Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bildermacherei!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casper (5) cropped.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Deichbrand 2013 (21).jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Deichbrand 2013 (21).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deichbrand Cuxhaven 2015 (60).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deichbrand Cuxhaven 2015 (67).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bitte Vorsicht bei der Kategorisierung edit

Bitte beachte bei den Kategorisierungsrichtlinien den Abschnitt COM:OVERCAT. D. h. ordne Bilder nicht gleichzeitig in eine übergeordnete Kategorie wie "Festivals" ein, die bereits genau passend in der Festival-Kategorie Category:Deichbrand 2015 stehen. Auch nicht in die Category:Cuxhaven. Der regionale Kategoriezusammenhang wird über die Festivalkategorie selbst hergestellt und nicht über jedes einzelne Bild. Es geht darum, dass allgemeine Kategorien nicht mit Massen von speziellen Bildern geflutet werden sollen und so vollkommen unübersichtlich und unbrauchbar werden. Bilder von Stars bei einem Charity-Event bloß unter Category:Charity einzuordnen ist dementsprechend auch nicht sehr sinnvoll. Wenn du von einem Event viele Bilder hochlädst, solltest du dafür eine eigene Kategorie anlegen und diese möglichst genau im Kategoriebaum (nach Ort und Art der Veranstaltung) verankern, Personen zusätzlich passend einordnen. Diese Bild ergibt in Category:Peter Lohmeyer weit mehr Sinn als in Category:Charity. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Dieser Bitte kann ich mich nur anschließen, bin gerade dabei, bei allen Deichbrand-Bildern die Category:Cuxhaven zu entfernen. Wenn man der Meinung ist, das Deichbrand-Festival sei Cuxhaven zuzuordnen, kann einfach Category:Deichbrand zu Category:Cuxhaven hinzugefügt werden und nicht jedes einzelne Bild. Grüße, --Joschi71 (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply