User talk:Medium69/archives/2015/12
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
user:Charlesjsharp, this is for you.
I write more in my native language ... you will make the effort to translate if you want.
Vous me taxez de partialité, vous avez déjà demandé de multiples fois mon blocage, vous pleurez sans arrêt sur mon comportement... Je ne fais qu'appliquer les règles en toute impartialité. Vous par contre avez largement commencé à me harcelé bien avant que je ne vous surveille de très près.
Alors que vous ne participiez que très rarement aux votes sur les QI, dès début novembre, vous avez commencé à vous opposé à Quantité de mes images avec des motifs souvent futiles. Vous en avez opposé près d'une dizaine. Contrairement à vous, quand on vous oppose une image, je ne la met pas en discussion. Votre motif qui revient le plus souvent est le problème de netteté. C'est même marrant de voir lors de mes recherches, que je ne suis pas le seul que vous harcelé ! Après avoir remarqué votre acharnement, je vous ai mis en garde et là, vous avez changé de technique. Vous attendiez que quelqu'un valide mon image pour vous opposé.
Et dans ces cas, une discussion intervient, et pour ne prendre que mon cas, dans 70 % des cas, vous avez été débouté et mon image a été qualifiée de QI. Parfois, vous étiez seul contre tous les autres qui disaient carrément le contraire de ce que vous prétendiez. Et je ne parle pas des autres qui subissent votre arrogance qui ont le même score que moi. Les archives des QI sont là pour certifier ce que je prétend. Votre mauvaise foi, et votre volonté délibéré de harcèlement.
Vous remettant en garde sur votre harcèlement, non content, vous avez persisté en poursuivant sur mes VI... D'ailleurs, le 5 novembre, vous m'avez même précisé sur ce n'était pas une vendetta. Je crois que nous n'avons pas la même définition du harcèlement.
Comme vous n'aviez pas l'air de comprendre, j'ai commencé à surveillé chacune de vos interventions. Et pour ne prendre que les VI, effectivement, je ferme les candidatures qui peuvent être fermé, les vôtres, bien entendu, mais aussi celles des autres et même les miennes sans états d'âme.
Rien qu'aujourd'hui 30 novembre, où dans une énième plainte au bureau des pleurs, vous prétendez que je ne ferme que les vôtres me taxant de partialité. Je vous laisse constater par vous-même ma partialité (en entête l'auteur de l'image) :
- medium69 - Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Aplonis_panayensis_(Stourne_bronzé)_-_471.jpg
- medium69 - Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Statue_de_singe_-_20150731_13h07_(10552).jpg
- El Grafo - Commons:Valued image candidates/Parasailing in Sochi.JPG
- medium69 - Commons:Valued image candidates/Basilique de la Visitation - 207.jpg
- SKas - Commons:Valued image candidates/BASE jumping in Sochi.jpg
- Llez - Commons:Valued image candidates/Phasianella modesta modesta 01.JPG
- Ercé - Commons:Valued image candidates/Capsicum annuum MHNT.BOT.2007.40.74.jpg
- Charlesjsharp - Commons:Valued image candidates/Female Galápagos lava lizard (Microlophus albemarlensis).jpg
- Charlesjsharp - Commons:Valued image candidates/American flamingo (Phoenicopterus ruber).JPG
Quand on fait les comptes, j'ai fermé : medium69 3 VI, El Grafo : 1 VI, SKas : 1VI, Llez : 1 VI, Ercé : 1 VI, Charlesjsharp 2 VI
Effectivement, on peut voir que je suis partial, car j'en ai fermé plus des miennes que des vôtres... Ceci à un nom : l'esprit de persécution !
Un peu plus drôle ; alors que vous n'avez pas du tout l'air d'aimer les animaux en zoo et que d'ailleurs, vous motivez votre opposition à cause de cela :
Vous n'avez sans doute pas fait attention que cette chouette à aussi été prise dans un zoo et par moi ! Remarque, il vous aurait été difficile de prétendre qu'il y en avait plein d'autres dans la catégorie. Cela à du vous arracher le cœur de vous apercevoir que vous m'avez donné un vote positif... Le 17eme. Je m'en serais passé volontier : Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Strix_nebulosa_(Chouette_lapone)_-_393.jpg
Je ne suis pas parvenu à retrouver la VI ou vous étiez très insultant envers moi et que je vous ai remis en place, y compris un autre utilisateur. Mais en quelques mots, vous prétendiez que je vous faisais perdre du temps à vous et aux autres. Que de temps perdu oui... mais à cause de qui ?
Quelques autres exemples qui m'ont beaucoup fait rire, d'autres moins. Lors par exemple du cas de Martinvl ou je me suis opposé à lui et que j'étais en total désaccord avec lui, il n'y a jamais eu de vengeance, ni de sa part, ni de la mienne. Mais à un moment, alors qu'il venait de vous mettre un vote négatif pour un manque de lien, si j'étais partial, j'aurais du m'en régalé... bah non, je vous ai mit un vote positif.
Archaeodontosaurus s'en étant aperçu, m'a même remercié. J'ai donc réagi sur sa page de discussion en français lui expliquant pourquoi je prenais votre défense. Le plus drôle vient juste après, et là, je colle le passage car c'est vraiment à garder dans les anales :
== Daily limit on VI nominations? ==
Hi Didier - you have willingly approved many of my images and I've limited my nominations to 5 a day (like QI). Recently however, Medium69 has been closing my nominations as quickly as permitted and I don't know whether you a) just didn't like them; b) considered there were too many; or 3) you didn't get around to them in time. Please let me know if you prefer a lower daily limit. [[User:Charlesjsharp|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 18:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
* I have chosen to take care of that 3 images by authors. This rule is personal to me. His has for me the advantage of optimizing the short time that I can devote to VI. I am saddened to see that other people do not vote for your images. Several were closed too early so I'm interested. But this was done legally. I would support the review presented whenever you will wish. Bonne journée. --[[User:Archaeodontosaurus|Archaeodontosaurus]] ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 06:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
** I will now limit my daily nominations to 3. For the existing 5-per-day nominations, I would naturally be grateful if you will consider reviewing them. Please fell free to increase your own nominations to 3-per-day. [[User:Charlesjsharp|Charles]] ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
On y apprend clairement que vous demander à Archaeodontosaurus de voter pour vos images... pardon, le suppliez presque de le faire. Lui, vous expliquant ses propres règles pour sa participation, vous ne manquez pas de lui dire que désormais vous ne soumettriez que trois VI par jour et que surtout, il n'hésite pas à en mettre trois lui aussi !
Ce que je lis, quand on analyse : Didier, aide moi à avoir mes VI car le medium me les casses et je t'aiderais à avoir les tiennes. Mais pas plus de trois car tu ne veux pas en analyser plus de trois pour moi.
En d'autres termes, vous vous achetez un "ami" pour qu'il soit sympa avec vous. C'est drôle, car dans le cas de Martinvl vous laissiez entendre que j'agissais de cette manière pour me faire des copains et qu'il votent positivement. D'ailleurs, vous remarquerez que Archaeodontosaurus était déçu de voir que personne à part lui votait en votre faveur. C'est sans doute à cause de votre arrogance, votre hypocrisie, votre fierté mal placée et surtout votre harcèlement envers nombre d'utilisateurs que très peu vous font confiance.
On voit à ce stade que vous êtes hypocrite, arrogant, pleurnicheurs, harceleur, vandale aussi, car il ne faut pas l'oublier, et ça fait déjà beaucoup !
Mais en poussant un peu plus loin, on découvre sur votre page personnelle que vous prétendez avoir un niveau professionnel en photographie en arborant fièrement le {{User PH-4}}. Il se trouve que c'est moi qui est créé ce 4eme niveau, mais pas pour des gens comme vous qui à la limite pourrait avoir le niveau 3 mais pas plus.
