Ascaron

Discussions

Licences

Bonjour,

J'ai du supprimer des images que tu avais importées récemment, il s'agissait de violations de copyright. Je t'invite à lire COM:APL : à moins d'avoir une autorisation explicite de la part des ayant-droits, et à moins que l'auteur de la photo ne soit mort depuis plus de 70 ans, une image est sous copyright, et inutilisable sur Commons.

Le fait que des images soient des images de presse, ou disponibles sur internet, ne change rien à ça.

Merci de faire le tri dans tes images : s'il y en a d'autres qui n'ont pas été prises par toi, et pour lesquelles tu n'as pas d'autorisation, il faudra les supprimer.

merci, le Korrigan →bla 21:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Et tu es prié de ne pas effacer les messages que l'on te laisse, et d'en tenir compte. Merci. le Korrigan →bla 21:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Ne t'inquiète pas ... je les efface mais j'en tiens compte. Mon but n'est pas de faire passer des images illégales sur commons. Je pensais réellement que les images de site presse ne poseraient pas de problème. Quand aux logos, je les ai photographié (puis retouché), mais j'apprends que ca ne fait pas partie du domaine public pour autant. Ascaron (talk) 05:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

OK. Pour les images de presse, non elles ne sont pas libres, du moins pas sans autorisation (qui sont assez dures à avoir d'ailleurs pour ça !). Sur Commons, les images doivent pouvoir être réutilisées "librement", c'est bien ce qui chiffonne les services de com'. Pour les logos, et pour le reste aussi d'ailleurs : si tu prends une photo de quelque chose, deux copyrights s'appliquent : celui du "quelque chose", et le tien en tant que photographe. Si tu photographies une peinture du XVIe siècle dans un musée, il est dans le domaine public, donc il n'y a plus que toi qui décide librement quoi faire de ta photo. Si par contre tu photographies la pyramide du Louvre, ou une figurine de Pokémon, ou un logo de marque, là les restrictions de l'objet d'origine s'appliquent, en plus des conditions que toi tu voudrais mettre sur ta photo. Tu peux lire Commons:Œuvre dérivée à ce sujet. Merci, le Korrigan →bla 07:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Pas de problème pour mettre les photos de voitures que tu as prises toi-même au Mondial, on peut les photographier sans restrictions. Par contre, pas de logos en gros plan ou de photos d'affiche par exemple. Pense juste à les mettre dans Category:Mondial de l’Automobile de Paris 2008. Merci ! le Korrigan →bla 15:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Croisière noire

Bonjour !

Le site que tu donnes indique pour le copyright "Agence photographique de la Réunion des musées nationaux", mais je t'avoue que je ne connais pas les règles pour les films et leurs affiches. Tu peux poser la question sur le bistro, d'autres gens pourront répondre.

Désolé ! le Korrigan →bla 10:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Ascaron!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Dsg-rapports.png is uncategorized since 6 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Évolution du parc automobile mondial.jpg is uncategorized since 28 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Amortisseurs-Derihon-Pub.jpg is uncategorized since 28 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Infobox projet aéro.jpg was uncategorized on 27 August 2009.
• Image:Renault Fluence 2.JPG was uncategorized on 29 September 2009.

File:MCE-5 coupe moteur fond blanc legende.jpg

J'ai envoyé une demande à l'entreprise pour leur demander si leur images étaient libres de droit. Ils m'ont répondu que oui. J'ai envoyé un mail à OTRS. Mais visiblement, tu ne l'as trouve pas. Comment faire pour prouver mes dires. Je t'envois le mail de réponse de l'entreprise ? L'ensemble des images de la catégorie Category:MCE-5 Engine sont dans ce cas Ascaron (talk) 19:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Salut,

J'ai bien vu le ticket #2009051310038955 sur OTRS, mais comme te l'as répondu un autre agent, cette autorisation n'est en l'état pas suffisante (notamment parce que le terme « libres de droit » est très vague). Malgré tes louables efforts ;) il n'y donc pour le moment aucune permission valide pour utiliser ces fichiers.

D'où l'apposition d'un bandeau approprié (je vais d'ailleurs le faire sur les autres images de la catégorie). Mais si jamais les fichiers sont supprimées avant que l'entreprise n'envoie une autorisation correcte, il sera toujours possible de tout restaurer en quelques clics...

Bon courage.--Bapti ✉ 18:50, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Que dois je faire maintenant ? Ascaron (talk) 16:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

euh, l'agent qui a répondu au courriel que tu as envoyé à OTRS t'a déjà expliqué qu'il fallait obtenir... À savoir une permission du type fr:Aide:Republication/Courriel Image.--Bapti ✉ 20:03, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Je pense que l'entreprise a envoyé le message type pour les autorisation. Peux-tu vérifier ? Merci Ascaron (talk) 07:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Je ne vois rien ni dans permissions-fr, permissions-commons ou permissions-commons-fr ni en cherchant avec le mot clef "MCE-5". Sais-tu à quel moment ils ont envoyé le courriel et avec quel objet dans le message ?--Bapti ✉ 19:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

L'objet doit normalement être [Ticket#2009051310038955]. Ascaron (talk) 20:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Je viens de vérifier : il n'y a rien de nouveau avec cette objet-là. De toute façon, si ils mettent "[Ticket#2009051310038955]" dans l'objet, le courriel s'ajoutera automatiquement au ticket en question qui ne contient pour le moment que ton courriel et la réponse d'un volontaire OTRS.--Bapti ✉ 20:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Ferrari picture

Hi, it would be much better to have cropped ferrari 458 picture its too small now, just look at the en:Ferrari 458 Italia article in wikipedia, seems you reverted also Maserati picture..... --Typ932 (talk) 07:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Do you have a better version of File:Audi S5 Cabriolet.jpg?

---

Thank you for your submission of File:Audi S5 Cabriolet.jpg. While all submissions are useful, do you think you might be able to supply a better quality version of the same, or similar, content? In many cases, the largest and highest resolution possible is the most useful version to have available. (MediaWiki has automatic resizing functionality, so there is no need for multiple versions of the same image at different sizes, users can select any size and the software will generate and cache the needed resolution on the fly.)

If you can supply the same exact image as File:Audi S5 Cabriolet.jpg at a larger resolution (or media at a higher bitrate, etc.), please just upload it over the original, users will get the new higher quality version with no further effort on your part. If on the other hand, the content is only similar, it is best to select a new image name, as there may be uses already where some aspect of the existing media was key to the usage. In the latter case, if you can provide a crosslink reference to the new image in the older one and vice versa, that will be extremely helpful.

Again, thank you very much for your contribution, it is appreciated.

High Contrast (talk) 08:40, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry; I'm not able to supply a better quality version of the same picture. Ascaron (talk) 10:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Barack Obama and Essam Sharaf G8 France 2011.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Barack Obama and Essam Sharaf G8 France 2011.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 19:05, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Boeing 787.jpg

File:Boeing 787.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

PierreSelim (talk) 13:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File tagging File:Flow Simulation F1.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Flow Simulation F1.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Flow Simulation F1.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Ariadacapo (talk) 17:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Diffuser pressure diagram.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Diffuser pressure diagram.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Diffuser pressure diagram.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Ariadacapo (talk) 17:43, 6 May 2016 (UTC)