Open main menu
Eatcha is Symbol possible vote.svg Busy

ARE YOU A NEW USER ? CLICK HERE TO LEAVE A MESSAGE

It's 2:06 PM, at my location (GMT+9)


Email : eatcha-wikimedia@pm.me

User talk:Eatcha/Archive 0 | User talk:Eatcha/Archive 1 | User talk:Eatcha/Archive 2 | User talk:Eatcha/Archive 3

Contents

Code issues in User:Eatcha/common.cssEdit

Hi Eatcha, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Eatcha/common.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new prettyCss issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 33 char number 11 - Evidence: 20px
  2. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 41 char number 13 - Evidence: 55px
  3. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 42 char number 12 - Evidence: 18px

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 18:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC).

Query regarding your recent deletion taggingsEdit

How is this file a derivative work? In fact, the file uploaded at the Commons is the oldest & the highest resolution version available on the net. And it is released under a proper license by its author Nivisharma845.

I haven't properly looked at your other similar recent taggings, but those files also don't seem like derivative works, e.g. how are the files like [1], [2], [3], etc. derivative works? - NitinMlk (talk) 14:50, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

NitinMlk, where is the EXIF of that file ? Certainly that is a derivative work. Please upload the full resolution original file with EXIF data. Regards, -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 15:42, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
File:WhatsApp-Image-20160611 (1).jpg, it is copvio from https://twitter.com/iamayeshanazir/status/740582332432846849?lang=en . It will be speedily deleted now. Regards, -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 15:47, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Maan2.JPG, this has a black frame so indeed a derivative work + Oos too, I should have marked it with speedy. -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 15:53, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
I didn't upload any one of these files. Normally inexperienced/newbie uploaders tweak their pics before uploading them here, which I guess affects their EXIF details, but that doesn't make them derivative work. Anyway, thanks for responding, and this time you tagged at least two of them correctly. - NitinMlk (talk) 15:58, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Ayesha Nazir Jatt.jpg was uploaded by User:RamishAsgharPTI who also uploaded another image of this same female-homo-sapien named Ayesha Nazir which is a copyvio from twitter see File:Ayesha Nazir Jatt Meeting with Imran Khan.jpg. This user is not a newbie who somehow deleted the EXIF but an offender. -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 17:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Malala Yousafzai.svgEdit

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Malala Yousafzai.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Yann (talk) 04:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Katie Bouman.svgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Katie Bouman.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Katie Bouman.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.
Yann (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

@Yann, what If I ask Katie Bouman to send an OTRS ? or should I ask her to send a self-portrait + send permission to OTRS ? I think the Image I used was not her work, so I guess the second option would be better. And the SVG of malala yousafzai is created using a public domain Image, what to do ? Best, -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 06:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi,
Yes, the source has to be free, so you need a permission from the copyright holder of the picture.
For Malala Yousafzai, your drawing doesn't seem to look like the source. I think you used File:Malala Yousafzai Azam.jpg rather than the one you mention. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

UploadsEdit

Hi, please make sure to add a license template when you upload a file. Jcb (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Jcb, thanks for notifying me, I just added license template to all of my uploads. -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 18:33, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! Jcb (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Blue?Edit

If you increase the yellow, temp and decrease the blue/green slightly it will become a QI. Compare the text in these two images, the other one looks more golden
This looks golden, I just increased the yellow using lightroom and It's a QI now

Thanks for reviewing my QI nominations. I am fairly new to photography, especially the post-processing stuff. Can you explain what do you mean by "pull down the blue", and how can I work on it? KCVelaga (talk · mail) 05:55, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi KCVelaga,
I should have avoided using jargon, Sorry for that. Your images of statues which are made of bronze/copper looks blueish(maybe because of the sky) and by decreasing the blue, increasing the temperature and slight increase in yellow can make them look more natural. You can use Adobe Lightroom for that, If you have the RAW files these images can become very good QIs. You can compare this between File:CQHM Abdul Hamid statue at Param Yodha Sthal Delhi.jpg and File:Subedar Joginder Singh statue at Param Yodha Sthal Delhi.jpg, the first one is not a QI only because of its bad lighting which can be fixed if you have the RAW files.
If you wish you can learn these things from YouTube. Here is a 8 minute tutorial that might help you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lCPsiCxShU
Regards, 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 14:34, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
@Eatcha: Thanks for your elaborate reply, and guiding me through the process. I will definitely go through the tutorial and do some practice. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 16:41, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

Sunrise at TaniJubbar Lake.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sunrise at TaniJubbar Lake.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunrise at TaniJubbar Lake.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Joy & Heron - Animated CGI Spot by Passion Pictures.webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Joy & Heron - Animated CGI Spot by Passion Pictures.webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank youEdit

I will see this video this summer, and I'll try to modify some of my pictures. Thank you for your words.--Drow male (talk) 23:13, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Reviewing quality imagesEdit

Hi Eatcha! Can you please be more considerate when reviewing images for QI mark? From what I've seen, a lot of images that you have reviewed as "Good quality" ended up in discussions and other revieweres didn't let them pass. Some of the users even questioned how it's possible that such images were marked as "Good quality" pictures. I'd politely suggest that you have a look at Commons:Image guidelines and maybe just nominate pictures first so you can have a better idea where the QI mark sits. It's often more about technical quality than anything else. Also, I don't think it's a good idea to try to "fix" other users image when, in fact, you might accidentally make them worse. All the best, --Podzemnik (talk) 01:13, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

@Podzemnik, Okay I'll only nominate images at QIC for the next 6 months, no voting and no editing.
Thanks -- 🇪A〒ℂ🇭A  💬 15:03, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Eatcha, I hope I didn't discourage you :) Your work is great and I enjoy it, it's just the QI mark might be tricky to grasp from the beginning. To me personally, it helped from the beginning that I only nominated images. Especially those pictures that were declined helped me to improve and understand what is expected for a QI mark. Regards from New Zealand, --Podzemnik (talk) 19:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Hadres Kellergasse.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hadres Kellergasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Dave Marcus profile pic (cropped).pngEdit

Pay attention to copyright
File:Dave Marcus profile pic (cropped).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
It's not my upload, I just cropped it from File:Dave_Marcus_profile_pic.png. -- 🇪A〒ℂ🇭A  💬 05:06, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:CGI Animated Short Film- "Mr Indifferent" by Aryasb Feiz - CGMeetup.webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CGI Animated Short Film- "Mr Indifferent" by Aryasb Feiz - CGMeetup.webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

ILLENIUM.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ILLENIUM (American musician, DJ and producer).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Burj Khalifa - flickr.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Burj Khalifa - flickr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
B dash (talk) 09:22, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Navigation templateEdit

Hi, Thanks for trying to start again these 2 competitions. {{F-PC-VC-SC-Transporter}} is too flashy IMO. Could you please fix it? I would just remove the colors. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:58, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

@Yann, ✓ Done as per opinion -- 🇪A〒ℂ🇭A  💬 14:07, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
I further reduced the border, and change the color to blue. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:12, 11 May 2019 (UTC)


AutopatrollerEdit

Hi, I gave you the "autopatroller" right. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:18, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Statue of Hindu God Ganesha.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of Hindu God Ganesha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Sunflower in a park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunflower in a park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Featured video candidatesEdit

Hi, Please do not nominate more than 2 at a time. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:46, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Featured contentEdit

Thanks for your efforts on Commons' featured content processes. Just curious what your motivation was and/or if you have future plans for them? (It's possible I missed a Village Pump thread or somesuch). — Rhododendrites talk |  20:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

@User:Rhododendrites, Actually it was not my Idea to re-start these 2 projects, I didn't even heard about these rusty projects before the discussion here, but Instead of discussing there I went on to start these project. And I'm actually in between a vacation (until 30th May), so I do have a lot of time & not much work to do that's why I started these 2 projects, my initial plan was to start only the FVC but because of enough time I started both. Yeah, I do have future plans for these 2 projects, specially the FSC which I guess will take-off this time (I'm not sure about the FVC). I plan to start SOTY(like POTY) and maybe VOTY(not sure, because of very few amount of videogrphers on commons). And I won't be able to reply for next 8hrs, it is about 2 AM where I live, need to go to bed. Thanks for your commendation -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 21:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

I just wanted to say thanks for working on the FPC bot. It's been unmaintained for years and we've had to suffer through many inconveniences as a result. It's great that someone like you is finally looking into it. -- King of ♠ 17:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Images in your test FP nominationEdit

Hi, wasn't the original issue for the FPCBot and your smiley that the image trips it up? You should include some images of different sizes (or only one after the other after the bot first made a count) in your recent test nomination. Or if you plan to add them later, you should clarify that in the nomination so other people following this aren't wondering about the same thing. – Lucas 21:52, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Lucas, Actually that Nom is only for testing the withdrawn function and smiley issue is not related to it. I'll add about 4 different noms to test more bugs separately including the smiley bug. Thanks -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 03:56, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

  • All right. Also remember to test the bug that a FPX tag (maybe also FPD) followed by FPC-reviewed will not be archived by the bot, the FPX tag needs to be removed first to work or one would need to manually archive the nom. – Lucas 07:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
  • @Lucasbosch: We are on it. You can follow as the code is tested on my talk page. --Cart (talk) 07:38, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
  • @W.carter: Thanks! I missed the discussion on your talk page the first time I looked because it was not sorted correctly but placed inbetween older entries. – Lucas 08:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Do not ping so many peopleEdit

Hi, Do not ping so many people. Interested contributors follow the page, and will answer if and when necessary. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Ok, will not ping that many user again-- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 13:54, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Best Commercial Spot RENAULT The Postman Animated CGI Spot by NKI.webmEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Best Commercial Spot RENAULT The Postman Animated CGI Spot by NKI.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Speravir 23:34, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, Eatcha, but I did not feel comfortable anymore. — Speravir – 23:35, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Ok, I understand -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 02:24, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

Bahram Gur hunting.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bahram Gur hunting.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bahram Gur hunting.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

Vitruvian Barnstar Hires.png The Technical Barnstar
For all your work with some much needed repair on the FPCBot. Thank You!!! Cart (talk) 06:38, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Humko hami se Tum hi ho (Brussels violin cover) - Sylwia Malachowska.webmEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Humko hami se Tum hi ho (Brussels violin cover) - Sylwia Malachowska.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
El Grafo (talk) 08:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Your new signatureEdit

Eatcha.sign.png

Hi Eatcha, just a friendly heads up: You may want to re-consider your new signature per Commons:Signatures#Images_in_signature. All the best, and thanks for your work on FSC/FVC. El Grafo (talk) 08:10, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

  • +1 While you have fixed up the FPCBot so that it allows small images now, you don't know what other places it might cause thouble. It is also awkward since it has no direct link to your talk page, which is the page most people want. On this forum you don't distinguish yourself by having an eccentric signature, you do so with your actions. With all the good work you are doing here, you don't need all these signature-playing. ;-) --Cart (talk) 09:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
    @El Grafo, W.carter: I had no Idea that an image can be used to DOS the Wikimedia servers, just read about the buggy caching system that Mediawiki is using. Thanks for the heads up. -- Eatcha (talk) 16:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

You could also use "-- ℰ𝒶𝓉𝒸𝒽𝒶" as signature --Habitator terrae 🌍 09:39, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:A Millipede Unfolding and Walking Away.webmEdit

Copyright status: File:A Millipede Unfolding and Walking Away.webm

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:A Millipede Unfolding and Walking Away.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Abzeronow (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Female Regal Jumping Spider eating a large bluebottle fly.webmEdit

Copyright status: File:Female Regal Jumping Spider eating a large bluebottle fly.webm

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Female Regal Jumping Spider eating a large bluebottle fly.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Abzeronow (talk) 17:22, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Juvenile Spiny Flower Mantis 01.webmEdit

Copyright status: File:Juvenile Spiny Flower Mantis 01.webm

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Juvenile Spiny Flower Mantis 01.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Deleted contentEdit

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | svenska | українська | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−


Hello Eatcha,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:A Millipede Unfolding and Walking Away.webm

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 19:34, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured video candidatesEdit

Featured videos logo square.svg We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
Dear Eatcha,
Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? We think you are. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag.
You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome !
-- Eatcha (talk) 17:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Joy & Heron - Animated CGI Spot by Passion Pictures.webmEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Joy & Heron - Animated CGI Spot by Passion Pictures.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
— Racconish💬 06:10, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 12:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Nino Rota (1911-1979). Love Theme From Romeo & Juliet (Alexandra Mukovnya - flute).webmEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nino Rota (1911-1979). Love Theme From Romeo & Juliet (Alexandra Mukovnya - flute).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
— Racconish💬 17:33, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Nazi Fanatics The Waffen SS History Documentary.webmEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nazi Fanatics The Waffen SS History Documentary.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
— Racconish💬 17:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 17:47, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 17:50, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

BlockEdit

Sorry, I had to block you for short time. You nominated for speedy deletion a lot of files. They generally do not qualify for speedy deletion. Uploader's request is valid reason for speedy deletion only during first week after upload; here whole month has passed. Taivo (talk) 18:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Delete my all files and block me indef. Thanks for such a wonderful experience"
Decline reason: "Request declined. 1989 (talk) 18:50, 11 June 2019 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

Dear Taivo,

I am really sorry for the way I behaved. I was in a really bad mood because of the deletion nominations of more than 70 files of mine and also because of the emails that I got due to these deletions in the late night(GMT+9). I promise you that I will be more careful in future and will not repeat such a mistake. Thanks for not deleting my files and blocking me(as a measure to stop me). -- Eatcha (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Block request to admins I trustEdit

User:Yann and User:Podzemnik can you please block me and my all bots(bots listed on my user-page) indef as I will not maintain them anymore and please place {{Retired}}. Maybe this is my last edit on Wikimedia commons, but who knows about future. Thanks -- Eatcha (talk) 18:35, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Just cool down, and come back tomorrow please. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:40, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I tried to send you an e-mail but it didn't work. Just take a break, everything is gonna be alright :) --Podzemnik (talk) 21:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
User:Yann and User:Podzemnik thanks for not blocking me indef. I was in a very bad mood due to 70+ deletion nomination in a few hours and due to the emails that I received due to these deletion in the late night(+9 GMT). Podzemnik you weren't not able to e-mail me because I deleted that email account due to the non-stop 70+ emails that I received when all my speedy deletion nominations were reverted by Taivo. -- Eatcha (talk) 12:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Wait, didn't you request for the images to be deleted? I'm Face-confused.svg Confused: now--Boothsift 01:24, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
@Booth,see [[4]], and the images that I nominated for speedy deletion was me getting mad from the deletion nomination mails, I actually wanted to nominate all my videos for speedy deletion but by mistake I placed that speedy template on some of my images as well. Including the current logo of Featured Videos and Featured Sound. I hope it's clear now. Regards,-- Eatcha (talk) 03:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

Prangs Valentine Cards2.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Prangs Valentine Cards2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prangs Valentine Cards2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

ApologiesEdit

Hello Eatcha, I am very sorry to see what I assume to be the effect of my nominating some of your files for deletion. Please trust I meant no harm. I just tried to help clean up some mistakes I thought you had made by raising a community discussion on these matters. I would be delighted if you could accept to look at this from the collaborative perspective I meant. Nevertheless, I sincerely apologize for any aggravation caused. Please trust this was not my intent. Kind regards, — Racconish💬 06:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Racconish, I was getting mad by emails that I received in the late-night(GMT +9) due to these deletions and I had no Idea how to change email address on Wikimedia (I found nothing at https://www.google.com/search?q=change+wikimedia+email , I now know it can be changed from preference ) and when Taivo started reverting my Speedy deletion requests I had to delete my email-address as my phones were ringing non-stop, I use automatic email forwarding which worsened this. Therefore this wasn't effect of you nominating some of my files for deletion, but the media-wiki software which I don't know how to use properly as I'm still a new user and I was very sleepy. Sorry for behaving in such a silly way. However, this is no excuse for the Speedy deletions that I filed that day. Regards, -- Eatcha (talk) 13:21, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much for this kind answer. I think I would not be the only one who would be happy if you would reconsider your decision. — Racconish💬 13:57, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Reviewing videosEdit

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Eatcha. You have new messages at Thomprod's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Thomprod (talk) 20:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)


Code issues in User:Eatcha/common.jsEdit

Hi Eatcha, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Eatcha/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 25 column 9714: Unexpected token ILLEGAL

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 10:53, 18 June 2019 (UTC).

Return to the user page of "Eatcha".