User talk:Zhuyifei1999


This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at

This is the user talk page of Zhuyifei1999, where you can send messages and comments to Zhuyifei1999.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | русский | sicilianu | +/−

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.


Ok. Please, let then the images uploaded,

E. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egargo (talk • contribs) 13:51, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Embedded Data Bot and DjVusEdit

Does your bot support these files? Here are some uncaught samples: File:Smotome.djvu, File:Small let ne.djvu and File:Sshj.djvu. It seems that the 2nd contains an ISO image, the 3rd a RAR archive and the 1st is just way too big (I didn't download it, but IMO it shouldn't be bigger than 10 MiB). --jdx Re: 09:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Now it does   --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
FWIW, the first one is application/x-rar (RAR archive data, v1d, os: Unix) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
And FYI: Commons:Bots/Requests/Embedded Data Bot (adminbot), I'm getting tired of this. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
How about WAVs: File:( --jdx Re: 06:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
WAVs should be supported. The current parser-analyzer says the whole file is WAV. I also did a remux analysis via ffmpeg, and it turned out to be larger than original (1424097326 -> 1424097358). Besides, 'Rar!' signature was not found within the file. I haven't checked the other signatures yet, but rar is the most frequently abused. It's also a very long (2h) audio, and having 1.4G could be normal due to its terrible compression. (Actually, does it have compression at all?) Therefore, it's probably just a copyright violation. If it really have embedded data, it's probably not simple concatenation, but something more sophisticated, like some steganography methods. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
AFAIR WAVs can contain compressed audio (A-law, μ-law, perhaps other algorithms), however usually they contain uncompressed PCM data. But, is it really an audio? Isn't it a video with WAV extension? The file is too big for me – I'm on a 1 MiB/s link (which is more than enough for things like email, Usenet and Wikipedia  ). --jdx Re: 09:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
FFmpeg (custom compiled on tool labs for the bot's use) remuxing shows this:
The file doesn't seem to contain video, but looking at en:WAV#WAV_file_audio_coding_formats_compared the bitrate is really high. I can't listen to the audio to determine if it is video-encoded-into-audio due to, well, it's also too large for me to download. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
It's uncompressed audio, so I would say that the bitrate is pretty standard: 48000 samples/s * 16 bits/sample * 2 channels = 1536000 bits/s. Anyway, I bet that the guy by mistake uploaded audio track instead the whole ripped movie (audio on BR discs can be uncompressed, just like in good ole CD-Audio: en:Blu-ray#Audio). --jdx Re: 11:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

what do you think about this?Edit let's talk on irc Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 06:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

@Gabrielchihonglee: I don't see you --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 06:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Tech News: 2017-03Edit

23:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Bot is downEdit

It appears the Flickr review bot has not been operating for several hours. Is this intentional? MB298 (talk) 02:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

  Done killed and restarted, no tracebacks found that could help debugging. The last edit before that was 21:05, 19 January 2017. Around this time, 21:21, the logs in Embedded Data Bot indicates an LDAP failure or NFS failure, and got restarted automatically. Not sure why flickreviewr didn't. In any case, I just killed all the bots except Embedded Data Bot, and restarted most. The rest should be restarting automatically soon. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Nope, Embedded Data Bot didn't escape its fate either. Restarted. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Transmission de pensée.pngEdit

  File:Transmission de pensée.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Titlutin (talk) 03:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Uploading Panoramio photosEdit

Hi, I have seen that edition of your bot, Panoramio Review Bot, and I wanted to know if it could be used, in some way, to upload photos directly from Panoramio. Did you know that Panoramio will be closed at december 2017? Cheers!, --Elisardojm (talk) 23:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Panoramio upload bot is uploading files from panoramio to commons. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
But, two bots uploading photos..., are faster than one..., don't think so? :) And thanks for the help with uploading videos! Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


Hi, Now I get Error: An exception occurred: IOError: [Errno 116] Stale file handle. The same file works on video2commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

  Restarted probably related to NFS outage --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
OK, it works now. Yann (talk) 10:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality on video2commonsEdit

Hi Zhuyifei1999, I have uploaded the video file:Chroicocephalus ridibundus, Viveiro.ogv with video2commons tool, but it has a lot of "lines/artifacts" that the original video didn't had. Format webm has more quality? How can I configure the tool to get more quality? I don't mind to wait. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

@Elisardojm: Could you try webm? OGG Theora compression is inferior to VP8 compression in WebM. Also note that the same filename may not work due to upload warnings. You might have to change the filename a bit and rename it after the upload. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
@Elisardojm: Actually no. The webm 1080p videoscaler output at [10] looks just fine for me, except for some interlacing issues. I can't check the uploaded OGG as it is too large for my bandwidth. Have you checked the quality of the uploaded video (output from video2commons) or the down-scaled videos (output from videoscalers)? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hmm. Lower res video do not seem to have interlacing issues... I'm looking into it --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 19:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Downloaded part of the file:Chroicocephalus ridibundus, Viveiro.ogv and the (temporarily stored) mp4 file upload to v2c, both have interlacing issues, so it's not a v2c problem --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 19:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey..., Did you change anything to the file? When I reviewed the video, quality was more poor, the fish had pixeled lines and now it had dissapeared. And the transcodification states were different, there was only a few, now there are a lot. Perhaps, the upload was in progress when I checked the video? I'm uploading anothertime the video in webm format, with this we could compare qualities. Bye and thanks for your help, --Elisardojm (talk) 19:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
@Elisardojm: I didn't change anything. Wikimedia's videoscalers was busy scaling the videos for regular use. Lower qualities gets scaled faster. Right not I'm working on deinterlacing the video. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 19:56, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Ok file has been deinterlaced --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 20:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Ah, I understand now...
The webm version it's just now uploaded too, File:Chroicocephalus ridibundus, Viveiro2.webm, but I don't know what it's the best... Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 21:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
No..., the ogv version is more sharp, isn't it? Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 22:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
@Elisardojm: That's hard to tell. The quality should be similar, but since I've deinterlaced the ogv version and not the webm, I'd prefer the ogv version instead. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
And, how can I deinterlace the vídeos at Commons? Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
As far as I know, there is no tool that can do deinterlacing. You can choose to:
  • Request at Commons:Graphic_Lab/Video_and_sound_workshop. This is probably the easiest way, but you have to depend on others.
  • Install a software capable of deinterlacing. I use FFmpeg.
  • Search online. I can't guarantee that this method works though.
--Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 19:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks!! Cheers, --Elisardojm (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Tech News: 2017-04Edit

20:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Zhuyifei1999".