User talk:Bgag/Archives 2013

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hassan II Mosque fountain.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:52, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Naval Museum of Chania.jpg

Yours sincerely, cmadler (talk) 14:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archaeological Museum of Chania (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 20:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orthodox Cathedral of Chania (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We have contradictory information about the year of construction. Spanish and Portuguese Wikipedia articles give 1860 as the year of construction (I think the Spanish article may have been translated from the Portuguese), the Russian Wikipedia article gives 1864, and the Commons category gives 1897. What is the correct year of construction? If 1860 or 1864, I think it's probably safe to assume that the architect/builder died before 1943, but if it's 1897, we probably should know about the architect, since they may have lived long enough for it to still be copyrighted in Greece, and there's no Freedom of Panorama there. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Info I have a travel guide (GeoGuide from Gallimard) which says that the cathedral was built in 1857. I have also seen on this site (http://www.chania-oldtown-walks.com/cultural-attractions/) that the cathedral was built between 1857 and 1860. And in 1864 on this site (http://www.alpha-omegaonline.com/chania_ville.htm). So I think the 1857-1864 period is the most probable for the construction on this cathedral. --Bgag (talk) 22:40, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Malia - Kernos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:47, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkadiou Street, Rethymno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Malia - Pillar Crypt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:16, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rethymno lighthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criterai met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 11:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manège militaire de Lévis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 07:12, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Malia - West Storerooms.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 21:33, 03 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Malia - Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 21:33, 03 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hall of the Knights (Krak des Chevaliers), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 22:08, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kritsa welcome sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. George Church, Kritsa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.-ArildV 16:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Kritsa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Malia - Grand Staircase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:54, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Malia - North Court 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

FoP in Italy, FoP in Greece

Bonjour Bgag.

Je viens d'aller faire un tour en VI, et j'y vois deux candidats venant de toi, l'intérieur de la Cathédrale de Rhodes, et le Palais du Gouverneur.

ça me rappelle d'excellents souvenirs de voyage, quelle belle île, et que de beaux monuments... As-tu vu Lindos, et Symi ?

Je m'interroge beaucoup sur le statut juridique de ces images (comme des miennes sur le même sujet).

Ces deux bâtiments ont été construits par l'occupant italien, en 1925 pour la cathédrale, à peu près à la même époque pour le Palais. L'architecte en est fr:Florestano di Fausto, mort en ... 1965.

Tu vois où je veux en venir...

Si Rhodes était restée italienne, tes deux images (et certaines des miennes) ne seraient pas admissibles dans "Commons" pour des raisons de droit d'auteur, No FoP in Italy.

Mais..... Rhodes est grecque depuis 1948...

Mais..... la Grèce applique la même règle: No FoP in Greece, liberté (relative) seulement 70 ans après la mort de l'auteur...

Quand j'ai téléchargé ma photo de l'extérieur de la cathédrale, je me suis tournicoté les méninges pour savoir si Florestano di Fausto pouvait voir son droit d'auteur protégé dans ces circonstances.

Je crains que oui.

Mais bon, restons-en là, c'était juste pour ton information, et pour partager avec quelqu'un cette question qui m'embête. Naturellement, je ne soulèverai pas la question publiquement, car je pense que nos images, fussent-elles douteuses juridiquement, apportent vraiment quelque chose à "Commons".

As-tu une opinion sur le sujet ?

Bien cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Camiros ? Tu vas alors recroiser mes productions ! :)--Jebulon (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Village of Kritsa, Crete.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lato - Prytaneion 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Minarets of the Umayyad Mosque.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Minarets of the Umayyad Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Congrats on a great set! Godot13 (talk) 03:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Evangelismos (Rhodes) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door in Rethymno 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done. --Bgag 14:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Statue of Saladin, Damascus.jpg

