Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, AnselmiJuan!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, AnselmiJuan!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Foto2-libros.jpg edit

 
File:Foto2-libros.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 17:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ref1-Consenso-de-Barcelona.gif edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ref1-Consenso-de-Barcelona.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ref1-Consenso-de-Barcelona.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 17:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Where does the "world" come from, did you paint the people? -- RE rillke questions? 17:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:97-Mundo-misterio2.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:97-Mundo-misterio2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:97-Mundo-misterio2.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 17:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Imagen-Giancarlo-Agostini-Solines.gif edit

 
File:Imagen-Giancarlo-Agostini-Solines.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 17:30, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Imagen-jorge-arbeleche.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Imagen-jorge-arbeleche.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Imagen-jorge-arbeleche.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

RE rillke questions? 17:32, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Imagen-juan-carlos-anselmi-elissalde.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Imagen-juan-carlos-anselmi-elissalde.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

RE rillke questions? 17:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

e-Mail enviado como justificativo de la autorización de difusión de ciertas fotos edit

De: Juan Anselmi <anselmijuan@yahoo.es> Para: "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Enviado: Lunes 2 de septiembre de 2013 11:26 Asunto: Autorización formal de publicación en WikiCommons

Para: "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>

Asunto: Autorización formal de publicación en WikiCommons

Hola señoras y señores de WikiCommons: Informo que he subido a Commons varias imágenes, algunas de mi exclusiva propiedad, otras en licencia libre debido al tiempo transcurrido, y otras que me fueron cedidas por Ricardo Antonio Casas, cineasta uruguayo que ya tiene biografía en Wikipedia. La galería de fotos de Ricardo Casas es tan grande, que por lógica necesitaba una autorización genérica, que es la que adjunto. Supongo el texto referido alcanza para darme cobertura a la acción que estoy tomando, pero si no fuera así, bueno, en todo caso y si me fuera solicitado, procederé como se me indique, por ejemplo haciendo firmar otra autorización en la que el señalado Ricardo Casas indique explícitamente los enlaces a Commons de las imágenes que él entiende están comprendidas y que fueron subidas por el usuario AnselmiJuan con su autorización. Proceder de otra forma, por ejemplo imprimiendo foto a foto y firmando cada una, es absolutamente imposible por el número de documentos gráficos involucrados, y por el hecho que debe hacerse una selección. Concretamente a la fecha ya he subido unas cuantas fotos cedidas por el mencionado Casas, pero aún tengo mucho trabajo pendiente de este tipo. Corresponde señalar que el referido Casas no es especialista en informática, no usa firma electrónica, y en su casa tampoco tiene ni impresora ni escaner, por lo que entiendo no se le puede pedir realice por sí mismo algo muy sofisticado. Saluda a ustedes atte.

Juan Carlos ANSELMI ELISSALDE Usuario en Wikipedia : AnselmiJuan

--Juan C Anselmi (talk) 16:46, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:AsesinosSerialesPortada.jpg edit

 
File:AsesinosSerialesPortada.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

De728631 (talk) 21:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:LaLune1867.jpg edit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:LaLune1867.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bueno, mirando la fecha de la publicación, resulta evidente que la imagen se encuentra en dominio público.

No obstante, al subir la imagen a Commons puede que quien suscribe la presente haya cometido algún error en cuanto al proceso. Cierto, no soy muy ducho en esto de las licencias y en general, en el procedimiento de ingreso de imágenes a Commons, así que no puedo asegurar que no haya cometido algún error involuntario.

Favor, informarme cómo puedo arreglar el eventual error existente, pues no sé identificar con exactitud el mismo, y tampoco sé corregir sus efectos negativos.

Sería una pena que por mi incompetencia se borrara esta imagen.

--Juan C Anselmi (talk) 21:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Captura de pantalla del sitio digital educachile.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Captura de pantalla del sitio digital educachile.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Captura de pantalla del sitio digital educachile.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Jespinos (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Beer Street - Calle de la cerveza.jpg edit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Beer Street - Calle de la cerveza.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Asesinato con ensañamiento 1.jpg edit

 
File:Asesinato con ensañamiento 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

De728631 (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Portada El animal mas peligroso.jpg edit

 
File:Portada El animal mas peligroso.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ganímedes (talk) 15:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Asesinos y asesinatos.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Asesinos y asesinatos.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Asesinos y asesinatos.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ganímedes (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Asesinato con ensañamiento 2.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Asesinato con ensañamiento 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Asesinato con ensañamiento 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ganímedes (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Escritor y presentador en el Ateneo de Montevideo.JPG edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Escritor y presentador en el Ateneo de Montevideo.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escritor y presentador en el Ateneo de Montevideo.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Discasto talk 23:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Pombo respondiendo preguntas durante la presentación de su libro en el Ateneo Montevideo, 4 julio 2015.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Discasto talk 23:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pombo y Michelena en el Ateneo de Montevideo el 4 de julio de 2015.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pombo y Michelena en el Ateneo de Montevideo el 4 de julio de 2015.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Discasto talk 23:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Gabriel-Pombo-1.JPG edit

 
File:Gabriel-Pombo-1.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Discasto talk 23:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Discasto talk 23:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mario Goloboff.gif edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mario Goloboff.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mario Goloboff.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Discasto talk 23:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Escultor antonio pujia.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Escultor antonio pujia.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Escultor antonio pujia.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Discasto talk 23:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Tapa del libro "Jack el destripador, la leyenda continúa".jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Composición de cuatro imágenes que aluden a asesinatos no resueltos.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Lunes 15 agosto 2016 - Inauguración Estatua al Arriero en Museo Andes 1972.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please avoid watermarked pictures edit

čeština  Deutsch  español  English  italiano  magyar  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  +/−


The image [[::File:Navidad 2017.jpg]] you uploaded contain(s) watermarks. The usage of watermarks is discouraged according to policy. If a non-watermarked version of the image is available, please upload it under the same file name. After removing the watermark, ensure that the removed information is present in the EXIF tags, the image description page, or both. Thank you for understanding.

Quibik (talk) 14:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Diego Perez edit

Hi AnselmiJuan, it is not helpful to put some pictures of Diego Perez that are in Category:Diego Pérez in a parallel category Diego Pérez Aguado. If the original name of the category is wrong, it should be moved to the new place. --Ailura (talk) 10:32, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Plagio edit

Señor Anselmi,

Perdóname la indiscreción. Pero veo estás plagiando tus subidas.

¿Por qué? Tú, un bibliotecario en es.wp y erudito en la vida real, y por eso sabes la gravedad de estas acciones. Te doy la oportunidad para defenderte antes de bloquear tu cuenta o sacar el tema en los tablones de anuncios. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hola usuario Magog the Ogre:
Muchas gracias por tu advertencia, y créeme que no he intentado en lo más mínimo cometer plagio, aunque por cierto, no descarto la posibilidad de haber omitido información relevante, entre ellas y como tú me señalas, la fuente en la que me basé.
Como me señalas varios casos distintos, de cosas que efectivamente hice pero en fechas diferentes, iré analizando caso por caso, y te responderé progresivamente.
Pero ante todo, te diré que yo no soy bibliotecario ni reversor, aunque tengo muchas ediciones realizadas en Wikipedia en español así como en Wikidata, y algunas (pero no muchas) en WikiCommons. Cierto, últimamente estoy trabajando bastante más en WikiCommons, y de allí mi gran interés en profundizar en la observación que tú me realizas, pues si estoy cometiendo un error o una omisión en forma sistemática, obviamente, deseo corregir esto a la brevedad, y no continuar repitiendo una forma de proceder que pueda tener falencias.
--Juan C Anselmi (talk) 10:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Respuesta respecto del Museo Real de Ontario: Tyrannosaurus rex edit

Hola usuario Magog the Ogre:

Respecto de este asunto, es cierto, hace poco tiempo he agregado esta imagen en el artículo del 'Museo Real de Ontario' asociado con la dirección electrónica https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museo_Real_de_Ontario, pero como podrás constatar si accedes a la dirección que indico acto seguido https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Ontario_Museum , podrás allí constatar que en la sección titulada "Natural History galleries" también se usa esta misma imagen.

