User talk:Siren-Com/Archive 5

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galba aureus Gallica 9436 revers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galba aureus Gallica 9436 avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Franz van Duns 17:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trajan aureus Gallica 10108 revers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Franz van Duns 17:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trajan aureus Gallica 10108 avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Franz van Duns 17:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domitien aureus Gallica 9617 avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domitien aureus Gallica 9617 revers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trajan aureus Gallica 12935 avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trajan aureus Gallica 12935 revers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aureus Octave Gallica 29 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aureus Octave Gallica 29 bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auguste aureus Gallica 16305 avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auguste aureus Gallica 16305 revers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Chianti 15:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Titus sesterce Gallica 16153 avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rodhullandemu 21:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Titus sesterce Gallica 16153 revers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rodhullandemu 21:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Claude aureus Lyon avers Gallica 6367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Claude aureus Lyon revers Gallica 6367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trajan aureus Gallica 21366 avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trajan aureus Gallica 21366 revers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Siren-Com/Archive 5,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Siren-Com/Archive 5,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julia Titi aureus Gallica 22326 revers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julia Titi aureus Gallica 22326 avers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Siren-Com/Archive 5,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Angélus Charles Jacquot 1888.jpg

File:Angélus Charles Jacquot 1888.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.249.103.145 19:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Statère à l'Hippocampe des Aulerques Diablintes (avers).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Statère à l'Hippocampe des Aulerques Diablintes (avers).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Statère à l'Hippocampe des Aulerques Diablintes (avers).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

BrightRaven (talk) 16:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Statère à l'Hippocampe des Aulerques Diablintes (revers).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Statère à l'Hippocampe des Aulerques Diablintes (revers).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Statère à l'Hippocampe des Aulerques Diablintes (revers).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

BrightRaven (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Reproductions de tableaux

Bonjour, Vous devez savoir que les reproductions d'oeuvres du domaine public en deux dimensions sont considérées sur Wikimedia comme restant dans le domaine public. Vous ne pouvez pas y revendiquer des droits d'auteurs du moment que vous les téléchargez sur Wikimedia. Donc, par exemple l'image ci-dessous : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Philippe_le_Beau_M_de_la_Chasse_détail.jpg est nécessairement dans le domaine public et la mention de droits d'auteurs est non valide. Si vous souhaitez que les réutilisateurs mentionnent votre nom il suffit de le préciser, mais l'ajout d'une licence est un abus.

J'en suis bien conscient mais ces images remontent à un temps où je ne maîtrisais pas le sujet et je les corrige quand j'ai l'occasion, mais les retrouver parmi mes 3700 fichiers est fastidieux. Vous pouvez aussi le faire vous même. Cdlt. - Siren-Com (talk) 00:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)