File:Statue of Saladin, Damascus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takabeg (talk) 05:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Evangelismos, Rhodes, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Evangelismos (Rhodes) - Rotunda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:01, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain in Rhodes Harbour 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:50, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Evangelismos (Rhodes) - Bell tower 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Evangelismos (Rhodes) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Felix Koenig 16:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Evangelismos (Rhodes) - Lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo del Governor, Rhodes, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I think you've got to add "exterior" to the scope. --JLPC (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Best one in the scope, meets all criteria. -- DerJojo (talk) 22:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door in Rethymno 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain in Rhodes Harbour 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West moat, Rhodes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 16:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cannon in Rhodes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone arch in Rhodes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. --JLPC 19:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coats of arms, Rhodes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now --Poco a poco 22:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cannon Gate, Rhodes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

VIS Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Church of Saint Simeon Stylites, Syria.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Simeon Stylites, Syria.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of the Grand Masters of Rhodes - Windows 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cannons in Rhodes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 07:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cannons in Rhodes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of the Grand Masters of Rhodes - Window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cannon Gate (Rhodes).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 05:02, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhodes clock tower 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suleiman Mosque (Rhodes) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge of the lingua of France - Gargoyle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 16:49, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge of the lingua of France - Gargoyle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge of the lingua of France - Gargoyle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Holy Trinity, Rhodes (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Best in scope; Especially if you add "exterior" :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:33, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Annotation with one of my pictures added. Nice street, isn't it ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:44, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec City 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:53, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferry Alphonse-Desjardins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 20:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ocean Henry Bain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 20:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château Frontenac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --NorbertNagel 20:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, but it needs a tilt cw Poco a poco 20:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)  Done. --Bgag 18:03, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic of a bird (Rhodes).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door on Odos Ippoton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good--Jebulon 23:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque of Odos Ippoton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 23:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge of the lingua of France - Gargoyle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 17:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic of fish (Rhodes).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not very sharp but ood quality imo. --JLPC 17:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cylindrical funerary altar (Rhodes) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin de ronde (Rhodes) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gate of Saint John (Rhodes).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhodes clock tower, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:51, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

VIS Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Gargoyles of the Auberge of the lingua of France.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Gargoyles of the Auberge of the lingua of France.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Quebec City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition --Rjcastillo 15:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge of the lingua of France - Gargoyle 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge of the lingua of France - Gargoyle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge of the lingua of France - Gargoyle 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments (Once the flag eaten, this gargoyle will speak French ;). QI for me. --JLPC 17:26, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joshua Tree 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hidden Valley Trail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beavertail Cactus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrel Cactus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hidden Valley Trail 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It "feels" better now --Poco a poco 19:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! California fan palm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortynine Palms Oasis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:45, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strawberry Hedgehog Cactus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:54, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! California fan palm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too high compression level, visible JPEG artifacts, see the sky, please--Lmbuga 19:00, 11 April 2013 (UTC) I have imported a new version. --Bgag 14:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC) QI, good quality, better, but in my opinion the compression level is a bit hight--Lmbuga 14:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brittlebush 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too generous crop IMO but good anyhow --Poco a poco 16:30, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ryan Mountain Trail 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bactrian camel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 16:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gazelle in San Diego Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 14:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southern Warthog.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indian rhinoceros in San Diego Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brittlebush 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Kadellar 12:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! African bush elephant in San Diego Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 15:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giraffe in San Diego Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cannon in Old Town Plaza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balboa Theatre, San Diego 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very nice --A.Savin 21:34, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower of Casa de Estudillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:42, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robinson-Rose House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Balboa Theatre, San Diego, California (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keating Building, San Diego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colours but some fixable CAs around the streetlights and the windows imo. --JLPC 17:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Made some corrections. Is it better? --Bgag 23:35, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Yes, it is. --JLPC 19:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Keating Building, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 18:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altamirano-Pedrorena House, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:19, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petco Park, San Diego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness just ok --Poco a poco 19:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spencer-Ogden Building, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
I.O.O.F. Building, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ingle Building, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Backesto Building, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petco Park, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaslamp Quarter 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lincoln Hotel, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Diego Chinese Historical Museum (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horton Grand Hotel, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cole Block, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Robinson-Rose House, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marston Building, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manchester Grand Hyatt Hotel, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hilton San Diego Bayfront Hotel (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Christian Science Monitor using your image in violation of licencing

Hi there, I have the duty to inform you that the Christian Science Monitor has used File:Road sign Homs-Palmyra-Baghdad.jpg in one of its articles in violation of the licencing terms. I have noted this at File_talk:Road_sign_Homs-Palmyra-Baghdad.jpg. I have sent you an email with some information on your rights as a photographer and how to go about obtaining compensation for violating licence terms. It might be of interest to you, that the person who has violated the licence terms is one of Commons fiercest critics (I've included that information for you). If I can be of further assistance, don't hesitate to contact me. Cheers, russavia (talk) 02:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harbor Drive, San Diego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Some CAs on the lower part of the picture, especially along the white lines. --JLPC 16:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)  Done Made some corrections. --Bgag 19:34, 17 May 2013 (UTC) OK now. --JLPC 22:24, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Globe Theatre, San Diego (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

This is one of the images forming part of the Valued image set: Arch of Antoninus Pius (Sbeitla) on Wikimedia Commons. The image set has been assessed under the valued image set criteria and is considered the most valued set on Commons within the scope: Arch of Antoninus Pius (Sbeitla) You can see its nomination at Commons:Valued image candidates/Arch of Antoninus Pius (Sbeitla).

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Balboa Park Botanical Building (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Difficult choice because there are good candidates. VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Diego Museum of Art 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Point Loma Lighthouse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Point Loma Lighthouse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:39, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabrillo National Monument Visitor Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelican in Coronado.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balboa Park Botanical Building 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Diego Museum of Man 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:47, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Globe Theatre, San Diego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Diego Museum of Art 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Point Loma Lighthouse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Point Loma Lighthouse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:39, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabrillo National Monument Visitor Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelican in Coronado.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balboa Park Botanical Building 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Diego Museum of Man 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:47, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Globe Theatre, San Diego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bayside Trail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --3uclides64 18:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Diego de Alcalá - plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 22:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Juan Rodríguez Cabrillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:38, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Casa de Machado y Silvas (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Mission San Diego de Alcalá (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Luis Rey de Francia 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft for my personal taste, but still OK for QI. --Tuxyso 15:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Luis Rey de Francia - plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 15:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mission San Luis Rey de Francia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope Poco² 21:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Poco² 08:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Juan Capistrano - plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Stone Church - bells.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Luis Rey de Francia 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --JLPC 17:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Juan Capistrano 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe a weak trace of CA at the far left? --NorbertNagel 17:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)  Done.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Stone Church 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Juan Capistrano 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Stone Church 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Junípero Serra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:22, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Juan Capistrano - South Wing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good job --Poco a poco 20:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge of the lingua of France 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Luis Rey de Francia 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just about ok. --Mattbuck 17:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mission San Juan Capistrano - North Corridor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egan House, San Juan Capistrano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steele Canyon Golf Club Canyon Course 2nd hole sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron, Québec 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 20:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron, Québec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay. --Florstein 16:34, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riverwalk Golf Club Mission Course 1st hole sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichens in Joshua Tree National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sycuan Golf Resort Willow Glen Course 2nd hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Lmbuga 23:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couvent des religieuses de Jésus-Marie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riverwalk Golf Club Driving range.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Ok for me if you crop the low part to obtain 2/3 of sky --Christian Ferrer 19:06, 27 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Good suggestion. --Bgag 23:11, 29 June 2013 (UTC)  Support OK for me --Christian Ferrer 03:38 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetière de St-Gervais 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 18:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kameiros - Temple of Pythian Apollo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Good quality--Llorenzi 19:44, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kameiros - Staircase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- MJJR 21:02, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kameiros - Exedra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- MJJR 21:02, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kameiros - Stele 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:26, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kameiros - Fountain square 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:28, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kameiros - Stele 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hierothyteion 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Medieval gate of the acropolis of Lindos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exedra of Pamphilidas (Lindos).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI to me Poco² 20:40, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:35, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acropolis of Lindos 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exedra of Pamphilidas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Ayios Ioannis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 22:35, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Ayios Ioannis 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me--Lmbuga 01:40, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donkeys near Lindos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Greek theatre in Lindos 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 18:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate of Saint Athanasios 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coats of arms, Rhodes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coats of arms, Rhodes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 17:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Apollo, Rhodes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft, but nice light and composition. --Jastrow 07:29, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Town Hall of the city of Rhodes.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town Hall of the city of Rhodes Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door in Lindos 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light spot on the door --Christian Ferrer 17:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Corrected. --Bgag 22:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC) Support OK now --Christian Ferrer 04:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Greek theatre in Lindos 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems blurry on the right. Mattbuck 17:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC) Should be cropped (16/9?) to be more understandable Borvan53 18:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment I have imported a new version. --Bgag 22:57, 4 August 2013 (UTC) OK for me  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agia Paraskevi Church, Rhodes (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It would be good to add "exterior" --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Mek'ele.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wukro Chirkos (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prayer sticks - Ethiopia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebu in Ethiopia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Vassil 14:50, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebu in Ethiopia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wukro Chirkos 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clothing shop in Mek'ele.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice colours --Gzzz 22:04, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wukro Chirkos - Graves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houses in Gheralta Massif.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sign in Tigray Region.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abreha and Atsbeha Church - Door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abreha and Atsbeha Church, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camels in Ethiopia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camels in Ethiopia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Vassil 16:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bete Giyorgis, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace Tomb (Petra).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 15:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corinthian Tomb (Petra).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--JLPC (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biet Medhane Alem 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bete Maryam, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rcih scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bete Abba Libanos, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biet Medhane Alem 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Library of Yohannes I 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fasilides Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. All criteria met. (I've added name of the city) Halavar (talk) 18:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mentewab's Castle, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 23:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fasilides Palace 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 14:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Library of Yohannes I, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 18:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:51, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Balderas Ber, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Can you add "facade" (or, for instance, "NW view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page ? --JLPC (talk) 21:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

 Support --JLPC (talk) 15:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Town Hall of Rhodes.jpg

And also:

• File:Town Hall of the city of Rhodes.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 23:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavilion of the Fasilidas' Bath, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Simien Mountains National Park Office.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Simien Mountains National Park Office.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thick-billed Raven 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geladas near Chennek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lobelia rhynchopetalum Giant lobelia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The File:Giant Lobelia 01 .jpg is also good. But they look different. Maybe both should be Valued Images, but represent different stadium or age (I don't know much about plants). Halavar (talk) 17:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment I think this picture is more representative because we see the plant in its two different phases (look at the small one at the left of the big one). --Bgag (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)  Support You convinced me:) All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ura Kidane Mehret Church, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:07, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:58, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Waga, near Konso, Ethiopia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. (Scope slightly modified, I hope it's OK.) --JLPC (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Scores:

1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: -1
2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: +1 <--

=>

File:Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Godot13 (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Scores:

1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: -1
2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: +1 <--

=>

File:Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Godot13 (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Scores:

1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: -1
2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: +1 <--

=>

File:Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Godot13 (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Scores:

1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: -1
2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: +1 <--

=>

File:Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Godot13 (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Scores:

1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: -1
2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: +1 <--

=>

File:Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Godot13 (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Scores:

1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: -1
2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: +1 <--

=>

File:Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Godot13 (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chancellery of Yohannes I, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support too.--Jebulon (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Chancellery of Yohannes I 03.jpg: -1
2. Chancellery of Yohannes I 02.jpg: -1
3. Chancellery of Yohannes I 01.jpg: +2 
=>
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 03.jpg: Declined.
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 02.jpg: Declined.
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 01.jpg: Promoted.

--Halavar (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Scores:

1. Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: -1
2. Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: +1

=>

File:Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: Promoted.
--Godot13 (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Scores:

1. Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: -1
2. Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: +1

=>

File:Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: Promoted.
--Godot13 (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Arak Touma, Lebanon.jpg

And also:

• File:Rhum arrangé Madagascar.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)