Claro, tal vez yo debería haber puesto por algún lado (muy posiblemente en WikiCommons), que mi fuente era el wikiartículo en inglés que te he señalado.

Estoy casi seguro que fue en este caso, que al intentar copiar precisamente esa imagen desde el wikiartículo en inglés al wikiartículo en español, me salió un aviso que esa imagen estaba en dominio público, aunque aún no estaba en WikiCommons, pero que se permitía ingresarla en WikiCommons en tales o cuales circunstancias.

Te señalo esta cuestión basado en mi memoria, pues como ya te he dicho, tengo bastante experiencia en Wikipedia pero no tanta en WikiCommons.

Pero ... ¿qué es lo que estoy haciendo últimamente?

Artículos de Wikipedia en español en los que otros wikiartículos hermanos en otros idiomas tienen ilustraciones o fotos de interés que no se encuentran en el hermano artículo en español, claro, lo copio (lo traspaso) al wikiartículo en español.

Pero además, paso a observar la correspondiente imagen en Commons para mirar las descripciones de pie de imagen que allí se indican, y por lo general, el español no es uno de los idiomas allí presente, así que lo agrego, procurando agregar también en dicha descripción de pie de imagen, enlaces que considero de interés a wikiartículos asociados.

Por favor, estimado usuario Magog the Ogre, accede a un sector de mi área de taller (cuya dirección seguidamente indico) desde la que estoy manejando estas cosas específicamente para "Monstruos del Cretácico":

En ese lugar verás que he estado trabajando particularmente en "Museo Real de Ontario" , "Esqueleto" , "Tyrannosaurus rex", así como en casi una treintena de otras temáticas, algunas de las que ya he trabajado bastante mientras que en otras recién estoy comenzando. Allí, seguramente podrás observar qué cosas son las que trato de hacer y de ampliar.

No dudes en señalarme cualquier posible mejora en los procedimientos que estoy aplicando, pues naturalmente, deseo orientar mis intervenciones en Wikipedia, Wikidata, y WikiCommons, de la mejor manera posible.

Ahora debo salir de casa, pues tengo un día bastante agitado. Esta noche a última hora, y/o bien mañana de mañana, miraré los otros casos que tú me señalas, por ejemplo, 'Inauguración monumento wikipedia.jpg' , 'Alfredo Bryce Echenique.jpg' , 'Louvre por la noche.jpg' , etc, para elaborar los justificativos que pueda tener.

Gracias anticipadamente por esperar mis respuestas.

--Juan C Anselmi (talk) 11:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Un agregado

Buscando y buscando, he encontrado el siguiente enlace:

Que esta imagen haya sido agregada o manipulada por un bot, supongo que no debería impedirme de usarla en otros artículos de Wikipedia, pues alguien la puso antes en un wikiartículo en inglés. Supongo debería existir alguna manera.

Favor estimado usuario Magog the Ogre, dame tu opinión al respecto.

