Open main menu

User talk:Rodhullandemu

Contents

Thank you for your attention at QI nomitationEdit

Hello Rodhullandemu, it was not my intention, to delete any nomination. Thanks a lot for your attention, I really don't know, how this could happened. --J. Lunau 13:15, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancient Chapel of Toxteth - Schoolroom.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
McLennan monument, Anfield Cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Northern catacomb, Anfield Cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cherry Lane entrance, Anfield Cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity, Anfield.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bank of Liverpool, Prescot Street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pleasant Street Board School - front elevation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liverpool YMCA.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ropemaker Place from Heathfield Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liverpool Mountain - context shots.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prenton Hall - East.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prenton Hall - West.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Everything, everythingEdit

We had fun on Commons:Deletion requests/File:JohnGeorgeHaigh.jpg the other day.. But now, I'm having everything but fun. I don't know to what degree you've been following some things that happened recently.

I don't know what to do anymore. Colin can accuse me of everything and their mother on COM:ANU without limits and he can't be held accountable in any way. Jcb attacked Guanaco a month ago and after that I got an email from him which (among other things) said "I have a lot on my plate right now outside of Wikimedia". But after 13 October there hasn't been any response to my mail anymore. I hope we haven't lost Guanaco. Looking at Guanacostats there is hope, but this wikibreak wasn't on good terms.

In what I can only call a smear campaign, my essays are nominated for deletion using blatant lies as arguments which was only initiated because Steinsplitter mentioned not liking them on Colin's thread full of false accusations. The perfect chance for T cells who simply never liked me for reasons I don't know to nominate two of them. He couldn't nominate the third one because Fæ already had, presumably because Fæ was unaware of the history of discussions here and on enwiki about Everipedia and the fact images from Everipedia do get uploaded here and can never stay because their attribution and licensing is botched.

Please, give me a reason not to become a vandal. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:03, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Alexis, I haven't really been following this and I'm probably too old to have meaningful opinions these days. A quick look tells me you are keen but perhaps optimistic- writing about people who are not on Commons is fraught with danger, er, as is writing about people who are on Commons. Opinions are always welcome in discussions but turning them into essays may not always have the intended result. I have no view on whether the two essays on Commons-related issues are useful, because I don't know the background. But becoming a vandal is a bridge-burning action which can only ever go one way- badly. For one thing, you instantly lose the trust of the Commons community, totally and forever. You are constrained to sockpuppet and seek out technical ways to avoid your IP block. That's time-consuming and in my experience is usually detected before long. So your kudos level then dips below the zero you had achieved for it. It's all downhill from there, and you eventually realise that other sites are easier to vandalise and troll. So, at least you go away (yay!), but with a door shut firmly behind you that you might have wanted to keep at least ajar (boo!). HTH, Cheers Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I have no reason to vandalise or troll other sites. I don't want to vandalise this one either. But Colin already accuses me of vandalising Commons, knowing full well he's lying. If he doesn't know, the alternative options would be far less flattering, so I assume he's lying. With your legal background you probably know: if you accuse a person or a group of something, it increases the chance they will end up doing exactly what they are being accused of. Because they're guilty anyway, so they might as well start doing it. Instead of Colin being told this is not okay, he gets a pat on the back. Is that Commons now? We can just accuse anyone we don't like of vandalism without any consequence? I find that extremely sad. As you haven't followed it, I understand you can't say or do much about it either. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Rodhullandemu".