Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Butko/Архив (ноябрь 2009)

< User talk:Butko
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 99of9 in topic Quality Image Promotion
Archive This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page.

Переименование

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Platunum coin12r 1835.jpg Я не подумал и исправил орфографическую ошибку, поэтому бот не смог переименовать файл. Не могли бы вы пометить файл как проверенный еще раз. --Dnikitin (talk) 16:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Возможно ли переименовать несколько файлов

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Еще вопрос. Возможно ли переименовать сразу несколько файлов.

Я по глупости перепутал у монет аверс и реверс и в категории Category:Platinum coins of the Soviet Union большой буквой R наконце пометил (как я считал изображения реверсов). А это на самом деле аверсы.

Не критично, но как то неаккуратненько --Dnikitin (talk) 16:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Я добавил Вас в список доверенных пользователей. Теперь сами можете ставить шаблоны наподобие такого {{rename|Platinum coin12r 1835.jpg|}} --Butko (talk) 18:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Спасибо! --Dnikitin (talk) 17:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Вопросы

Latest comment: 14 years ago27 comments2 people in discussion

1. С помощью Коммониста пытаюсь загрузить изображения. В файле etc/licenses я подредактировал текст напротив шаблона{{cc-by-sa-3.0}}, чтобы отображался мой текст в параметре "Права (Дальнейшее использование этого файла)", но получилось кракозябрами, см. File:WSoS 2008 Moscow-102.JPG. Что делать?--Agent001 (talk) 23:12, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Наверное, проблема в кодировке файла. Если использовать кириллицу, то, по-идее, файл нужно сохранить в кодировке UTF-8. Или можно схитрить и написать нужный текст на подстранице User:Agent001/text, а в etc/licenses написать {{subst:User:Agent001/text}} --Butko (talk) 08:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Спасибо получилось. PS. Пожалуйста. удалите 5 файлов, загруженные мной сегодня, я их загружал для тестирования.--Agent001 (talk) 11:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Категории

Пожалуйста, создайте категории, я с этим не в ладах, список будет пополнятся. (В скобках я укажу, по моему мнению родительскую категорию):

  1. Vladimir Sinitsin Владимир Синицын (спортивные комментаторы/снукерные комментаторы) —
  2. Изображения переданные Владимиром Синицином —
  3. Ding Junhui (Snooker players) —
  4. Nikolay Saraev (бильярдный судья (русский бильярд))

--Agent001 (talk) 11:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Так вы поможете создать категории, мне ждать, или обратится к другому?--Agent001 (talk) 10:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Сами категории создать не проблема (category:Vladimir Sinitsin, category:Ding Junhui, category:Nikolay Saraev), но какие файлы должны в них находится? --Butko (talk) 11:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Ага, я понял. В категории должны быть какие-то файлы. Я спрашивал на тот случай, что не знаю в какую ставить родительскую категорию, я то в Рувики еле-еле это умею, а тут все на английском. Файлы в эту категорию, я в скором времени загружу, просто я буду загружать помощью Коммноиста, там же надо вставлять категории. При чем у меня будут общие категории для всех фалов + отдельные категории для конкретных фалов. --Agent001 (talk) 12:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

PS. Допускаются ли тут категория "изображения переданные таким-то"? вроде я видел здесь такую.--Agent001 (talk) 12:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Можно загружать в «красную категорию», а потом её создать. Родительские: Category:Snooker players, Category:Snooker referees, Category:Snooker. Категории про фотографу/загрузившему участнику допускаются, см. category:User categories --Butko (talk) 13:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
1. Можно загружать в «красную категорию», а потом её создать — с этим сложно. Хорошо, я загружаю в красную категорию, а потом вы мне поможете ее создать, ок? 2. category:User categories — здесь тоже я не понял. Категория для фоток загруженых мной будет category:Files uploads by User:Agent001? А как будет категория "Изображения переданные по свободной лицензии Васей Пупкиным" (здесь обращаю внимание, непосредственно он не фотографировал, но права на них принадлежат ему).--Agent001 (talk) 13:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Например, я делал Category:Photos by Anton Nossik и Category:Photos by Sergey Berezhnoi --Butko (talk) 13:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Если таких фотографий много, то общая категория допускается. Естественно, эту категорию нужно сделать подкатегорией этих людей --Butko (talk) 09:05, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Новая проблема с Комонистом

