Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Esperants!


File:Sebastianortega-2008.jpg edit

File deletion warning
File:Sebastianortega-2008.jpg has been marked as violating policy, because it is considered unfree. This file has been, or will be soon deleted. The file is licensed under a license that does not permit unlimited redistribution, commercial use or the creation of derivative works. Wikimedia Commons is a free media repository, which means that unlimited redistribution, commercial use and the creation of derivative work must be allowed. See Commons:Licensing for more information. If you want to ask permission from the author of the file, please do so using a template from Commons:Email templates. For images, you may find it useful to read Commons:Image casebook.

Martin H. (talk) 05:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Sebastianortega_2009.jpg edit

 
File:Sebastianortega_2009.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Familiaortega.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Familiaortega.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Familiaortega.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Undergroundcontenidos logodeempresa.jpg edit

 
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  русский  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  বাংলা   +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Sebastianortega entrevistalanacion.jpg edit

 
File:Sebastianortega entrevistalanacion.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 01:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Do you see ANY comment on the Diario lanacion website that allows you to steal the image and publish it here under a {{FAL}} - Free Art License?? Do you see any comment on the lanacion website saying that you can reuse their content freely, everywhere, for ever and for every purpose? Have you read Commons:Alcance_del_proyecto#Términos_de_licencia_requeridos? I dont think so.

I dont know how many accounts you already absued - (abuso ! mirar es:Wikipedia:Usuarios títeres) - but many. It is not understandable, it is realy astonishing and upsetting that you obviously never read the very, very, very basic rules but simply continued stealing. For God sake: Read the rules! Read Commons:Primeros pasos! You can NOT copy images from other websites here! --Martin H. (talk) 01:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

(Copied from Martin H's user page where it was deleted)
You are educated evil, not even hello. In addition a little respect towards the women, right? It denounces to you, bye.
P.S: I saw the rules, I had a mistake in the photo
It asks before attacking!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--Esperants (talk) 01:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
My intention to work on Commons is not to exchange pleasantries. Seems like you not read rules. So if warning you that way will finaly make you read the rules and stop your abusive behaviour the unfriendly tone is appropriate. I can have blocked you also for block evasion and continued copyright violation. --Martin H. (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Talking nice to other users is always a good idea. Also if users upload unfree images. We can all make mistakes and if users is new a kind note with some help should normally be enough.
I do not know if Esperants has other accounts since there is no links to them. But if there is it is not good to use other accounts. If so please choose one and stop using the others.
I checked the first image mentioned on the talk page (File:Sebastianortega-2008.jpg). It is licensed all rights reserved on Flickr and this license is not allowed on Commons. However if author gave a permission (OTRS pending) then that is ok and image should not be deleted. I found a mail regarding the image in OTRS (https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=4304651&ArticleID=4897406&QueueID=151) but I can't read it so I can't tell if the permission is ok. It looks a little short but that should be something a relevant OTRS-user can fix by asking the person who send the mail.
The next image (File:Sebastianortega 2009.jpg) started as "Own work" but was changed after a copyvio notice. Copying from webpages is never allowed unless the site specific tells it is ok (then we need a working link to permission) or if you have a permission from the copyright holder to send to OTRS.
Images like File:Sebastianortega entrevistalanacion.jpg should have a link to where it was found (+ link to permission) so the license can be verified. If it is not from the web then a better description of source + a permission to send to OTRS would be good.
I therefore suggest you upload images you have taken yourself or make sure you have a valid permission before you upload them to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 10:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Regarding the OTRS ticket: It was sent by Esperants himself/herself and tells that he or she is asking for permission. This email does not refer to the Flickr image or its copyright holder nor does it promise to ask for permission or that a permission notice is to be expected from the copyright holder. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Then ticket is obvious of no use. --MGA73 (talk) 12:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is not a mistake, it is persinting copyright violation by sockpuppeteer Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Sofia-co. From the first day this user did nothing but uploading stolen images. --Martin H. (talk) 07:33, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blanking of your talk page edit

Hi Esperants, please note that per the guidelines for talk pages we do not like to see them blanked if there are still recent messages. You are free use the services of the MiszaBot if you like older messages to be archived. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2010 edit

Please remain calm and collegial edit

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  +/−


 
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

Killiondude (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Esperants, comments like this one are not civil. Neither are blankings of other user's comments. You will be blocked if I see anything of this being continued as this is highly disrupting. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 19:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Pablocullel-sebastianortega.jpg and File:Ucontenidos.jpg edit

Hi Esperants, you transfered these two pictures from Flickr (see here and here). Both pictures are under a {{Cc-by-nd-2.0}} license. You, however, added a {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} license to them. Please be more careful in transfering such images as it is a copyright violation if you give a license to the images uploaded at Commons which is not compatible with the original license of the copyright holder. Secondly, the “nd” means that the copyright holder does not permit the creation of derivatives, i.e. the picture must not be changed. This restriction, however, limits the freedoms that are required for the files at Commons. We insist that all files must not only be freely distributable, be even usable for commercial purposes but also be changed. This would allow us to retouch an image, for example. I've deleted these two pictures as we cannot host them at Commons.

All images you have uploaded so far had to be deleted. From this it is obvious that you have either no idea or no regard to copyright law. Please do not continue to upload any more images from anywhere else on the web without asking first if they are acceptable at Commons. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 19:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The images on flickr are now relicensed, however the flickr user is not the copyright holder, compare [1] and [2], thats only a bad and silly attempt to evade copyrights - flickrwashing. --Martin H. (talk) 12:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Sebastianortega_pablocullel.jpg edit

 
File:Sebastianortega_pablocullel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Justass (talk) 22:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC) Reply

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Killiondude (talk • contribs) 22:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Martin H. (talk) 12:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply