Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Rodhullandemu

Quick Question

Once an IP has been reported/delt with and the vandalism has been reverted already is it appropriate to patrol the edits if it isn't already patrolled? I try to keep as much of a handle on anonymous IP vandalism as one person can and I am curious what would the appropriate way to deal with this? I already patrol the edits of a someone doing vandalism before I would revert but I don't know how to handle someone who has had an admin action against them. The case of 85.118.76.63 made this issue shown to me. Thank you for your time. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

There's actually little point monitoring contributions since they are rarely static IP addresses and that particular vandal seems able to use new ones in the same subrange with some ease. On the other hand, there's no harm in it since in a limited subrange, e.g. a public or school library, the vandalism may recommence after the block expires, but it's more likely to be spotted if you are watching the target of the vandalism. Hope that helps. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:55, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
28 - 38 Upper Hope Place overviews.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Philharmonic Hall, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Philharmonic Dining Rooms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Everyman Theatre, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Britannia Adelphi Hotel front elevation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Photos of Albert Camus

Dear Administrator,

Much to my regret, these photos should be removed too:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:FF-AC.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:FF-AC-hq.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:CamusJeanCatherine.jpg

They all belong to Fonds Albert Camus. Thanks in advance!

Soleil222 (talk) 21:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

@Soleil222: No problem.   Done Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Rodhullandemu".