Atelier ZoooooZ

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Atelier ZoooooZ!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, User:Atelier ZoooooZ, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

 

Artikelseiten gehören nicht hierher, sondern auf Wikipedia. Außerdem ist das hier keine Plattform für Selbstdarstellungen oder Werbung. --Achim55 (talk) 08:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Eine User Seite dient zur vorstellung des Users und muss bestimmte inhalte tragen. Ich empfinde es als sehr verachtend wenn entsprechende Arbeit durch stupides Löschen belohnt wird anstatt kurz eine Nachricht zu senden das die Seite etwas gekürzt werden sollte. So funktioniert keine Zusammenarbeit. Desweiteren dient die Userseite als Quellenangabe welche nach Europäischenrecht zwingend notwendig ist. Atelier ZoooooZ (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Kunst und entsprechende Werke dürfen nicht Anonym sein. Auch wenn ich als Autor meine Werke zur freien Verwendung zur Verfügung stelle. Entsprechend könnte sonst Jeder irgendwo Bilder und Werke einfach kopieren und hier einstellen um sich dann selbst die Erlaubnis damit zu geben diese an anderer Stelle zu verwenden. Atelier ZoooooZ (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Im gegenzug habe ich kein Verständniss für Userseiten, welche irgenwelche kryptischen Tabellen enthalten. Das hat nichts mit der Vorstellung eines User zu tun. Siehe Seite von -Achim55. Atelier ZoooooZ (talk) 10:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Also falls noch eine Angabe als zuviel erscheint bitte hier kurz anmerken Danke. Atelier ZoooooZ (talk) 10:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Noch eine kleine Hilfe, bei Künstlern wie mir spricht man nicht von einem Userprofil sondern mehr von einer Vita mit dem Hintergrund da geschaffene Werke nicht aus dem Nichts herauskommen. Im Gegensatz zu einem Fotografen der einfach irgendwas Abfotografiert da hier ein Gegenobjekt existiert. Da ist das Wiki wohl sehr star und unzureichend. Dazu ist mir aufgefallen das sehr viele Werke hier kein ausreichendes Profil haben. Alleinige Angaben wie User99 oder Atelier ZoooooZ sind nicht ausreichend. Egal ob ich als Autor ein Bild verschenke oder verkaufe, ich trage immer die Verantwortung dafür. Das heißt die Quelle muß komplett sein. Atelier ZoooooZ (talk) 12:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, User:Atelier ZoooooZ, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

 

Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Das letzte Abendmal - The last Super interpretation nach Leonardo da Vinci.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Das letzte Abendmal - The last Super interpretation nach Leonardo da Vinci.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Das letzte Abendmal - The last Super interpretation nach Leonardo da Vinci.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bacchus und Ariadne.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bacchus und Ariadne.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bacchus und Ariadne.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Wie ich sehe ist Common Wiki eine nicht Kommunikative Wildwest Seite wie jedes andere Spamforum auch. Admins die einfach nur löschen und keinerlei Wertschätzung gegenüber der Arbeit des Users zeigen. So habe ich nie in meiner Früheren Zeit gearbeitet. Atelier ZoooooZ (talk) 13:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Ich bitte daher darum alle meine Werke mit sofortiger Wirkung von dieser Seite zu nehmen. Danke für das Verständnis. Atelier ZoooooZ (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Hallo ZoooooZ, es tut mir leid, dass Ihr Einstieg bei Wikimedia Commons derart unerfreulich war. Gemäß unseren Benutzerregeln dienen die User-Seiten aber eben nicht zur Erklärung des Oeuvres eines Künstlers, sondern beziehen sich ausschließlich auf die Arbeiten bei Commons und anderen Wikimedia-Projekten. Das hätte man spätestens vor der zweiten Löschung der Benutzerseite klarstellen müssen. Gemäß Ihrem Wunsch habe ich jedoch jetzt alle drei Bilder wieder entfernt, die Sie hier hochgeladen hatten. De728631 (talk) 15:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Danke schön für ihr Antwort. Eventuel wäre dan einfach gut eine einfache Maske zu machen die nur Name und Adresse ... zulässt, dann passiert so ein Fehler eher nicht. Für Werke wie meine fehlt dann die Angabemöglichkeit digital am Zeichenbrett erstellt. Wie ich gesehen habe kann ich nur angeben Fotografiert oder abfotografiert was beides nicht der Fall ist. Ich könnte also auch nur eine rechnerisch mögliche Größe angeben. Atelier ZoooooZ (talk) 21:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Solche Angaben zur Erstellung der Werke können aber durchaus auf der Dateiseite des jeweiligen Bildes angebracht werden. Wenn das Bild einmal hochgeladen wurde, lässt sich jederzeit der Eintrag zum Beispiel in dem Feld |source= ändern oder ergänzen. Und für Kunstwerke gibt es sogar eine eigene Vorlage {{Artwork}} zur Beschreibung der Datei. Ich gebe zu, dass man mit dem automatischen "Upload Wizard" nicht dahin gelangt, aber dieses Tool ist eben für die Mehrheit der Benutzer hier entwickelt worden, die "nur" Fotos hochladen. De728631 (talk) 06:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:König Wilhelm mit Bier 2022 Mumzy ZoooooZ Export sw.png

Copyright status: File:König Wilhelm mit Bier 2022 Mumzy ZoooooZ Export sw.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:König Wilhelm mit Bier 2022 Mumzy ZoooooZ Export sw.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)