--Juan C Anselmi (talk) 12:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Claro, tal vez yo debería haber puesto por algún lado (muy posiblemente en WikiCommons), que mi fuente era el wikiartículo en inglés que te he señalado.
Sí, pero esa es la definición del plagio: copiar una obra sin mencionar la fuente.
me salió un aviso que esa imagen estaba en dominio público
No es en dominio público. Algunos son libres y gratis, sí, pero todavía tienen una licencia que requiere mencionar el autor. Otros no son libres, son de "Uso legítimo", lo que no permitimos en Commons, ni en Wikipedia en español, pero sí en Wikipedia en inglés.
pero que se permitía ingresarla en WikiCommons en tales o cuales circunstancias.
Sí se puede copiar, si mencionas la fuente.
lo copio (lo traspaso) al wikiartículo en español.'
Sí es aceptable, si mencionas la fuente.
No dudes en señalarme cualquier posible mejora en los procedimientos que estoy aplicando
Yo recomiendo CommonHelper para trasladar las fotos.
pues tengo un día bastante agitado
Lo siento. Mi intento no era inquietarte. Sólo quería entender tus acciones. Ahora me parece que te equivocaste; no actuabas con mal intento.
miraré los otros casos que tú me señalas
Arreglaré las otras imágenes que ya subiste. O las borraré si es necesario.
Que esta imagen haya sido agregada o manipulada por un bot, supongo que no debería impedirme de usarla en otros artículos de Wikipedia
Lo que hace el bot no tiene nada que ver con lo que se pueda hacer. Todavía se puede usar la imagen en Commons, pero hay que mencionar la fuente. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Ok. Muchas gracias por tu sugerencia. Trataré de seguir tus indicaciones estimado usuario Magog the Ogre (dame un poco de tiempo para intentarlo yo mismo, así de paso, aprendo para que a futuro no vuelva a cometer el mismo tipo de torpezas), aunque si no logro hacer esto bien, te estaré muy agradecido que tu mismo lo hagas, o modifiques lo que entiendas se deba cambiar para mejor. --Juan C Anselmi (talk) 13:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
En el día de hoy, además, analizaré lo mejor que pueda y te explicaré, otros de los cuestionamientos por ti planteados a algunos de mis wikiaportes. Pues claro está, lo que deseo es que todo quede lo mejor posible tanto en Wikipedia como en Commons. --Juan C Anselmi (talk) 13:22, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hola de nuevo estimado wikiusuario Magog the Ogre:
También había omitido la fuente en el elemento cuyo enlace indico seguidamente, la cual agregué:
También, utilicé esta imagen en el artículo de Wikipedia en español titulado "Monumento a Wikipedia".
--Juan C Anselmi (talk) 14:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
No necesitas referir al autor en el artículo. Basta tener un enlace en la página de descripión de la imagen. Basta porque cualquier usuario puede hacer clic en la imagen y el software mostrará el autor. ¿Tengo razón? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:43, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Otro caso señalado como irregular o problemático por el usuario Magog the Ogre edit

Se trata de la imagen almacenada en WikiCommons, correspondiente al enlace que a continuación se indica:

En el propio registro en Commons, en la sección "Permiso", puede leerse lo siguiente:

  • Este trabajo ha sido liberado al dominio público por su autor.

Por lo tanto, no entiendo cómo es que pude haber cometido una transgresión o una omisión.

--Juan C Anselmi (talk) 16:31, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Claro, no habías quebrantado la ley. Pero es poco ético, y por eso, e contra las reglas de Commons. Requeremos que los subidores citen la fuente de cada imagen que suban. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Perfecto, mucho te agradezco, estimado usuario Magog the Ogre, hayas observado esta omisión de mi parte, y me hayas guiado sugiréndome la forma de enmendar esta falencia. En lo personal, soy muy respetuoso de las opiniones de otros wikimedistas, en especial de aquellos como tú, que en una determinada área tienen sin duda mucha más experiencia y antecedentes que yo, pues como ya dije, mis aportes en WikiCommons son mas bien limitados. Nuevamente gracias. --Juan C Anselmi (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Noticia andes 1972.jpg edit

 
File:Noticia andes 1972.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo of a newspaper (although blurry, does not qualify for deminimis)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

küñall (nütramyen) 02:39, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:ROY2.JPG edit

 
File:ROY2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

23.112.190.160 17:50, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Carlos Nantes Bolsonaro.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Carlos Nantes Bolsonaro.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sturm (talk) 05:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply