Chesipiero

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Chesipiero!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Welcome, also. If you have questions feel free to put a note on my talk page.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Matrei am brenner

I have deleted this once and you have recreated it. If

• you intend to create a category, then you must use the name Category:Matrei am brenner, or, if it is a town name, probably Category:Matrei am Brenner.
• you intend to create a gallery of images, then you must put some images in it before saving

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Chesipiero!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Forte di Fortezza 01.jpg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Matrei am Brenner 10.JPG was uncategorized on 19 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Quebecair F27 CF-QBD.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Quebecair F27 CF-QBD.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

High Contrast (talk) 13:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Non capisco...

Vedo che hai fatto pesanti modifiche nella categorizzazione delle chiese che non capisco. Vorresti cortesemente farmene partecipe? Tra l'altro anche se non esistono progetti in Commons tra utenti stiamo cercando di dare delle convenzioni per evitare di vedere decine di categorie non opportunamente correlate tra loro; se vuoi avere un'idea del lavoro basta che tu passi nella mia pagina discussione utente e in quelle dei miei interlocutori. Aspetto news, grazie per l'attenzione.--Threecharlie (talk) 10:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Mountains of Bezirk Reutte

Hi Chesipiero, do you feel it will add value to commons to put all mountains into the lowest possible administrative unit? For all units? You just started here, there is a lot of mountains to recat in case of following your implicit proposal, but I would like to ask you if returning to a leaf category per federal state like Category:Mountains of Tyrol (which you did not remove for the mountains in Bezirk Reutte, thanks a lot for that), could be possible. ciao --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Hallo, I was working in Bezirk Reutte, as all the others Districts in Tyrol, to organize the category. I checked the Villages name and I found the Monutains name too. I decided to create the category Mountains of Bezirk Reutte just to separate from the Villages, the category is in Category: Mountains of Tyrol too. Suggest me the way to separate the "Mountains" from the "Villages" in Bezirk Reutte. Bis bald. User:Chesipiero

Yes I saw that, but you also have been creating a complete new and deeper level for mountains. I just wanted you to halt before you run after one Bezirk after the other. I had a look at some other districts in Tirol, and I didn't find any other mountain. So my proposal would be to remove categorization for Category:Mountains of Bezirk Reutte completely and also the cat itself. IMO there some problems with too fine grained subcats:

• Finding an object gets more difficult (you eventuelly habe to know the district, not only the federal state).
• Even with proper cat-description (which only few people do add; you didn't; and nobody reads) the cat could be seen as an example for COM:OVERCAT, what will guide a user one day to remove it from what is looking as the parent cat Category:Mountains of Tyrol. Which would be wrong for mountains at the border of the district, unless they have been added to the other Bezirk's category.
• It makes the cat tree asymmetric - unless you plan to add categories for each district. (which does not make that much sense, as there are also rather flat aereas in Austria).

What do you think? Thank you for cleaning up those Tirol related categories anyhow. (btw: you can use four tildes to put your signature here: ~~~~) ciao --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Done !Chesipiero (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, requested speedy deletion for category. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:38, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Aviation Wikiproject on Commons?

Hey mate, I've had an idea of starting an Aviation WikiProject on Commons. I have created a page at User talk:Russavia/Proposal where I hope that if other editors think this is a good idea, we can all come up with ideas, etc. Please keep all comments on that page for time being, and if you know of other editors on Commons or on other language projects who might be interested in commenting, coming up with ideas, etc, please let them know of the discussion. Let's see if this could be a workable project. russavia (talk) 12:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:C-130H Hercules (Italian Air Force)

Hello!

When you create categories related with Italian armed forces, don't forget to link them adequately, like this. --21:53, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Please use sub-categories

---

When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––Apalsola ^{t • c} 10:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Please let me know where I was wrong, tahnks a lot. Chesipiero (talk) 14:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC) (Comment moved from User talk:Apalsola#Sub-categories. ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 17:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC))

At least this (already in Category:F-18 in the Finnish Air Force and Category:OH-FMM (aircraft)), this and this (already in Category:Midnight Hawks). And let's keep the discussion in one place (it was started here). I have your talk page in my watchlist, so I will notice any replies. ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 17:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

File:NC CRC-7275.jpg

File:NC CRC-7275.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 09:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of en-interwikis

Hi Chesipiero, I do not understand your deletion of interwikis to en: like here or here. The articles exist and are valid in the English Wikipedia. Could you explain please? Thanks. Raymond 15:49, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

The links to the en-interwikis are present on the top of the Category page.Chesipiero (talk) 16:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your explanation. I see what you mean but you are wrong. These lines on the top of the Category page are language templates only but they do NOT create interwiki links. They are missing on the left side. For example Category:Spanair. Do you see ca/en/es interwiki links there? I don't. Please revert your last changes. Thanks. Raymond 17:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Re-established the interwiki links.Chesipiero (talk) 17:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012

Hey Piergiuliano, I've noticed that you uploaded literally tons of good pictures showing South Tyrolean cultural heritage monuments (and maybe you've noticed me, too, while adding categories and monument-tags). Since I assume that you're interested in this topic, I just wanted to bring to your notice that there is a related project on the German wikipedia. In the past months we've created monuments lists for each municipality in preparation for the contest, they might be useful for your work on Commons. If you have any kind of questions, suggestions and so on, we'll be glad to answer those on our talk page (I guess you're fine with German as well?). Regards, Mai-Sachme (talk) 07:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Chesipiero. You have new messages at Russavia's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

russavia (talk) 19:46, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

File:RCAF (DHC-5A) CC-115 Buffalo 454 (34407).jpg

File:RCAF (DHC-5A) CC-115 Buffalo 454 (34407).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.01.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.02.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.02.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.03.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.03.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.03.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.04.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.04.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.04.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.05.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.05.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.05.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.06.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.06.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.06.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.07.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.07.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica 1972.07.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

RE: File:JP 4 Mensile di Aeronautica

Hello, Chesipiero. You have new messages at El Grafo's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File tagging File:Aviazione e Marina 1969.53.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Aviazione e Marina 1969.53.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Aviazione e Marina 1969.53.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Martin H. (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Livorno Stadio 1.JPG

And also:

• File:Livorno Stadio 2.JPG
• File:Livorno Stadio 3.01.JPG

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:33, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Grazie, mi dispiace della cancellazione dell'immagine, ma dopo aver consultato legali, avvocati, sentenze e aver letto che la pena arriva a 15.000€ e 3 anni di reclusione abbiamo deciso che pubblicando immagini con quei parametri si va contro la legge. Il tuo esempio citato, di cui ti ringrazio di averlo citato, è molto importante perché diviene un'ulteriore conferma del fatto che in Italia nessuno sa ciò che la legge in materia di diritto d'autore vieta, e nessuno la fa rispettare. A questo punto io mi sento offeso dallo Stato italiano poiché a me e a tutti pone un divieto che però non fa rispettare ad altri. Sarà comunque lo stesso Raffaello Brizzi tramite i suoi eredi a far eventualmente causa ai diretti interessati. Se non richiede troppo tempo saresti capace di indicarmi gli altri siti in cui appare la tua immagine, anche ritoccata? Forse potresti comprendere meglio cosa sta avvenendo su Commons e quali conseguenze si avranno anche per Wikipedia: Deletion requests/FoP Italy. Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Perfetto grazie. Quando trovi quei siti scrivemeli. Ciao --Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:55, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Livorno ATL bus stop 8650.JPG

File:Livorno ATL bus stop 8650.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Morning ☼ (talk) 16:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Boeing 2707 SST Supersonic Transport mockup 01.jpg

File:Boeing 2707 SST Supersonic Transport mockup 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 16:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Gloster aircraft sorting

Hello,

I was wondering what point do you have in adding sort keys to aircraft categories in Category:Gloster aircraft, such as this? Since all Gloster aircraft categories begin with "Gloster", the sort order of the categories is the same as it was before only sorted at "*" instead of "G". This seems rather meaningless. MKFI (talk) 20:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes, why are you removing useful cat sorts, as here (and many other recent ones). Andy Dingley (talk) 22:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Air France map routes 01.jpg

File:Air France map routes 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

UserB (talk) 12:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:Aircraft manufacturers

Hi, Chesipiero. Re Category:Aircraft manufacturers, and your recent work involving that category. Please note that the cat is for companies, not aircraft, but there is some crossover between this cat and Category:Aircraft by manufacturer, particularly to help disambiguation. A category for the full company name can be justified:

• 1. If the company name is long and complicated, or not easily recognised when searching for an aircraft category (eg Société des Avions Marcel Bloch/Bloch aircraft); or
• 2. If there are files that don't come under aircraft, eg automobiles, factories, people, logos, etc.; or
• 3. If an editor has already created a category with a defunct company name, that might be useful for disambiguation (eg Air Fouga/Fouga).
  

I hope that you can recognise these differences, and perhaps you will consider removing some of the Xxxx aircraft cats from Category:Aircraft manufacturers where there is unnecessary duplication of simple names (eg Comac aircraft), and similarly remove duplicated companies from Category:Aircraft by manufacturer (eg Rockwell). Regards, PeterWD (talk) 11:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Britannia Airways ticket cover 1970-08-31.jpg

File:Britannia Airways ticket cover 1970-08-31.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 14:39, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

File:IATA passanger ticket cover 3608.jpg

File:IATA passanger ticket cover 3608.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 14:40, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

language templates

Thanks for your work to add language templates to several cats or galleries. But please use the correct format {{en|1=Text}} to prevent display issues with some special characters. --Denniss (talk) 12:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 20:07, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Trans World Airlines boarding pass 1973-08-05 1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Trans World Airlines boarding pass 1973-08-05 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 23:35, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Trans World Airlines boarding pass 1973-07-11.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Trans World Airlines boarding pass 1973-07-11.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 23:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:C-119 Flying Boxcar (Italian Air Force) 02.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:C-119 Flying Boxcar (Italian Air Force) 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Trans World Airlines Convair 880 N812TW.jpg

Hi there, in relation to File:Trans World Airlines Convair 880 N812TW.jpg, can you tell me if this was taken at JFK or LaGuardia? Cheers, russavia (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

N750PA

Hi,

you uploaded file:Pan American World Airways Boeing 747 N750PA 01.jpg. In the description you mention the name Clipper Rambler, but according to this list, the name of the plane was Clipper Neptune's Favorite. Given the length of the (illegible) name on the nose of the plane, that seems plausible to me. The dates you specified seem to be in accordance with the list.

Richardw (talk) 15:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

PS: See also file:Boeing 747-121, Pan American World Airways - Pan Am AN1399875.jpg. Richardw (talk) 16:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

• I see... basically, the name 'Rambler' was used only a very short time (the plane was renamed the same year it was delivered to Pan Am), the picture was taken after the plane had received its new name, and the description doesn't mention the renaming. I'll add a few words. Thanks for your reply! Richardw (talk) 20:51, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Brenner Basistunnel 1.JPG

File:Brenner Basistunnel 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    21:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Hughes XH-17 with cars.jpg

---

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Hughes XH-17 with cars.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Windecker-model WL.jpg

File:Windecker-model WL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Эlcobbola _talk 15:48, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Taylor titch.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Taylor titch.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:23, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Experimental aircraft of the United States

Why did you restore "Category:Experimental aircraft of the United States" to all the X-planes after I'd just removed it? This is double categorisation since they are all in "Category:X-planes", which itself is in "Experimental aircraft of the United States". There is no need for this duplication. — Huntster (t @ c) 09:38, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Since you are actively working on these various categories, I'll wait a day or so before consolidating all these to the X-plane category. Thanks for your efforts! — Huntster (t @ c) 13:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

File:SAS Scandinavian menu cover 1972-08-22.jpg

File:SAS Scandinavian menu cover 1972-08-22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 08:42, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Aviation now on Twitter

Hi, as mentioned here, Commons:WikiProject Aviation is now on Twitter. I will be using the feed to tweet photos from our now extensive repository of aviation imagery, and will also use it for outreach activities. If you have any suggestions on how to get the maximum use out of Twitter feel free to leave suggestions on the Aviation project talk page. You can follow the account at http://www.twitter.com/commonsaviation. Cheers, russavia (talk) 14:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Talk back

I have responded on my talk page. I originally thought that the edits by you that I reverted were vandalism to Commons, but that is not the case. I have undone my reverts. DLindsley (My talk page) 23:05, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

File:De Havilland Canada DHC-7 C-GNBX-X 01.jpg

File:De Havilland Canada DHC-7 C-GNBX-X 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 15:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Mig-15

The MiG-15 itself was not used as a trainer aircraft when it was first made, the MiG-15UTI was the dedicated training version of the MiG-15.Articseahorse (talk) 19:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

X-48 change

Hi Chesi, would you please stop making this edit to the X-48 category? The X-48B was a three engine aircraft, but the X-48C has only two engines. This is already reflected in their individual categories. — Huntster (t @ c) 04:19, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Livorno Terrazza Mascagni 09 @chesi.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Livorno Terrazza Mascagni 09 @chesi.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

File:British Caledonian DC-10 N54643 C72173.jpg

File:British Caledonian DC-10 N54643 C72173.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Домна (talk) 09:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Consistency

consistency of usage usually trumps, unless it goes against common sense JarrahTree (talk) 01:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Ciao

Posso importunati per alcune richieste?

