User talk:Yann/archives 2

Peugoet Image:604-1978.jpg

Salut Yann

Cette photo et toutes celles que tu trouveras sur l'article Peugeot 604 sont tirées d'un dépliant publicitaire de l'époque. Je ne sais pas trop quelle licence sélectionner pour ces images. Elles ont déjà été recopiée sur notre site [1].

En ce qui concerne la photo récente, dans l'infobox Automobile a été prise par mes soins à Rétromobile 2007 Paris. J'en suis donc le propriétaire.

Merci pour ton aide.

@+ Xavier

MJ images

I wish you had looked at my user page and notified me of the concerns before hand. My advice to you in the future would be to look over someone's contributions and see if they are an established user who knows the policies before immediately deleting their photos (as you can see I've uploaded over 120 flickr photos under the correct license). Anyway the reason for this is because I have been in regular email correspondence with the flickr user who took the photos and convinced her to re-license adn release them for Wikimedia use (giving her several links to discussions explaining Wikimedia policy). However she did so incorrectly and because I saw only the two little symbols and assumed they were cc-by-sa. She has since licensed them correctly and now I have to go re-upload all the photos again. Please be more ocnsiderate to established users in the future, although your actions were within policy you'll make few friends acting that way toward established users. Quadzilla99 16:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC) - All of this was a misunderstanding on my part, I wasn't aware he/she could restore the photos so fast. Quadzilla99 17:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok she changed the license on the photos, though so you can check them directly. Quadzilla99 17:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry if I came of a little hostile. I type poorly and I thought would have to re-upload all of them myself which would have taken forever especially considering I deleted them from my hard drive. It would have taken me probably another 30-40 minutes. I didn't know you could just restore them so quickly. Thanks. Quadzilla99 17:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:FlickrPopularTagCloud.png

Hi Yann! Image:FlickrPopularTagCloud.png is not copyrighted because of lacking en:Threshold of originality so I uploaded it again with Template:PD-ineligible. Thank you for keeping Commons tidy but in this case there should be a vote for deletion process or something like that if you still want the image to be deleted. Greetings -- Nichtich 10:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

If you wish you can upload just a list of words but a screenshot of a copyrighted website is copyrighted. All of the words together with the different colors and sizes, IMO is not ineligible for copyright and therefore is copyrighted by Yahoo. Yonatanh 10:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

There may be trademark restrictions but surely no copyright because there is not enough originality in the list. There are even less restrictions then on all of this. I can use the same algorithm, the same words and frequencies and create the same image - weighting words per frequency and using two specific colors is nothing original! It's not even sure whether there is a Colour trademark. -- Nichtich 11:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I really appreciate your work and there surely a lot of copyrighted stuff is uploaded to commons that needs to be deleted as soon as possible. But this image is not copyrighted. May you please point me to convincing sources, discussions, decisions etc.? If there is a policy on commons that Threshold of originality does not need to be fullfilled then I regret it but policies are need so I won't insist on uploading this image - so based on what facts do you judge the image as copyrighted? So where does the copyright by your opinion or the current commons policy set the border?: -- Nichtich 11:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

• The screenshot as I uploaded it
• The same image in black and white (no colour trademark)
• The same image withtout "All time most popular tags" - just a alphabetically sorted list of words weighted by size (I uploaded it at Image:TagCloudBasedOnFlickr.png)
• The same in another font, no snapshot but same words and same sizes
• same words, same sizes, different line breaks, different colour, different font.

Image:Eden_Ben_Basat.JPG

Hey, I was wondering why you tagged that picture as having no source since I think that user did take the pic and tagged it with a self license (I'm saying this because he also uploaded two of the pics in Category:Footballers_from_Israel and Image:Ramat Gan Stadium.jpg which all have to do with Israeli football. Yonatanh 10:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Bayrou

Oui, j'ai l'autorisation, il me semble d'ailleurs que toute ses images sont libres Kyle the hacker 19:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Images: TinTin and Harry Potter

Hello Yann,
You say that Harry Potter and TinTin not a public domain is. But TinTin Bruxelles.jpg is a public domain and I've edited it and I thought I am allowed to edit and distribute my edits of public domains.

