Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20101229 Naqsh e Rostam Shiraz Iran more Panoramic.jpg

File:20101229 Naqsh e Rostam Shiraz Iran Panorama.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2011 at 16:26:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A map of the whole archaeological place - I added notes over the image according to this map. Ggia (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support I decided to upload a high resolution of this monument, since this current nomination [1] is not featurable. I have to mention that the main subject in this photo are the tombs inside the rocks and not the rock itself. This "extreme" panorama gives you a good overview of the whole archaeological place. -- Ggia (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - impressive at this resolution. --Xijky (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive, highly valuable. Nice to see something from Iran. I have scrutinized the photo for stitching errors. None found . I would still like to see you upload and nominate one of your excellent peoples photographs (like from the refugee camp in Greece I saw a while ago, can't find it again, made a big impression on me) from one of your nice B/W film cameras. Just as a variation to the panos. --Slaunger (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments.. this image with the immigrants that you like [2] may-be it will be used by amnesty international for a campaign about refugees. The fatal problem of all my b&w images is that they are shot by b&w film / 400ASA - and the grainy images in FPC usually have no success. Ggia (talk) 22:55, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's free to try ;) - Benh (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the sky is posterized and a dark aura surrounds the cliff. Aslo I'm uncertain about the projection, as it's difficult to imagine how it actually looks like, if the cliff is curved or not. Also the crop on the left and right is a bit tight. _→AzaToth 21:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I can follow you insofar that the image page could benefit from having some added info about the field of view. --Slaunger (talk) 21:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - How can I do that (add the field of view)? @AzaToth if these posterized spots around the cliff are so fatal problem for the image I understand you oppose (for your information I cleaned some dust spots around the sky and I applied there a de-noising) - about tight crop I don't agree - it is already an extreme panorama. About the orientation look the street how it is curved and zoom over the image with the map. Ggia (talk) 22:55, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
SupportЮ. Данилевский (talk) 06:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Very good image quality and obvious ev. It could be a great photo if more space were given around the subject and, preferably, the whole geological structure were shown, as in the nomination below. As is it looks like caged. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:01, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--AHURA♠ 12:22, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Somewhat tight feeling with the crop, but otherwise I like. --Ximonic (talk) 15:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice texture and resolution, but I also feel the crop is too tight. This gets more evident (to me) when you compare with the other nom, which has a nice composition (but quality issue, and over "HDR" use). Adding FOV is also a benefit. Description looks a nice place to me for that (I sometime do that). - Benh (talk) 09:59, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment no HDR has been used... these images are single shot (no combination of images into a HDR). In the shadows I used masks and increased the lumnosity.. if this seems like a HDR effect. The strong blue color is due to the altitue (iran is on a plateu ~1200-1600m and here are dry weather conditions). Ggia (talk) 12:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- As I understand Benhs review the HDR comment was regarding the other nomination, not this one . --Slaunger (talk) 12:59, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- - You understood well ;) Sorry if it wasn't clear enough. BTW, I far much prefer the light and deep blue sky of your picture. - Benh (talk) 18:13, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 13:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good and impressive --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:37, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose after comparsion with the other one. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Either/or. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 05:52, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:20101229 Naqsh e Rostam Shiraz Iran more Panoramic.jpg, alternative, featured edit

Support Due to the comments.. I uploaded a new version.. a little more panoramic. I cannot make a more panoramic than this one.. Next time I will visit Iran I will try to get an even more panoramic image. Ggia (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer that one over the main nom. but I feel a bit lonely here... - Benh (talk) 21:14, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poor chap, you shouldn't feel lonely here. This version is also FP for me. --Slaunger (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I finally had the time to open this large file and review. As for the other file, crop is very tight for my taste. But this one is pretty good. The view is impressive, the stitching is good, the quality is good. Featurable (I'd rather have this one featured, but both are fine). Very educative, congrats. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one. - Benzband (talk) 20:05, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image has better colours and has more clarity (see the reliefs). --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral too tight crop and harsh light. Needs also a cropping at left (IMHO) and right (just a few pixels). Sky underexposed. But a very nice place, documentation, very good overall (esp. EV), but not good enough for a promotion and too good for declining. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 05:52, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would suggest to become fetatured the second image. It is the one without oppose votes.. Ggia (talk) 12:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

The chosen alternative is: File:20101229 Naqsh e Rostam Shiraz Iran more Panoramic.jpg