User talk:Dirtsc/Archive/2018

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Vicelinkirche Hamburg Innenraum.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Vicelinkirche Hamburg Innenraum.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: artist died in 2000, no fop in germany

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vicelinkirche Hamburg Innenraum.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Vicelinkirche Hamburg Innenraum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Adventskirche Hamburg-Schnelsen, Fenster.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Adventskirche Hamburg-Schnelsen, Fenster.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: artist died in 1979, no fop in germany

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Smb michaelsfenster 1.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Smb michaelsfenster 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: artist died in 1979, no fop in germany

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Smb michaelsfenster 1.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Smb michaelsfenster 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 11:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Adventskirche Hamburg-Schnelsen, Fenster.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Adventskirche Hamburg-Schnelsen, Fenster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Lkfb nebenkapelle.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lkfb nebenkapelle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Dirtsc,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) 20:30, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pgkw aussen hh-winterhude 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 03:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pgkw aussen hh-winterhude 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. IMO filename could be improved. Most of the people do not know "pgkw". --XRay 05:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pgkw aussen hh-winterhude 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pgkw aussen hh-winterhude 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kw eichenwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Exquisite. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:14, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martinuskirche Eppendorf 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:46, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martinuskirche Eppendorf 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martinuskirche Eppendorf 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Chrkwbk pantokrator.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Hallo, ich hab hier das Problem mit unserem Rathaus-Fenster. Ich werde versuchen, das mal von außen zu fotografieren - evtl. auch abends, wenn Innenlicht an ist. Vielleicht hilft Dir das, zumindest bei den Fenstern bzw. deren Glas / Farben und Mustern. Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 09:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Das könnte in Einzelfällen erfolgreich sein, muss ich mir mal ansehen. Viele Grüße --Dirtsc (talk) 14:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Office building Überseering 35 south-west view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
commercial area City Nord, central zone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
office building Überseering 45 / New-York-Ring 2 entrance view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche brokstedt giebel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is some noise in the shadow --Trougnouf 12:17, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Support. Very good image: beautiful colors, excellent sharpness -- Spurzem 19:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche brokstedt 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 12:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche brokstedt 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche brokstedt 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche brokstedt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality, not the right settings. 1/800s is completely unnecessary for a static subject and the top could have been sharper with f/11 --Trougnouf 00:51, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche brokstedt 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deichstraße Wasserseite 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The photo seems a bit overworked. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:26, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt hohnerkamp 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt hohnerkamp 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:50, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche brokstedt chor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments somewhat blurred at the top (perspective correction?), but acceptable. --Smial 10:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katharinenkirche HH Chorseite 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 11:34, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katharinenkirche HH Chorseite 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speicherstadt 2017 7 Wandrahmsfleetbrücke Dienerreihe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche behlendorf aussen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche behlendorf aussen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche behlendorf aussen 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche behlendorf aussen 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche behlendorf kriegerdenkmal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche behlendorf aussen 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality, would be better with a lower aperture so that the foreground is in focus but subject is sharp --Trougnouf 13:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche behlendorf aussen 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo, good quality, but IMO not a very interesting detail --Michielverbeek 17:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche behlendorf innen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche behlendorf innen 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche behlendorf innen 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 13:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt hohnerkamp 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt hohnerkamp 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt hohnerkamp 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenstadt hohnerkamp 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cch umbau 2018 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:33, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord postpyramide abriss 2018 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord postpyramide abriss 2018 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:33, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speicherstadt 2017 3 Bei St. Annen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support The man taking photo disturbs a bit, but generally this photo is good enough for me. --Tournasol7 14:46, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speicherstadt 2017 1 Block V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 18:20, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speicherstadt 2017 2 Block V Holländischer Brook.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:50, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speicherstadt 2017 11 Block W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:22, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 30928 nusskamp 24 26 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 30928 nusskamp 24 26 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jenischpark gewächshäuser 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. A few more categories would be nice. --MB-one 09:53, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jenischpark gewächshäuser 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:55, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jenischpark gewächshäuser 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 08:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cch umbau 2018 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition, good quality. --MB-one 16:31, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cch umbau 2018 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:32, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord exNixdorf Überseering 33a 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord exNixdorf Überseering 33a 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 09:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord exNixdorf Überseering 33a 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Uoaei1 11:52, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord postpyramide abriss 2018 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord postpyramide abriss 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord postbank ostseite 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 12:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord postpyramide abriss 2018 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord postpyramide abriss 2018 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 11:41, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City nord postpyramide abriss 2018 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 22523 heinrich traun str 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 11:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 22519 heinrich traun str 48 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 11:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 22522 heinrich traun str 54 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:08, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 22521 heinrich traun str 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 22518 heinrich traun str 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 29273 siedlung stlukas 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 29273 siedlung stlukas 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schule frohmestraße 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franksche siedlung 24 Ecke Övern Barg Övern Block.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franksche siedlung 27 Ecke Övern Barg Övern Block.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:47, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schule frohmestraße 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 20:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche eddelak 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Geocodes would be nice. --Smial 16:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franksche siedlung 38 Övern Block 2 bis 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franksche siedlung 31 Övern Block 34 bis 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 30927 hummelsb kirchenweg 75 77 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche eddelak 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dreieinigkeitskirche St Georg Kirchenschiff 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Pretty good for a phone pic --Daniel Case 06:07, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche eddelak 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support The building is sharp --Daniel Case 05:52, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franksche siedlung 19 Övern Barg 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franksche siedlung 18 Rückseite Wellingsbüttler Landstr 234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 09:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franksche siedlung 4 Am Stein 1 bis 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fb kd 30927 hummelsb kirchenweg 75 77 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs more categories --MB-one 15:40, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Comment Some categories added. --Dirtsc 08:47, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Support Trees in foreground are a bit distracting, but ok --MB-one 09:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franksche siedlung 6 Am Stein 57ff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)