Concern Harry Potter,
HarryPotter.jpg is not a public domain, indeed. But it is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 license. Wich sais I'm allowed to edit the file and distrtibute my edits under the same license. That's what I've done:
HarryPotter2.JPG, HarryPotterh3.JPG

So I think the pictures are totally legal.

Greetings Toon Maassen

Copyrighting JSHAA pictures

Hi Yann - my permission was given orally. Auroranorth 12:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:RAID ant and roach.jpg

You deleted my image as "copyvio". Care to give the reasoning? --User:Dante Alighieri User talk:Dante Alighieri 19:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Licence image-Logo

Bonjour Yann. Je connais bien Wikipedia (fr+en) mais je découvre Commons. En fait il s'agit du logo de mon labo de recherches, dessiné il y a 2 ans par une collègue (auj. partie), laquelle m'a dit au téléphone qu'il n'y avait pas de problème pour l'utiliser. D'ailleurs légalement le logo est probablement propriété de mon institut de recherche / du CNRS (plutôt que de l'individu qui l'a créé). Sous quelle licence indiquer qu'il s'agit du domaine public? Et sur quelle page indiquer cela? Merci d'avance, Womtelo 16:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC).

Bonjour Yann, Le détenteur des droits (© Lacito-CNRS) autorise l'utilisation de son logo dans Commons. (email envoyé par le responsable du laboratoire aujourd'hui, à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). La licence qui convient est-elle {{Attribution}}? Je ne suis pas sûr, il y en a tellement... Merci. -- Womtelo 18:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Picture deleted...

Sorry, I didn't know. You don't have to be such a jerk about it.--MonkBirdDuke 21:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Cristina Donà image

Sorry, I don't understand the tag you put on this: Image:Cristina Donà StazioniLunari Firenze dic06.jpg Why does it have unsufficient information about copyright status?? Thanks--Sibilla 21:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, the author asked to upload this image. But the same should be for the other images in the Cristina Donà Gallery.. they have all been originally published on that website (http://www.stellebuone.it) the authors gave their permission.. but you didn't put any advice about them before--Sibilla 21:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I uploaded a new version of the file above: Image:Cristina Donà FestivalCreatività Firenze dic06.jpg that has originally been posted on Flickr. For the other pics in the Cristina Donà gallery the authors will write an e-mail with their permission to permission@wikimedia.org. I hope it's okay. Bye --Sibilla 10:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

NSD

Hi Yann,

when you do special:newimages patrol, I think you should just delete any files that don't have source or licensing info straight away. We already tell people we will do this -- special:upload says If you do not provide suitable license and source information, your file will be deleted without further notice -- and I think we should start following it up. For one thing it is best to delete files before they have a chance to be used in articles, so you don't have to worry about delinking them. For another, it saves a lot of hassle because then later it isn't that someone else has to look at it and check things. If one person can deal with it, it can save a lot of effort.

I have been deleting no source/no license newimages "on sight" for about a week now and it is going well, even no one complains on my talk page yet. Also when you spot someone re-uploading the same file it is a good chance to give them one last warning, and if they continue, then block them. cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 03:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

In quite a lot of cases, the author just forgets to put a licence even if he is the author of the image. Even I do that. Usually the author has a blue-linked userpage, though. Even if you only pick red-linked userpage users, there are lots who don't put source information. Don't forget, a description of the image is not a source. And a "self" template is not a source. cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 04:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

For restoring my images.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 02:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Lestath is deleting them again. Could you comment at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests? I don't want to see any wheel warring, but it seems to me like he is acting rogue here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 00:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Source

Do you want the exact URL to the photo or just a wikilink to the page? --Oakster 17:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Never mind. I've just seen an example from you. Thanks for the advice. --Oakster 17:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Novasatenercasaenlaputavida.jpg

Hi, First, sorry for my poor English, I'm Spanish. I`ve seen you have deleted this image. It is licensed as [2] and I would like to know the reason of the copyvio. Thank you MasterJ 22:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Autorisation

Salut!!!

