User talk:Rodhullandemu
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Wilbert Awdry
I am sorry to say that I dont find your closing statement convincing. Material/medium/method of creation do not correlate to the work's legal status. I believe they are graphic works. Graphic works are separate from works of craftsmanship. Some precedents of similar photographs being deleted:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Homer Simpson in Cerne Abbas.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Blue plaques in Monmouth
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Strawberry Recording Studios Blue Plaque.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chepstow - St Mary's Churchyard Walk plaque - geograph.org.uk - 503782.jpg--Roy17 (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- I only started practising law in 1974, so perhaps I'm a bit of a newbie. I think the wording is clear enough to fulfil the permissive nature of Section 62, and when open to interpretation, should be so construed. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Even though the 1988 Act deleted the explanatory clause from Works of artistic craftsmanship, not falling within either of the preceding paragraphs found in en:s:Copyright_Act,_1956_(United_Kingdom)/Part_1, I dont think works of artistic craftsmanship should be interpreted as such a broad catch-all.
- The definition of works of artistic craftsmanship itself is not very extensive either as reflected in legal precedents.--Roy17 (talk) 20:25, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
┌─────────────────────────────────┘
I thought the discussion was over. It is now. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Scottish categories
Do you think that like w:Category:Populated places in Highland (council area) is divided into the likes of w:Category:Populated places in Sutherland that we should do the same here? For the Inner Hebrides do you think that we should sub divide it so that we have something like Category:Islands of the Inner Hebrides in Argyll and Bute and Category:Islands of the Inner Hebrides in Highland council area? the reason being that many are placed in both categories when a single (divided) category could be used? As far as I can see only those part of the Islands of the Clyde, some in Loch Lomond and possibly a few tiny ones are in Argll and Bute but not the Inner Hebrides. For Highland some in the northern part aren't apparently part of the Inner Hebrides. For the Outer Hebrides and the Orkney and Shetland Islands this problem doesn't appear to exist (apart from possibly Category:Island of Stroma) because the archipelagos are concurrent with the council areas. Uninhabited island categories like Category:Uninhabited islands of Highland (council area) might also be useful. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:41, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: I'm not usually happy to categorise by placenames that are no longer current, but that would be a start. I realised years ago that Highland was going to be difficult to subdivide and never got round to thinking about it in depth. As for the islands, that makes sense because because then we don't mis-categorise but we do have a coherent category structure. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
★
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bellcote, schoolroom at Ancient Chapel of Toxteth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
★
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Exhibition Centre Liverpool.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
★
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Hulley statue, Liverpool Waterfront 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
★
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Tollbooth at George's Dock Ventilation and Control Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
★
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Sea wall, Albert Dock 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|