Quelqu'un qui se dit aussi doué que cela en photographie, avec seulement 13 images remarquables, qui prétend qu'une grande partie des autres font des photos ratées, à pourtant nombre de ses propres photos qui ne passe même pas en QI !
Un comble pour quelqu'un qui se dit aussi bon en photo. Je n'ai pas toutes vos contributions, mais j'adore celle-ci : Commons:Valued image candidates/Scarlet ibis (Eudocimus ruber) roosting.jpg.
Non seulement la photo est plus que flou, mais en plus, vous osez la nominer en image de valeur ! Quand je vous fait remarquer qu'on ne voit que des taches rouges, vous prétendez que non et attendez un autre avis qui ne viendra d'ailleurs jamais tellement il est honteux de présenter cela quand on se prétend professionnel dans la photographie. D'ailleurs, on remarque aussi votre harcèlement, pour me demander de reconsidéré mon votes...
Moi qui ne suis qu'avec un humble {{User PH-2}}, C'est le genre de photo que je n'oserais même pas garder dans ma collection personnelle... donc ne serais-ce que la mettre sur Commons... Bref, vous aurez compris que pour moi, vous êtes très légèrement plus doué que moi en photo ; mais vu que j'ai commencé la photo qu'en avril de cette année, j'ai largement confiance pour vous surpassé dans les semaines qui viennent.
Donc à tous ces défauts qui vous vont si bien, on peut aussi ajouter la vantardise...
Vous aurez remarqué que j'ai volontairement tagué plusieurs utilisateurs ; c'est volontaire ;)
Pour finir ce pavé, je ne vous harcèle pas, je vous rend simplement la monnaie de votre pièce en inspectant chacune de vos contributions et je ne compte pas vous lâcher de si tôt. Mais surtout, n'hésitez pas à me dénoncer si je vandalise...
Amicalement --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 01:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hôtel des Invalides - 20150801 15h59 (10623).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Demande d'aide
Bonjour Willam, je suis nouveau ici sur commons (mais tres vieux sur wikipedia) et je ne connais pas bien anglais mais je veux bien avoir au moins une photo de qualité. Je vous prie de m'aider avec votre conseils. Tout mes photos que j'ai mis ont été critiqué et on a mis en cadre rouge. En fait, c'est un peu décourageant. Je ne sais pas si je peux faire une bonne photo avec mon appareil qui n'est pas un Nikon ou Canon de dernier cri mais je veux bien... S'il vous plait aidez moi. Merci d'avance. --Armenak Margarian (talk) 16:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Armenak Margarian: Bonjour, tout d'abord avant toutes choses, il ne faut surtout pas se décourager et bien lire toutes les critiques. On ne dit que très rarement pourquoi on valide une photo comme qualité, mais à l'inverse une photo refusée est toujours commentée.
- Parfois, ils sont dur à lire, mais il faut plutôt les prendre comme un enseignement. En faisant ainsi, tu comprend où sont tes lacunes et pourquoi la photo n'est pas de qualité. Parfois, j'avoue que le détail critiqué est litigieux, mais généralement, la critique est juste.
- Aussi, ne pense pas que tu sois obligé d'investir des milliers d'euros dans du matériel photo pour faire de belle photo. J'ai un matériel de plusieurs milliers d'euros, et ce n'est pas pour autant que je réussi toutes mes photos ! A l'opposé, j'ai vu des photos faîtes avec un simple iPhone vraiment sublime.
- Certes la qualité de ton appareil et mieux, celle de l'objectif aident, mais cela ne fait pas tout.
- J'ai vu que les photos sont issues de plusieurs appareils, dont aucun sont des reflex. Je suppose donc que tu n'a pas accès aux fichiers RAW. Malheureusement, quand ton appareil te rend un fichier jpeg, un logiciel interprète les données du capteur et crée un fichier au format jpg. Ce format de fichier, dit destructif est un format compressé, et pour cela tout ce que le logiciel considère comme superflu est supprimé. Malheureusement, le traitement des photos est donc plus difficile, car en raison du manque d'information et les latitudes de corrections sont largement moindre qu'avec un format RAW, qui lui, conserve toute l'information enregistré par le capteur.
- L'inconvénient majeur dans ton cas est que tu dois vraiment prendre soin à avoir une bonne balance des blancs et de bien prendre en compte la luminosité. Je ne connais pas ces appareils, et tu ne peux peut-être pas faire ces réglages.
- Si c'est le cas, il faut voir si tu as accès au minimum à des modes précis pour certaines situations (paysage, portrait, etc.) Ces modes sont des réglages prédéfinis par le fabricant et sont donc fait pour une scène en particulier.
- Il faut aussi, si tu peux en faire le réglage sur l'appareil, faire en sorte que la compression jpeg soit la plus basse possible. Certes cela rend des fichiers plus volumineux, mais tu garde plus d'information. Il faut aussi savoir qu'un fichier jpeg perd en qualité à chaque nouvel enregistrement. En effet, à chaque nouvelle version, il compresse le fichier et donc enlève de l'information. Après plusieurs cycles d'enregistrement, tu te retrouve avec une image irrécupérable.
- J'avoue que ce n'est pas simple, mais c'est la triste réalité.
- Une chose importante aussi est de bien décrire et surtout de bien catégorisé tes images. Si tu crée une catégorie, ce qui est même conseillé si elle n'existe pas, il faut la lier à une catégorie mère. Il faut éviter de laisser le lien rouge. Pour la description, essaye de mettre en plus d'une version dans ta langue natale et une version anglaise. Tu peux te servir de Google traduction pour t'aider.
- Ci-dessous, je reprend chaque échec que tu as essuyé et je t'explique pourquoi en commentant les critiques que tu as eu :
| Commentaire | Image |
|---|---|
| Cette image à de l'artefact jpeg. Il est causé par une trop forte compression de l'image (ou par un enregistrement successif de la même image à plusieurs reprises). Il est clairement visible à la limite du ciel.
Il t'est aussi reproché la composition ; en effet le ciel est presque inexistant. Au cadrage, tu aurais du soit faire en sorte qu'il n'apparaisse pas, ou alors qu'il soit dans le premier tiers de la photo ce qui est mieux en paysage. |
|
| Là, le problème est multiple. Tout d'abord ta description est trop vague. De plus, et de là, tu aurais pu nommer ton image correctement, il te faut le genre et l'espèce de la plante, que l'on indique en italique comme cela par exemple : Leucanthemum vulgare (Marguerite commune). En ayant cette information, tu peux donc nommer, catégoriser et aussi décrire l'image. Sans cette information, aucune chance d'être image de qualité, indépendamment de la qualité de l'image.
Je ne sais pas si vous avez cela sur le Wiki de ta langue maternelle, mais en français tu peux demander une identification : fr:Wikipédia:Atelier identification/Demandeurs pour une espèce végétale, animale, ou tout autre objet. On te parle aussi du ciel brûlé (surexposé). quand une image a une zone brûlée, cela indique que c'est un blanc pur et que rien ne peut être récupéré. Pour un ciel il ne peut pas être d'un blanc pur. Pour cette image, un cadrage que tu aurais pu faire est le format carré en centrant ta fleur. C'est des rares cas où personnellement, je préfère le carré. |
|
| L'image est un peu sombre sur la gauche, soit un problème d'exposition, mais le plus important pour moi est que l'image est un petit peu floue. | 
|
| Un ciel postérisé est souvent induit à cause d'une trop forte compression. Dans ce qu'il reproche à cette image sans en parler, c'est la balance des blancs. L'ensemble est peu « rouge » ; sans doute que ton appareil à été berné par la couleur des pierres du bâtiment. Cela peut se régler dans un logiciel comme Lightroom ou Photoshop.
Il y a aussi un léger problème de perspective qui peut se corriger. |
|
| Là, comme c'est un défaut facilement récupérable, il t'a juste mis un commentaire pour te laisser le temps de le corriger. L'image est un peu penché. | 
|
| Ici, l'analyse s'arrête à la taille de l'image. Les images de qualité doivent faire au minimum 2 mégapixels ; à ne pas confondre avec les mégabits qui est le poids du fichier. Cette taille se calcule en multipliant la largeur par la hauteur. Pour cette image, 1024 × 768 = 786.432 pixels, soit 0.79 mégapixels environ. | 
|
- Je te le redis, il ne faut pas se décourager et surtout accepté de se remettre en question avec les remarques pour pouvoir s'améliorer. Pas toujours facile à accepté, mais c'est une condition absolue pour s'améliorer.
- J'espère avoir pu t'éclairer un peu et si tu as d'autres questions, n'hésite pas. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 18:17, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Super, quelle réponse!!! Merci énormément. --Armenak Margarian (talk) 18:46, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Armenak Margarian: Si je peux te donner encore un conseil, exprime toi en anglais quand tu commentes le QI. Tu peux t'aider de la traduction Google. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 22:15, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Super, quelle réponse!!! Merci énormément. --Armenak Margarian (talk) 18:46, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Bonjour Willam, encore une petite chose que je veux comprendre. Mon ami a mis une photo 
et on demande des choses que ni moi ni lui ne savent pas. Par ex strong CA, Qu'est-ce que ça veut dire?. Je te demande de m'expliquer un peu, quand tu auras du temps et l'envie. Merci d'avance. --Armenak Margarian (talk) 18:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Armenak Margarian: En anglais CA est l'abréviation de Chromatic Aberration, aberration chromatique. En général, c'est un défaut que l'on peut corriger facilement, même si la source n'est pas en RAW. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 01:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Bonjour Willam,
- tout d'abord merci pour ton aide. J'ai une question est-ce que File:Akhtamar12.JPG que j'ai mis possible de corriger une aberration chromatique? --Armenak Margarian (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Armenak Margarian: J'ai eu un peu de mal mais j'ai arranger un peu cela. je remplace ton image.
- Il se peut que tu ne vois pas la différence entre les deux versions à cause du bug actuel de Commons. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 17:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Willam tu es vraiment extra, merci. Moi, aussi j'ai fait un travail et par hasard j'ai mis ma version. Mais à la fin j'ai rétabli ta version. Merci encore.--Armenak Margarian (talk) 18:26, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Armenak Margarian: si tu penses que ta version est meilleurs, n'hésite pas à remplacer mon travail. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 18:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Cher ami, j'ai appris un tas de choses grâce à toi et je continue à apprendre. Ton message m'a si encouragé que je veux bien utiliser tout mon temps libre pour faire des images et mettre sur communs. Merci pour le temps que tu as pris pour me guider dans tout ça. Je suis très reconnaissant. Par contre continue à me critiquer si tu vois des choses mauvaises. Je commence à comprendre mes fautes :))--Armenak Margarian (talk) 19:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Salut Willam, comment vas-tu? J'ai encore une question. Qu'est-ce que ça veut dire CCW? Et est-ce que c'est corrigeable? Je parle de cette photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D4%BF%D5%A1%D5%B5%D5%A1%D6%80%D5%A1%D5%B6%D4%B5%D6%80%D5%AF2.jpg Merci d'avance. --Armenak Margarian (talk) 10:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Armenak Margarian: bien merci ;) Cela, je l'ai appris récemment, car j'ai eu la même chose. C'est une abréviation en anglais qui signifie (tiré de Wikipédia fr) :
- En mécanique et graphisme, CCW est une abréviation signifiant counter clockwise (rotation en sens anti-horaire), le contraire sens horaire est CW
- Autrement dit, ton image est légèrement incliné sur la gauche. Oui Très simple à corriger avec un logiciel de photo.
- À l'avenir, si tu as d'autres questions, créé un nouveau sujet au lieu de répondre sur celui-ci. C'est plus simple pour suivre les discutions. Et n'hésite pas en cas de besoin. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel des Invalides, west face.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Centre sportif Émile Anthoine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Homme statue - 214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vierge Marie - 20150714 13h51 (10354).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Merci
Merci pour modifier l'image https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9b/Pista_de_hielo_BAKH.JPG
Actually I didn't know what you meant by perspective, now that the image is corrected, it seems obvious.
Merci de nouveau!
--Basotxerri (talk) 17:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Basotxerri: thanks, no problem :) --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 01:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tour Eiffel - 20150801 13h57 (10615).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Gustave Eiffel, profile, by Antoine Bourdelle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
_-_413.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_409.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
_-_418.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roc des Bœufs - 219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fontaine - 20150430 16h11 (10153).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pillars of the Eiffel Tower, Nameplate of the Société des Hauts Fourneaux, Forges et Aciéries de Pompey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical lift operator's seat on the outside of the Eiffel Tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion
| |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Hôtel des Invalides - 20150801 16h09 (10630).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hôtel des Invalides - 20150801 16h09 (10630).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roc de Chère - 226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 20150714 21h28 (10427).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_363.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tadorna tadorna (Tadorne de Belon) - 363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Groupe Tribal Percussions - 244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Crépi - 20150405 14h40 (10078).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tour Eiffel - 20150801 13h30 (10609).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gustave Eiffel - 20150801 14h55 (10616).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 20150713 22h01 (10321).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilique de la Visitation in Annecy (France), west face.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bengal - 20150614 17h14 (10310).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zalophus californianus, jump.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
VI Change of scope
Hi Medium69,
I have changed the scope of this VI submission for which you had previously voted. If you are happy with the new scope, can you please recast your vote. Martinvl (talk) 08:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jardins du Trocadéro - 20150801 15h24 (10619).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Champ-de-Mars - 20150801 15h29 (10620).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tour Eiffel - 20150801 13h44 (10613).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_420.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coucher de Soleil - 20150607 20h08 (10306).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
_-_20150801_17h08_(10637).jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sturnus vulgaris (Common Starling) - 20150801 17h08 (10637).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Massif des Bornes - 229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palais de Chaillot - 20150801 16h02 (10625).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Musée du quai Branly - 20150801 16h07 (10629).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jardins du Trocadéro - 20150801 16h02 (10626).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_20150801_17h08_(10636).jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sturnus vulgaris (Common Starling) - 20150801 17h08 (10636).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hello Medium69 -- In response to your oppose vote re the above nominated image, I changed the category/scope to a more appropriate one. I appreciate your input. I'm still learning the ropes here. Thanks -- WikiPedant (talk) 17:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ballon PanoraMagique - 20150802 08h53 (10641).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris - 20150801 16h07 (10628).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
VI renominated
Hi Medium69,
I have changed the scope of this VI nomination. Please revisit the nomination and recast your vote.
Regards
Martinvl
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canon obusier de 12 - 20150802 10h29 (10653).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Groupe Tribal Percussions - 249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Balance à fléau - 20150802 11h00 (10657).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Épissure - 20150802 11h02 (10658).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lanterne - 20150802 09h55 (10649).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paratonnerre - 20150801 15h59 (10622).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
| |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Homme statue - 214.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Homme statue - 214.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rustler Roundup Shootin' Gallery - 20150802 11h19 (10664).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Décor Molly Brown Riverboat - 20150802 11h21 (10665).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bateau maison - 20150802 11h22 (10667).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Applique murale - 20150802 11h32 (10668).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lanterne - 20150802 09h48 (10647).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chariot - 20150802 10h32 (10655).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Caisse, barils et malle - 20150802 10h04 (10652).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_20150801_17h09_(10639).jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sturnus vulgaris (Common Starling) - 20150801 17h09 (10639).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_459.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Groupe Tribal Percussions - 251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lance d'incendie - 20150802 11h40 (10672).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Applique murale et hache - 20150802 11h33 (10669).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Encore des difficultés
Bonjour Willam, commment vas-tu? cher ami j'ai essayé de faire tout mon possible pour corriger cette photo mais je ne comprends pas ce que je dois faire. Peut-tu m'expliquer un peu ce que je dois faire? --Armenak Margarian (talk) 12:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Armenak Margarian: Je bosse encore ce soir :/ Sur la photo ce qu'il t'est demandé, c'est de corriger l'inclinaison. L'eau n'était pas horizontale. J'ai fait la correction et uploadé la photo. Pour moi, maintenant, elle est bonne telle qu'elle est. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Medium69: Cher ami merci pour ton aide, je veux te dire que j'ai essayé plusieurs choses avant de te demander. Je ne te souvens pas chaque fois que j'ai une moindre difficulté seulement quand apres plusieurs essais je ne trouve pas la solution. Merci beaucoup pour ton aide. Encore une chose grace à tes encouragements j'ai 10 photos de qualités. Et je continue activement à mettre des photos, aussi bien j'apprends les logiciels et aussi bien faire la photo. J'espere bientot avoir de bonnes connaissances. Une question, tu bosses dimanche (c'est normal en France)? --Armenak Margarian (talk) 17:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Armenak Margarian: Pour info, je te ping pour que tu saches que j'ai répondu, mais tu n'a pas besoin de le faire car c'est ma page de discussion et que je la suis ^^. Aucun problème pour moi de te donner des conseils et t'aider dans la limite de mes compétences. L'apprentissage peut être long et douloureux, mais il faut bien comprendre que les remarques qui sont faites sont généralement justifiées. Il faut s'en servir pour comprendre ses erreurs et c'est ainsi que l'on peut progresser. Je suis content pour toi que tu est persisté et que tu est enfin pu obtenir le label de qualité pour plusieurs de tes images.
- Pour le dimanche, c'est un jour non travaillé pour une majorité de personnes en France, mais certaines travailles. Moi en l'occurence, je suis conducteur de tramway. Mes jours de repos ne sont dont pas les samedi et dimanche comme la majorité des français. De plus, je travaille souvent le soir. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 01:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Medium69: Cher ami merci pour ton aide, je veux te dire que j'ai essayé plusieurs choses avant de te demander. Je ne te souvens pas chaque fois que j'ai une moindre difficulté seulement quand apres plusieurs essais je ne trouve pas la solution. Merci beaucoup pour ton aide. Encore une chose grace à tes encouragements j'ai 10 photos de qualités. Et je continue activement à mettre des photos, aussi bien j'apprends les logiciels et aussi bien faire la photo. J'espere bientot avoir de bonnes connaissances. Une question, tu bosses dimanche (c'est normal en France)? --Armenak Margarian (talk) 17:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Translohr STE4 - 143.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Translohr STE4 - 143.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Flûte - 20150802 12h43 (10673).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_-_20150801_17h08_(10638).jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sturnus vulgaris (Common Starling) - 20150801 17h08 (10638).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Charette - 20150802 13h25 (10690).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fenêtre - 20150802 12h47 (10678).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Groupe Tribal Percussions - 263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mont Baret, south slope, in Haute-Savoie (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
_-_471.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_-_438.jpg){kind=link}
_-_393.jpg){kind=link}
_roosting.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_418.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
.jpg){kind=link}
Canon obusier de 12, in Seine-et-Marne (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality image not appearing as such
Excuse-moi, Medium69, j'ai une question... Do you remember this image which was nominated for Quality Images in November?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Buesa_Arena_01.JPG
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_November_23_2015
It was tilted, then I uploaded a corrected version and you finally promoted it as Quality Image. However, strangely it does not appear as such.
Do you know how these things work on Wikimedia Commons? Should I present the image once again for nomination?
Merci pour ton aide!
Salut, --Basotxerri (talk) 18:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Salut @Basotxerri: , non ton image est reconnu comme image de qualité. le robot ne n'avait pas pris en compte parce que je viens de m'apercevoir que je n'avais pas mis le modèle
Support mais 
Comment après ma correction qui la validait. J'ai réparé cela sur l'archive et je t'ai mis le modèle d'image de qualité sur ton image. Nul besoin de la représenter. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 18:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, je pense que je comprends ça. Mais si on peut appliquer le modèle directemente sur une image, tout le monde pourrait autodéfiner ses images comme images de qualité, n'est-ce pas? En tous cas, j'ai vu tes corrections dans les deux pages, merci beaucoup! --Basotxerri (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Basotxerri: Pas tout à fait. Si quelqu'un fait cela, un jour quelqu'un s'en aperçoit et fait un signalement auprès des administrateurs. Cela serait considéré comme du vandalisme. La modification que j'ai faite sera certainement repérée. En regardant les archives, le vérificateur s'apercevra que je n'ai fait que rétablir un oubli. Donc pas de problème.
- De plus, quelqu'un qui tricherait ainsi se ferait bien plus d'ennemis qu'autres chose, et je lui souhaite alors bon courage pour la suite. C'est comme si tu essaye de nominer plus de cinq images par jour. Toutes celles qui n'aurait pas du être nominées sont systématiquement rejetée en opposition. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 18:57, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oui, c'est clair, après tout c'est le principe wiki: tout le monde peut participer, et les principes de la domaine des images à Wiki Commons ne distinguen pas des principes des articles textuelles à Wikipedia. Bon, bonne soirée! --Basotxerri (talk) 19:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, je pense que je comprends ça. Mais si on peut appliquer le modèle directemente sur une image, tout le monde pourrait autodéfiner ses images comme images de qualité, n'est-ce pas? En tous cas, j'ai vu tes corrections dans les deux pages, merci beaucoup! --Basotxerri (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Living statues, in Annecy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
.jpg){kind=link}
Lightning rods, in Eiffel tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raquettes à neige - 20150802 13h01 (10683).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Wonderful holidays
Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 15:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Tremonist: Thank you very much ; I wish you happy holidays to you too. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 16:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
It's almost here....
 | |
| Time To Spread Some Happy Holiday Cheer!! | |
What's especially nice about the digitized version is that it doesn't need water, | |
...and a prosperous New Year!! 🍸🎁 🎉 | |
| Pure pun-ishment. [1] |
- @Atsme: Thank you very much ; Happy Holidays. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 16:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***
|
* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * * | |
| * Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC) |
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Tours Saint-Jacques - 195.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tours Saint-Jacques - 195.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lanterne - 20150802 13h16 (10685).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roue de chariot - 20150802 13h24 (10688).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lanterne de vestibule - 20150802 12h46 (10676).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paragliding, on the puy de Dôme (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Merry Christmas
| Merry Christmas | 
|
--Llez (talk) 07:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Molly Brown - 20150802 11h08 (10662).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roc des Bœufs, north slope, in Haute-Savoie (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Massif des Bornes, northwestern slope, in Haute-Savoie (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
.jpg){kind=link}
Virgin Mary, statue in wood, in a building niche, Annecy (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.jpg/Archive_of_previous_reviews){kind=link}
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Groupe Tribal Percussions - 257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fontaine - 20150802 14h59 (10710).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Voilier échoué - 20150802 14h09 (10702).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Plage des Pirates - 20150802 14h05 (10699).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lanterne - 20150802 13h55 (10691).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Campement - 20150802 15h44 (10723).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fontaine - 20150802 14h58 (10707).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
.jpg){kind=link}
Category:Snowshoes, in wood and leather.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Groupe Tribal Percussions - 258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feu de camp - 20150802 15h44 (10722).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fontaine - 20150802 14h58 (10708).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Groupe Tribal Percussions - 253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Groupe Tribal Percussions - 264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aurore - La Belle au bois dormant - 20150802 16h44 (10733).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Flora - Belle au bois dormant - 20150802 16h43 (10731).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue de cobra - 20150802 15h35 (10719).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lanterne - 20150802 14h03 (10695).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feu d'artifice - 315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blanche-Neige - 20150802 16h44 (10735).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lanterne - 20150802 14h03 (10696).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Happy New Year!
|
Fireworks from the Philippines to celebrate 2016 |
Happy New Year Medium69! I hope you still do your great work in 2016!  ★ Poké95 07:11, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
|