Commons:Valued image candidates/Schloss Monaise BW 2011-09-02 11-12-10.JPG

Trier Schloss Monaise BW 2011-09-02 11-12-10.jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Berthold Werner (talk) on 2011-09-06 13:48 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Schloss Monaise
Used in	Global usage de:Schloss Monaise
Reason	Best preserved example of a villa suburbana of the late 18. century in Germany -- Berthold Werner (talk)
Review (criteria)	Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:27, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] Oppose as not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 4 (is not fully described on the image page). I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. Cf. Nomination just before this one, where much more information is given on the image page. พ.s. 03:58, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] Comment Added an extensive ;-) description in german. --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:08, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] This could have been OK were it not a copyright infringement of this! พ.s. 07:49, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] I took it from here: de:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Trier-Euren, that should been checked against copyright violation. --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] Support Best in the category. Yann (talk) 11:12, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] Comment Text is still a copyvio. พ.s. 22:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] Support best in scope. Text is no copy-vio. Objective descriptions have no copyright because of no available threshold of originality. Wetenschatje: please don't make such imputation without sufficient acknowledgment. But I recommend to add an English description. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] CommentEnglish description added. Not so extensive as the german one. --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 3 support, 1 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC)`[reply]