Нжимаю кнопку "загрузить", авторизация проходит, но:

  1. Файл размером 129КБ загружался минуты 3, так долго раньше никогда не было. Большие файлы 2-3 МБ, либо загружаются пустыми (error), либо вообще не загружаются, полоска загрузки в коммонисте стоит на месте вечно. Что может быть?--Agent001 (talk) 21:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Я не знаю, может быть, были проблемы с сервером и через время будет всё в порядке. Я через «Коммонист» загружал файлы размером в несколько десятков мегабайт и тогда проблем не было --Butko (talk) 06:53, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Хух, наконец-то закончил. Хотите верьте, хотите нет, 240 файлов загружались всю ночь. Но семь файлов не загрузились, см. User:Agent001/gallery#Fri Oct 02 02:20:39 EEST 2009, не знаете почему? Это те файлы, которые вы уже удаляли по моей просьбе. По-видимому, Коммонист не будет загружать файлы, имя которых уже существовало, даже если они ранее удалялись, так понимать?--Agent001 (talk) 07:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Коммонист не загружает дубликаты уже существующих файлов. Наверное, в кеше осталась информация, что такие файлы уже есть. Могу восстановить, если нужно --Butko (talk) 09:08, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Да, желательно их восстановить.--Agent001 (talk) 10:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Работа для бота

Прошу проставить категории:

1. Category:Files uploads by User:Agent001 — в файлы загруженные мной до 1 октября 2009 года.

Спасибо. Но странно, в истории правок правку видно, но на странице категория не отображается.--Agent001 (talk) 08:43, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Нужно в настройках включить отображение скрытых категорий (вкладка «Внешний вид»)--Butko (talk) 09:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
  Done

2. Category:Vladimir Sinitsin — в файлы:

--Agent001 (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  Done

3. Category:Michaela Tabb — в файлы:

--Agent001 (talk) 10:50, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  Done

4. Category:Ding Junhui — в файлы:

--Agent001 (talk) 20:27, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  Done

5. Category:Mark Selby и Category:John Higgins в файлы:

  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-9.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-85.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-81.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-80.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-8.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-79.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-80.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-8.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-79.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-78.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-77.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-74.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-72.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-72.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-70.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-69.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-67.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-57.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-56.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-55.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-54.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-50.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-49.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-46.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-44.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-43.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-245.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-219.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-218.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-217.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-216.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-215.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-213.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-212.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-211.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-210.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-209.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-208.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-207.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-205.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-203.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-20.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-10.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-1.jpg
  Done

6. Category:John Higgins & Mark Selby в файлы указанные в п. 5 --Agent001 (talk) 11:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

  Done

7. Category:John Higgins в файлы:

  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-90.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-60.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-53.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-51.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-48.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-33.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-32.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-31.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-246.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-244.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-243.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-234.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-233.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-231.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-230.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-229.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-222.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-22.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-214.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-200.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-199.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-192.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-183.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-182.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-181.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-173.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-170.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-17.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-169.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-168.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-167.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-166.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-165.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-151.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-15.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-147.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-146.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-145.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-142.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-141.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-140.JPG

--Agent001 (talk) 12:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

  Done


8. Category:Mark Selby в файлы:

  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-61.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-47.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-38.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-37.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-34.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-239.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-23.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-206.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-204.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-185.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-184.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-18.jpg
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-164.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-159.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-158.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-155.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-154.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-153.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-128.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-127.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-126.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-124.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-121.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-120.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-119.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-118.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-117.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-116.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-115.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-114.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-104.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-103.JPG
  • WSoS 2008 Moscow-102.JPG

--Agent001 (talk) 12:13, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

  Done --Butko (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 9b33835bd03325eb8bc897ef5e511219

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Галилео Чини

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Андрей, добрый день! Хочу обратить Ваше внимание на галерею работ Галилео Чини. Участник загрузил их как собственные работы, но он является автором собственно фотографий, а фото сделаны таким образом, что никакой разницы между ними и эскизами декораций - объектов съемки, совершенно нет. То есть, по сути, это репродукции. Собственно автор декораций - это итальянский художник Галилео Чини, что отражено в названии файлов. Автор, если верить итальянской статье, умер в 1956 году, то есть в общ.достояние его работы пока не перешли. Есть, конечно, вероятность, что файлы загрузил наследник, но что-то мне не верится. Скорее всего, это нарушение АП. Но если нет, прокомментьте мне, чтоб я знал на будущее? --Shcootsn (talk) 08:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Можно выставить эти фотографии на удаление (Commons:Deletion requests). В общем случае такие фото будут нарушать авторские права как производные работы. Но возможны нюансы (например, фото загружено наследником или другим правообладателем, в стране происхождения есть свобода панорамы для двумерных объектов и др.) --Butko (talk) 09:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Спасибо. А здесь где-нибудь на складе можно проверить, есть ли свобода панорамы в Италии? Чтобы не быть поспешным. --Shcootsn (talk) 11:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Italy - пишут, что нет --Butko (talk) 11:53, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Выставил на удаление Commons:Deletion requests/Galileo Chini --Butko (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Добавление новых шаблонов

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый день! Я создал серию армяноязычных шаблонов, не могли бы вы их добавить?--Elegant's (talk) 13:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

  Done --Butko (talk) 14:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Спасибо:)--Elegant's (talk) 19:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Рак-отшельник в бухте Ласпи 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gorgeous --99of9 13:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Лицензия для билетов?

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый день, Андрей!

Лицензия PD-UA-exempt подходит для разовых билетов на проезд в городском транспорте?

С уважением, Георгий

-- George Chernilevsky talk 14:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Нет. См. User talk:Butko/Архив (октябрь 2008)#Re: Билеты. А вот, если на билете нет рисунка и он состоит только из букв и цифр, то наверное, можно считать его {{PD-trivial}} --Butko (talk) 17:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


Огорчительная ситуация с билетами

Нашел вот такие варианты:

Лицензии, видимо, не соответствуют истине.

Сейчас винницкие билеты на трамвай-троллейбус есть в 4-х цветовых вариатнах: синий, зеленый, малиновый, алый. Кроме текста присутствует простенький орнамент (как на старом билете). Думал отсканировать все варианты в один файл, а теперь сомневаюсь.

И еще вопрос: если я чего-нибудь загружу, а это будет удалено из-за нарушения авторских прав, то в результате я буду считаться плохим юзером (потеряю какое-то доверие)?

-- George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Конечно, нужно стараться не нарушать авторские права. Но нарушение может быть неосознанным или из-за «серой зоны» в правилах и законодательстве. Либо в момент загрузки файл может быть приемлемым, а потом из-за каких то изменений в законодательстве или правилах стать неприемлемым. Доверие будет зависеть от того, как себя поведёте. Если другие участники скажут что вот это плохо и не надо так делать, а Вы при этом будете игнорировать предупреждения и продолжать загружать такие файлы, то это приведёт к конфликту. Если ситуация спорная, то нужно не действовать силой, а искать аргументы и приводить их в обсуждении или согласиться, если с аргументами оппонентов не поспоришь. --Butko (talk) 08:16, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Ok, спасибо за информацию. -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:29, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sebastopol bazilika v bazilike 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good -- George Chernilevsky 09:58, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Бабочка на ЮБК 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, although resolution of the main subject itself is hard at the limit. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Жук-олень в бухте Ласпи 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Cayambe 7:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Жук-олень в бухте Ласпи 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good in spite of some noise and borderline DOF. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:06, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 Venus gallina shells.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good as a photo. The description page seems a bit minimalistic though. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:47, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

2 вопроса

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Доброго времени суток, Андрей!

1) File:Kh-15 free drawing.png - очень примитивный рисунок, есть неточности. В категории имеются фотографии. Автор рисунка не возражает против удаления.

Удалил. Лучше такие рисунки делать в SVG, чтобы другим авторам было проще исправить --Butko (talk) 14:30, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

2) Есть ли у Вас книга или адрес сайта для идентификации морских раковин?

Нет. Я просто фотографировал раковины, которые накопились у меня дома, а опознавали их другие участники (через Category:Unidentified Mollusca) --Butko (talk) 14:30, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

С уважением, Георгий -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:22, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

OTRS на Су-35

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Картинка замечательная, но копиво Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Su-35MAKS.jpg.

У меня нет OTRS аккаунта, чтобы попросить разрешение. Могу только попробовать предварительно договориться с Правообладателями. Что и куда они должны прислать?

-- George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Чтобы просить разрешение аккаунт не нужен. Правообладатель просто должен послать шаблонное письмо, а потом участники имеющие доступ к OTRS проверят это письмо и поставят соответствующий шаблон. Т. е. достаточно переговорить с правообладателем и попросить его отправить такое письмо, а потом уже формальности. --Butko (talk) 07:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Колорадский жук в бухте Ласпи 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments the best one of the series, camera on the border, structures could be finer --Mbdortmund 13:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gafranium tumidum shell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments imo good enough --Mbdortmund 13:20, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

About file File:Stone Fence Krk.JPG.jpg scheduled for deletition

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. Problem with license information for this file is not clear to me. I was transfered this file from Flickr with Flickr upload bot and relied on his ability to chose and write authors copyright permission, of course, I was also personally checked before these icons (Now is icon BY what is OK). Well, today, when I look on the history, I see that you and user Vlsergey added some informations (CC-BY and Paolo Mazzo). I see that now permission is: cc-by-2.0, was that data missed? Is it now all right or not? Sincerely --Vhorvat (talk) 11:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

I hesitate to answer this question. Now photo on Flickr is not licensed under CC-BY-2.0. So I tag it "no permission" template. But if bot was check license before upload it may be ok --Butko (talk) 14:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Do you check license yourself before upload? --Butko (talk) 14:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago8 comments5 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crataegus monogyna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 10:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeonium arboreum on flowers exibition.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- George Chernilevsky 10:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cufut Qale kenassa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Still good, because overexposure is only in the clouds that are white anyway. However sharpening halos are hard at the limit where I would decline, especially on the corner column. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mytilus galloprovincialis shell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me -- George Chernilevsky 10:25, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of the Hercules Farnese in Alexander's gardens, Saint Petersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Question Can you stamp out that cable in the background? -- H005 21:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
  Done I remove cable from the background --Butko 09:45, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Good job.-- H005 19:21, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain nozzle with lighting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The subject is not so much exciting, but image quality is good. --Cayambe 13:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Two Eobania vermiculata shell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Why interference Category:Gastronomy?

