Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 04 2023

Consensual review edit

Bibliotheek Breda Centrum mural 2023 - 2.png edit

 

  • Nomination Entrance of the central library of Breda, which just got a new mural --ReneeWrites 11:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose Nice colors, but not sharp enough.--Alexander-93 14:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Rethymno_old_harbour_panorama_3.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Rethymno old harbour at sunrize -- Nino Verde 08:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • I think there is some uncorrected lens distortion - the horizontals are not horizontal on the buildings --ThibautRe 18:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • It is not lens distortion, it is stitched image. You can see that i used 'panorama' template in description page. Unfortunately this is not fixable, so you can decline this if you want. --Nino Verde 12:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Got it, the distortion created by the projection is a bit disturbing to my eyes. Sorry! --ThibautRe 20:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Toilets_of_Amantaka_Suite_Amantaka_luxury_Resort_&_Hotel_Luang_Prabang_Laos.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Toilets of Amantaka Suite, in Amantaka luxury resort and hotel in Luang Prabang, Laos. --Basile Morin 02:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 03:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose If door is important, it mus be whole in frame. If not - you need to retake picture without door for for a continuous line of white wall on the right. --Kirill Borisenko 20:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support I think the right edge is cut off at an appropriate place. --King of Hearts 08:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:31, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 11:27, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz 05:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 17:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Feldkirchen_Bahnhofstraße_46_Bahnhofsgebäude_Fenster_Portal_16092023_4446.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Portal and window at the building of the train station on Bahnhofstraße #46, Feldkirchen, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality --Tagooty 02:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I think you need to crop right corner of the building for good composition. --Kirill Borisenko 20:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment   Done @Kirill Borisenko: Thanks for your review. I cropped the right corner of the building. —- Johann Jaritz 06:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality -- Basile Morin 08:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality and good image. I don't think that a tighter crop woud be better. -- Spurzem 16:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support I don't understand the cropping thing, both versions are ok. --Smial 18:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 17:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Rethymno_old_harbour_6.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Rethymno old harbour at sunrize --Nino Verde 10:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Sorry, why do add extremely similar images? --Kirill Borisenko 20:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose You could see a bad crop. The boat rests against the edge of the frame at the lower left corner. ---Kirill Borisenko 20:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support The crop is fine for me. Only the tip is touching the bottom, so in terms of visual weight it doesn't look too imbalanced. --King of Hearts 08:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support The wide-angle perspective is something to get used to in such a shot, but I don't see any significant technical flaws. --Smial 18:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 17:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Loreto_-_Basilica_della_Santa_Casa_di_Loreto_-_Veduta_della_piazza_-_2023-09-27_15-43-48_001.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Basilic of Loreto, Marche, Italy. Place. --Terragio67 17:18, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Needs some correction of the perspective. --Hillopo2018 09:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Please add a note (or notes), where you found perspective issues. --Terragio67 18:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Do not see distortions. It seems good for me --Nino Verde (talk) 12:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Can't see any distortion, good quality --Grunpfnul 08:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 17:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

File:20230213_Wallfahrtskirche_Mariahilf_Passau_02.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View across a fence to the Wallfahrtskirche Mariahilf in Passau --FlocciNivis 16:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Absolutely do not like the composition. Most of that church is hidden by the fence and other structures. --Hillopo2018 10:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support No FP for sure but good enough for QI. --King of Hearts 08:12, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per King of Hearts. --Smial 17:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Münsing_Am_Kirchberg_2_003_2023_04_26.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Catholic parish church Mariä Himmelfahrt, built from 1640, east side
    --F. Riedelio 12:09, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • I have the feeling that the correction of the perspective was not entirely successful here. -- Spurzem 12:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No QI, the perspective correction ruined the motive totally. --Hillopo2018 09:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Antiguo_ayuntamiento,_Lindau,_Alemania,_2022-10-22,_DD_54.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Old town hall, Lindau, Germany --Poco a poco 06:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. The gable is too flat and the colors are too pale. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 11:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose needs color adjustments. --Hillopo2018 10:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support I don't see any problem with colors. Perfectly ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 18:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I must agree to Spurzem. This actually looks slightly compressed vertically. See the clock and also the bicycle at the bottom left. The clock is still round in the old photo File:Kurt Hielscher Deutschland 1924 Lindau Rathaus.jpg, not oval. --Smial (talk) 18:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Color is a matter of taste, and here it's within the rather wide range of acceptability we typically give to QICs. -- King of Hearts 08:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment Fair enough. I've adjusted the aspect ratio and "warmed" it a bit, better? @Spurzem, Hillopo2018, and Smial: Poco a poco 12:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support now. --Smial 17:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)