Marathwada political promo sock farm edit

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AbhijitSonavane

Some have edits and uploads here, you may want to check. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 13:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

OTRS edit

I have uploaded a few images of actor Suriya on commons from BH. The photos show him attending a press conference for the 2014 SIIMA Awards. Could you review the photos for OTRS? Thanks. Ssven2 (talk) 10:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unlucky choice of images. Can you nominate them for deletion? See Commons:Deletion requests/SIIMA images from bollywoodhungama. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
While the images are undeniably SIIMA related, is there proof there were actually taken in India and not abroad? If there is, I think they can be used. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Uploaded File:Shanvi 62nd Filmfare South Awards.jpg. Could you review the photos for OTRS? Thanks. Ssven2 (talk) 15:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Manmohan Singh.jpg edit

Can you delete the earlier versions of this? Two are copyvios by a copyvio sock -- vrghs jacob (big CCI and long list of socks blocked on en) and another of some random upload? cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 13:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Maalavika Manoj January 2017.jpg edit

The owner of that image is expected to send a permission email via an ID containing the name "malimanoj93". Once it is received, you know what to do. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sorry! Am no longer an OTRS member. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:E.M.E.A College Main Building.jpg edit

What is your problem man.I have proper licence for that image before. Now why the hell you nominated it for deletation.You are mentally retard.That picture taken by me and also edited by me.I previously published it in Facebook only.Link is provided there.Now can you explain what's problem with this picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishad Pkn (talk • contribs) 00:06, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

IIFA images at Bollywood Hungama edit

BH's free images policy does not include photos taken outside India, and there are tons of IIFA images from that site uploaded here illegally. Please get all the BH images from these categories deleted: Category:International Indian Film Academy Awards and Category:2012 IIFA Awards. --Kailash29792 (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why can't you yourself start nominations? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Shamefull secsission. You follow a person, who never ever upload an image to Commons, a person who even at de:WP works very often ageinst me. You delete an image, that shows Sports. The result of Sports. I will remember this for the next time. As long Administrators like you act this way, I will think about my iploads in future. Maye it was a fault, to donate more than 23.000 of my images to Commons. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Marcus Cyron: I am not at all aware of you or the DR nominator or the relationship you guys have. Being a totally uninvolved admin I do not think my judgment had anything to do with the uploader or the nominator but only to do with the usability of the image. I still believe that COM:EDUSE is not met. But you know you can still try COM:UNDEL if you are not satisfied with the result. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Просьба восстановить файл edit

Уважаемый Dharmadhyaksha! Просьба восстановить производную версию File:Irina Lachina.jpg, удалённую Вами 02.03.2017 в 07:07, например, под именем File:Irina Lachina1.jpg. Пришло разрешение в OTRS от автора фото, Ticket#2017030210022113. Заранее огромное спасибо! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion edit

I dont know why these notification for deleting the images being put on my page by you !!!

If commons is not the place to upload the images where one can upload it ? These are the images regarding the wiki 15 celebration at IIT Bombay India. I By deleting these images the related pages will loose them that is all.

Please update me.

Thanks

Rahuldeshmukh101 (talk) 17:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you bother to read the notification, you would have your answer. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

ऑटो पेट्रोलर edit

मला हा हक दिला गेला हे परंतु याला कसं वापरू ते समजू नये. पिवळा रंग दिसत नाही. त्याबद्दल जर मदत केली तर चँगले.--✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please prefer to comment in English, the most common language over Commons.
You are autopatroller now, which means your edits are now automatically patrolled. It does not mean that you can patrol other editor's edits; something that a patroller does; both being different things. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

K thnks--✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 10:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bijendra01 (talk · contribs) edit

Hi, Dharmadhyaksha. When you have some time, please look contributions of Bijendra. They have no categories and no normal description. That way they are out of project scope. If you can identify, describe and categorize some of them, that's good. Others must be deleted. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Taivo: Described, categorized and renamed five images that were left undeleted as of today. I hope we don't have to go through various deleted images of the user. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Akshatha Inamdar's images edit

Not entirely sure what you'd like comments on, so I'll give one general and one specific. I suppose you already know much of this (it's not like people get elected admins after a month of activity here), but I don't want to omit part of my train of thought.

General: yes, we almost never need multiple copies of the same image. Sometimes it can be useful, e.g. {{Archival version}}, alternate renditions of famous paintings, or odd situations where multiple copies are uploaded to deal with some MediaWiki technical issue, but with a typical user-created image, one copy is sufficient; additional copies should be deleted if there's not already some demonstrated use, although of course any admin should undelete one if someone wants to use the image and the non-deleted one doesn't quite do the trick.

In all the gallery-displayed images in the thread you put at COM:AN, I believe that the color version is more useful than the B&W. Seeing that we (WMF-wide) almost always use color images, and that B&W images are typically used in situations where a color image doesn't exist, I doubt that people are going to use B&W for these images when color's available. That issue's particularly relevant here because these are famous landmarks with tons of pictures; maybe if we had half a dozen images of a place, we could retain all of these, but as Category:Taj Mahal and its subcategories have more than two thousand images, and as Category:Sydney Opera House has several hundred (and each one has a whole subcategory for black-and-white images), I just don't get the point of keeping all of these. Nyttend (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

My Lonar, Sindkkhed Raja photos edit

Its been observed that you have summarily deleted the Photos which carry lot of good value. You have reduced the Lonar lake into a minor article. Everyone knows how important Lonar is in terms of Geological, Architectural & tourism. By reducing it to minor it has been hurt so much that any international visitor would not bother on visiting.

Similarly Markanda Mahadev is such an ancient place of importance and you reduced it to TEXT article. i suspect the intention of mass deletion. Please explain me & remove my doubt on intention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satish-ansingkar (talk • contribs) 04:56, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Did you read Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Satish-ansingkar? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:BhanuPriya sketch.jpg edit

 
File:BhanuPriya sketch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your VFC installation method is deprecated edit

Hello Dharmadhyaksha, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for youǃ edit

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For your contributions towards the campaign WLUS India. Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 05:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: .   §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Today's newspaper edit

Hi I have been brought to a notice by User:संदेश हिवाळे that some event is going to be organized in order to improve Marathi Wikipedia. According to me there is no announcement such or notification on the local Wikipedia. As local Wikipedia doesn't allows to upload files it will be uploaded on Commons. I request you if such or any uploaded on Commons that are copyrighted don't allow it on Commons. As to verify the script (devnagri) other might not be familiar. So you take initiative to see whether it is copyvios. The link to the event in today's newspaper http://newspaper.pudhari.co.in/epapernew.php?articleid=PUDHARI_JAL_20170527_04_4 --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 05:39, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

मराठी विकिपीडिया व्हॉट्सॲप ग्रुप edit

--✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Paavans edit

Hi, You close this as delete, but the files are still there. ;) Regards, Yann (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Done now. Thanks for pointing out. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Need Help with Copyright Issues edit

Hi, Indian Air Force in UK 1933.jpg I clicked this picture from Air Force Museum in New Delhi. This is a very old picture and its copyright has expired. I request you to let me know if still there are some issues with the picture. I have several similar pictures like this waiting to be uploaded. Thanks Abhinav619 (talk) 10:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Abhinav619: Sorry for delayed reply. Reproduction of such PD images seems ok to me. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Newmarket Hill-Peter Whitcomb.png edit

 
File:Newmarket Hill-Peter Whitcomb.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

bjh21 (talk) 00:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is this Copyright template suitable here? edit

I've used Template:EdictGov-India for the logo of an organisation of Govt of India. Is it correct? Can I upload some images from Ordnance Factory Board's official website to wiki using this template? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PAWANHANS (talk • contribs) 21:39, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Commons Conference project edit

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

User:Rshmukherjee edit

Could I ask you to take a look at the uploads of User:Rshmukherjee? To me, they don't look credible as "own work," but I'm guessing you would have more linguistic and cultural competence than I would to work out what's going on here. - Jmabel ! talk 05:16, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sorry @Jmabel: for the delay. I was busy in Hindi Wikipedia's editathon with my limited time available. Now that it's over I will be available on Commons more frequently.
Turns out that my talk-page stalker has raised a DR already; Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rshmukherjee. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

MrWp edit

Hi Dharmadhyaksha, I am sure you would like to express your views at m:Stewards'_noticeboard#Emergency_help_from_Steward --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Indian Institute of Science - Electrical Engineering Department.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mohammadulhaque (talk) 22:14, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Transcript-bineet.jpg edit

 
File:Transcript-bineet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bineetojha (talk) 14:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:IndianRailways.JPG edit

 
File:IndianRailways.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nthep (talk) 16:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Prime Minister of India.jpg edit

I think this([1]) image can be now undeleted as {{GODL-India}} is a valid license now. Jee 14:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Money of India edit

Hi, I have restored all money of India: Commons:Deletion requests/Money of India. In the future, please use {{GODL-India}} as a dual license. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:48, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thakoreji edit

Hi, long time, no see. I noticed that you have just deleted a few copyvios I tagged. I think the uploads of that uploader - Thakoreji (talk · contribs) - are likely mostly to be problematic. - Sitush (talk) 09:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC) How Problem??? Thakoreji (talk) 09:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CptViraj (Talk) 08:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (talk) 14:22, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:61st National Film Awards India winners edit

I listed Category:61st National Film Awards India winners which you created at Commons:Categories for discussion for greater discussion about the category. I would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/12/National Film Awards India ceremonies. Thank you! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Sajid-Wajid.jpg edit

 
File:Sajid-Wajid.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Sajid-Wajid.jpg edit

 
File:Sajid-Wajid.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Pictures from Bollywood Hungama edit

Hi Dharmadhyaksha, I'm a bit confused about the Bollywood Hungama licence template and I think you are one of the best people to ask how it works. I often feel unsure about images from BH, and right now I'm wondering whether File:Amit Bhadana Photos-Celebs-grave-IWM-Digital-Awards-2019-13.jpg would be allowed, provided the proper attribution and a link to this page are added. It was taken at the IWM Digital Awards which is an event in India – but does it count as a Bollywood event? I can't find any other images with "IWM digital awards" in the description. Secondly, the picture has a watermark which seems promotional to me per Commons:Watermarks#Unacceptable watermarks but again I'm not 100% sure. (I assume the watermark means that it was definitely a BH photographer who took the photo.) As this photo is used by undeclared paid editors for promotion at en.wikipedia I'm not going to look into how I could remove the watermark, if that is an option – I won't try to have the image deleted if it is in fact legal to have it here, but also won't use my volunteer time to help those people earn money.

If that image is not eligible for the BH licence, how about File:Celebs grace IWM Digital Awards 2019 Crop image.jpg? I tag pictures as copyright violations from time to time, and this particular area, with cropped versions of potentially copyrighted pictures, is one where I should really be better informed.

I can tag these images for deletion if they are in fact not eligible for Commons, but I guess I should place Template:BollywoodHungama on BH images to flag them for review in future, unless they are obvious copyvios?

Sorry about all the questions, but this is something I feel I should have known more about long ago :-) --Bonadea (talk) 12:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Bonadea: , Bollywood Hungama through an OTRS email have given permission to use some of the images from their website. This includes events that take place in India. You may check the template Template:BollywoodHungama for all the conditions. As per that i dont think this image is copyrighted. However, it is necessary to provide the link to the exact image and the file to be tagged with this template so that it get reviewed. You may yourself add the image link in file description so an admin or reviewer can check it. Or you may ask the uploader to do so, for this as well as the cropped image. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 14:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

De-adminship warning edit

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Dharmadhyaksha. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2020 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you--A1Cafel (talk) 13:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Neha Dhupia 01.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Neha Dhupia 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Neha Dhupia 01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

~Moheen (keep talking) 18:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Neha Dhupia 02.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Neha Dhupia 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Neha Dhupia 02.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

~Moheen (keep talking) 18:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons! edit

Dear Dharmadhyaksha

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC edit

Hello Dharmadhyaksha,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (talk) 19:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Bandera CELAC.png edit

Hi Dharmadhyaksha. Would you mind taking a look at File:Bandera CELAC.png and checking whether it's the same as File:CELAC.png which you deleted as a copyvio back in December 2015? The uploader is the same and the file names are similar; in addition, the claim of "own work" is questionable at best and more then likely another case of COM:NETCOPYVIO. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:2008OHdemprimary.PNG edit

 
File:2008OHdemprimary.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TylerKutschbach (talk) 23:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

How we will see unregistered users edit

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

File:INC 2009 Justin Trudeau.jpg edit

 
File:INC 2009 Justin Trudeau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-M.nelson (talk) 23:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Food ends in less than a week. Hurry! edit

 

Hello Dharmadhyaksha!

Wiki Loves Food photographic competition on Indian cuisine, which is happening from November 1 to November 30, 2022, ends in less than a week. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. If you are thinking about to participate again, now is the time!! We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, photograph and upload all kinds of foods and beverages originated from or found in Indian sub-continent and get a chance to win exciting prizes.

Click here to upload

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Food 2022 in India team)
sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Degopuku.jpg edit

 
File:Degopuku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

160.238.0.149 09:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:AmitRam.jpg edit

 
File:AmitRam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply