User talk:IM3847/Archive 2

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India 5th prize

	Congratulations!!
	Your photograph has won the 5th prize for Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India. We have sent you an e-mail and requested you to provide necessary details, so that you can receive the declared national prize. Thanks for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 09:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jali Arch on the entrance of Dargah Hazrath Syed Shah Moosa Quadri in Hussaini Alam 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Architecture of Toli Masjid 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Architectural detail on Entrance arches of Toli Masjid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear IM3847,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows on Hitex Exhibition Center - Trade Fair Office.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:02, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Side Elevation of Hitex Exhibition Center - Trade Fair Office.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:02, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Side Elevation of Hitex Exhibition Center hall 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:02, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi IM3847, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

-- ~riley (talk) 19:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Structural members of Kempegowda International airport (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. Geotag would be useful --Podzemnik 16:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC) Sure, working on it. Will add Geotag to all images uploaded by me.. --IM3847 18:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear IM3847,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Ameen Peer Dargah in Kadapa.jpg

File:Ameen Peer Dargah in Kadapa.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD F5 (missing essential information): OTRS could not confirm authorship per Ticket:2020012310006036 If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!^{Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS).} 16:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Connecting corridor in Northern wing of OU college of arts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please improve sharpness. And please add geo location, improve description, label and categorization. And EXIF data would be nice. --XRay 06:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Just made neccesary changes, please have a look at them. --IM3847 06:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank you. It's just a weak promotion. Sorry, but sharpness and details are acceptable, but not the best. --XRay 08:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corridor in Ground floor of OU arts college.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you add the geolocation, please? --Tournasol7 06:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Just made neccesary changes, please have a look at them. --IM3847 06:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank, it's enough for good quality. But with EXIF data would be great. --Tournasol7 09:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Architectural elements of OU college of arts (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yellow Billed Babbler captured at Shimoga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the main part of the bird --Michielverbeek 20:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddy crop near Malkapuram, Eluru.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunrise on paddy fields near Eluru (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! An unused staircase and grass paver blocks (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 11:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mangoes during the end of Autumn season in Hyderabad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Maximilian Reininghaus 17:01, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apple MacBook Pro 15" (2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Wilfredor 21:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajiv Gandhi International Stadium, Uppal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ashok Leyland Viking.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - We're not looking at "services"; we're looking at a bus. Please edit the scope accordingly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: I've changed the scope of the nomination, please check it again.-IM3847 (talk) 16:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Better, but you're linking 2 Wikipedia articles. Instead, link one Commons gallery where all the photos of this bus are. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: I've attached the common's category where all the images of this bus model are at. Is linking the category a correct way to represent it?

Link that Commons category in the scope and delink the Wikipedia articles. Keep all the words you currently have in the scope if that's the scope you want for the VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Done, please have a look at it.—IM3847 (talk) 01:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you.  Best in Scope -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Mavathuru lake nearby Kotagiri, Karnataka.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mavathuru lake nearby Kotagiri, Karnataka.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

MB-one (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

@MB-one: Hi, I've provided a link for image's source, which clearly mentioned that file is Available on Wikimedia commons under CC BY-SA 4.0.--IM3847 (talk) 11:55, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

You are correct. The license was not immediatly visible to me, but now I found it. Is it your own image? --MB-one (talk) 13:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

@MB-one: That was by a photographer named Deepak TL, he had even even submitted a few images via OTRS.--IM3847 (talk) 15:26, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial view of Koothagal in Ramanagar District.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Ok look at the scope changes --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial view of Kapu Beach Light house in Karnataka, India.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

where? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Added the location in description and scope, please have a look.--IM3847 (talk) 15:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome on Tomb of Mohammad Quli Qutub Shah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)