Comment est-ce que je peux importer une image si son auteur m'a donné de l'autorisation de l'utiliser dans Wikimedia à travers de mon e-mail?--Le K@l! 06:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Merci bien pour votre aide!!!--Le K@l! 17:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Groupofzombiesjoelf.jpg

Image:Groupofzombiesjoelf.jpg - why this image was deleted? BeŻet 23:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

...And why Image:Gt-pro-series-2-.jpg was deleted? You are deleting images on free licenses... It had the {{Attribution-Ubisoft}} tag!BeŻet 12:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

...and Image:Kubuspuchatekwinnie.jpeg? The same as above BeŻet 12:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Next time please request image for deletion before deleting it so users can have time to explain you some things BeŻet 12:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

When it comes to the screenshots, please read (and learn) this User:Avatar/Ubisoft. A german version of the discuusion with an Ubisoft employee can be found here. An example can be found here Image:Lock On Cockpit MiG.jpg. Best regards BeŻet 13:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I know that. The image Image:Groupofzombiesjoelf.jpg was NOT form the film, you must read the description carefully. It was taken during the shooting of the film, thus it IS LEGAL. It HAD a free licence. And what about the screenshots which have FREE LICENCES aswell, but were deleted? BeŻet 15:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I believe it is confusing, because it is not typical for game companies to release their screenshots under free licenses. Best regards BeŻet 16:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Medalla-bling-wikiproyecto-hiphop.png

Hi! The diamond I was using was probably copyrighted because it was taken from a Google search, so I've done a new version using Image:Diamong.jpg. Also, I've added this info to the page of the picture. Is that enough? Thank you! Steve-o 14:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:1817-early-rollercoaster Promenades-Aeriennes Le-Bon-Genre.JPG

Comes from a French magazine, not a book, as far as I know... Churchh 16:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lifesize8weekfetus.JPG

Hi Yann. You deleted an image that I uploaded, because you said it is not free. However, the website stated: "We hereby grant to You a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use the Image on the terms and conditions explained in this Agreement and on the Image preview page FREE OF CHARGE."

Also, I forwarded to Wikimedia Privileges an email from the copyright owner, stating: "I own the copyright to the image mentioned in your email letter and found at http://www.sxc.hu/photo/322389 and also the image I attach to this email (Ab8wP1140258.jpg). I grant permission to copy, distribute and/or modify these documents under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, no Back-Cover Texts, and subject to disclaimers found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GFDL."

This is not sufficient? Ferrylodge 18:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Yann. Thanks for your message at my talk page. Here's the info you requested:

Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:02:41 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Fwd: RE: Request to Make of Bill Davenport

To: permissions@wikimedia.org

I can resend if you like. Merci.Ferrylodge 18:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for undeleting it.Ferrylodge 03:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Radiation warning symbol.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Radiation warning symbol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

—xyzzy_n 18:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Book cover picture

Hi. You deleted the image I uploaded of a book cover: Image:Space Viking (pb cover 01).JPG. What's the problem? I took the picture myself.
Wwoods 19:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Strange

You are vandalist. I don't understand why you destroyed photo small-eared dog and bush dog, I totally don't understand, If really was someone bad, that you or other man who know on licence can this correct but not now destroy. I write the author, licence, source.... I must end cooperation with wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and wikimedia commons.....this is difficult choice but I can't normal creature the articles. I must destroy my all articles, sorry, but I must this doing. Why you destroy my pictures, this is free encyclopedia and other sisters projects, I don't think so. User:Caniche Caniche

Image:Jeans.jpg

I don't think {{PD-ineligible}} was wrong license there, for me it was to be accepted. I think sometimes we have to use implicitly positive solutions. And your message you put into the uploader's (Juanmak) page would be rather never read by him, he does not work here since October 2005.

Regards Julo 02:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:Grynszpan Herschel.jpg

I relied on what en:wiki stated. If their clain is incorrect, then the picture has to be deleted: I cannot add further info, apart for what was provided. Best wishes. Giovanni Dall'Orto --G.dallorto 11:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Artifort

Hello Yann,

It seams artifort is doomed on wikipedia. Ive placed some material this morning and no one believes I work for the company itself. Ive been trying to add a page purely with information on the models and their designers. Nothing fancy, just info.(more because people keep mixing up the models and its designers) But ive already got a warning that it was an advertisement rather then an infomation site. And by the way, our logo's and images are all royalty free(some special reason within the furniture branch) If you still don't believe me, please e-mail us ; User:Artifort

Keller OE graphics

Hi! I don't brake law when I have upload those images, because I have rigts and needed permissions to upload them :D. I think, they are very important in Wikipedia, so please tell me, can You upload them? I don't understand licensing rights on Wiki. And I don't want to have problems, almost everyday with it. I want to see them in my article about Olimpia Elbląg football club :D. Keller OE 13:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:BM_icone.png

J'ai ajouté sur la page suivante http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:BM_icone.png l'adresse d'origine de l'image (dans la case "Source"). Merci d'annuler la programmation de sa suppression. User:Magic-Bretzel

Franc Suisse

About Image:001CHFr.jpg - it was moved from fr.Wiki with others, like Image:1CHFr.jpg. It was stated there that they are PD. If they aren´t, you must delete the others. Manuel Anastácio 20:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

But people from Wiki.fr will not be pleased with that, I'm sure... Because is, really PD... And they deleted the original file when this one was uploaded here. :)... LOL. Manuel Anastácio 20:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Tagged as {{PD-Switzerland-official}}. —xyzzy_n 20:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cirque roger lanzac.jpg

Bonjour et désolé si cette image vous pose probleme d'un point de vue droit. Je pensais qu'à partir du moment ou je prenais la photo c'était ok. Je ferai plus attention à l'avenir. Bonne soirée.

Frédéric Masson

CentrodeSanCristobal1995

Is the tag I'd use the appropriate for this San Cristóbal image? This is a very old pic I have since ever, but actually I don't have any original source information. If the pic must be deleted please let me know. Greetings! --Rolf Obermaier 22:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

166.77.6.4 blocked

Hi, Yann. I've been trying to reach you while registered with my used id, but i finally decided to do it with this method. I don't know if this would work out, but i rather to tell me what to fix first and not really punish people right away. My IP address is 166.77.6.4. -thing you may probably already know since Wikipeida records it instantly. Again, be friendly and let people to learn your skills, not just castigate them if they didn't know how to upload -like me. Thanks.

deletion of Image:1112FIC326x550.jpg

Hi there,

you deleted a picture of the en:OpenMoko-Phone (Image:1112FIC326x550.jpg) with the comment "press image, no source, copyvio". As you might know, OpenMoko project is about creating a GPL cellphone, so their goals are not that far away from wikipedia's. I don't know, if it was stated within the original image description, but Sean Moss-Pultz explicitly released the pictures under the GFDL. (see http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2007-January/002080.html). He is the lead project manager and an employee at FIC. I don't know about the conventions here at commons, but would you consider restoring the picture ?

cheers, --de:Benutzer:ThePeritus aka 85.178.86.161 23:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:BM_icone.png (suite)

Je ne comprend pas ce qui va pas concernat cette image, car sur la page à laquelle mène lien que j'ai ajouté (http://www.bide-et-musique.com/bannieres.html), il y a bien écrit « Vous pouvez utiliser librement ces images sous réserve de mentionner le nom Bide&Musique pas loin ou que le contexte y fasse référence ».

N'est-ce pas suffisant ? User:Magic-Bretzel

Bonjour, Merci pour la modification du fichier. Je suis heureux que ce soit réglé. User:Magic-Bretzel

"Sarah Vulva" image

Greetings, I noticed that you deleted the "Sarahvulva crop nolabel.jpg" and the "Sarahvulva crop.jpg" images. There are still other copies of the same image on the Commons: Image:Sarahvulva-hr.jpg, Image:Sarahvulva.jpg, and Image:Vulva crop (italian).jpg. Since they are copies of the same "Sarahvulva crop nolabel" image you already deleted, you might want to delete them as well. 151.203.179.82 17:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Bert Petersen

I have recieved confirmation that the e-mail you requested was sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Please undelete the image as I requested. Thanks. --Coldbourne 18:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks soo much. Your compliment brightened my day! Indianhilbilly 22:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for tagging

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ocha05e.jpg

Thanks to sorce file tagging.It's mistake.Sorry.Does it become evidence by The Archive.org? Expressing gratitude for infinity is dedicated to you. --擬古猫(GIKONEKO) 23:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Aide svp !

bjr. J'ai reçu votre msg. Je ne telecharge jamais aucune image qui soit sujete à un copyright quelconque, mais je dois mal m'y prendre et cocher les mauvais endroits. Je ne suis meme pas sur de vs ecrire où il faut ! Les images téléchargées m'appartiennent et j'agis en tant que gestionnaire des sites des artistes, engagé par la production, je veille à mettre à jour certaines choses ou rectifier des erreurs, compléter des infos, etc.. Photos d'artistes, affiches, pochettes de cd et dvd, guitares, tout cela est non seulement libre de droit, mais nous appartient à 100%. J'ai laissé un msg à ce sujet avec les photos et il est très facile de vérifier avec le producteur/ artiste lui-même, jean-pierre danel (www.jeanpierredanel.com, jpdanel@puzzleproductions.com, 06 09 47 20 34). Les photos de "miss daisy" par ex sont à nous et sont mises ici à titre informatif pour compléter les infos du site. Elles ne font l'objet d'aucun copyright et il n'y a aucune violation d'aucun droit que ce soit. Merci de me dire comment procéder pour éviter toute ereur. User:Stratospheric

You delete "Image:Sarahvulva.jpg"

We used it in two german wikipedia-articles - no porn-articles. We used it a long time ago. So its a bad surprise. Please restore the picture. You can not see in commons that it is used in german wikipedia? Thats a problem!

• Picture from april 2006: [3] aus google
• [4] German article
• [5] second German article -- 217.184.1.4 12:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't get it... wether it is being used on another wiki or not is irelevent. It's an image stolen from an amateur porn site, and therefore should be deleted, and removed from all articles see:Wikipedia:Talk:Vulva#Stolen image. The stolen porn-site image should be deleted. 70.109.230.91 14:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Cropped Images

I'm guessing this is why there is a tag on the DJ Wolfe pic. The higher-res versions of the images were on my old computer. I have to get them, as these were taken from lower-res images that I emailed to myself a few months ago. I will source link to the low-res images on my flickr page until I can get the hi-res images uploaded (should be next week).→Deser† sapper•≈talk 14:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Tokio Hotel

Hi, oh my god i am so sorry, why don't understand very well what you told me about the picture i upload, can you explain it please but less complicated... thanks! User:Rorakk

oh, haha i understadn it all now, well the photographer, well i don't know because i take this image grom another internet page who permit using Tokio hotel images for any purpose, including commercial ones, that's why i took this photo, because is not restricted in amy use, but, well can you tell me how to make this photo more... i dont know the word, but i want to make it official i mean that it is good to have it, and not ereasing it, please give me a hint. User:Rorakk

oh well i take it from this page: www.last.fm there is a gallery where you can see and take photos right here: http://www.lastfm.es/music/Tokio+Hotel/+images but is in panish i think...

and if you want more specificly is here the image: http://www.lastfm.es/music/Tokio+Hotel/+images&submode=view&proposal=460205 User:Rorakk

huh? mmm... well, i don't know what to say to you, you know, there is another picture that have been uploaded too, of Tokio Hotel and is permited, and Last.fm is a page that the images are taken from another people or web site, how ever Tokio hotel is a German band, that its fotos are semanaly published in fan pages, because Tokio hotel photos are for fans, i am only trying to give to Wikipedia another image to put in an edition who need one, but this is not my point, what i want to know please is where to put all the Copyright and those thing to finally edit the photo properties, please- and thanks

Rorakk 15:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey did you erase it? I don't understand how to edit and how to use commons can you brefly explain please?

About Image:GPLLinksysLogo.png, and your deletion of it

I left a note stating the source of the logo, proof that it is under the GPL, and detailed instructions on how to extract the freely licensed logo from a GPL'd .tgz file at http://www.linksys.com/gpl/ . I do not know how this file could be labeled as no source, and no license after all the work to prove the source and the license. Someone must have vandalized the image description page. Could you please restore this image? Thank you. Jesse Viviano 15:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• By the way, no one had bothered to notify me about the impending deletion, so I think that the {{Nsd}} that was probably used was invalid. Jesse Viviano 16:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

thanks

oh thanks for the explanation, now i know what to do and what not to do, very thanks, and sorry, i only have fotos from myself but i don't know if it is right to put them, can i put photos that i myself take?

Fairuse

Fairuse now, ok? Jeronimo1980 17:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Source

Which images and which source? --G.dallorto 17:42, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Photos

These photos where I am introducing in commons are of the following site: http://www.vitruvius.com.br. No problems, ok? Jeronimo1980 17:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

But it is allowed, therefore do not have information of copyrights, ok? Jeronimo1980 17:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome message

Thank you for your thoughtful "Welcome" message, on User talk:Dvortybot. Unfortunately, bots are not in much habit of reading such welcome messages, but I'll try to make it through all of that, on the bot's behalf.  :-)

--Connel MacKenzie 20:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Affiche du film les anges de satan

Bonjour, Je m'appelle Amine Soulaymani, assistant réalisateur et assistant directeur artistique sur le film "Les Anges de Satan" de Ahmed Boulane. Je suis en outre informaticien, developpeur Zope/Python/Plone. J'ai été chargé par Ahmed Boulane d'ajouter une page à Wikipedia en ce qui concerne le film. En mon âme et conscience, j'ai crée une page objective, sans publicité ni "arnaque marketing": synopsis, quelques anecdotes et fiche technique. Pour l'agrementer, j'ai ajouté l'affiche du film en basse qualité, avec l'accord du réalisateur. Cette petite image a été postée dans de nombreux forums, et a été communiquée à la presse, et son utilisation est libre mais copyrightée. Votre démarche de suppresion de cette image est certainement justifiée, mais j'ai reçu l'accord formel de son utilisation dans Wikipedia par le réalisateur et producteur du film. Merci. User:Rawhead

Image:Dragonfablelogonewbr.jpg

Just to let you know, Chicofran2 uploaded this image again five minutes after you deleted it. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for dealing with it again. You're a champ! —LX (talk, contribs) 23:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

reply

regarding [6], what did i do? which images are copyvios? DVD R W 02:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sarahvulva.jpg and Image:Sarahvulva crop.jpg

Hi. You restored Image:Sarahvulva.jpg at 11:33 on 9 March 2007 (UTC) with the explanation "13 revisions and 3 file(s) restored: licence & permission ok". Why then did you delete Image:Sarahvulva crop.jpg, which is based on Image:Sarahvulva.jpg? Further discussion is at w:Talk:Vulva#Stolen image, w:Image talk:Sarahvulva crop.jpg#Possibility that the image was stolen, Image talk:Sarahvulva crop.jpg#Possibility that the image was stolen, and User talk:Tom#Image:Sarahvulva.jpg and Image:Sarahvulva crop.jpg, and log links are here and there. Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 05:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Seeing that this image is most probably a copyright, I deleted it and all images which are derivative. There was a confusion because the uploader claimed that he took the picture himself. Regards, Yann 13:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Have you contacted the uploader? Does his email address look like the one here? Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, seeing that he probably lied when uploading this picture, I have a problem using his opinion. This site is not just some pictures of his wife... Yann 22:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

No source?

