User talk:Nemo5576/Archiwum1

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Quentin in topic Usunięcie zdjęcia ET22

Images with missing information edit

The following images have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. Most of these images only have a license but do not have a verifiable source. Some images are claimed to come from militaryimages.net where members can upload images whose copyright they own. The terms for the web site clearly states [1]:

WARNING : We take copyright theft very seriously and includes the theft of copyright images from this site, if you find that your own personal images are appearing on other websites without your permission please inform the webmaster. If the webmaster receives requests from other sites regarding images you have uploaded, they will be told to ask you personally via the discussion board or private message.
The copyright of your images is not transferred to MilitaryImages.Net, it remains 100% yours.

You need to add more information so that others can verify that the images indeed are public domain, e.g. name of photographer, name of web site or anything else that will help others identify the copyright owner. Images without enough information may have to be deleted. Regards, Thuresson 11:04, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Scanned images edit

You said on Thuresson's talk page that several of the images above are scans from military magazins "Żołnierz Polski", "Polska Zbrojna", "Wojskowy Przegląd Techniczny" from years 1984-92 - thus, those magazines (or the respective photographers) hold the copyright to those images, they are not under a free license and will have to be deleted. If you reproduce someone elses work, you can not publish it without the permission of the original author. This is called "copyright"... -- Duesentrieb 11:08, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The lack of a clear copyright notice does not mean that the work is without copyright - it is in fact the other way around, a copyright notice means that the work is copyrighted. It is fully possible that the photo was published somewhere else with copyright notice. See Template talk:PD-Polish. Thuresson 15:41, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Machine gun BAR 1.jpg edit

You claim that this photo comes from the US federal government but have not included any source to substantiate this. Please explain why this photo is issued by the US government. Photos with false or incomplete information may be deleted. Thuresson 13:07, 26 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Zdjęcia PD na stronach z © edit

No cóż... Jeżeli jesteś pewien na 100%, że dane zdjęcie jest PD, to możesz zignorować copyright - jednak najlepiej byłoby, gdybyś znalazł oryginalne źródło danego zdjęcia jako PD. Ciężko czasem udowodnić, że jakaś firma, czy instytucja nie stworzyła danego zdjęcia, a jedynie je wykorzystała ze źródła PD. Datrio 09:17, 15 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Heh... Ciężko mi powiedzieć. Najlepiej rzuć ten temat albo na Commons:Village pump, albo na jej polski odpowiednik, niech więcej osób się wypowie. Nie jestem aż tak doświadczony w prawie autorskim. Pozdrawiam, Datrio 09:34, 15 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Help needed... edit

Greetings !

I have noticed that you seem knowledgeable about small arms; I have taken a number of photographs at a show, a good part of which I have no clue about. You might be interested in having a look at them at Category:Pistols by Rama.

Thank you in any case ! Rama 12:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violations edit

Please be advised that the above referenced images that you uploaded have been removed due to complaint by their creator. These images are copyright Ken Lunde, and not available for free use, thus are violations of Commons usage policy and subject to immediate deletion. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 17:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the check, I was influenced by the author webpage. Greudin

popraw licencje grafik :P edit

Ładowacz na commons powołuje się na twoje uploady na pl.wiki, więc napisz skąd to wziąłeś i popraw tagi licencji na adekwatne :P A potem skasuj wersje na pl.wiki :)

Pozdrawiam --WarX 19:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Yad-Mordechai-museum-Lebel-carabine.jpg edit

Thanks for correcting me. Bukvoed 19:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bielinek IMG 2412.jpg edit

Hello Nemo,

I hope you do not mind, but I nominated your image Bielinek IMG 2412.jpg as Quality Image candidate. --Thermos 06:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielinek IMG 2412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

thank for a fine contribution to Commons. Gnangarra 07:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

pl:Grafika:Carbine Daewoo K1.jpg edit

Your Picter have no Source. Please add the source, becous I want uploade it on Commons--Sanandros 19:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Kategorie edit

Czołem. Czemu kasujesz kategorie ze stron grafik? Halibutt 17:40, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

To proszę nie rób tego. Wygodniej się operuje kategoriami, zwłaszcza odkąd jest commonist. A im więcej otagowanych zdjęć, tym lepiej. W końcu commons jest dla grafik, nie dla galerii. Halibutt 06:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sympetrum sanguineum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Re: Kategoryzacja zdjęć zwierząt edit

Tak, zauważyłem. Dziękuję za grzeczne zwrócenie uwagi. Pozdrawiam. Pko 19:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Chodzi o wymagania do Quality Images. Jeśli jesteś tym zainteresowany, to możesz wypowiedzieć się w dyskusji: Commons talk:Quality images candidates#Modification of guidelines. Pko 19:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Mi też kiedyś wydawało się, że strony są lepsze od kategorii, ale teraz nie widzę specjalnej różnicy, jeśli kategorie są odpowiednio szczegółowe. Kategorie są o tyle wygodne, że można je dodać od razy przy wysyłaniu zdjęcia i w zasadzie nie trzeba się o nie dalej martwić. Jedyne z czym walczę, to dodawanie zdjęć do kilku kategorii, z których każda jest podkategorią następnej. (Tak, jakby ktoś na przykład dodał to samo zdjęcie do kategorii Waeapons, Firearms i Recoiless rilfes.) Pko 20:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Wszystko ma swoje plusy dodatnie i plusy ujemne ;) A strona Commons:Pierwsze kroki była ostatnio edytowana w listopadzie 2004 r. Od tego czasu sporo zasad na Commons się zmieniło... Pozdr. Pko 21:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wrongly Identified Images edit

The images:


were wrongly identified and are under the article Merops persicus. I have uploaded new Images with correct names and have marked the above ones for speedy deletion can something be done about the article so that the above images can be deleted?


The images that I have uploaded with correct names are:


And these may be put under an appropriate article


regards,

--Rawlife 09:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Usunięcie zdjęcia ET22 edit

Nie przypominam sobie... Powiedz tylko, w jakim artykule. Usuwałem zdjęcie ET22 autorstwa Janusza Jurzyka, Twojego chyba nie. Pozdrawiam, Quentin 19:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Return to the user page of "Nemo5576/Archiwum1".