Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Rezonansowy

File:Explorer++ on ReactOS.pngEdit

Rezonansowy, please explain how have you managed to take such screenshot of Explorer++ in ReactOS? We need this information for testing purposes. ReactOs Team —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 08:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Copy to CommonsEdit

Hi Rezonansowy. Magnus' Move to Commons tool assumes it is a legitimate template (presuming it checks if a template exists on Commons before copying it) and appends it to the generated file description page. In other words, this template's existence causes it to be used. Also, please note that there are many name variations to this template on enwp; this is a less common one, so it doesn't show up regularly in transfers. Regards, FASTILY 23:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Ping closing admin: @Ruthven -FASTILY 23:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for your feedback on it! Basing on info given by you above, I think all we need to do is to update Magnus' MtC tool and create other redirects to conform to Wikipedia templateland. --Rezonansowy (talk) 03:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
It's not exclusively an issue with Magnus' tool. FtCG also seems to have this problem. Furthermore, neither of these tools are actively maintained. The solution you've proposed creates a ton of unnecessary work in that a) someone will have to work with the tools' [inactive] authors to implement and distribute a code fix, and b) create an impractical maintenance problem (e.g. what if someone creates new redirects on enwp, or another wiki?). IMO a better fix would be to either generate a recurring database report tracking copy to commons templates, or use a bot to remove instances of the template (I believe OgreBot already does this for new uploads). The template does not need to exist for either of these solutions. Regards, FASTILY 01:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Rezonansowy".