User talk:Rhododendrites/2024b

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastern boxelder bug (41288).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NYC Portal (51317).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue dasher (73158).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, apart from the blown highlights of the stem (minor detail) --Basile Morin 02:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicada killer (72993).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicada killer (73179).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicada killer (73200).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastern amberwing (73102).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastern-tailed blue (73248).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aaron Douglas by Edwin Harleston (51419).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dancer (72783).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue dasher (72789).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! American snout (72851).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walnut Street Theater lamp (82258p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Needsmoreritalin 02:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cedar waxwing eating a mulberry (12175).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy egret (72749).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Variegated fritillary (72934).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lvova 14:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hump-backed beewolf (73215).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lvova 14:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastern-tailed blue (73266).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lvova 14:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy egret (72763).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:17, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue dasher (73146).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Snowy egret (72749).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Snowy egret (72749).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cicada killer (73200).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cicada killer (73200).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Good pictures!

I just browsed through each one of your featured pictures and by golly I must say they are wonderful. You got a lot! Very good use of 10 mins in my workday haha. I'm very grateful that you've released these to the creative commons. Thank you! JungleEntity (talk) 23:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

@JungleEntity: Thank you for this nice message! Much appreciated. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  23:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Iguana iguana image

I'm trying to nominate this file for VI, but it is missing the coordinates. I'd really appreciate it if you are able to geocode it. Zzzs (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Just want to check in on your progress in case you didn't hear my initial message or you didn't have time to respond. Zzzs (talk) 18:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

@Zzzs: Was at Wikimania in Poland for the past week, but  Done now. Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  23:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

 Thank you so much! I appreciate it! Zzzs (talk) 23:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Painter Working On Chain Link Fence, August 1973 (7455070220).jpg

And also:

• File:Painter Working On Chain Link Fence, August 1973 (7455069308).jpg
• File:Stacked Cars In City Junkyard Will Be Used For Scrap, August 1973 (7455146712).jpg
• File:X-Ray Treatment At George Washington University Hospital, August 1973 (7455168586).jpg

Yours sincerely, ~TheImaCow (talk) 21:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Auroras for beginners

Ok, here we go. So auroras are about to peak soon due to increased activity in this solar cycle. See [1], [2], [3] &[4]. Last week this one was shot in NY and this one with Perseids was shot in Ohio, even further south than NY. During the big aurora in May, you got these from NY. The first thing you do is to start scouting for a good location. You need a place with an open view to the north, like a hill, park or beach. As you've seen in my photos, you don't need absolute darkness. If you can see stars, then it's fine for aurora too. At southern locations, the auroras can mostly only be seen down by the horizon and up about 1/4 of the sky to the zenith. Try to get something nice in the foreground or to frame it with.

If I lived in NY, I'd probably go somewhere along the north coast of Long Island. According to the light pollution map, it has about the same light as where I live. The Hamptons would be preferable, and this here 40.904295°N 72.528166°W / 40.904295; -72.528166 would be a perfect location. You get a clear view north over the bay, a gap in the lights between New Haven and New London, and the lights from the mainland shielded by the North Fork. Next up if following the weather forecasts, both normal and space. My go-to page is NOAA. When the charts start to turn yellow-orange, you know something is up. Scroll down to Aurora Forecast and hit play. When the "doughnut" starts to bloat and turn some other color than green as it hits your location, it's time to get moving. Social media are also great. Follow some aurora chasers (there are many in Scotland, Alaska and Minnesota), a lot of these guys will post photos almost immediately when an aurora starts, so this will give you a heads up. Aurora nights often come in pairs, so if you are late to the party the first night, you might get it the next.

Tech stuff: A tripod is a must. Always do manual focus, set it on some small bright spot as far away as possible. Strong auroras can be shot at ISO 800, but usually you'll need to go up to 1600-3200, or further if you have a really good camera. Use a short lens, 18-24 mm, as these things are huge. Use the lowest aperture possible, anything from f/1.2 to f/4.5. Since the aurora can move very quickly at times, don't let the exposure time get too long, try to keep it under 10 sek (ideally 2-6 sek). Auroras behave a bit like smoke, and the shorter the time, the more well-defined you can get the rays and drapes of the aurora. With longer time, you will get a more hazy glow, and also star trails. Last week I was primarily out to get meteors and thus used very long exposure (25-30 sek) and I was just plain lucky the aurora was a bit sluggish that night.

To the naked eye, auroras are paler than you see in photos. The camera will pick up the color better than your eyes, especially for red/pink auroras, since they often drift into the infrared spectrum. When I shot this one, I was so focused on the meteors, I actually didn't notice the aurora until I saw it glowing on the camera screen; it was too close to IR. A good start for you would be to just set up the camera somewhere when you think there might be an aurora (according to forecasts), point it north and see if you catch anything. The camera can pick up things you yourself don't see at first. Faint auroras take some time to learn to pick out, but once you see it, you’re hooked. Do not be afraid to take partial shots of the aurora, they can sometimes make for better compositions than doing the whole thing. Ask follow-up questions if you like, and May the Earth’s Force Field be with you! --Cart (talk) 11:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

So this might be a 'heads up'. When accounts like this [5] start paying attention to increased solar activity, auroras might happen in a few days. We can see the solar activity long before the particles reach Earth and that's what the enthusiasts go for. --Cart (talk) 22:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Belatedly, thanks for all of this! Interesting that you would go east a couple hours to Long Island rather than north a couple hours -- I suppose a couple hours north wouldn't change that much compared to a big open view? I think most likely this is advice I will save for when I'm going to a place that's darker/more open and check the forecsasts then (rather than driving a couple hours from the city on a chance.... unless the chance is really big), but I do hope to use it. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  11:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

If I had a choice, I would always go to a place with water reflection for auroras, hence my recommendation for Long Island. A beach is also easier for a beginner since it provides an unhindered 180 deg view. On land you always run into obstacles like vegetation when the aurora decides to veer of course. Myself, I'm a bit landlocked now that I don't have a car and the busses stop going at 22:00. Sure, I live close to the fjord, but hiking there alone at night and taking on the local wildlife (moose, wild boar), is not something I like.

I hope you'll get a chance to do this kind of photography soon. You might want to keep an eye on the sky even from NYC. With the strong auroras now, I've seen a lot of photos taken right in cities, so it's a start. This here is taken right in central Stockholm(!), so it's the equivalent of making a shot from the Brooklyn Bridge Park (even if that photo might be faked). The aurora can be spotted, but very few people think there is even a chance to capture it, so they just Don't Look Up. (pardon the very bad pun) --Cart (talk) 12:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Just a heads up. Strong aurora warning today. The beginning of it was seen in mid US last night and it looks like it's building up for another night. [6] I'm praying the clouds outside will go away. --Cart (talk) 14:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beyond Eden (00803).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NOSPR red bricks (60137).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NOSPR (60129p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice film library (60182).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurasian coot (60587).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania Katowice closing party (01275).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 18:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania Katowice closing party (01260).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Star apartments in Katowice (00834p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 18:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katowice neon (01524).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wojciech Korfanty statue (60198).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:01, 21 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary Katowice (50104).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 03:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania Katowice closing party (01236).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silesia Star building in Katowice (60170).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Picture is good but it needs a better description, there are many 'buildings in Katowice'. --Plozessor 03:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC) Fair enough. Tracked down the name/location and updated.  Done Rhododendrites 14:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)  Support I tried similar shots, but yours is way better, definitely a QI --Kritzolina 18:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silesian Park (60300).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition. But please give a more precise description. --Augustgeyler 07:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC) I added "path through the woods in" but I don't know what more I can add. I tried to add rough geocoordinates to help. Rhododendrites 14:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)  Support The path, the park, an estimated location. Thats a good description now. If you want you can add {{Location estimated}}. --Augustgeyler 23:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat mosaic (00851).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)  Support The cat is looking for Piet... support. --GRDN711 02:59, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Blue dasher (73146).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blue dasher (73146).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red squirrel (21808).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 01:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red squirrel (21775).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 01:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nowa Oranzeria (21539).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandarin x domestic duckling (22011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandarin ducklings (22134).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Lazienki park (21889).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 16:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Lazienki amphitheater (21886).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice composition.Ziko 17:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red squirrel (21813).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 16:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace on the Isle (21895p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. Because of it's size, it has to be a stiched image. Even though there are multiple horizontal lines to care of, I can't see obvious part where the image is stiched together. --D-Kuru 16:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC) That's good, right? :) I've added the panorama tag because, yes, it's stitched. Rhododendrites 17:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eastern amberwing (73102).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eastern amberwing (73102).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw University rooftop garden (22564).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mandarin duck (21926).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 07:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hooded crow (21576).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 07:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! European green woodpecker (21737).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 07:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw University rooftop garden (22558).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 07:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw University rooftop garden (22492).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw University rooftop garden (22491)2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw University library (22572).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, though harsh lighting --Tagooty 02:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw University (22233).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw Presidential Palace (22248p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw University rooftop garden (22537p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 16:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw University rooftop garden (22547).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 16:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw University rooftop garden (22494).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red squirrel (21825).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you check the WB? --Poco a poco 19:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)  Support Better now --Poco a poco 18:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warsaw University rooftop garden (22513p)2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Top of St. John's Cathedral in Warsaw (22408).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staszic Palace (22226p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Market Square Warsaw (22594p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Square (22399).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. And a nice castle square bear. --Peulle 10:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Al Solidarnosci (22324p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 14:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Red squirrel (21808).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red squirrel (21808).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)