Commons:Valued image candidates/Nervous system Bufo bufo (DFdB).jpg

Nervous system Bufo bufo (DFdB).jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Dein Freund der Baum (talk) on 2010-01-24 13:32 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Nervous system of an amphibian
Used in	Global usage de:Nervensystem; fi:Hermosto; Bufo bufo
Review (criteria)	Comment The scope sounds really narrow to me. How about something wider - e.g. "Nervous system of an Amphibia"? --MattiPaavola (talk) 10:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for your comment, I just changed the scope. --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 19:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] Scope changed from Nervous system of a Bufo bufo to Nervous system of an amphibia --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 19:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Support I didn't find anything even nearly as interesting within the scope. Geotag is missing, but that is ok since it is a museum shot. -- MattiPaavola (talk) 09:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] Request I can not find this scope ??? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:13, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] Comment I took the liberty to create Category:Amphibian nervous systems and associate the nominated image with that new category and link it to the scope, so I think it is OK now. I am wondering if that category name would be a slightly more adequate name for the scope as well? e Or, if the present scope is kept should it not be ...amphibia -> ...amphibian? --Slaunger (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] Thank you for your help! I'm not a native speaker but I think you're right – my dictionary says "amphibian". --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 00:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] Comment I understood perfectly, Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 00:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)`[reply]