Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder
Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.
Formalien edit
Nominierung edit
Leitsätze für die Nominierung edit
Bitte lies alle Leitsätze (Englisch) vor der Nominierung.
Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:
- Auflösung – Fotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,92 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.
- Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.
- Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.
- Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.
- Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.
- Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.
- Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.
- Wert – unser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
- nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
- Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
- schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.
Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.
- Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.
- Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.
- Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.
- Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.
Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.
- Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.
- Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.
- Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.
- Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.
- Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.
- Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.
- Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.
- Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.
- Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.
- Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.
Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.
Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen edit
Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.
Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.
Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.
Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein:
Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:
- {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}
Abstimmung edit
Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:
- {{Support}} ( Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status),
- {{Oppose}} ( Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
- {{Neutral}} ( Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
- {{Comment}} ( Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
- {{Info}} ( Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
- {{Question}} ( Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)
Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.
Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.
Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.
Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen edit
Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit
- {{Keep}} Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
- {{Delist}} Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).
Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:
In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:
- Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
- Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
- Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.
Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.
Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten edit
Allgemeine Regeln edit
- Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
- Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
- Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
- Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
- Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
- Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
oder durch Hinzufügen von{{withdraw}} ~~~~
. - Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
- Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
- Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
- Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
- Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
- Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
- Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.
Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl edit
Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:
- Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
- Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
- Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
- Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.
Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.
Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.
Vor allem sei freundlich edit
Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.
Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.
Siehe auch edit
- Zum Bearbeiten der Liste mit den Nominierungen klicke auf: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- Eine chronologische Liste ist unter Commons:Featured pictures/chronological zu finden.
- Ein Archiv vergangener Nominierungen liegt unter Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.
- Eine Anleitung, wie man Nominierungen beendet, findet sich unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.
Inhaltsübersicht edit
Exzellenz-Kandidaten edit
Featured picture candidates edit
File:Musée Louvre-Lens Fragment du palais de Darius, SB 23177 (1).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 10:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Description :
- Fragment of the decoration of the palace of the Persian king Darius Ist: archer of the royal guard
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Info created , uploaded,nominated by Pierre André. --Pierre André (talk) 10:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Support -- --Pierre André (talk) 10:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hydrangea petiolaris (klimhortensia), 05-03-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 04:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hydrangeaceae
- Info Budding leaf bud of a Hydrangea anomala 'Petiolaris' Climbing hydrangea. Focus stack of 15 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-29, DD 36.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Mixed_&_Groups
- Info Group of Mundari kids with cow dong ashes (as antiseptic agains mosquitos) in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool. Yann (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 130.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 16:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Young Laarim woman with extensive scarification, Kimotong, South Sudan. c/u/m by Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! Yann (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Héron garde boeufs à Oued Mejerda.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Bubulcus
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Rufous-throated Partridge 0A2A9937.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 12:20:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lovely, but the legs are underfocused. Wolverine XI 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- in such light conditions (low light) you can only open the diaphragm to full aperture to have a decent image and obviously everything will not be in focus. You must always take the shooting conditions into account. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cart's statement comes across as passive-aggressive. If I understand correctly, you are directly placing me in the category of "voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically". That's fine, do you; there's a legitimate reason why I don't post my pictures here, but that doesn't make me any less inadequate. I have no problem with the other responses here, except Cart's. Keep in mind that this is not the first time it has occurred; see here. Wolverine XI 07:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, this. Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support In perfect light, the focus is sharp on the eye, which matters at this depth of field. More is not possible at f/4. An excellent capture in my view. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb shot as usual from JJ. Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. BigDom (talk) 03:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:The Duomo and Tower of Pisa at sunrise.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
- Info created and uploaded by MHoser - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support 2024 and we don't have any FPs of the Leaning Tower. Nice and different perspective, by the way. -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks amazing. --iMahesh (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too many dust spots in the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Lovely, but I have to agree that at least the most prominent dust spots need to be fixed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Atlas nautique du Monde edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
- Info created by Lopo Homem - uploaded by Gzen92Bot - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, very high-resolution, interesting document. Yann (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent reproduction of beautiful world map. I love the detailed invention of the Antarctic Mundus novus ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 07:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Red Lechwe.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 10:56:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- InfoA Red Lechwe at Port Lympne Wild Animal Park. Created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop on 3 sides. Yann (talk) 11:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Do you have an image where horns are not cropped? --iMahesh (talk) 15:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The horns have to be fully displayed. Wolverine XI 16:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a big fan of the crop. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Great posture and expression, sharp eye, beautiful OOF background. And while the crop on 3 sides is indeed unfortunate, it has the advantage that it makes the image look more intimate: looking at it I really feel face to face with the animal. – Aristeas (talk) 07:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:L'entrée de la vallée des gorges de Thelja.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 10:17:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Skander zarrad L'entrée de la vallée des gorges de Thelja
uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose IMHO, it would look much better if the plant in the bottom is not cropped and too much noise in the sky. --iMahesh (talk) 15:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is lacking throughout the image. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose i am not sure what Wolverine thinks is wrong with the detail, this picture seems quite sharp to me. However, I miss an outstanding composition. The plant is awkwardly placed half cut-off at the bottom of the frame and I can't see an outstanding compositional idea in the landscape in general. Cmao20 (talk) 02:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sunset view of Everest.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 00:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- Info created and uploaded by Nir gurung - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really impressive. Consider cropping away a bit of the sky though; not so much that we lose the beautiful deep blue hue of the upper atmosphere, but enough to make the mountains clearly appear in the upper half of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful colours Daftation (talk) 10:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular light. ★ 12:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'd honestly leave it as it is, wouldn't crop the sky. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfectly executed. Wolverine XI 16:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice! --SHB2000 (talk) 05:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Church Square Park Hoboken November 2021 001.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Stunning. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfect, looks like an architectural render. --iMahesh (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks like monopoly to me. Wolverine XI 16:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Colors of the trees are nice to look at -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:PO boxes at the historic Chico Post Office (2024)-L1005460.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:36:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting and unusual subject, great find. There is a small amount of barrel and perspective distortion it seems? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The Leica Super-Elmar 21mm has an extremely low amount of distortion (virtually close to none). Please keep in mind that it's an old building. Oh, also: a good friend showed me this view. If someone deserves credit for finding this gem, it's him. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Micha (talk) 09:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Considering how small the room is, it's amazing what a sublime effect it creates in the image. Well captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating shot! I noticed a slight tilt to the right on the wall face, probably due to the building's age. Nevertheless, the composition is solid overall.. --iMahesh (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Река Коксу осенью 2.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 22:27:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
- Info created by Marat Nadjibaev - uploaded by Marat Nadjibaev - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great scenery, enhanced by the long exposure. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful scenery. – Aristeas (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Flamant rose Thyna009.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 21:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image noise and weird blurring --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- ISO 250 : image noise? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The blurred flamingo at left is a bit disturbing, but noise is fine. Please consider cropping. Yann (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cropped it, thanks El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree a tighter crop would improve this image Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot crop it further to the left side of the photo otherwise the composition of the photo will be affected and unbalanced El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The left crop is something else. Wolverine XI 16:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mountain View Cemetery1.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Canada
- Info: Boulder Mountain above the Mountain View Cemetery, Revelstoke, British Columbia; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Punta de las Gaviotas.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
- Info: golden hour at Punta de las Gaviotas; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Grüne Heupferd (Tettigonia viridissima) bei der Häutung.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Tettigoniidae_(Katydids_or_Bush_Crickets)
- Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion you've gone too far with the colors. The greens appear like radioactive on my screen, and when I check the settings on Lightroom, I see you modified the "tint" (+18%), added whites +54%, and shadows +100%. The insect is sharp but the colors unnatural -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Basile Morin; the green color is way too much. Wolverine XI 16:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded a new version of the image with (hopefully) more natural colours. But you have to keep in mind that the picture was taken in bright morning sun light (with the subject in the shadow), which leads to bright colours. --Stephan Sprinz (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Panoramic view of Taj Palace Hotel and Taj Tower with the iconic Gateway of India in the background.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 15:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
- Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Since I'm the creator of the file, please inform me if any adjustments to the color palette are needed. I can make changes from the raw file if necessary. -- iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe if you crop the empty sky and water a bit, let's say to 16:10 or 16:9, it'll be better? Красный wanna talk? 22:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks much better. I have cropped the dead spaces, please check. --iMahesh (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support now, thank you. Красный wanna talk? 21:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think you were not very lucky with the light but I enjoy the careful composition of this photo and the image quality is strong. Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Macrocallista nimbosa shell edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:38:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
-
Left Valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
-
Right valve (Extant)
-
Left valve (Extant)
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Veneridae
- Info The set shows the shells (2 valves each) of two specimens of the same species. One shell, originating from the Lower Pleistocene, is about 1 - 1.5 million years old, the other is an extant specimen collected alive in 2003. Both specimens come from Florida; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Micha (talk) 08:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Casio W-96H.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 13:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
- Info Casio W-96H, second and beter try, light, colors etc. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The background is not distracting this time. ;o) Yann (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This setup for the watch works much better and supports the intended effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy background (so distracting), with blurred and sharp areas, and dark and clear areas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. Daftation (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Honestly I preferred your last one, I found the colours and the background more interesting, but this is again good product photography and deserves a star. I understand that people might find it a little low on wow but that's a matter of the genre, still, I think it would be cool if we could feature good product photos like this. Cmao20 (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The subject is very easy to capture, so nothing worth featuring here. Wolverine XI 16:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info I would like to see, those who oppose to make similar. Wolverine "easy". I think you never made something like this, so oppose is irrelvant, who made them would never say easy. Stacked Macro shots are heavy work. Some 5-6 h of work,cleaning, editing stack mistakes, which are normal. Show me "easy" shot. please. --Mile (talk) 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's not my responsibility to prove myself to anyone, so think what you must. And please, don't take things personally. Wolverine XI 07:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I could only duplicate Cmao20’s words. And no, high-quality product photos like this one are absolutely not easy: this is very much work. – Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Coup de foudre et bateaux amarrées aux cotes de la Galite.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Lightning
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great picture. Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 22:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support What a shot! --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Impressive but it would nice to get rid of the green lines around the rock below the lighting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin Fixed green chromatic aberration Atef Ouni (talk) 16:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the notification -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think there is a bit of camera movement, but overall the immense wow factor and strong composition makes this FP. Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 07:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Kluang - waterfalls on Gunung Lambak May 2024 01.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 10:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malaysia
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool shot! Красный wanna talk? 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support IMO a bit oversaturated but I really like the composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 Thanks for the support and feedback - only +2 saturation in PS but happy to dial it back if others feel the same. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Agree with Cmao20 it's oversaturated. Green leaves, blue water -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin, The Cosmonaut, Cmao20, ArionStar, and Красный: Thanks for the feedback. I've tweaked the saturation of the blue, green and aqua channels, looks a bit more natural now IMO. Let me know if it needs any more work, always happy to get constructive criticism. BigDom (talk) 02:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Residential by Carrer Sant Josep in Finestrat, Alicante, Spain, 2024 January.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
- Info A really unusual composition but I like it a great deal. created by Ximonic - uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support interesting compo. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the composition, although there are some strange contours around the leafs. --Micha (talk) 09:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A nice place. It’s often very difficult to find a satisfying composition in such narrow corners; here this was achieved with real success. – Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Moosheide im herbstlichen Morgenlicht (1).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
- Info IMO a really beautiful composition. created by GZagatta - uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great lights and composition, but there is vignating isn't it ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The solitary tree creates a wonderful mood of hope in the scenery. The slight vignetting emphasizes this, in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful light Daftation (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:A Bonda tribe of Odisha drinking Mahua drink.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:09:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting people
- Info created and uploaded by Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi - nominated by iMahesh -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃǃ Terragio67 (talk) 19:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 23:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Year of Africa probably. --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Thanks for the review, but that's from India and yes they are part of the first wave of migration from Africa about 60,000 years ago. --iMahesh (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- You should atleast respect the author by giving space and time to respond, please dont take everything into your hands unless I ask to. Search engines provide enough data but respect the owner of the picture to thank or share the gratitude too. Very weird and immature behaviour @IM3847 Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IM3847 Is it still my picture or you owned it?, Im very much confused with these kind of comments. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Relax, it's not that deep. Wolverine XI 16:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you say so… Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 01:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Relax, it's not that deep. Wolverine XI 16:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi: No, that's not how things work. You released it under the CC-BY SA 4.0 license; now you have to live with the consequences. IM3847's behaviour is certainly not "weird and immature", but it does reflect your behaviour. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SHB2000 Lets not get personal. He is new to Wikimedia commons and needs time to understand how process works. I should have created another filepage under his authorship and uploaded sharpened images over there. But since it will confuse the author seeing two different filepages, I choose to upload the new version. Anyway I should be placing a message on talk pages of Professional photographers from next time, before upgrading their photos. I have anyway created and added a this template to his userpage, so other users cannot rewrite the original version Mr. Suresh uploaded for the Wiki Loves Folklore photo contest. --iMahesh (talk) 08:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SHB2000 And since there is a Conflict of Interest between us, can someone please nominate his other two images 01 and 02 for Featured Picture Candidates as well. They look amazing and has a great potential to be the best we get here in India. --iMahesh (talk) 08:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IM3847: Please do not edit other people's messages because you disagree with the tone. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SHB2000: Understood, won't edit others' messages. Thanks for the reminder. -- iMahesh (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @SHB2000 Lets not get personal. He is new to Wikimedia commons and needs time to understand how process works. I should have created another filepage under his authorship and uploaded sharpened images over there. But since it will confuse the author seeing two different filepages, I choose to upload the new version. Anyway I should be placing a message on talk pages of Professional photographers from next time, before upgrading their photos. I have anyway created and added a this template to his userpage, so other users cannot rewrite the original version Mr. Suresh uploaded for the Wiki Loves Folklore photo contest. --iMahesh (talk) 08:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @IM3847 Is it still my picture or you owned it?, Im very much confused with these kind of comments. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- You should atleast respect the author by giving space and time to respond, please dont take everything into your hands unless I ask to. Search engines provide enough data but respect the owner of the picture to thank or share the gratitude too. Very weird and immature behaviour @IM3847 Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Thanks for the review, but that's from India and yes they are part of the first wave of migration from Africa about 60,000 years ago. --iMahesh (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment According to the guidelines, nominated images should not have signatures in the picture: "No advertisements, signatures, or other watermarks in image. Copyright/authorship information of all images should be located on the image's description page and should not interfere with content of the image." It was added during the nomination process. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to SHB2000 for restoring the latest version. @Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi: You should also restore your other two photos that were already marked as quality images. Not only did you add a signature, but you also reduced the resolution so much that both images are only a few kilobytes in size due to very low resolution and high compression: Photos 01 and 02. Pictures that have already been tagged (QI, FP or VI) cannot be modified in this way. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Too bad they released their content under a CC license if they didn't want their photos to be edited this way. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to SHB2000 for restoring the latest version. @Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi: You should also restore your other two photos that were already marked as quality images. Not only did you add a signature, but you also reduced the resolution so much that both images are only a few kilobytes in size due to very low resolution and high compression: Photos 01 and 02. Pictures that have already been tagged (QI, FP or VI) cannot be modified in this way. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi, per above, watermarks are not allowed on QI or FPC or FP images. Please revert to the original version. If you don't want anyone to edit your photos in overwrites, please use messages on the file page instead. Take a look at this photo and this one to see what such texts and templates can look like. --Cart (talk) 09:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Garo people at khagrachori 04.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info Uploaded by Wasiul Bahar - nominated by Wasiul Bahar -- Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow and technically not one of the best. --Micha (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Oroville State Theatre during blue hour (2024)-L1005456.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 05:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere. Wolverine XI 08:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The pink light is a special element in the composition. ★ 13:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support The lights are beautiful and the pink and blue colors together are also beautiful here and the accuracy in the crop of the image is even more decisive. I wish I had taken this photo. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support An outstanding photograph that makes the viewer believe that the great era of American Art déco has returned. The light, angle, composition, and timing are perfect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I usually find this style kitschy, but it is great here. Yann (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin and Yann. – Aristeas (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scimitar Light Tank MOD 45149231.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 23:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
- Info created by British MOD - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Super sharp image and the photographer captured the action quite well. Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Both antennas are cut off. Yann (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Very good quality, but cropped on the top. --iMahesh (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The chopped-off antenna aren't a problem for me, the subject of the picture is the body of the tank. —Bruce1eetalk 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:048 Lioness during golden hour of the morning at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:52:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Inspirational. Wolverine XI 08:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Amazing Stories, November 1928.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:22:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Magazine and newspaper illustrations in color
- Info created by Amazing Stories, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really cool artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Micha (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Питкярантский район, Валкеалампи сверху (2).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 13:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
- Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be sharper, but, stunning composition. Cmao20 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition, but the sides and the edges aren't sharp enough to me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Porta de aço elétrica.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 11:35:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism
- Info Eletric roller shutter door. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This kind of photography is always interesting, but I can't find any wow here. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very minimalist! --SHB2000 (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's the door of my office.
- (by the way, I just changed the category to Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism) ★ 23:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm in doubt between Abstract, Minimalism or Texture Photography… ★ 01:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a bit of a grey area – though after all, they're not photography concepts that exist in isolated bubbles; an overlap is expected (and this is one of them). Cart's suggestion also makes sense. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm in doubt between Abstract, Minimalism or Texture Photography… ★ 01:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Minimalism is fine when the light is special, or when something extra makes you feel "wow". Unfortunately here it is just a boring texture with uneven light, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I too would go with 'Texture Photography' on this. It makes most sense. --Cart (talk) 09:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is the shutter white or grey in real life? BigDom (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- White, but the morning light made the top a little darker, grayish. ★ 00:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile Morin, nothing wrong with it but just not speaking to me. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose --Micha (talk) 09:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 11:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Abacate.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 11:35:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Avocado fruits in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support looks cool for me, nice composition. Красный wanna talk? 13:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Several aspects of this image make me feel this is not one of the best of the website. First, the background at the right and at the left, then the lack of sharpness in the corners, and finally the narrow depth of field, probably automatically set in the smartphone.
- The guidelines say "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." and here neither the subject is very difficult nor the quality exceptional, compared for example to focus stacked fruits or vegetables in the same gallery -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not very sharp and the irregularity of size means that this is a somewhat messy composition Cmao20 (talk) 03:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support disagree with Basile, but I'd be interested to see how a crop works out. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose lack of sharpness, light and compo are imo not outstanding. -- Ivar (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Don't like the composition. --Micha (talk) 09:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 11:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Barque sur une mer de sel à Chott Jrid.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 06:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great quality. Daftation (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Oversaturated? ★ 12:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, saturation updated :) Atef Ouni (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, saturation updated :) Atef Ouni (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poetic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really a better image after deciding to desaturate it. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning subject and composition. Image quality not perfect but doesnt matter because it's so lovely. Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Beyond the Black, Dancing In The Dark Tour, Stuttgart 2024 (28) (cropped).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 11:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
- Info created by Robin Müller, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, impressive posture and facial expression. – Aristeas (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Felino Volador (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 00:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe she is little a bit too much to left. But fine motion. --Mile (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-44-09 FortDeRoppe.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Please fix the chromatic aberrations visible around the stones and the wall at the bottom right -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how to make it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sur Lightroom, "Pinceau" (sélection) -> "Supprimer la frange" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Je n'ai pas lightroom. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pas de problème. Voir lien ci-dessus -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me. Wolverine XI 21:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-15-36 FortDeRoppe.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 11:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Per above. ★ 23:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective problem, at the left. Wall is not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that the floor is falling down. I prefer the other image, it is depped and the lights make it more interesting, this one is not wowing to me --Poco a poco (talk) 12:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Should be centered, and the left side is especially subpar. Wolverine XI 08:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but per Poco. This one lacks something in terms of the composition, too much of the frame is just a bare wall. Quality is good but IMO QI not FP. Cmao20 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Samango monkey (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus) Mount Sheba.jpg, featured edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info No FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose you said "No FP", therefore not an FP– jk, Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)- Support Impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and plain background with an appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great! BigDom (talk) 08:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the background! Wolverine XI 21:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Plains zebras (Equus quagga) Maputo.jpg, featured edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:51:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
- Info Quite a few zebra FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice reflections. Cmao20 (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition.--Terragio67 (talk) 04:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice mirror image, good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Photographers in Rabat.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 17:32:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
- Info Instead of forced portraits, you can have qucik and spontaneous shots. I like this one, planed and executed in few seconds till they realize. Sigthseeing group in Rabat, column stay. --Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it would be better without the two standing figures behind the photographers, but still good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support that standing fellows. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment So this was taken without the subjects knowing they were photographed? —kallerna (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Probably yes. Sometimes you do the same, right? --A.Savin 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment —kallerna I would still say spontaneous shot, not planed. For candid, i would think bushmans with extra zoom, hiding and waiting some superstar by pool next house, so they know what are they waiting and probably know what kind of photo will they get. --Mile (talk) 07:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Probably yes. Sometimes you do the same, right? --A.Savin 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice typical tourists scene. – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Funny but too busy compostion. It would work without the guy passing by in the background, with his finger on his nose. He seems embarrassed to be in the frame. The two ladies behind are also distracting. And the wall at the right has nothing special. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I like the idea and it's a good candid shot of the photographers, very natural. I don't mind the wall on the right which adds to the candid nature, making you feel like you're watching these photographers from round a corner. But the people in the background, especially the man, are just too distracting for me, sorry. BigDom (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Average composition when taking background into account. --Thi (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile and others. Yann (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile and BigDom. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The guy bombs the photo, unfortunately. Wolverine XI 21:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Theyyam of Kerala by Shagil Kannur 2024 (30).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 10:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Theyyam, the dancing God, is a ritual art form of Kerala. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Again, not an FP with this crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing to say.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose some of the drummers are difficult to see against the background. Could be fixed with editing. Schierbecker (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Tried my level best. Since it is a lowlight photography hard to remove shadows. Now please watch. If somebody helps to improve more i will send the original file on email.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Heavy noise reduction and tight framing but the masquerade is fascinating. Ermell (talk) 07:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 06:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
- Info Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east wall, with a height of 2400 m the highest mountain wall in the Alps; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Supporting because of the subject, nice light and sky and good quality. Still it's just a close-up of a mountain without any interesting composition Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Poco Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice compo. Wolverine XI 03:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view of the highest mountain wall in the Alps (see nomination). – Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow. --Micha (talk) 09:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scarlet Veil (51013483841).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 08:42:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Charlie Marshall, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by
YannSHB2000 - Support Perfect composition. -- Yann (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann as uploader. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We already have a similar FP of the same woman. ★ 13:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but more important to me, this gives a kind of suspense or mystery, when she is not looking at the camera. Yann (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I was going to stay neutral because the portrait is good, but definitely too soft. The already existing FP is too similar, of a better composition, and with much better sharpness than this one, that's why I feel that I have to oppose here, sorry, Yann. Poco a poco (talk) 13:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the other one is better, but this one is sufficiently different also to make FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know I live in a hurry, but you should wait a little longer. ★ 21:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed; at least I can take over the nomination if you [Yann] want. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it has a chance now, but I am OK with you talking over. Thanks for offering. Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Code fixed for SHB2000 taking over the nom. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support No problems with two coexisting FPs of her. ★ 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Cart! SHB2000 (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support No problems with two coexisting FPs of her. ★ 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Code fixed for SHB2000 taking over the nom. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it has a chance now, but I am OK with you talking over. Thanks for offering. Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed; at least I can take over the nomination if you [Yann] want. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality of the existing FP is much better. Compare the eyes, the nose and the mouth. Also too similar to the previous one -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nah, this image is not what we need in an FP. The composition is underwhelming, the quality is subpar and the crop is OK, I guess. Sorry for not supporting, but hey, that's life. Wolverine XI 17:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2024 -- 4263-7.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite an unusual perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I don't get it. The wheel may be interesting, but it is only a small part and too dark, and the rest is a blurry background. Yann (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I agree, but a nice light, though Poco a poco (talk) 13:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. --.Karelj (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I have been going back and forth on this but I am not sure the composition really works. It feels like the wheel is a bit of an afterthought, placed at the edge of the frame. I think it would have worked better with more wheel and less OOF background Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The blurry background covers too much of the picture, while the wheel only covers a portion too small for my liking. --WildMouse76 (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Moral support A very interesting and unusual composition, probably too unusual for us. It reminds me of some paintings which show a person looking at a distant landscape or town; in these paintings the nominal subject is that distant object, but they emphasize the person in order to allow the viewers to identify themselves with that person; so in some regard the real subject is the contemplation of the person who looks at that distant object (example). I vaguely remember some photographs which use the same approach, but combine it with a key feature of photography (the interplay of sharp and unsharp) by putting the focus on the person and throwing the landscape/town out of focus, still keeping it recognizable. Now in this photograph the wheel plays the role of the front person; the standing wheel seems to contemplate the great past and presence of that big industrial area. I guess my explanation is lengthy and unclear, but on these lines the composition actually works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the detailed, yet rather unusual review. I think it's very positive that my intention for the photo is clear. --XRay 💬 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Won't work for me. I cannot tell what the content is, Daftation (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition and black subject don't work for me. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing spectacular. Wolverine XI 17:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Erzbunker -- 2024 -- 4214.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:40:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice frame, but the reflective portion is not--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Almost as beautiful as an Egyptian temple.--Ermell (talk) 08:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, artistic composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very special, imo. An elegance of simplicity. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I do not understand the composition. Nice light though. —kallerna (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kallerna. -- Karelj (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I do understand the composition. It is special and the execution is excellent. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Himmeldunkberg Gipfelkreuz II.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 15:19:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info Summit cross on the Himmeldunkberg. In the background on the right the Kreuzberg. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Makes me feel cold just to look at it Cmao20 (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
NeutralSupport Great light, composition and perspective: The panorama has many interesting details, such as the serpentine road, the ski lift, the icy benches, the dynamic condensation trails, or the impressive view above the clouds. Well done! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Comment Temporarily changing my supporting vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is resolved.-- Radomianin (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)- Support ★ 19:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Hallo Milseburg, ich finde das Bild klasse. Allerdings fällt mir bei Deinen Bergszenen immer auf, dass der Schnee ziemlich grau ist (was normalerweise ein Indiz dafür ist, dass bei der Aufnahme keine oder eine zu geringe manuelle Belichtungskorrektur eingestellt war). Egal, was auch immer der Grund für die graue Farbe des Schnees ist… könntest Du bitte überlegen, ob Du den Schnee durch nachträgliche Korrektur etwas weißer machen kannst? Beste Grüße, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeSnow is simply not gray. I rarely intervene based on technical concerns, but I've now seen enough winter photos here where exposure compensation wasn't applied correctly. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info And just to explain this properly: Modern cameras are programmed to average the brightness of the scene to a middle gray, resulting in snow appearing dull and gray rather than bright and white. To correct this, the photographer has to dial in (some cameras have an extra wheel for this) a stop or so of exposure compensation to instruct the camera to increase the exposure, making the snow appear natural. Applying exposure compensation results in a well-exposed image where the snow retains its bright, white appearance without being washed out or appearing gray. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks to Frank for the thoughtful review. I just opened the image in PS and noticed that the sRGB profile is not assigned. This can make a big difference in how the image looks in different browsers. @Milseburg: If you are going to develop the Raw file again with exposure adjustments, exporting it in the sRGB profile would be a good choice. Just my 2 cents to solve the problem. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good catch, Radomianin. I have taken the liberty to embed the sRGB profile with ExifTool. @Milseburg: This is just a little help, especially if you do not want to edit the image anymore; embedding a colour profile with ExifTool is a lossless operation and has no impact on the image data itself, so your image was not changed by this at all. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not a usual sight from Germany. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I miss wow here. I like snowed landscapes, but preferably with virgin and white (I concur with Frank) snow, not the case here. I also find the crop at the top too tight. I believe that there was FP potential here but I just see a cross that cannot breath at the top, trampled grey snow and a bit of mountains. Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It works fine for me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A wonderful view (I can only agree with Radomianin’s first comment); however I have to admit that the whites could be whiter – I have tried it, adjusting the white point makes the whole image even better. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Impressive landscape but as others have said, the white balance is off and the placement of the cross feels a little awkward. BigDom (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Frank Schulenburg.Ermell (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info @Cmao20, Radomianin, ArionStar, Frank Schulenburg, Aristeas, SHB2000, Famberhorst, Agnes Monkelbaan, Llez, Poco a poco, Sebring12Hrs, Kallerna, BigDom, Ermell, and MZaplotnik: Sorry for my absence and thank you for the reviews and criticism. I tried to take this to heart, washed the snow and uploaded a new version. Better and sufficient? --Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much for the revision, Milseburg. Your editing has significantly improved the picture. I have restored my original supporting vote. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Milseburg! – Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hampi, India, Rocky landscape of Hampi, Granite rocks of Matanga Hill.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 12:45:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#India
- Info Hampi's ancient granite boulder landscape at sunset. The Archean plateau is stable and one of the oldest in the world. Hampi, Karnataka, South India. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great light, unusual but effective composition. Compositionally much improved by having the woman in it Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I like 1st version more than yellowed, unless you could put yellow somewhere in the middle of both, or to revert back, 1st was just fine. --Mile (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I might have overdone it with saturation. Following your suggestion, here is a new version with less saturation in red channel and tweaked temperature/tint. I don’t want to go any further as it will make it look bleak. I specifically reprocessed this file in newer version of Lightroom to get more true to life appearance. To me it looks golden/orange to match the last moments of the golden hour before sunset. I think it is closer to the original light as the sunset colors can be intense. Also newer versions have more detail and dynamic range. The original is 10+ years old and was batch-processed with older software and original temperature settings that may be wrong. --Argenberg (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support неплохо. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive like a painting, in my opinion. Thanks for the image improvement, Argenberg. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The light is great and the scene spectacular, but I personally haven't understood the composition. It isn't working for me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit noisy, but great light and composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco, too busy composition IMO. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 09:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Ceramics
- Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by
YannF. Riedelio - Support Harmonious composition of a simple cup. -- Yann (talk) 09:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi F. Riedelio, nice photo, but the name is a bit too ambiguous for an FPC. Could you suggest a name that better describes the image? --Cart (talk) 10:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Renaming to "Gray espresso cup with amaretto" commissioned. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll fix this for you. :-) --Cart (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination Cmao20 (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The crop is a bit too tight in my opinion to make it to FP. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thanks for the review. New version with different cropping. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality, clear and effective composition. – Aristeas (talk) 16:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, for me that is an empty cup. Nothing inside visible. -- -donald- (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thanks for the review. Description improved.
- The photo should represent a cup and not its contents.
- As the espresso is served in a half-full cup (about 40 ml), the contents would not be visible from this angle. F. Riedelio • 💬 10:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose When you try shots like this, you will have to clean all dust around. For instance, i spent 2-3 h with clock. Also, as above, cup is empty, its just a cup, so cookie and coffee would be nice, now just cookie without coffee and pic is named per coffee. Third objection, spoon could be new or without wearing scratches. I dont see EXIF, but this should be sharp photo (stacked image), here seems like one shot on to much closed Aperture. --Mile (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just a language note: This model of small cups are called "espresso cups" even if they are empty. It's a name for the cup size. (example) --Cart (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you put cookie, than i would expect coffee too. Now its a bit spoiled, both or none. It could see size by spoon. --Mile (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Many thanks for the review and the tips.
- Unfortunately, the EXIF data has been lost due to the export from Lightroom. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thank you. for the the tip. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I believe that some of Mile's comments are too strict (like straches in the spoon) but he has got a point regarding the cookie with an empty cup. I also find the level of detail not the best for an studio photo. I'd have probably used focus stacking here Poco a poco (talk) 19:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Mile. —kallerna (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj 09:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 12:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dust and scratch improved, generative filling. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- F. Riedelio, do you want to take over the nomination from Yann? You don't have any current nominations yourself so you can do that and let the nom continue until the end of the voting period if you like. If you say yes, I'll fix the code for the takeover for you. Also, you should not have uploaded the cup with coffee over the original photo, but instead uploaded it as a separate new file especially since the empty cup file has been assessed as a QI. This is a too big change. The empty cup image is valuable for the wiki project too, we need both. The filled in cup should have been offered as an 'Alternative' on this nom, or perhaps as a completely new nom. This needs to be sorted out, I can help you if you like. --Cart (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to continue the nomination. After this extensive discussion, I am looking forward to the outcome. Thank you in advance for your support.
- I have restored the older version of "Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg" and uploaded the modified photo as a new file "Gray espresso cup with amaretto 1.jpg". F. Riedelio • 💬 17:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for that, you are now in charge of this nomination.
- You might also want to take a look at the coffee in File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto 1.jpg, the right side of the coffee looks like it's not totally ok. Good luck with your nom! --Cart (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- F. Riedelio, do you want to take over the nomination from Yann? You don't have any current nominations yourself so you can do that and let the nom continue until the end of the voting period if you like. If you say yes, I'll fix the code for the takeover for you. Also, you should not have uploaded the cup with coffee over the original photo, but instead uploaded it as a separate new file especially since the empty cup file has been assessed as a QI. This is a too big change. The empty cup image is valuable for the wiki project too, we need both. The filled in cup should have been offered as an 'Alternative' on this nom, or perhaps as a completely new nom. This needs to be sorted out, I can help you if you like. --Cart (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:022 Brown-throated wattle-eye at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 08:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Platysteiridae (Wattle-eyes, batises and shrike-flycatchers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very good composition and pretty bird but the bird is quite small in the frame and also the resolution is not huge which means the actual pixel level detail on the bird itself is not that high. Cmao20 (talk) 11:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. With wildlife photography it is unfortunately very hard to get close to every subject and some birds are more shy than others. This small bird unfortunately didn't stay very long (only a few seconds) while I was approaching very very slowly. Apparently there is only 5 pictures of it on commons and the highest quality one that got it in focus is this one, the second one only beeing of 853x1280 pixels. Out of these 5, only 3 males were photographed and the second highest resolution picture in focus of the male after this one beeing only of 600x400 pixels. There is also no FP of the species nor of the family. The bird was shot with a 600mm lens with a 50 million pixels sensor and as I recall the bird wasn't that far, but it's just a small and shy bird. We have pictures of the same resolution of still subjects that are less sharp. I think that in this picture the light was good and that the picture nicely shows the bird's environment. The feather detail is also quite good considering the bird size in my opinion. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah you're right, I should be consistent Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The larger crop nicely shows the context and hints at the habitat. – Aristeas (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Only 2,797 × 1,865 pixels and the bird in this image is very small. The background is too dominant in my opinion. Useful document, but not all the useful images on Commons should be featured. For a FP of a bird, you need at least to be able to see some fine details of the animals at full resolution, not only the branches where it lives. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. In my opinion it can not be expected the same level of detail for a small and shy bird where there is only a few seconds window to take a picture of it without possibility to go closer to it compared to pictures of still objects. Also, we have FP pictures of birds that have the same if not less definition than this one : 1, 2. I actually think this picture has enough level of detail compared to the bird size in real life and to the possibility to get close to it. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Small passerines like this one are among the most difficult subjects for bird photographers. They're skittish and notoriously hard to photograph. A big thank you to Giles for taking this excellent image and sharing it under a free license! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then it's amazing JJ Harrison managed to photograph so many of them in high resolution. Perhaps a matter of equipment -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a matter of resources. Harrison's lens costs about ten times more than Giles's. I think it's a bit unfair to other bird photographers that such expensive equipment should set the "standard" for FPs. We can only be grateful that people with very high-end cameras and lenses donate some photos to Commons, but I don't think they should set the bar for all the FPs in their special fields. Sometimes FPC can be a tad too elitist. --Cart (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- JJ Harrison sets the bar for birds like Kabelleger sets it for trains, or Iifar for focus stacked plants / fruits / insects. Equipment matters but also experience, explored places / subjects, patience, skill, chosen composition, etc. -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I also wish more detail but I'm not an expert in bird photography and will support relying on Frank's opinion. What is definitely a minus in my eyes, is the crop, it's too generous. I'd definitely crop more everywhere, but above all the leaves at the bottom Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Generally, it's lacking of details and resolution but as someone who tried to photograph small birds I can only appreciate this image. Difficulty over quality. Красный wanna talk? 16:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung) edit
Fri 10 May → Wed 15 May Sat 11 May → Thu 16 May Sun 12 May → Fri 17 May Mon 13 May → Sat 18 May Tue 14 May → Sun 19 May Wed 15 May → Mon 20 May
Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung) edit
Sun 05 May → Wed 15 May Mon 06 May → Thu 16 May Tue 07 May → Fri 17 May Wed 08 May → Sat 18 May Thu 09 May → Sun 19 May Fri 10 May → Mon 20 May Sat 11 May → Tue 21 May Sun 12 May → Wed 22 May Mon 13 May → Thu 23 May Tue 14 May → Fri 24 May Wed 15 May → Sat 25 May