Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2011/11

< Commons:Closed most valued reviews

Closed most valued reviews/2011/11

Scope edit

   
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Vibhijain (talk) on 2011-08-03 09:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Jagadguru Rambhadracharya

  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most valued review 

Scores: 
1. Jagadguru Rambhadracharya.jpg: +2
2. Jagadguru Rambhadracharya2.jpg: +1
=>
File:Jagadguru Rambhadracharya.jpg: still VI.
File:Jagadguru Rambhadracharya2.jpg: declined.
--George Chernilevsky talk 16:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
 
View opposition
Nominated by:
Vibhijain (talk) on 2011-10-11 08:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Jagadguru Rambhadracharya
It should go on Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review. Vibhijain (talk) 12:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Jagadguru Rambhadracharya.jpg: +2
2. Jagadguru Rambhadracharya2.jpg: +1
=>
File:Jagadguru Rambhadracharya.jpg: still VI.
File:Jagadguru Rambhadracharya2.jpg: declined.
--George Chernilevsky talk 16:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Château de Pignerolle edit

   
 
View opposition
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2011-11-05 21:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Château de Pignerolle

Scores: 

1. Château de Pignerolle.jpg: +0
2. Château de Pignerolle (Eusebius).jpg: +2
=>
File:Château de Pignerolle.jpg: Declined.
File:Château de Pignerolle (Eusebius).jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2011-11-05 21:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Château de Pignerolle

  Support better view of the building. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] 

Scores: 
1. Château de Pignerolle.jpg: +0
2. Château de Pignerolle (Eusebius).jpg: +2
=>
File:Château de Pignerolle.jpg: Declined.
File:Château de Pignerolle (Eusebius).jpg: Promoted.
--George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Tornado edit

   
 
View
Nominated by:
Ks0stm (T•C•G) on 2011-11-18 17:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Tornado
Used in:
en:Tornadoes of 2011 (November section)
Reason:
Nominating for the scope tornado because it better demonstrates a tornado by showing the connection with both the cloud and ground and has better lighting than the current valued image (for full disclosure, the current valued image is a FP and this image's FPC appears like it is going to fail). This is the current valued image. -- Ks0stm (T•C•G)

  Request There is already a Valued Image for that scope.Please open a Most Valued Review. --Myrabella (talk) 19:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I knew I probably was doing that wrong. I'll fix that in a second. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 21:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Tornado in southwestern Oklahoma on November 7, 2011.jpg: +0
2. F5 tornado Elie Manitoba 2007.jpg: +0 (Current VI)
File:Tornado in southwestern Oklahoma on November 7, 2011.jpg: Undecided.
File:F5 tornado Elie Manitoba 2007.jpg: Undecided. (Still VI)
--George Chernilevsky talk 21:12, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Ks0stm (talk) on 2010-01-05 01:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Tornado
Used in:
Thunderstorm Tornado myths Tornadoes of 2007

  Request Geocoded data are missing. Please add them in order to fulfill criterion 5. --Myrabella (talk) 13:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added an approximate geocode based on comparing the scenery in the image to satellite photos of the area and the tornado's track...I doubt anyone could get the exact location due to the creator/uploader being inactive. If this estimated geocode is not suitable, feel free to remove it. Sorry I can't do better. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 20:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for having geocoded the picture; this estimated geolocation can be kept, IMO. There is a lot of images and sub-categories in Category:Tornadoes, so reviewing it isn't so easy. An image showing how the tornado funnel is in contact with a cumulonimbus cloud could have been a good illustration too (e.g. File:Dszpics1.jpg or File:Occluded mesocyclone tornado5 - NOAA.jpg) because "for a vortex to be classified as a tornado, it must be in contact with both the ground and the cloud base" according to en:Tornado. But this documented and geocoded FP VIC is really impressive. I   Support it due to its better quality, and considering that it depicts the phenomenon clearly enough. --Myrabella (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 22:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Status is "promoted" for the previous nomination -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:19, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] 

Scores: 
1. Tornado in southwestern Oklahoma on November 7, 2011.jpg: +0
2. F5 tornado Elie Manitoba 2007.jpg: +0 (Current VI)
File:Tornado in southwestern Oklahoma on November 7, 2011.jpg: Undecided.
File:F5 tornado Elie Manitoba 2007.jpg: Undecided. (Still VI for previous nomination)
--George Chernilevsky talk 21:14, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Closed_most_valued_reviews/2011/11&oldid=63042963"