 2O15 2O16 2O17 2O18 2O19 2O2O
2O21 2O22 2O23 2O24
Topics started in 2012

File:Legoland_Billund_Robocoaster.jpg edit

 
File:Legoland_Billund_Robocoaster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.131.15 17:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your image uploads edit

It is not a good idea to add photographer name into the filename. Credits are given in the image description ("Author"). Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 23:46, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi I note that you have renamed a large number of my and other contributors' uploads under this Commons:FR#reasons:
# Aim Examples (old name) Examples (new name)
3. Correct misleading names into accurate ones File:MY_CUTE_MOUSE.JPG
File:1BIGGest_nOSE_everS33n.JPG
File:Dutch_pet_rabbit.jpg
File:John_Doe_at_concert.jpg
I do not see how prefixing my ID makes it a misleading name. It is certainly not what the examples illustrate. Can you point me to a Wikimedia guideline stating that IDs are not allowed in filenames?
The issue is not credit but to keep the filenames unique. E.g. being a popular subject, there could be any number of images called File:London_Aquatics_Centre_interior.jpg while File:cmglee_London_Aquatics_Centre_interior.jpg is much more likely to be unique and would almost certainly not clash with an existing file.
cmglee (talk) 13:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for bringing this up. The renames were proposed by user:BaldBoris and I agreed with him, but you are correct that this is not reflected in the renaming guidelines, and you can claim the files should be moved back. I'm looking into the relevant guidelines and will get back to this. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 23:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your understanding. As there's a more thorough discussion at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#ID_in_filenames_.2F_User:Materialscientist, let's continue there. cmglee (talk) 11:21, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for making Phase_diagram_of_water.svg edit

It illustrates the phases very nicely! Thanks! Scraimer (talk) 08:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Scraimer; glad you find it useful! cmglee (talk) 11:22, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
2O11 2O12 2O13 2O14 2O15 2O16 2O17 2O18 2O19 2O2O
2O21 2O22 2O23 2O24
Return to the user page of "Cmglee/archive2012".