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

See also Why interference Category:Gastronomy? (Category:Gastronomy --> Category talk:Gastronomy)--Tom778 (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ocimum basilicum flowers in Crimea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments here the shallow DOF looks good imo --Mbdortmund 02:28, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vespiary of Polistes gallicus 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment File size is very low, < 1 MB. Otherwise good. --Cayambe 12:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
This is original size created by camera. I don't apply post-processing to this image --Butko 14:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Паук в Донецке 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Новые армянские шаблоны

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

И снова добрый день! Прошу вас пройтись по этой категории, я создал много новых шаблонов, около 70% в категории надо добавить.--Elegant's (talk) 20:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

  Done --Butko (talk) 05:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Спасибо, и ещё эти два,[1],[2] пожалуйста.--Elegant's (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  Done --Butko (talk) 18:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Большое спасибо.--Elegant's (talk) 17:56, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sorbus mougeotii in Donetsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- H005 12:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa canina in Donetsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 13:50, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cerastoderma glaucum shell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Палач у экспозиции орудий пыток (ретушь).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veteran truda 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I can't see anything wrong with that. --99of9 12:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veteran truda 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment The crop is extremely tight, and appears to cut a sliver off the top of the subject. Can you recrop a little wider? --99of9 22:13, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
the other one, too, else OK --Mbdortmund 23:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I upload new version --Butko 14:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Ok, that has removed the error. Thinking about it I suppose it's ok to crop tight, because there's no point seeing more black canvas. --99of9 12:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Category:Snooker

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Не подскажите, почему в этой категории не отображаются подкатегории? Их должно быть много.--Agent001 (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Там просто много файлов и категории уехали на вторую страницу. Попробую оптимизировать --Butko (talk) 09:28, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Locomotive EPL2T on train station in Donetsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment The wires above the loco seem to have been cut. Did you modify anything there or is it just an impression ? Otherwise good --Grez 12:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't apply post-processing to this image. This wires are from pavilion on platform --Butko 15:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
well, in this case... --Grez 19:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of ancient coin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and useful. --Cayambe 08:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 гривны. Круты 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments 1/400 Sek., f/3,2 is not so good for the coin, it is not running away, but still accaptable --Mbdortmund 10:57, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Aileen Wuornos.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Не подскажите, почему в статье Aileen Wuornos упорно возвращают несвободный файл (мало того, направильно оформленный), хотя есть такой же, но свободный? В енвики, отличные от рувики правила КДИ? --Agent001 (talk) 16:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Эти две фотографии с одинаковым правовым статусом, т.к. они из одного источника. Сейчас в английской Википедии изменили шаблон лицензии и теперь он совпадает с Викискладовским --Butko (talk) 07:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Хм, у той фотографии неверный лицензионный статус, она может быть свободной (как загрузил я), тем не менее ее возвращают.--Agent001 (talk) 09:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
По сути это одна и та же фотография, только кадрирование разное. А насчёт КДИ - в разных разделах они, действительно, могут отличаться --Butko (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Храм святого Владимира 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 18:09, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Базилика 1935 года 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Berthold Werner 18:27, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Вопрос о загрузке изображения

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Андрей, добрый день! Не посоветуете ли, как поступить в такой ситуации: есть фотографии певца из его личного архива, которые он передает участнику википедии с разрешением опубликовать. Но собственно автором снимков певец, естественно, не является. Фотографии сделаны в 60-70-х годах, автора, возможно, установить не удастся. Можно ли их разместить на складе и тогда под какой лицензией? --Shcootsn (talk) 09:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

На Викискладе вряд ли, так как нужно разрешение автора. А вот в Википедии как fair use, наверное, можно --Butko (talk) 09:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Так ведь там портреты живого артиста, не пройдет по критериям... Ну а если автор все же найдется, там ведь особая форма согласия нужна? --Shcootsn (talk) 11:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Если автор найдётся, то ему нужно будет послать шаблонное письмо. Если нужны просто фото этого певца, то можно попросить у него фотографии с известным автором, который не против размещения фото под свободной лицензией. Если нужны именно эти фотографии, т.к. они отображают какое-то невоспроизводимое событие, то нужно будет описать почему используются именно эти фотографии, почему другие фотографии не подходят и почему важно, чтобы именно эти фотографии были в статье - тогда они могут соответствовать ru:ВП:КДИ --Butko (talk) 11:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Городские ворота Херсонеса 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Mbz1 16:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Городская баня VI-X веков.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK.--Mbz1 15:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Церковь-усыпальница XII-XIII веков 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Mbz1 15:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Еще раз про Су-35

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Обсуждение здесь: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Su-35MAKS.jpg.
На всякий случай, посмотрите OTRS сообщения, может быть, что-то пришло от них с текстом по-русски?
С уважением, -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

К удалению

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Страничка к удалению:
Commons:Valued_image_candidates/_HexaplexcichoreumProfils.jpg
Автор ошибочно создал номинацию в виде страницы с ведущим пробелом. Я уже всё исправил и переименовал, осталась только эта страница-перенаправление. Она уже не нужна.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:18, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

OTRS

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый день! не могли бы вы мне разъяснить суть OTRS разрешения в этом файле File:Team_Fairplay.jpg.

Я хочу использовать еще несколько фото этого же автора и хочу знать разрешение дано на фото определенного сайта или только на конкретное указанно фото? --Dnikitin (talk) 01:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Есть разрешение только для этой фотографии --Butko (talk) 07:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Кадрирование Ваших QI номинаций

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый день, Андрей!

Если есть оригиналы Ваших фотографий раковин, то переделайте, пожалуйста, кадрирование.
Картинка гораздо лучше смотрится, если с каждой стороны есть поле хотя бы в 30% от линейной величины объекта. Сильно обрезанные снимки хуже воспринимаются и дают мало возможностей для последующей подгонки (например, для печатных изданий).

С уважением, Георгий -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:45, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Постараюсь. Серия снимков у меня сохранилась. Нужно будет выбрать нужные оригиналы. --Butko (talk) 15:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago12 comments6 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Башня Зенона 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments With a possible but IMO acceptable perspective distortion (wall edges not vertical). --Cayambe 10:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Кладка усадьбы III в до н.э. 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Храм святого Владимира 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well done. --Cayambe 11:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Храм святого Владимира 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The spot is gone. OK now. Geocode would be nice. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sorbus mougeotii fruits.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- H005 19:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crataegus monogyna 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice quality -- George Chernilevsky 16:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cichorium intybus in Donetsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Strong noise. The white spot at the bottom of all unnecessary. - Darius Baužys 19:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
I remove white spot at the bottom --Butko 07:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Now it's OK for me. - Darius Baužys 10:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Idea leuconoe 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. With a slight regret for the small file size. --Cayambe 15:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crataegus monogyna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zoo in dokuchaevsk 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- H005 23:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Zelenograd - 15th microdistrict.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Переименуй, пожалуйста, в File:Zelenograd - 16th microdistrict.jpg. Спасибо. Alex Spade (talk) 20:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

  Done --Butko (talk) 10:34, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sorbus mougeotii flowers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 22:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aesculus hippocastanum flowers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Mbdortmund 14:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

К удалению

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

1) Category:Category:Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ5 - моя ошибка (2 раза Category).

2) File:Rapana_thomasiana.jpg - маленькое фото плохого качества. Баланс белого сильно искажен. В категории есть варианты лучше. Наверное, нужно обсуждение перед удалением?

--George Chernilevsky talk 13:35, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

1 - удалил, 2 - наверное, лучше выставить на обсуждение Commons:Deletion_requests --Butko (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 14 years ago8 comments5 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Male passer domesticus in Donetsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and useful. Please, add geotag. --Cayambe 15:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Топа 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice eyes. Crop IMO acceptable for this close-up --George Chernilevsky 06:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blackberry in Crimea 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Securigera varia in Donetsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment Simple elegance, but needs a denoise. --99of9 10:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
I apply Gaussian blur 0,3 px and upload new version --Butko 10:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Good now -- Archaeodontosaurus 09:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Топа 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good IMO. --99of9 23:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Топа 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good IMO. --99of9 23:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Butko/Архив_(ноябрь_2009)&oldid=154028709"
Return to the user page of "Butko/Архив (ноябрь 2009)".