User talk:FlocciNivis/Archive 2

Latest comment: 1 year ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220730 Wasserturm Stadtwerke München 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot at the right border --Poco a poco 12:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
  Done @Poco a poco: I don't know how I could miss this dust spot. I'm sorry about that. I should check my images more carefully --FlocciNivis 17:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210930 Fördergerüst Göttelborn 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but it needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 12:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
  Done @Poco a poco: performed PC --FlocciNivis 17:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220810 Gartenpavilion Schloss Sanssouci.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220806 Buttbrunnen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment To much harsh lights, and is the perspective ok ? --Sebring12Hrs 07:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
  Done @Sebring12Hrs: Fixed that and also cropped the lower part a bit --FlocciNivis 17:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
  Support Thank you and the compo is not so bad. --Sebring12Hrs 18:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220812 GTZ-Haus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Perspective ccorrection is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 18:56, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
  Done @Sebring12Hrs: I think that fixes it. Thank you! --FlocciNivis 12:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)  Support All good now. --Sebring12Hrs 08:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220528 Gunetsrainkapelle Hausham 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 21:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20190331 Zitadelle Spandau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220306 St. Jakob Hochmutting 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:15, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20190310Bergehalde Grühlingstraße 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210930 Mariä Himmelfahrt Quierschied.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective distortion visible on the buildings on the left (mostly on the church tower which is tilted to the right). Strangely buildings in the center and to the right are straight. Result of editing? --Jakubhal 17:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
  Done @Jakubhal: I did some pc one it now --FlocciNivis 17:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
  Support Ok. Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:15, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220312 Altes Schloss Schleißheim 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220313 Kapelle Vordergraseck 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220227 Gut Warnberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210502 Anthocharis cardamines 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support A bit soft but sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs 09:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210502 Anthocharis cardamines 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support A bit soft but sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs 09:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210807 St. Peter und Paul Oberammergau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 21:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180915 Palais du Rhin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180620 Wettersäule Saarbrücken 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180109 Kriegerdenkmal Sonniger Tag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180304 Ölbergkapelle Au.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220313 Kapelle Vordergraseck 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20190420 Post Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180907 Schuman roundabout.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220313 Kapelle Vordergraseck 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220811 BahnTower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment Perspective correction is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 06:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
  Done I adjusted the verticals a bit --FlocciNivis 16:26, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220427 Kieswerk Eching-Süd 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 17:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220319 Ramsachkircherl 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment I think the perspective needs to be ajusted a bit. --Sebring12Hrs 11:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
  Done You're right! I oriented myself now at the verticals of the tower. I hope that is okay. I'm not 100% sure if this is optimal. If not, I'll try something different. Thank you --FlocciNivis 16:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
  Support IMO it's very good now, thank you ! --Sebring12Hrs 09:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220306 St. Jakob Hochmutting 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Light is may be a bit too harsh, and there are few CAs. --Sebring12Hrs 06:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
  Done Thank you for the feedback --FlocciNivis 17:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
  Support It's better now. --Sebring12Hrs 08:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210814 Cirsium oleraceum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality --AnonymousGuyFawkes 18:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221006 Oktoberfest 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support A bit noisy but good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221006 Oktoberfest 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220926 Columba livia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2007 Passau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20211010 Amanita muscaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 17:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210905 Fischbachbad 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 17:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210710 Amanita rubescens 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20181114 Rabbiner-Ruelf-Platz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support It's a shame this object in the foreground, but good colors. --Sebring12Hrs

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200912 Alter Johannisfriedhof Leipzig 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 17:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220908 Fröttmaning 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200124 St. Eligius Völklingen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180106 Sankt Vitus Windach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210814 Arion 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and what a beautiful type of slug, but I wish we could get an identification of the species. I looked at a bunch of pictures, and I'm not sure which species this is. -- Ikan Kekek 05:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Slugs of the genus Arion are unfortunately difficult to distinguish. I would say it's probably Arion rufus, but I don't know for certain. Thank you! --FlocciNivis 09:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, I wasn't sure between 3 species I looked at; that was one of them. Anyway, thanks for taking the picture! -- Ikan Kekek 16:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210814 Cirsium oleraceum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220709 Neufahrn bei Freising.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20211005 Wilhelm-Heinrich-Brücke Saarbrücken 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 19:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20211005 Josefsbrücke Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 19:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220811 U-Bahnhof Stadtmitte Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20211010 Katholisches Pfarrhaus Saarburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment A lot of CAs need to be removed. --Sebring12Hrs 18:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
  Done I removed some CA. If that is not enough, can you point me into to the direction of the CA? Because I tbh did not see a lot of CA --FlocciNivis 22:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
  Support When I watch on my phone, I can see a lot of CAs whit zoom, but on full screen on computer (whithout zoom) there are not very visible, although I can see you removed the most visible. --Sebring12Hrs 15:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200115 Columba livia domestica Bürgerpark Saarbrücken 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200115 Columba livia domestica Bürgerpark Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210521 Callimorpha dominula 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210521 Arion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220923 Nymphenburg Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:16, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180907 Statue Queen Elisabeth Brussels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality... (...although a small yellow ball is visible bouncing under the statue) --Terragio67 13:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180907 Kunstberg Mont des Arts 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210919 Schanzenbergbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221020 Narrenbrunnen Lindau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 Maritim Hotel Ulm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Really a good shot. Do you mind to check and align the building verticals, please? --Terragio67 14:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thank you and   Done! --FlocciNivis 16:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Good quality: Verticals are better now, thanks. --Terragio67 17:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210911 Staustufe Güdingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201204 Ludwigskirche Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200728 Teufelsburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210320 Naturschutzgebiet Saar Steilhänge Lutwinuswald 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210328 Pumpenhaus Alte Schmelz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210328 Spellenstein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support A bit tilted IMO, but overall quality still very good. Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220810 Neues Palais Potsdam 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The uninteresting foreground should be cropped out. --Ermell 10:10, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I would prefer not to do that, as this would for my feeling result in a strange aspect ratio. And also the foreground is not completely uninteresting imo, as its bareness exemplifies the heatwave of August 2022 in Brandenburg, but no hard feelings, if this makes it not a QI --FlocciNivis 16:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
  Comment I think you should have the latitude to make this choice, but please eliminate all the dust spots, some of which are more evident than others. -- Ikan Kekek 16:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
  Done I removed the dust spots --FlocciNivis 21:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality and a supporting vote from me. Ermell, please feel free to move this to Consensual Review on account of the composition. -- Ikan Kekek 05:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220805 Friedrichswerdersche Kirche 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210829 St. Mauritius Erfweiler-Ehlingen 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210829 St. Mauritius Erfweiler-Ehlingen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180914 Ponts Couverts Strasbourg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180520 Strix leptogrammica 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --BigDom 15:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200228 Allianz Arena 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201105 Staatstheater Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Drow male 16:22, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210802 Ungererstraße 158 München-Schwabing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210425 Deutsche Post Niederlassung Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221029 Kieswerk Kronthaler 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:19, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220917 Belgradstraße 16 Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Maybe a touch dark but a nice two-point perspective. --BigDom 08:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
  Support I agree, good. --Sebring12Hrs 08:58, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221029 Schlüterbrücke 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 12:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221029 Schlüterbrücke 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 12:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 Berblinger Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 Donaucenter Neu-Ulm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221108 Urnenhalle am Teich Munich Westfriedhof 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210930 Göttelborn Kohlbachtalweiher 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I suggest removing the unsharp thing at the bottom. --Milseburg 21:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
  Done Thank you! --FlocciNivis 15:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC) Could be a bit sharper towards the edges but overall good enough for QI now in my eyes. --Milseburg 12:33, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221018 Schrannenplatz Memmingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:17, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221018 Wasserkraftwerk Illerstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --BigDom 17:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200414Universität des Saarlandes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:48, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220619 Sierck-les-Bains 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support --Sebring12Hrs 12:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221106 Sederanger 3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221029 Schroffenberg-Mös Denkmal Freising 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support --Sebring12Hrs 12:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210109 Rondell Bürgerpark Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210120 Columba livia domestica Bürgerpark Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support --Sebring12Hrs 12:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20190330 Zitadelle Spandau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Peaceful and good. -- Ikan Kekek 20:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200801 Ludwigsbrücke 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210423 Mannheimer Wasserturm 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210329 Prunus cerasifera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yeriho 20:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220805 Soviet Cenotaph in Berlin-Tiergarten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 Gänstorbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 Maritim Hotel Ulm 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sammandi 11:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221018 Amtsgericht Memmingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20191219 Wassertor Bürgerpark Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality (but please add geolocation). --C messier 17:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you and   Done I added the camera and objects geolocations --FlocciNivis 10:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220812 Zoofenster 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment The white building is leaning on a bit at left. --Sebring12Hrs 08:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
  Done fixed the perspective --FlocciNivis 22:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:55, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

1969 Dunkerque

Hi FlocciNivis,
The images in your User:FlocciNivis/1969 Dunkerque file do not relate to Dunkerque but to Lille. I can easily rename some English descriptions if you don't mind. Best regards. Velvet (talk) 10:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Velvet, thank you for writing me and please do so. Dunkerque was a deduction from Google image searching the church. I should have written that in the description.
I will then also change the name of the page with those images soon. Best regards FlocciNivis (talk) 11:02, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Ah right and at the image of the church File:1969 Église Saint-Éloi de Dunkerque 01.jpg is a sign saying Dunkerque, but this is then probably because the two cities aren't that far away from each other. FlocciNivis (talk) 11:06, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Ok, I started and will continue tomorrow. Good evening. --Velvet (talk) 18:13, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
@Velvet Thank you! Have a nice evening as well FlocciNivis (talk) 19:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi FlocciNivis   Done I changed all the descriptions of the places I've been able to identify. Best regards --Velvet (talk) 11:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi @Velvet thanks again! I'll take care of the file names and change the page which compiles the images accordingly. FlocciNivis (talk) 12:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Prag am Meer

 
"Prag"

Hallo, das Bild zeigt eindeutig Helgoland. Wie möchtest du es umbenannt haben? Sitacuisses (talk) 17:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Hallo @Sitacuisses, das macht Sinn! Ich habe gerade nochmal in den Nachlass geschaut und da gibt es noch mehr Fotos aus Helgoland, zu denen dieses Bild zu gehören scheint. Das scheint auch eine Studienfahrt gewesen zu sein.
Ich werde diese Fotos dann auch irgendwann hochladen. Benenn das Foto gerne so um, wie du das für richtig hälst. Um genaueres zu erfahren, muss ich erst ein bisschen rumfragen. Danke dir auf jeden Fall dafür, dass du die Fotos durchschaust. FlocciNivis (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200622 Kongresssteg Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:23, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201021 Second Life Ottmar Hörl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201019 Saar in Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201019 Alte Brücke Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Sehr schön --A.Savin 13:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200705 Quellgebiet des Köllerbaches zwischen Großwald und Kirschhofer Tal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221115 Chinesischer Turm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200725Christkönig-Kirche Luisenthal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:19, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 Mural Ulm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200701 Staustufe Güdingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 15:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180906 Evere 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180505 Alopochen aegyptiaca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200115 Altes Casino Burbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180708 Bombus 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:49, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221028 Tram line 23 Munich 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200912 Nikolaikirche Leipzig 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment a bit too noisy, otherwise good. --MB-one 11:47, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
  Done I reduced the noise --FlocciNivis 20:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good now --MB-one 17:51, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200611 Bübingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200709 Schanzenbergbrücke 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200920 Reparaturhalle Dampflokbetriebswerks Saarbrücken 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200705 Wayside Cross Heusweiler 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20191124Wildfreigehege Wolfsrat 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:18, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200423 Völklingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20181020Stiftswald Sankt Arnual 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 13:58, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180118Skulpturenweg Ammersee 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 14:39, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20190711 St. Eligius Völklingen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220312 Nördlicher Pavillon Schloss Lustheim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:04, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220320 Trafohaus Garching-Hochbrück 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:04, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220327 Würm Landkreis München 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:12, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201014 Bison bonasus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200228 Hochbrücke Freimann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200304 Marienklause München 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200326 Saar in Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201014 Columba livia 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and a sweet picture. I wasn't there to watch the pigeons in action, but I've observed pigeons a lot, and you can correct me if I'm wrong and this was an aggressive attack, but I think they are a couple and one pigeon is very gently removing a mite from under its mate's eye and eating it. -- Ikan Kekek 19:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hm, I think you might be right about that. This was going on for a while and while the pigeon on the right didn't seem to be comfortable, it also didn't fly away or anything. I took a couple of pictures of them. You can take a look here: Category:Saarbrücken photographs taken on 2020-10-14 and feel free to correct or expand the descrption(s) :-) --FlocciNivis 20:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
  Comment My girlfriend and I feel confident from the sequence of photos that one pigeon is grooming its mate by helping out below their eye and then going around to the back of their neck, another place they can't reach, but I'm not sure how much to say, as we're not experts in bird behavior, just observers of pigeon behavior. So take this for what it's worth. -- Ikan Kekek 05:58, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200705 Eiweiler Viaduct 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200408Deutsch-Französischer Garten03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200705Heusweiler Schulzentrum 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:08, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201121 Kreuzweg Wünschberg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:08, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200418 Fußgängerbrücke Bahnhof Saarbrücken-Burbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 12:25, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20191221Halberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200119 Alte Engelfanger Schule 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210129 Bahnhofstraße Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 12:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200705 Quellgebiet des Köllerbaches zwischen Großwald und Kirschhofer Tal 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:40, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200720 Ardea cinerea 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Sammandi 10:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210612 Zweibrücken 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210711 St. Hedwig Wehrden Saar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Fotos aus Karlsbad

Hallo, beim Blick in deine geerbten Bilder stechen für mich die Bilder aus Karlsbad heraus. Die sehen nämlich nach Profiaufnahmen für Tourismuszwecke aus, mit typischen Perspektiven, gestellten Szenen und gestylten Menschen und Räumen. Könnte es sein, dass es sich um gekaufte Bilder handelt und nicht um Aufnahmen deines Vaters?

Gruß, Sitacuisses (talk) 17:58, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Hallo @Sitacuisses! Das stimmt. Die weichen tatsächlich sehr von dem Stil der restlichen Fotos ab. Ist wohl besser hier auf Nummer sicher zu gehen und diese Fotos wieder zu löschen? FlocciNivis (talk) 18:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Verdächtig erscheinen mir auch die Bilder aus Konopiště und wenige aus Prag. Am besten sollte das an den Originalen erkennbar sein, wenn die noch vorhanden sind. Löschen ginge am einfachsten als Sofortlöschung von Urheberrechtsverletzungen mit Hinweis auf versehentlichen Upload der Bilder. --Sitacuisses (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
@Sitacuisses Die Negative existieren noch zum Glück. Ich würde mir die demnächst mal ansehen. Dass diese Bilder von Karlsbad z.B. eingescannte, gekaufte Bilder sind, wäre definitiv im Charakter meines Vaters. Ich habe in den Fotokollektionen auch schon eingescannte Postkarten entfernt. Aber über die Negative kann ich das ja dann eindeutig herausfinden. FlocciNivis (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
@Sitacuisses Nochmal ein update: Ich konnte die Dias jetzt finden und du hattest mit denen aus Karlsbad recht. Das sind alles gekaufte Dias, die sich durch Aufschrift sehr gut unterscheiden lassen von denen, die mein Vater selbst geschossen hat. Ich stelle zu denen jetzt einen Löschantrag.
Die anderen Dias werde ich mir morgen noch genauer anschauen. Da sind auf jeden Fall auch einige Gekaufte dabei. Die gehe ich dann Stück für Stück durch und stelle bei den Gekauften einen Löschantrag.
Danke dir, dass du da so genau hingesehen hast. Ich Zukunft achte ich da vor der Einstellung drauf.
Gruß FlocciNivis (talk) 16:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210402 Sulzbachtalstraße 18 Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:12, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210403 Oberwürzbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220427 Kieswerk Eching-Süd 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210619 Sylvensteinspeicher 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210728 Fischbachstraße Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:18, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200709 Saar in Saarbrücken 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 12:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220702 Mittlere-Isar-Kanal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220130 MELO Verwaltungsgebäude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200509State forest Saarbrücken 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20211008 Landschaftsschutzgebiet Saarschleife und Leukbachtal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice proportions and alignment. --Aciarium 21:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200707 Bergehalde Grühlingstraße 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210320 Naturschutzgebiet Saar Steilhänge Lutwinuswald 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:13, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220922 Bombus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

 
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear FlocciNivis/Archive 2,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221020 Römerschanze in Lindau Bodensee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221018 Einhorn-Brunnen Memmingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221009 Totenleuchte König Ludwig II 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Composition is very good, can tilt it at right a little bit until the stair looks the same at bottom in both corners? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 17:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
  Done @Fabian Roudra Baroi: thank you for the feedback --FlocciNivis 17:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good job, keep contributing. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221009 Totenleuchte König Ludwig II 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good Composition. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 17:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220812 Mühlendammschleuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221231 Klinik Sulzbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221018 Town hall of Kempten Allgäu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221009 Nepomukbrücke Starnberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220619 Sierck-les-Bains 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210928 Pleurotus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210928 Pleurotus 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230107 Wöhrd Rathaus Mural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221029 Domberg Freising 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180512 Christkönig Kirche Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:26, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210603 Südportal des Straßentunnels Ludwigstraße Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201031 Püttlingen 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220327 Todesmarschmahnmal Planegg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180107 Haltepunkt St. Ottilien 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200402 Saar in Saarbrücken 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200427 Alte Brücke Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200624 Fischbachbad 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230107 Heilig-Geist-Spital Nürnberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 19:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230106 Heilig-Geist-Spital Nürnberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 19:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221217 Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide Freezing fog 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221217 Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide Freezing fog 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201017 Grange de Chèvremont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20210612 Karlskirche Zweibrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220410 Badenburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:33, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201105 Moderne Galerie Saarbrücken 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200820 Dillinger See 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201021 UrbanArt Parcours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201021 Sinter plant Völklingen Ironworks 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20201031 Kloster Heilig-Kreuz Püttlingen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:24, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220423 St. Benedikt Gauting 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is room for improvement in terms of crop on the left and, above all, right --Poco a poco 14:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
  Done I cropped image a lot now --FlocciNivis 17:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  Support Better, although the shadow on the left is not helping --Poco a poco 19:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221018 Pfaffengasse 8 Memmingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221231 Evangelische Kirche Neuweiler 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "FlocciNivis/Archive 2".