User talk:Grand-Duc/Archiv/2010/December

Considérations diverses

J’ai eu le temps de vérifier hier soir l’os temporal, il n’y a pas de problème mais j’ai rajouté le bandeau d’image large. Le délai est passé pour VI, je la représenterai dès que la première image sera effacée.

Tu n’es pas familier de VI, car ton scope pour ta coupe de maïs n’est pas correct. Dans la formulation actuelle tu demandes que cette image soit la référence pour toutes les photos de maïs, ce qui est un peu excessif. Il faut réduire le scope à : « maïs micro structure » ou quelques chose d’approchant.

File:Bellis perennis full plant.jpg Pourrait faire une très belle image VI !

Bien amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Merci pour tes "considérations diverses"!
Effectivement, c'était ma première nomination d'une œuvre sur COM:VI, c'est logique que je ne suis pas le plus familier avec les procédures. Je viens de changer le scope vers "Zea mays, Vascular bundle" comme proposé par Llez.
La pâquerette sur VI? Vraiment? J'ai créé cette image pour une sorte de concours inofficiel sur les Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder, les critiques ont été plutôt négatives (profondeur de champ insuffisante: trop grandes portions de la plante floues et les pétales sont surexposées), mais si tu estimes qu'une nomination en vaut la peine, je veux bien essayer ma chance. :-) Salutations amicales, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zea mays, Vascular bundle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Scope too imprecise to be reformulated --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
• Agree with Archaedontosaurus. I suggest a subscope like "Zea mays, Vascular bundle", "Zea mays, Histology" or something like that. --Llez (talk) 12:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Zea mays to Zea mays, Vascular bundle --Grand-Duc (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Best in scope. Geotagging not needed, studio shot ---- Llez (talk) 21:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bellis perennis (Common Daisy).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:40, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope APTOC (talk) 03:40, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Sockpuppet -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support "Comme promis" --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Grand-Duc/Archiv/2010!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Weihnachtsbaum mit roter Dekoschleife.jpg was uncategorized on 25 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Schwarzschwanz-Präriehund Nuernberg2.jpg was uncategorized on 17 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Vogelpark Marlow - Loris - Trio.jpg was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:DE-WP-Waffenportal-Salutorden-Bild.png was uncategorized on 27 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 28 August 2011 (UTC)