You have tagged two of my photos as unsourced, when they clearly state that I am the author, and one links to my website (http://www.keysphotography.com), where that image is hosted. Please explain why you have tagged these images. Thanks. Steevven1 19:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Image:Badgerpages1.jpg

Why have you deleted this image? It is a picture of the newspaper of my university. I used the correct option...

Pourquoi avez-vous supprimé cette image? C'est une photo du journal de mon université. j'ai utilisé l'option correcte... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adasta (talk • contribs) at 20:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:London Eye Sam Kuper.jpg

Dear Yann,

I'm completely baffled as to why you deleted this image. I took it with my own camera and uploaded it to Commons myself under - as far as I can recall - a perfectly suitable license. If there was a problem with it, you ought to have contacted me to discuss the matter before deleting. Please would you either undelete the image or get in touch (s p k 3 0 at cam dot ac dot uk) to let me know what the problem with it was.

- Sam (--Zazpot 21:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC))

Dear Yann,

Thank you for your reply. That image was intended to be licensed under generic CC-BY-SA; my mistake. I would be grateful if you could undelete the image.

Best regards,

Sam (--Zazpot 11:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC))

Deletion of Image:Chandleraz_logo.gif and Image:Chandleraz_logo.svg

Yann,

I am not sure why you felt it necessary to delete the images for the seal of the City of Chandler that I uploaded. Perhaps the .svg version was not of low enough resolution (or any resolution, for that matter) to fit fair use, but I would have preferred some contact, messaging or warning in that regard before completely deleting the images. Let me know what would be acceptable to upload for use in the Wikipedia article for Chandler so that a suitable seal image can be included in the article without being deleted.

Regards, Ixnayonthetimmay

Photo

Salut Yann,

Il faut supprimer cette photo, comme ça je mettrais la même mais droite et avec une meilleur description. Cordialement, Bianco Dorian 11:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Image:Naomi Campbell.jpg

Hi, Yann. You deleted this image as "copyvio", but it appears as cc-by on flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jongos/115441660/ ? What did I missed? Thanks! --Abu badali 15:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kaltenengers am Rhein.jpg

Hi Yann! I just saw you tagged an image uploaded by me with {{no source since}}. Since the description page says it's "own work" by de:Benutzer:Luftauge.1 I wonder what information might be missing? --Lychee 21:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Image sleuthing for Image:Cricket World Cup trophy.png

(Be warned: you could become embroiled in a deletion request.) Could you do a quick favour for me? Could you look at this deleted image -- http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Cricket_World_Cup_trophy.jpg -- which was deleted as a copyvio and see if it is the same image as en:Image:Cricket world cup trophy.jpg, Image:Cricket World Cup trophy.png or http://www.flickr.com/photos/icc-cricket/324545379/? Thanks. --Iamunknown 23:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Bayrou

plop Alvaro 15:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Dreyhaupt

Hey Yann!

Concerning: Image:Johann Christoph Dreyhaupt.jpg

There is currently a "Schreibwettbewerb" (writing contest) at de.wikipedia.org and my article covers http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Christoph_von_Dreyhaupt.

I asked (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Review/Schreibwettbewerb#Johann_Christoph_von_Dreyhaupt) if there is an oil painting of Dreyhaupt (I saw this picture on a school's website), hoping for some /serious/ information. User "Bucherhexe" uploaded this image to do me a favor (her first Commons upload). I brought this issue on de.wp's information desk where especially "AndreasPraefcke" confirmed my concerns about the originality and the aesthetic value of this painting. We believe that it was done in modern times, possibly to create a modern illustration of the school's eponym. I have not found any information about an /old/ oil painting of Dreyhaupt.

So:

• this is a low quality image
• it is /not/ old
• so it has no cultural, historic and aesthetic value
• it's not needed to illustrate the article

Believe me, that I am the first to upload his picture again, if I have found any suitable information about an old painting of this great man.

I truly appreciated another deletion of this image, unbureaucratic and without distrust.

Regards, Polarlys 22:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)