La prima è chiederti se se passi spesso dalla Toscana. Vedo che passi da Livorno, ma anche in Florida, Tirolo, isole della Scozia... quindi ho dubbio che tu non ci sia sempre. Mi spiego: sto facendo un mini censimento di utenze toscane, per organizzare delle iniziative sul territorio, tipo delle gite. Io non vivo spesso in Toscana ma mi piace incontrare wikipediani se ci passo. Starei contattando per qualche gita in zona, non dico si concretizzerà nulla di speciale ma fa piacere mettere assieme facce nuove.

La seconda è se hai voglia di imparare qualche strumento per la gestione immagini, che serve a trovare immagini che mancano nella zona dove ti trovi. Sto facendo un censimento sprimentale delle utenze italiane disponibili a scattare foto che mancano ancora nelle voci (stazioni, edifici, frazioni...). In Toscana va abbastanza bene soprattutto verso Siena e Firenze ma a Livorno non ho ancora contattatp nessuno. Mi hanno già risposto una trentina, ma spero di arrivare a almeno un centinaio.--Alexmar983 (talk) 14:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Genova.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Genova.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Genova.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ariadacapo (talk) 09:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Jöchlstuhrn

Salve!

Non so se parli il tedesco (o forse l'Esperanto), così provo di esprimermi in italiano, sperando che ci capiremo. Sentiti libero di rispondere in italiano, tedesco o in Esperanto, come preferisci. Propongo di rispondere qui, sulla tua pagina, mettedo il modulo/template {{Reply to|Renardo la vulpo}}.

Qualche anni fa ai creato la categoria Jöchlstuhrn. Mi pare che la „h“ sia nel luogo sbagliato, e che il nome tirolese sia Jöchlsthurn, come suggerisce anche il lemma Palazzo Jöchlsthurn della Wikipedia italiana.

Sei d'accordo se propongo di cambiare il nome della categoria?

Cordiali saluti -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Grazie per la risposta più veloce che ho mai ricevuta! Tanti auguri anche a te. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Metrojet

This category has been nominated for discussion to change the name to Category:Metrojet (Hong Kong). Josh (talk) 22:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Please make your new version under a different name

The file:Mosca class - NH 47556 - cropped.png has been edited by you and substantially reduced. The new version looks good, but as it is very small in screen size, I have reverted your edit. If you want the file on Commons, please upload it under a different name. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 21:00, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Livorno Piazza Matteotti skyscraper 01 @chesi.JPG

File:Livorno Piazza Matteotti skyscraper 01 @chesi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

File:MM Orsa.jpg

File:MM Orsa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 15:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Orsa 567.jpg

File:Orsa 567.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:13, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Speranza di Gesù Alhama Valera 1.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Speranza di Gesù Alhama Valera 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Speranza di Gesù Alhama Valera 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Ruthven (msg) 19:29, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Espero 1.jpg

File:Espero 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 09:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Horten_H_XIII

Horten H XIII has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

GeisterPirat (talk) 14:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Canadian National timetable 1975-04-27.jpg

File:Canadian National timetable 1975-04-27.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 12:35, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Dc3 reggio.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dc3 reggio.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Dc3 reggio.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Avro 691 Lancastrian I-DALR Alitalia.jpg

Copyright status: File:Avro 691 Lancastrian I-DALR Alitalia.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Avro 691 Lancastrian I-DALR Alitalia.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

:File:Reception party for returning villagers at Arctic Village.jpg

Reverted to version as of 13:35, 24 April 2011 (UTC) January 2 2021 version appears to have been edited. Restored for fidelity to original, Edited images should be uploaded as separate files and the modifications noted. Dankarl (talk) 03:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Corazziere Caria.jpg

File:Corazziere Caria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Montecatini Terme Excelsior baths 01.JPG

Yours sincerely, SCP-2000 10:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Category:Churches_in_Halltal

Churches in Halltal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Luftschiffhafen (talk) 23:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:VEF_I-11

VEF I-11 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

ZLEA _T\^C 20:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

File:1966 Alaska license plate 69306.jpg

File:1966 Alaska license plate 69306.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fourthords | =Λ= | 23:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you Chesipiero – Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 01:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you Chesipiero – Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 17:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you Chesipiero – Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 00:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks a lot for the Special and Photographer Barnstars you honoured me. I have only done what I can do for improving Wiki. Chesipiero (talk) 15:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Bye bye ! I am on vacation !

Chesipiero (talk) 16:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Maria Himmelfahrt (Pfons) 10.JPG

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Quebecair timetable 1975-06-28 01.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Quebecair timetable 1975-06-28 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Quebecair timetable 1975-06-28 01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Quebecair map routes 01.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Quebecair map routes 01.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC)