User talk:Medium69/archives/2015/11

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. also pretty sharp --Hubertl 21:50, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Jardins de Beauval - 340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:56, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bornes Massif, west view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dents de Lanfon, southwest view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Pagodes de Beauval - 342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:47, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine - 143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aldabrachelys gigantea (Tortue géante des Seychelles) - 380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The tortoise could be centered, nevertheless good quality IMO. --Palauenc05 18:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groupe Tribal Percussions - 274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 08:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pagode - 338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but close enough --Poco a poco 21:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groupe Tribal Percussions - 272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stenocereus pruinosus - 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reasonably good color and detail --Daniel Case 05:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilobium parviflorum (Épilobe à petites fleurs) - 20150731 13h04 (10548).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirabilis jalapa (Belle-de-nuit) - 470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pokéfan95 03:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't mind the crop at the top and the crop at the bottom; the good parts of two different explosions are showing. --RaboKarbakian 16:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

My dear friend, I am very sorry!

Inbetween the last year you nominated more than 300 almost 500 pictures and expecting from other colleages their reviewing, so they will be promoted as Quality Images. You wanted your pictures to be examinated with due diligence and in the best way possible. Because, Quality, Valued and Featured Pictures are a showcase not only for Wikimedia-Commons, even for your own personal work, reputation and success.

In return, you haven´t reviewed not even one picture of the other photograpers!

Reviewing means, that you ask anyone - you don´t know personally - to take a look to your very private work. That means also, that the reviewer has to download your picture (sometimes more than 20 MB), then open it in a special program, and then he has to check it as follows:

1. perspective distortion, the images must be aligned straight
2. check for over- and underexposed areas
3. check, if there are some dustspot left from the sensor
4. check for so called jpg-artefacts and posterized areas
5. Sometimes, you can see some vignettations.
6. Blurryness, sharpness, oversharpening, brightness...
7. Color abbreviations and overprocessed, unnatural colors (oversaturation)
8. White balance check.
9. Checking for possible lens flares
10. looking for disturbing elements, composition.
11. Check, if the picture have the minimum size and the photographer is a WikiCommoner.

This is the same check everyone has to do, when preselecting his own pictures for QI. Nothing more. And you know, this can be sometimes pretty time-consuming. And because of this, everyone is able to review pictures, otherwise he won´t be able to nominate by his own. Because this is part and precondition to meet the QI-Guidelines

But this is not all, there is a lot more to do:

• Checking, if the picture is properly categorized
• If the file has a proper, meaningful filename
• is there an good description of the subject (eventually in english too - but this is not mandatory!)
• If there are geo coordinates (useful, but not mandatory too!)

This all makes a normal image to a Quality Image!

But even this is not all which has to be done! If you give someone an advice for repairing, you have to follow the reactions. When you see then the  Done sign, you have to check, if it´s really done!

When I edit this list step by step for every picture I review, it takes me a lot of my very limited time. Time, I would like to spend for writing articles in Wikipedia. On the other hand you expect a good, neutral and diligance examination within a short time. Like all other candidates too.

But, if you expect from your colleagues that someone dedicate his time and you're not willing to make the same effort, then I can and will not review your pictures in the future anymore.

I think it´s a shame, but I prefer to review pictures of colleagues who make more than just QIC to get a promotion for their own pictures.

I really don´t expect that you rate my pictures on the contrary.

This would be even bad for the whole review process.

The more distributed participants are active in this evaluation, the neutral and independent the examination process will be.

I wish you great success with your images.

Greetings from Vienna, --Hubertl 10:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

@Hubertl: Hello, My apologies for my english, but I use Google translation.

It is true that I never studied the photos, because I did not want to influence judges. Reading you, I understand that it is a serious mistake and that these same judges spend time on the photos and it would be only fair to participate myself in these assessments.

Now I will take your advice, and I will evaluate candidates photos in my work cycle.

Thank you again for your explanations that allowed me to open my eyes. I thought it would be unhealthy to be my turn examiner, but I understand that it is just the opposite.--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your understanding! Reviewing images from others is really a good learning process to understand the approach, how the other, well practiced fotographer work! You will benefit a lot for your own work. --Hubertl 11:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Pagodes de Beauval - 343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Wildlife images

Bonjour William You will have noticed that I am opposing all your wildlife QI candidates. This is not a vendetta, but I really do feel that they fall well short of QI standards. I know a tortoise picture got chosen, but I would have opposed that too! Do please check out the guidelines. Je suis désolé. Charles (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Do not worry, I read every comment and it allows me to understand why it is made. No worries for me. I know you are very talented and they are justified. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Je vous en pris. Charles (talk) 11:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

When I see your determination, I think if it is harassment.--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Pagodes de Beauval - 345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanterne - 20150731 18h21 (10597).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Enchanting. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yucca gloriosa (Yucca) - 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality or me> --Rolf H. 11:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorilla gorilla gorilla (Gorille des plaines de l'Ouest) - 458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia (Cigogne blanche) - 464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia (Cigogne blanche) - 403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Pagodes de Beauval - 346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca silenus (Ouandérou) - 428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca silenus (Ouandérou) - 429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Pagodes de Beauval - 474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branta sandvicensis (Bernache néné) - 465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yucca gloriosa (Yucca) - 80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurypyga helias (Caurale soleil) - 432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Pour VI

Tu as vote contre pour plusieurs image en VI qui n’avaient pas de géocodage. Elles sont maintenant géocodées. Il serait juste que tu lève ton vote négatif ou que tu donne un nouvel argument pour maintenir ton vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Pas de soucis je vais voir cela rapidement. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Très bien. Prend ton temps ne sois pas pressé. Pour "German conductor" tu as mal fermer ton intervention que tu n'a pas signé. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: C'est fait pour le géocodage et j'ai signé pour l'autre VI. Par contre, le lien indiqué dans la liste des VI n'est pas le bon pour « German conductor » ; j'ai été réverté en le corrigeant, et je ne tient pas à partir sur une guerre d'édition sur cette liste.--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otocyon megalotis (Renard à oreilles de chauve-souris) - 386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 09:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pagode - 349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lemur catta (Lémur catta) - 356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question What do you think about the proposed crop? (See note.) --XRay 17:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)  Done The proposed framing is better. Thanks. --Medium69 02:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks. --XRay 07:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceratotherium simum simum (Rhinocéros blanc du Sud) - 385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment to much ground. --Jean11 18:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)  Done I changed the framing. --Medium69 12:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 08:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Statue de singe - 20150731 13h07 (10552).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue de singe - 20150731 13h07 (10552).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 03:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spheniscus humboldti (Manchot de Humboldt) - 467.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strix nebulosa (Chouette lapone) - 393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chaîne des Puys - 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hippotragus niger (Hippotrague noir) - 387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aplonis panayensis (Stourne bronzé) - 471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dracaena arborea - 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lemur catta (Lémur catta) - 357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail and color --Daniel Case 06:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue en marbre - 20150731 15h16 (10578).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parapente - 147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice combination of cool colors --Daniel Case 06:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yucca gloriosa (Glorious Yucca), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please add the vernacular name (Glorious Yucca) in brackets and in addition I'd add "habitus" to the scope to differentiate between the plant as a whole (Habitus), flowers, fruits and so on (eg. "Yucca gloriosa (Glorious Yucca), habitus"). --Llez (talk) 12:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done thanks. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:57, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Enseigne du ZooParc de Beauval - 20150731 09h10 (10474).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enseigne du ZooParc de Beauval - 20150731 09h10 (10474).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue d'éléphant - 20150731 14h20 (10564).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please change the filename. "Statue" is nearly meaningless. --XRay 14:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC)  Done --Medium69 16:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks. --XRay 10:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Réverbère - 20150714 10h16 (10325).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pagode - 348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Роман Дергунов 20:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suricata suricatta (Suricate) - 438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi to me. --Julian Herzog 21:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centre sportif Émile Anthoine - 20150801 16h00 (10624).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel des Invalides - 20150801 16h09 (10630).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Eiffel - 20150801 15h30 (10621).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bengal - 20150311 14h56 (10000).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Schoolbook example for using a low DOF the correct way. --Jacek79 20:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Racine - 240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giraffa camelopardalis (Girafe) - 382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dracaena arborea, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 21:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chaîne des Puys, southern slope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Strix nebulosa (Chouette lapone) - 393.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Strix nebulosa (Chouette lapone) - 393.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ascenseur tour Eiffel - 20150801 16h59 (10633).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, and a great capture. --Michael Barera 02:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Eiffel - 20150801 13h56 (10614).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:04, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Eiffel - 20150801 13h38 (10610).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque de la Société des Hauts Fourneaux, Forges et Aciéries de Pompey - 20150801 14h56 (10617).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:36, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buste Gustave Eiffel - 20150801 14h57 (10618).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spheniscus humboldti (Manchot de Humboldt) - 469.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strix nebulosa (Chouette lapone) - 399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massif des Bornes - 216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The sailboats look quite good even from this distance. --Michael Barera 01:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strix nebulosa (Chouette lapone) - 397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Statue de singe - 20150731 13h08 (10553).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue de singe - 20150731 13h08 (10553).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Statue in focus and well lit --Daniel Case 20:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strix nebulosa (Great grey owl).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The picture is beautiful but this: file:Strix nebulosa CT.jpg, describes better the animal; and above all it is in its natural environment.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support file:Strix nebulosa CT.jpg is a nice image, but I suspect is not in its natural environment. The background had been doctored (rather badly). Charles (talk) 16:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your accusations of vandalism

William Please look at the VI talk page where I am making a complaint about your behavior. Charles (talk) 13:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)