Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dolicopodidae.jpg
File:Dolicopodidae.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2012 at 12:24:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 12:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Muhammad (talk) 12:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)- Support nice. Tomer T (talk) 12:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Martin Kraft (talk) 12:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support informative and impressive. ----Paolo Costa (talk) 13:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Caption too minimalist. Unable to recognize the species. Too blurred area.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Neutral as per above. Cute long-legged fly; no species info, so less EV. Bit more DOF is appreciated. -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC)- Neutral --Katarighe (Talk) 12:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support Might fall short for EV (due to shallow DOF and lack of sharpness and information), but I like the composition and minimalist background - Benh (talk) 19:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Unable to recognize the species and not enough sharp. Darius Baužys → talk 15:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Comment I think the other picture taken by same contributor is far better: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Long_legged_fly.jpg -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC)- Support -- User:Andrew J.Kurbiko
- Oppose Insufficient file description. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose nice but not FP for me. DOF to low, low sharpnes, unfavorable cut. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Lošmi (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose needs id. --Quartl (talk) 11:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
