Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bn bt ec01!

-- 11:17, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

File:NagalandGovernorNikhilKumar.jpg edit

Hi, at what public event was this picture taken? What date and where? It is unusual to scan pictures such as this. - Sitush (talk) 12:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, The picture was taken at a public event where the Governor presided over;people that are either public figures or pictures that are taken at public events come under valid Wikimedia Commons comes under permitted category

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Bn bt ec01!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Satyendra Narayan Sinha Ji.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Satyendra Narayan Sinha Ji.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Satyendra Narayan Sinha Ji.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 19:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Om Sai ram sri ji.gif edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Om Sai ram sri ji.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Om Sai ram sri ji.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Nilfanion (talk) 20:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mr Shankar Sharan.gif edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mr Shankar Sharan.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mr Shankar Sharan.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Nilfanion (talk) 20:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
File:H E Nagaland Governor of Nagaland Nikhil Kumar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lovy Singhal (talk) 11:57, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Vice President Delivers Satyendra Narayan Sinha Memorial Lecture.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lovy Singhal (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Bihar Vibhuti Dr Anugrah Narayan Sinha.jpg edit

 
File:Bihar Vibhuti Dr Anugrah Narayan Sinha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lovy Singhal (talk) 03:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Shri Satyendra Narayan Sinha with Prime Minister of India Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Shri Satyendra Narayan Sinha with Prime Minister of India Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Shri Satyendra Narayan Sinha with Prime Minister of India Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, KurodaSho (talk) 07:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello. If these files above comes under PD, public domain, you have to identify the source/date/country/author etc. so as to determine licence status. If these files are really your own work, please send formal written permissions for Commons:OTRS. Thank you. --KurodaSho (talk) 13:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


Hello

As per the guidelines, one's private work/creation need not to seek formal written permission. Anyways, since a useful constructive content addition is being distorted reportedly, Kindly explain how should such formal written permission be send? Will you scrutinize hundreds of millions of similar images released by authors and post similar talk there too? Or it's just haphazard pick and chose? Anyways, I anticipate you to reply and tell about the OTRS method

thanks— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bn bt ec01 (talk • contribs) 9:01‎, 6 Sep 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Dear Ellin Beltz


There can not be a more brazen & blatantly illegitimate & malicious attempt to suppress creativity and to nullify one's sincere contributions to wikimedia commons over so many years. As an active wikipedian since last one decade, it is a biazarre that almost all the uploaded images have been arbitrarily proposed for deletion without proper analysis and scrutiny! Some of them have been on wikimedia for over 4-5 years and are an important part of informative content. This disturbingly harsh and prejudiced action is highly deplorable and unacceptable. If you want, sincere wikipedians and wikimedia contributors to stop doing their work, please block/ban us but don't spoil the value addition cintributions

It's like one parameter for anything and everything which is both impracticable and incorrect!

Sir, I humbly appeal and ask to the wikimedia community, should there be herculean restrictions on creativity and should all of us contributors be 'censored' to suit one's tailor made needs? This is very much against the spirit of this organization

Sir, As far as the official legitimacy of all the said images are concerned, I humbly ask everyone,Is there any convention that prohibits or censors contributing one's own original creation or pictures of natural landscape, public figures at public functions taken by an individual and pictures from one's personal archives?

1. If I visit a public function attended by a public figure and take snaps in my individual capacity (Which is absolutely permissible both legally and officially in India & as per wikimedia policy), will the said images will be deleted just on the pretext and unsubstantiated notion that there must be official camera pictures present for the said function! It is a bizarre but if i click a picture of a rare tree or an animal and upload it on wikimedia;will it be deleted since the govt. also publishes the same pictures?

All the below pictures have been absolutely clicked by me and in my capacity as an individual, neither are they copyrighted nor there is any official hurdle what so ever in uploading them since I , as the author is releasing them, As a free photographer and a creative contributor, there can not be any remotest reason what so ever to remove/delete my creations based on fabricated facts and vendetta.All these images are an indispensable part of contents and any deletion will jeopardize the very essence of people's encyclopedia i.e. Wikipedia & Wikimedia


2.If an honorable constitutional functionary visits my private home on a personal visit and i take the snaps personally, will it be forced to be deleted? Since their official PRD machinery may have taken similar snaps.

This is authoritative haphazard murder of creativity and contributions!

The Said images:


  are from my personal archives, (Mind you neither official nor professional but Personal)

On what basis will they be deleted? Just because some one is after an old wikimedia contributor Bn bt ec01, so they will be deleted?

3. There are millions of such pictures of public figures & personalities taken by individuals and uploaded on the Wikimedia; Will all of them proposed to be deleted on similar 'one size fits all' basis? Will they be censored too without reasons?

Infact, even from my Home country India and home province Bihar; there are hundreds of similar images posted by individual contributors; will they be haphazardly deleted and removed without proper scrutiny?

4. Why is the wikimedia cracking down based on a prejudiced idea and unsubstantiated ground? I hereby stand that all these images belong to the contributor, is there any proof/evidence that contradicts the same? Never, there just can't be! Since Truth always prevails!


5. If the wikimedia administrators want to ban, censor, arbitrarily edit/delete and impose restrictions on a legitimate contribution by a author, Please ban/block me from Wikimedia and block hundreds of un named un sung volunteers like me who had spent hours & days & years for making wikimedia a success.

6. I henceforth, quit wikimedia and would only hope that Justice will be done to me, for this will not be an individual case but the case of every single contributor from India

7. I humbly request, please block me, ban me, despise me but don't ruin valuable contributions in a haphazard and blatantly incorrect manner

[[User:Bn bt ec01|Bn bt ec01]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bn bt ec01 (talk • contribs) 12:36‎‎, 8 Sep 2015 (UTC)

Please sign your postings edit

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
 
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--KurodaSho (talk) 14:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Deleted content edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Bn bt ec01, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Shri Satyendra Narayan Sinha.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violations edit

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


 
Hello Bn bt ec01.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

SpacemanSpiff 20:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


Humble clarification edit

If there are any issues, I shall voluntarily correct it and seek guidance of admins to rectify errors. However, the said images are not copy right violations at all at any place by any policy standards . Is there any such evidence which points to the alleged shortcoming? No there can't be!

Also, I admit a few of them have license template issues but that doesn't implies that all the files are same and have similar issue, it is impracticable. Suppose an upload or edit doesn't fit into copyright policy but that doesn't means that all the edits , including the legitimately correct ones should be viewed with suspicion.

I agree that the most suitable license should be used but the core issue of claiming copyright violations is non-existent. Errors, if any should be widely discussed & rectifid. I am willing to constructively contribute

Your account has been blocked edit

Эlcobbola talk 16:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply



Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Reason:No veritable evidence of misuse found for alleged violations, Is contributing on wikimedia a misuse by any standards? if multiple users edit or contribute to similar/same topics/pages that is perfectly normal and does not ever violate any norms!. Interest and Inclination are prerogatives of editors. Also, The edits of said ID have sometimes been both complementary and contradictory. But that doesnot means that it is necessarily duplicacy! Also, I have to file appeal against the incorrect deletion of originally created images, along with providing credible facts supporting the issue that even some of my own creation images with no copyright or any issue possible at all were also deleted! I can only file appeal if i am unblocked. It is worth mentioning that Even if copyrights issue with some images were 'dubiously' proved, WHY GENUINE Images were deleted? which have been scrutinized over and over again all these years.Please also review the decision and unblock so that I can appeal against the block with the higher administrators and also appeal against blatant incorrect deletion of original images. I had requested to provide evidence of copyrights violations against each deleted image individually but so far the said administrator has not responded.Bn bt ec01 (talk) 10:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)"Reply
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

File:Dr Rajendra Pd. DR.Anugrah Narayan Sinha.jpg edit

 
File:Dr Rajendra Pd. DR.Anugrah Narayan Sinha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 08:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply