Andrea014

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Andrea014!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Plakate GoatMilkFestival in Bela Rechka.JPG edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

File:Plakate GoatMilkFestival in Bela Rechka.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Das zur Löschung eingetragene Bild

Das ist alles sehr kompliziert für mich. Dafür spreche ich nicht gut genug Englisch. Hier erst mal ein paar Links für mich zur Orientierung:

Category:Gorna Bela rechka Die Bilder haben alle noch keine Freigabe, obwohl die Mail mit der Freigabe schon am 2. September geschickt wurde. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrea014 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Commons:Löschanträge#Most recent deletion requests
Commons:Deletion requests/2016/10/21#File:Plakate GoatMilkFestival in Bela Rechka.JPG
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Plakate GoatMilkFestival in Bela Rechka.JPG

Ich habe geantwortet und zunächst einmal gefragt, wieviel Zeit ich zur Klärung der Frage habe. Darauf erhielt ich keine Antwort. Auf der deWP erhielt ich die Auskunft, es müsste in Ordnung sein, wenn de:Diana Ivanova/en:Diana Ivanova die Veranstalterin wäre. Das ist sie.

Wie es nun weiter gehen kann, weiß ich noch nicht. Es ist für mich sehr verwirrend.

Falls jemand das hier liest, wäre es nett, wenn ich ein wenig Unterstützung bekommen könnte.

Martin Kraft: In der Not bist Du mir eben in den Sinn gekommen. Ob Du so nett sein könntest, mir aus der Patsche zu helfen? Ich weiß, sowas darf man eigentlich nicht tun, in der Regel heißt es dann: „Ich arbeite nicht auf Zuruf!“ Und dafür habe ich vollstes Verständnis, aber ich weiß jetzt wirklich nicht, wie weiter. Insofern bitte ich um Welpenschutz!

Freundlichen Gruß --Andrea014 (talk) 17:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Andrea014! Ich habe das Freigabe-Ticket gerade bearbeitet, bei allen unproblematischen Bildern einen Baustein eingetragen und wegen der Photos, die Werke anderer Urheber zeigen, eine Rückfrage gestellt.

Keine Sorge: Sollten diese Bilder gelöscht werden, bevor die Freigabe bei uns eingeht bzw. von uns verarbeitet wird (wir haben da einen ziemlichen Rückstau), so ist das kein Beinbruch. Wir kümmern uns im Falle einer Freigabe dann darum, dass bereits gelöschte Bilder von einem Admin wieder hergestellt werden.

Beste Grüße // Martin K. (talk) 18:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lieber Martin K.!

Das ist aber wirklich sehr nett! Herzlichen Dank!

Ich habe leider eine schreckliche Krankheit, die viele ältere Damen befällt: ich rege mich viiiel zu schnell auf. Da gibt's leider keine Pille gegen. Wäre das an einem anderen Tag passiert, hätte ich das möglicherweise besser weg gesteckt. Aber: erinnerst Du Dich, als ich Dir vor einiger Zeit auf der Fragen-zur-WP-Seite schrieb, ich würde dann mal „flirten gehen“, um höhere Auflösungen von Bildern zu bekommen? Das hatte ich getan, hatte Erfolg (na ja, für die Bilder von Kunst nur für 500px, aber immerhin mehr als 200px) und war gerade gestern am hochladen, als dieser Eintrag zur Löschung kam. Da kommt der Honig im Kopf in Wallungen, kann ich Dir sagen! Ich wollte ja schon kurz vorher den Notarzt holen, als beim Hochladen was Komisches geschah.

Genau das hat auch verwirrt, dass ein Foto zum Löschen markiert ist, aber noch keines der vielen anderen ein Stempelchen hatte, obwohl die Mail schon fast 2 Monate alt war. Also auch Dankeschön für die Stempel!

Das zweite Foto, für das Du keinen Stempel vergeben mochtest: es ist eigentlich das Logo der New Culture Foundation. Aber dort ist sie auch Managerin & Kuratorin (s. Link). Diese Foundation musste sie gründen, um Fördergelder z.B. vom Goethe-Institut für z.B. das Goatmilk-Festival zu bekommen. Insofern hätte man, wenn jemand über diese Organisation mal einen Artikel schreiben wollte, schon das Logo!

Noch habe ich Ivanova nicht gefragt (die hat maximal viel um die Ohren), aber im Moment kann ich Folgendes sagen: Sie ist die Mutter des Goatmilk-Festivals. Es war ihre Idee, um die sterbende Region zu beleben. Sie ist Veranstalterin des Festivals, organisiert es mit Hilfe von Anderen, kuratiert es und ist die Seele von's Janze. Sie hat die Fotos gemacht, ist eine Frau mit tiefem Respekt für andere und hat natürlich die Erlaubnis z.B. der Alten dort, die Fotos zu veröffentlichen. Wenn es zwingend erforderlich wäre, würde ich sie noch mal behelligen mit Fragen.

Nun warte ich erst mal geduldig ab.

Schönes Wochenende wünscht --Andrea014 (talk) 04:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Due to a mishap it was possible for a while to upload .mp4 files. You have uploaded one or more .mp4 files in that period. Please go to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MP4 files to see all files that are affected. If the video(s) are entirely your own work or properly licensed you can re-upload them with video2commons.

Yours sincerely, Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 01:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Riesenalk 3 Island.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Riesenalk 3 Island.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Artsfriends (talk) 05:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Riesenalk 2 Island.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Riesenalk 2 Island.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Artsfriends (talk) 05:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Riesenalk 1 Island.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Riesenalk 1 Island.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Artsfriends (talk) 05:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Riesenalk Info-Tafel Island.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Riesenalk Info-Tafel Island.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Artsfriends (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:2018 Island.mp4 edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:2018 Island.mp4 is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

COM:CSD#F7 Disallowed format.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 01:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Geheimnisbuecher Enid Blyton DSCF3384.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Geheimnisbuecher Enid Blyton DSCF3384.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Geheimnisbuecher Enid Blyton DSCF3384.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yellowcard (talk) 12:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, Yellowcard! Das hochzuladen war vielleicht eine Schnapsidee. Sie war entstanden, wie Du auf meiner Disk in deWP lesen kannst, nachdem Rudolf ein ähnliches Bild für seinen Artikel hochgeladen hatte und ich dachte, aha, wenn nicht ein Buchcover, sondern mehrere auf dem Bild sind, dann ginge es. War das ein Irrtum? Wenn ja und das ganz sicher ein Irrtum war, dann kann das Bild auch gelöscht werden. Ist eh grottenschlecht, weil ich wiedermal meine Kamera nicht bedienen konnte. Freundlichen Gruß --Andrea014 (talk) 13:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Andrea! Unabhängig davon, ob hier ein oder mehrere Buchcover abgebildet sind, sind diese vermutlich urheberrechtlich geschützt, es sei denn, es gibt irgendwelche Gründe, warum das nicht so sein sollte?! Du kannst nicht einfach Werke Fremder abfotografieren und weiternutzen, und erst recht kannst Du nicht über die Lizenzierung behaupten, dass Du die vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechte besitzt und diese im Rahmen der Lizenz teilweise auf jedermann überträgst. So etwas kann unter Umständen teuer werden – das ganz generell. Wenn Du also keine Hinweise darauf hast, dass diese Titel gemeinfrei sind (z.B. weil der Urheber seit mindestens 70 Jahren verstorben ist) oder Du eine Freigabe des Rechteinhabers hast, ist es vermutlich sinnvoll, wenn Du einen Commons-Admin um Schnelllöschung bittest. Viele Grüße, Yellowcard (talk) 13:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nu schimpf doch nicht so mit mir! Für ein Deckblatt war mir das klar. Für vier war es mir nicht klar. Ich hab es einem alten Hasen abgekupfert, dessen 4 Bücher zwar etwas älter sind... Wie geht das mit dem um-Löschen-bitten? Kann ich das nicht auch auf deWP machen? Hier finde ich mich nicht so gut zurecht. --Andrea014 (talk) 13:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ich hab die Datei wunschgemäß gelöscht. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 17:56, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dankeschön! Gruß --Andrea014 (talk) 02:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Psychopathologie des alltagslebens freud 1912 3.png edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Psychopathologie des alltagslebens freud 1912 3.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Psychopathologie des alltagslebens freud 1912 3.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic