User talk:De728631

TUSC token 211033b1711e51385fa1da3b5f03b199Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!Edit

Upload pictures for Carrie Underwood why I deleted? What can I do to be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mogada1972 (talk • contribs)

You cannot upload photos taken by another and claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
(That's what I wrote at Mogada's talk page. De728631 (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC))

AppreciatedEdit

Good work thanks - account blocked and original user warned. It is Flickr washing without doubt but I'm guessing it is ignorance rather than particularly evil intent. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 08:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Courtesy Arizona State University, 2015.jpgEdit

Hi De728631. Are you able to verify the OTRS ticket for File:Courtesy Arizona State University, 2015.jpg? I think the uploader (the same user from that VP thread) may have misinterpreted something I wrote on ther user talk about permissions emails and "OTRS pending" templates. I guess it's not impossible that a major US university would agree to freely license such content, but it does seem a little unusual, doesn't it? Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I don't have access to the OTRS system but I a similar case is being discussed at the OTRS noticeboard. Anyhow, this file doesn't have any licence at all. De728631 (talk) 19:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
I thought admins also had access to OTRS, so my mistake. Thanks for checking the licensing and for post on their user talk. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Public domain Mark 1.0Edit

Hi, Most people, including Carl Lindberg, think that this is OK. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:J. Yancey McGill and Nikki Haley.jpg‎. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Yann, I'm sorry but I have to disagree. Even Carl wrote that "we don't trust simply any PDM mark out there, since we don't know what was behind the determination". That image of Prince Ali I refused to restore was clearly not his own work but made a by another photographer so we need to know who released this into the public domain and why. It alls depends on the individual work and in this case I thought there was insufficient evidence to restore the file. De728631 (talk) 19:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Any Suggestions on how to proceed? This issue with the PD and Flickr seems as clear as mud and a source of (frequent) contention. The photos of Prince Ali are the public domain images provided to the press/media/etc. He is running for the presidency of FIFA. PeterWesco (talk) 22:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
As always, we need permissions from the original photographers and/or copyright holders. We don't know where these photos were taken so maybe they are a work for hire making Prince Ali the copyright holder, maybe they are still copyrighted to the photographer who just granted full rights of use to the Prince but some PR agent uploaded the images to Flickr under a seemingly PD licence. Unless this is clearly disclosed at the relevant page on Flickr I'm not comfortable with uploading those images here. De728631 (talk) 23:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
I have sent a message to the Flickr account holder to request 1) update the images to CC0 2) Post a proper release in the album (if possible). I will let you know when/if a response is received. PeterWesco (talk) 16:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, I hope that account holder will change the licenses to a more explicit type. De728631 (talk) 22:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

barnstarEdit

Thank you very much for the barnstar ;) Pyb (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "De728631".