Detlef Dauer

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Detlef Dauer!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Karl Schorn (1803-1850), Karten spielende Wallensteiner, Porzellanmalerei, Pfeifenkopf, D1386.jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Karl Schorn (1803-1850), Karten spielende Wallensteiner, Porzellanmalerei, Pfeifenkopf, D1386.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Guanaco (talk) 12:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Alle von mir eingestellten Objekte sind mein unbestrittenes Eigentum, Rechte Dritter bestehen nicht! Dazu gehört auch mein Inventar D1386!

File:D0552-0 Magdeburg, Johanniskirche 1951, Karl Friedrich.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:D0552-0 Magdeburg, Johanniskirche 1951, Karl Friedrich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:D0638-0 Kloster unser lieben Frauen Magdeburg 1951.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:D0638-0 Kloster unser lieben Frauen Magdeburg 1951.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Alle von mir eingestellten Objekte sind mein unbestrittenes Eigentum, Rechte Dritter bestehen nicht! Dazu gehört auch mein Inventar D0638

Please use sub-categories edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

In die Category:Düsseldorfer Malerschule sollten im Normalfall vermutlich die kompletten Künstler-Personenkategorien rein anstatt der Einzelbilder. --Sitacuisses (talk) 03:48, 14 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Karl Friedrich,Magdeburg Brücke Buckau 1928 , D0349.jpg edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Karl Friedrich,Magdeburg Brücke Buckau 1928 , D0349.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

тнояsтеn ⇔ 16:59, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Alle von mir eingestellten Objekte sind mein unbestrittenes Eigentum, Rechte Dritter bestehen nicht! Dazu gehört auch mein Inventar D0349!

File:Karl Friedrich (1898-1989), Magdeburg „Brücke am Bahnhof Buckau“, Lithographie 1928, D1104.jpg edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Karl Friedrich (1898-1989), Magdeburg „Brücke am Bahnhof Buckau“, Lithographie 1928, D1104.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

тнояsтеn ⇔ 17:00, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ferdinand Theodor Hildebrandt (1804-1874) „Warnung vor der Wassernixe“, Porzellanmalerei, Zierteller, D0736-1.jpg

Alle von mir eingestellten Fotos und Objekte sind mein unbestrittenes Eigentum, Rechte Dritter bestehen nicht! Es handelt sich um seltenes Kulturgut, das für die Öffentlichkeit publiziert ist !!!!!!!!! And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please do not reupload deleted images edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

English | français | +/−

I see you have uploaded Karl_Schorn_(1803-1850),_Karten_spielende_Wallensteiner,_Porzellanmalerei,_Pfeifenkopf,_D1386.jpg after it has been deleted. Please don't do that—as long as you haven't fixed the problem with it, it will just get deleted again and you might eventually be blocked. If you don't know what the problem is, ask the administrator who originally deleted your file (see the deletion log). - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Es gibt keinen Grund, die in commons wikimedia von mir eingestellten Fotos zu löschen: Alle Fotos sind von mir (mein Urheberrecht) und alle eingestellten Objekte sind mein unbestrittenes Eigentum!!!!!!!!

Was soll das?????????????ß

In that case please send a permission statement to OTRS. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:00, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ich, Detlef Dauer, besitze in den bei commons wikimedia eingestellten Fotos das Urheberrecht und die abgebildeten Objekte sind mein unbestrittenes Eigentum (Sammlung Dauer). Alle Links zu www.oblivion-art.de führen zu meiner Internet-Seite (siehe Impressum). Es handelt sich also nicht um externe Dateien!

Mail your statement to permissions-de

wikimedia.org. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 08:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Detlef Dauer,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Detlef Dauer,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Detlef Dauer,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect sourcing and licensing edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please pay more attention to filling in the required information correctly. This is not acceptable. It is not your own work, so you must not use {{Own work}}, nor are you the author. It is a faithful reproduction of a Public Domain work, so it is PD, not CC. Our policies require you to credit the actual author and list the actual source, see COM:S. Storkk (talk) 07:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Willy Knabe (1896-1967), Federzeichnung, Das Gebäude der Handelskammer, (Magdeburg).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Buidhe (talk) 23:04, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Parameter Urheber, Datum, etc edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bei

c:File:William French (1815-1898), Des Kindes Gruß, Stahlstich nach De Bruycker, D2295.jpg

habe ich mal ein paar systematische Korrekturen angebracht. Ich vermute, dass du solche leiderleider fehlerhaften Parameterwerte auch an anderen Stellen eingefügt hast. Also solltest du da noch nacharbeiten.

gruß --Goesseln (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Erotische Kleinplastik, kopulierendes Tödlein, D2412.jpg edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Erotische Kleinplastik, kopulierendes Tödlein, D2412.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: as stated on website this is copyrighted

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Stepro (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Schnupftabakflasche, Erotik, Meißen, D1413.jpg edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Schnupftabakflasche, Erotik, Meißen, D1413.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: See link - made in 1960, so the artist is definetly not dead 70+ years

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:50, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Stichling, Benvenuto, Stahlstich nach C. Buchner, D2421-10.jpg edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Detlef, ich möchte dich darauf hinweisen, dass deine Hochladungen sehr unzulänglich sind. Du beachtest nicht das Hochladeformular. Als Beschreibung solltest du nicht die Quelle angeben. Aber vor allem: bei solchen Abbildungen nicht du bist der Autor und dein Name in der Beschreibung hat nichts verloren. Als Autor soll die Person(en) angeben werden, die das Werk geschaffen hat/haben, gewöhnlich als Creator. Für Werke, die du nicht geschaffen hast, darfst auch keine CC-Lizenz vergeben, sondern PD (public domain), falls seit dem Tod des Autors mindestens 70 Jahre vergangen sind.
Betrachte diese Datei als Beispiel und vergleiche die Unterschiede zwischen den Beschreibungen vor und nach der Korrektur. Ich habe schon mehrere von dir hochgeladene Dateien korrigiert, wofür ich viel Zeit verloren habe und ich bitte dich, die Qualität der Beschreibungen zu verbessern und die noch nicht korrigierte Beschreibungen, selbst zu korrigieren.
Übrigens das, was du oben geschrieben hast, dass die Dateien, die von Oblivion stammen, dein Eigentum ist, ist eine Lüge. Die Fotos von Porzellan sind auch geschützt, wie alle anderen. Vor allem nicht du bist der Autor und du darfst es nicht behaupten. Fremde Fotos lebender Personen darf man nur mit einer OTRS-Einverständniserklärung einstellen, die du besorgen solltest – sonst müssten diese Fotos gelöscht werden.
Du wurdest schon mehrfach auf Unregelmäßigkeiten hingewiesen, und diese Hinweise hast du offensichtlich nicht beachtet. Deswegen möchte ich dich darauf hinweisen, dass dein Konto gesperrt werden könnte, wenn du weiter Dateien auf die gleiche Weise hochlädst. Mit so einem Benutzer gibt es fast mehr Probleme als Nutzen. --Mewa767 (talk) 17:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, alle Objekte, die ich eingestellt habe, sind mein unbestrittenes Eigentum und in der Regel über 100 Jahre alt. Sie sind mit weiteren Informationen auf meiner Web-Seite www.oblivion-art.de veröffentlicht und auch die Fotos sind von mir angefertigt und mein Eigentum. Die Unterstellung einer "Lüge" ist völlig unangemessen und entbehren jeglicher objektiver Grundlage .

Bei Porzellanmalerei aus der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts durften die Maler nicht signieren und können deshalb nicht genannt werden.

Meine Leistung besteht in erster Linie in der Veröffentlichung meiner Sammlung und der Nachweis, welches Werk als Vorlage für die Malerei oder Lithophanie diente.

In meinem Alter von 76 Jahren, bin ich zeitlich nicht mehr in der Lage, alle Anmerkungen zu "falschen Handlungen" bei commons wikimedia auszuwerten und entsprechend zu reagieren. Schade! Ab sofort stelle ich meine "Mitwirkung" bei commons wikimedia ein und danke wikimedia dennoch für die oft nicht verstandenen kritischen Notizen.

Geholfen hätte mir sicherlich ein Mentor in meiner Nähe, der mir auf die Sprünge geholfen hätte. Ein Beispiel für Handlungen, die ich nicht nachvollziehen kann und mir keines Fehlers bewußt bin, ist mein Gemälde Isidor Popper (1816-1884), Gemälde, In der Dorfschule,D1912, es wurde von Wikimedia nicht veröffentlicht, warum, welche Urheberrechte sind verletzt?Detlef Dauer (talk) 18:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Detlef, das Problem beruht offensichtlich auf deiner Unkenntnis der Problematik der Urheberrechte einerseits und wie eine richtige Beschreibung eines Werks aussieht andererseits. Es ist nirgendwo erklärt, dass du der Eigentümer der Seite Oblivion-Art und der darauf vorgestellten Werke bist. In Commons geht es außerdem nicht um Eigentumsrechte, sondern um Urheberrechte und dass du diese Objekte besitzt, ist normalerweise nicht relevant. Wie die Problematik der Urheberrechte aussieht, habe ich in groben Zügen in meiner ersten Nachricht dargestellt. Es gibt auf Commons Hinweise zu dieser Problematik: wenn man sucht, dann findet man entsprechende Informationen. Die sind allerdings nicht leicht verständlich und in der Tat wäre für dich ein Mentor hilfreich. Um einen Mentor muss man sich selbst kümmern und das hättest du spätestens dann tun sollen, als du gemerkt hast, dass auf deiner Diskussionsseite Benachrichtigungen über die bevorstehende Löschung der Dateien aufgetaucht sind. Denn das war ein deutlicher Hinweis darauf, dass du die Problematik nicht verstanden hast. Und sich darüber aufzuregen, bringt ja nichts. Mit einer guten Beschreibung hättest du dir die Probleme ersparen können. Andererseits wäre man über deine Mitarbeit froh, weil die Bilder selbst wertvoll sind. Leider macht die sehr miserable und fehlerhafte Beschreibung das zunichte. Irgend jemand müsste unheimlich viel Zeit opfern, um diese Mängel auszubessern und darauf hat sicherlich niemand Lust. Ein Mentor muss übrigens nicht in der Nähe wohnen. Per Internet und eventuell zusätzlich per Telefon kann man ausreichend viele Informationen austauschen, damit jemand, der etwas lernen möchte, es auch lernen kann. Grüße --Mewa767 (talk) 01:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hallo,

Offensichtlich besteht das Problem mit meinen Veröffentlichungen darin, ob es sich um meine Arbeit oder Leistungen Dritter handelt.

Weil in der Regel die Urheber "meiner" Objekte vor über 100 Jahren gestorben und die Objekte noch älter sind, habe ich diese ohne Lizenz und Genehmigung als meine Arbeit (Eigentum, Beschreibung, Fotos) eingestuft und auf meine Webseite www.oblivion-art.de mit weiteren Informationen verwiesen. In allen Beschreibungen gebe ich, soweit vorhanden, immer den Stecher, Maler und bei Porzellan die Manufaktur an. Detlef Dauer (talk) 09:24, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Detlef, ich komme auf diese unterbrochene Diskussion wieder zurück. Leider muss ich ich feststellen, dass Du meine Ausführungen nicht verstanden hast. Das Problem besteht mit Deinen Beschreibungen und Lizenzen. Du musst zunächst verstehen, dass die Tatsache, dass Du Eigentümer der abgebildeten Objekte bist, noch kein Grund ist, sie mit einer der Lizenzen CC zu veröffentlichen, weil diese im Prinzip nur für eigene Arbeiten (d.h. durch den Hochlader selbst ausgeführte) gedacht sind. Es kommen also Lizenzen PD wie PD-old oder PD-old-100-1923 in Frage, wenn der Autor seit mindestens 70 oder 100 Jahren tot ist. Ferner darfst Du nicht solche Arbeiten als eigene Arbeiten deklarieren. Du bist nicht der Autor dieser Arbeiten und Deine Leistung besteht lediglich darin, dass Du diese Bilder hochgeladen hast. Wenn Du als Quelle Deine eigene Seite angibst, spielt das keine Rolle. Nirgendwo ist angegeben, dass es sich um Deine Seite handelt und die Leute, die genauer die Angaben lesen – so wie ich – stoßen auf diese Weise auf Ungereimtheiten, die man ja doch vermeiden kann. Schau Dir doch genau die von mir geänderten Beschreibungen der von Dir hochgeladenen Bilder an und nimm sie als Vorbild, wie korrekte Beschreibungen aussehen könnten. Dazu gehört auch, dass man die Namen der Künstler als Creator angibt, d.h. {{Creator:Vorname Name}}. Es wäre angebracht, dass Du alle anderen Beschreibungen Deiner Bilder systematisch mit Verwendung dieser Vorbilder überarbeitest. Es wäre auch sinnvoll einige auf der Seite Oblivion angegebene Informationen, wie z.B. Abmessungen, die auf Commons weggelassen wurden, zu ergänzen. Falls Du dazu noch weitere Fragen hast, kannst Dich mit ihnen gerne an mich wenden. --Mewa767 (talk) 02:58, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic