Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 16 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Himeji castle in may 2015.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Himeji castle in may 2015 after 5 year renovation --Nubero 12:54, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Mmmmh, doubtful license IMO... + dust spot (see note), cyan cast (wrong white balance) and obvious downsampling... I need an other opinion, please.--Jebulon 13:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment I removed the dust spot. Everything else: Please elaborate what you find doubtful about the licence. Regarding what you call color cast: There is none. This is what the morning sunlight looks like in shadow areas. If I were to “correct” this to a neutral grey, I would introduce a color cast. Also the picture is downsampled on purpose. First of all it’s still plenty big and secondly, it allows me to prove that the picture was taken by me should that ever be doubted: No one but me has the image in its original size--Nubero 22:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment to keep your proof of ownership, a downsample to 95% is enough. As QIC rules explicetly allow to ask for higher resolution for easy to take photographies, I ask you for providing a resonable resolution. We are not lenient to promote landscape thumbnails of a 36 MPix D800. --Cccefalon 10:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment Well, if you want to get technical about it 95% is not enough – see here – but I do understand your point. I’ll upload a 80% scale in a short while.--Nubero 13:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Fair enough, thanks in advance. --Cccefalon 14:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Done :-) --Nubero 15:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I see no problem with the colour of the sky. In fact, I got this (indeed not really pleasant) cyanotic sky often, when shooting in Borneo or Indonesia. There are two slight correction, I would like to adress: There is one blurry bird on the left half and the right side of the building is leaning in. I suggest a bottom crop to reduce the oof area (see note). Concerning the WB, I think, that it can be as it is, though I perhaps changed it some +100 Kelvin --Cccefalon 06:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  Support I understand and accept the convincing explanations, especially about the cyan color of the wall in shadow. I don't understand what I see in the sky, very visible on my Mac27, but I assume good faith. The dustspot is corrected, and the picture at full size is very nice. And my first comment is back. I'm not a troll, I support, it is a QI (please notice that I did not oppose at first...)--Jebulon 23:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  Comment Thank you for your objective statement Jebulon. I think this whole desaster was a good reminder of the dangers in communicating with others by means of some web platform. I’m all for burying the hatchet as I don’t need the grief (and I’m sure you can do without it too). What do you say? I need to run to a train now but if you feel like it we can use mine or your talk page if there is further matters. I for one would welcome your comment. --Nubero (talk) 01:00, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 23:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Plates_on_Pontifical_Palace_(Castel_Gandolfo).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Plates on Pontifical Palace (Castel Gandolfo) --Livioandronico2013 07:03, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Lacks contrast and needs horizontal perspective correction. --Gzzz 21:43, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done Gzzz. Next time for nonsense like this rather than oppose it is better to leave a comment.--Livioandronico2013 12:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Imo a tighter crop would eliminate a few confusing elements on top and on the sides --Moroder 13:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done--Livioandronico2013 15:12, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support ok for me now --Hubertl 17:19, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Thanks --Moroder 19:36, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File:RhônExpress_Stadler_Tango_n°102_-_Aéroport_Lyon_Saint-Exupéry.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Tramway RhônExpress in Lyon airport --Billy69150 11:09, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose imo the picture is tilted clockwise and would need a correction of pincushion distorsion -- Gzzz 21:51, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment the object in the forground is disturbing --Denkmalhelfer 09:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality for me. I see no lack. -- Spurzem 21:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support--Σπάρτακος 11:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 17:23, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Plate_of_Benedictus_XIV_in_Collegiata_di_San_Tommaso_(Castel_Gandolfo).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Plate of Benedictus XIV in Collegiata di San Tommaso (Castel Gandolfo) --Livioandronico2013 07:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 10:32, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose IMO, the plate needs to be centered, it can be easily modified... --Gzzz 21:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  Done Gzzz. Next time for nonsense like this rather than oppose it is better to leave a comment.--Livioandronico2013 08:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

{{s}} looks fine for me --Derzno 09:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

* Ausgleichsstimme   Support für Getrolle --Ralf Roletschek 10:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

    •   Comment Please make your vote clear, Ralf --Hubertl (talk) 17:36, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • {{s}} My comment has to be understood as a neutralizing the negative vote here --Derzno 14:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Double vote --Livioandronico2013 15:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

*{{cmt}} do yo be here to discuss picture or about me? For your first comments you should focus on true pictures --Denkmalhelfer 16:53, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  •   Comment Gzzz, won´t you have another look, it´s fixed. --Hubertl 17:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 19:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Hıdırlık Tower 02.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Hıdırlık Tower, Antalya, Turkey--Bgag 21:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 21:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too soft imo. --Kadellar 22:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Bad mood,Kadellar? I´m just asking without obligation. --Hubertl 23:20, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Can't I oppose? If we promote every picture, we don't need nominations, just include the template. I think it was harder to get a QI two years ago. --Kadellar 00:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose no QI --Denkmalhelfer 07:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC) Sockpuppet Poco a poco 19:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
    Would you kindly explain why it is no QI? -- Spurzem 11:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. Good composition, good sharpness, good colors. Perhaps a little bit too bright. -- Spurzem 11:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overall unsharpness. Alvesgaspar 13:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough. --Palauenc05 05:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Kadellar.--Jebulon 14:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Bgag, why do you use f9? I saw another picture of yours with f11 or 13. I think f7.1 is enough for DoF, and it will improve sharpness. -Kadellar 09:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  Comment This depends very much on the lens used and cannot be given as a general advice. Diffraction does not work as a hard limit, where f/8 still looks fine and f/11 leads to useless unsharpness. Many of my images are taken with f/11 or even f/22 and are still sharp enough, at least up to about 6 or 10 MPixels. -- Smial 12:17, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Rather blurred. Perhaps too much noise reduction? Lighting and composition are very fine. -- Smial 12:17, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry per others --Livioandronico2013 21:59, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 06:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)