Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
Start a new talk topic.


English | français | magyar | македонски | 中文 | +/−

Babel user information
hi-N इस सदस्य को हिन्दी का मातृभाषा के समान ज्ञान है।
en-5 This user has professional knowledge of English.
mr-1 या सदस्याला मराठी चे प्राथमिक ज्ञान आहे.
gu-1 આ સભ્યને ગુજરાતીનું પ્રાથમિક કક્ષાનું જ્ઞાન છે.
Users by language

File:Arnab Goswami interviewing Arvind Kejriwal..JPGEdit

 
File:Arnab Goswami interviewing Arvind Kejriwal..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

116.74.12.126 05:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Arnab Goswami interviewing Arvind Kejriwal..JPGEdit

 
File:Arnab Goswami interviewing Arvind Kejriwal..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sigmabaroda (talk) 09:48, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecatedEdit

Hello Harsh 2580, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Double-supports at QICEdit

Thanks for your work reviewing candidates at Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. I just wanted to let you know that supporting a candidate that someone already supported is not common practice. Not only is it not necessary (a candidate only needs one support vote to pass), it also delays promotion because the bot waits for a minimum of 48 hours after the last comment before processing reviewed candidates. I may have given you the wrong impression with my vote here, in which case I apologize; that was a special case, where I thought the picture was so good that it should be nominated for featured picture, and wanted to add a small suggestion to the nominator on how to improve the image even more. I very rarely double-support an image that someone else has supported, and I don't recommend doing it without a good reason. -- King of ♥ 23:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: Oh ok. Thanks for letting me know. - Harsh 11:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)