User talk:Halavar/Archive4

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows church in Rybnik, Silesia, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 00:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek w Rybniku 8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:36, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wroclaw - Uniwersytet Wroclawski o poranku.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wroclaw - Uniwersytet Wroclawski o poranku.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom, Rynek 9, Pszczyna 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budynek Starostwa Powiatowego w Rybniku 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek w Rybniku 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Krzyżowice, Silesia, Poland. Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 00:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Albrechtice, Cieszyn Silesia, Czech Republic. View from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 00:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Automatic categorization

Hi Halavar, I have changed the template of WLM winners, so there is no need to include a category. It will be added automatically, Poco² 22:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

And therefore IMHO this kind of edits have no added value. Poco² 08:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I think that change you made didn't change much... Before my edit (your image manualy added to thge category Winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 in Jordan) your photo was not in the category Winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 in Jordan. Before my edit, there were only 9 images in that category. So that tool didn't include automatically your image to the category. --Halavar (talk) 10:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

It does definitely work, but you don't have to believe me. Poco² 18:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I've just added tag {{WLM finalist or winner image |year=2014 |country=Ireland |place=1 }} to this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rathgall.png. And there is no automatic categorization. I don't know what I did wrong... And the same situation is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:%D8%A3%D8%B3%D8%AF_%D8%A2%D8%B4%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A.jpg&diff=138889082&oldid=138779792 --Halavar (talk) 11:37, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Please, check both pictures again. Now they have a category. In order to be categorized the category has to exist, otherwise it would be shown below with a red link, which is not helpful. So, if you create the corresponding country category, it will be used and shown if you include the template. Poco² 17:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, the categories are now exist. But they are empty. Look, there are no images in those categories. Look here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Rathgall.png&action=edit There is no category listed in the edit page. So, I still must add all 10 images manually to the corresponding category...:( --Halavar (talk) 17:45, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

You will see the category at the bottom of the image (not in edit mode). You will not see it in edit mode because the category is embedded in the template and will show up only when the template is executed. Poco² 20:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Look at this one in this category Poco² 21:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, it's working. --Halavar (talk) 23:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Dawny ratusz w Mistku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Kościół św. Jakuba 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, kamienica, Náměstí Svobody 7, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół pw. Matki Boskiej Bolesnej w Rybniku 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --ArildV 21:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół Matki Bożej Fatimskiej w Istebnej 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --ArildV 21:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staw Węglornik w Palowicach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek w Rybniku 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Skoczowie 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pałac w Wodzisławiu Śląskim 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Katarzyny i Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Rybniku-Wielopolu 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budda Siakjamuni w Świątyni Zachodniej w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budda Sandżaa w Świątyni Zachodniej w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boka Kotorska w cieśninie Verige 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaża w Durrës 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sąd Rejonowy w Cieszynie 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stacje drogi krzyżowej w ogrodzeniu kościoła św. Jana Chrzciciela w Raciborzu 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sanjaa (Buddha Dīpankara) inside Western Temple in the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buddha Sakyamuni inside Western Temple in the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:43, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — revi_msg 14:57, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Famberhorst 19:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo -- Spurzem 20:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trzy główne świątynie w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongołka w pobliżu Złotej Stupy w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:55, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figurki Awalokiteśwary w Głównej Świątyni w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You could have gone a bit further, but ok --Poco a poco 21:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sita Mahakala (Gonggor) inside Main Temple in the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na miasto Karakorum 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stary cmentarz żydowski w Cieszynie42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek w Raciborzu po remoncie (jesień 2013) 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CA, but ok --Poco a poco 11:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buddha in his teenage years inside Eastern Temple in the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:23, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przygotowania do lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przygotowania do lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przygotowania do lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przygotowania do lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przygotowania do lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Step w Karakorum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Cieszynie3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit noisy ... --XRay 09:42, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buddha Amitābha inside Main Temple in the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palden Lhamo (Shri Devi) - Dharmapala (protecting deity) inside Main Temple in the Erdene Zuu Monastery. Kharkhorin, Övörkhangai Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeźdźcy na stepie przed rozpoczęciem lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --The Photographer 19:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeźdźcy na stepie przed rozpoczęciem lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przed rozpoczęciem lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolski chłopiec i konie na stepie podczas lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe you could reduce the brightness of the blanket on the left, but QI anyway. --JLPC 17:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. --Halavar 17:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Młodzi jeźdźcy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam w Karakorum (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Pleasy apply the personality rights template to all your portrait photos of this series. --Cccefalon 13:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)  Done --Halavar 17:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolski chłopiec i konie na stepie podczas lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI, but it is possible to add a little bit more space on top and crop a little bit at the bottom of the image? --Cccefalon 07:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 12:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC) Much more balanced now! QI for me. --Cccefalon 12:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przygotowania do lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now. --JLPC 17:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz Karakorum (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, highlights could also be a bit lower, but QI overall --Poco a poco 19:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muzeum Etnograficzne w Kruji 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs (see note) --Christian Ferrer 15:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)  Done CA removed. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, ul. Tyršova 19, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharpness is fine, car is very minor. Quality is excellent. --Ram-Man 01:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

WLM Albania i Kosowo

Nie wiem na ile to prawdziwe, ale ta strona wygląda ciekawie [1] ;) --Pudelek (talk) 17:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Ooo super! Gratulacje! Dzięki wielkie za wiadomość:) Aż miło widzieć, że tak dużo naszych zdjęć im się spodobało:) Halavar (talk) 00:00, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:41, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Młoda Mongołka na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little bit motion blur at one leg but acceptable. --Cccefalon 10:52, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolski chłopiec i konie na stepie podczas lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:08, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:25, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Młoda Mongołka na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przed rozpoczęciem lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yellow channel satured and motion blur problem, you could use a more fast obturation speed and less DoF, however, QI IMHO --The Photographer 15:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:28, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budynek Szkoły Muzycznej w Żorach 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Ducha (obecnie muzeum miejskie) w Raciborzu 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok but it will be better if you crop or clone out the cut road sign at right --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Dom, ul. Hluboká 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Borderline with the noise being sharpened, but it still looks fine at normal magnifications. --Ram-Man 12:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kunín, Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Świętego 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments unsharp --Ram-Man 12:27, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Młoda Mongołka na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very cute :) --Livioandronico2013 18:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:28, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeździec na stepie na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. It could be more than "OK" if there were more space above the riders head. I proposed a crop/clone-out to get the motif more balanced. --Cccefalon 14:32, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:33, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Młodzi jeźdźcy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam w Karakorum (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky is a bit green-yellow --Christian Ferrer 19:17, 14 November 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Pleaste take a look again. --Halavar 21:44, 15 November 2014 (UTC) The changes are good. --Ram-Man 03:25, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Ułan Bator z Gana's Guest House (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 22:18, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, kamienica, Náměstí Svobody 7, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ostrawa, Kamienica, ul. Tyršova 19, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:08, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Młody jeździec na stepie na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeźdźcy na stepie na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:29, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Młody jeździec na stepie na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI despite some motion blur. --Cccefalon 11:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przed rozpoczęciem lokalnego festiwalu Naadam (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Value. Poor categorization. --Ram-Man 03:48, 16 November 2014 (UTC)  Comment The categories are good. There is no reason to decline my image according to that kind of statement. Maybe others should decide. --Halavar 11:56, 16 November 2014 (UTC) The image should have been categorized before nomination. Poor categorization is a perfectly valid reason to decline. See the third bullet on "Image page requirements" for QIC. Ram-Man 13:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:25, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Ułan Bator z Gana's Guest House (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:42, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeźdźcy na stepie na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:12, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wroclaw-Most Grunwaldzki.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wroclaw-Most Grunwaldzki.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:08, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 15:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 11:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 11:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 11:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Hluboká street in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:07, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Holy Spirit church, now museum in Racibórz, Silesia, Poland. View from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:08, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint James in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. Tower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:00, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe slightly tilted to the left. --Uoaei1 14:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of the Church of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross in Karviná, Czech Republic. Main nave..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:43, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megjid Janraisig temple in Gandantegchinlen Monastery, Ulan Bator, Mongolia. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 11:34, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok für QI. Could be even better with a litte bit more magenta defringing. --Cccefalon 12:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Ułan Bator z Gana's Guest House (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting documentary photo about the yurts in the city. --Cccefalon 12:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much foreground and sky for my taste. QI nevertheless. --Cayambe 08:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --C messier 14:19, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, jaskinie (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please see my note. I'm not sure, what is exactly the reason, but it is probably fixable. --Cccefalon 12:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Than ks for the hint, you were right. I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:54, 21 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality now. Nice, vivid colours. --Cccefalon 13:03, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, jaskinie (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough. Subject is correctly portrayed. --Ram-Man 02:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done. Composition is OK (person in the background?), but it's enough. --Ram-Man 01:59, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, jaskinie (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Florstein 16:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budda w swoich młodzieńczych latach w klasztorze Erdene Dzuu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Náměstí Svobody in Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but please remove the artefacts. --Cccefalon 13:10, 23 November 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 14:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentThe left side is lower --Jacek Halicki 11:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)  Done New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 11:58, 24 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. That was strange. --Coyau 14:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Chromatic noise (face)--Lmbuga 12:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archive of Ostrava (23 Špálova street), Ostrava, Czech Republic. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The former town hall in Místek, Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The entrance gate to the Khamar Monastery, Dornogovi Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Im. / Fav.} 17:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The main stupa in Khamar Monastery, Dornogovi Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Buddha in Khamar Monastery, Dornogovi Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Orientation changed to "portrait". --P e z i (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Khamar Monastery, Dornogovi Province, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:43, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, jaskinie (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 17:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:33, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, kompleks Szambala (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A geotag would be appreciated. --Cayambe 08:41, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gazi Mehmet Pasha Hammam in Prizren, Kosovo. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Widok na morze z tarasu widokowego (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, port (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The coastline needs correction! --Hubertl 15:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)  Comment Not fixable. --Halavar 17:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC),  Support I fixed it, the picture has really good quality --Hubertl 17:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the help. I noticed a CA on the mast, so I removed it and uploaded fixed version. --Halavar 19:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, port (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, port (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, port (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Ułan Bator z Gana's Guest House (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Widok na morze z tarasu widokowego (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, port (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Brama wejściowa z rzeźbami psów (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zespół klasztoru Gandan (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Much better. --C messier 10:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Brama wejściowa z rzeźbami psów (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 16:18, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:17, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (35).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na lokalnym festiwalu Naadam (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Fort św. Jana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 14:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Stary port, mury miejskie i kościół Dominikanów (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 14:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Widok ze starego portu na wybrzeże (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 14:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Brama Pile (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Widok ze starego portu na wybrzeże (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. IMO too much water at the bottom, but still QI. --XRay 11:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Plaża Banje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 12:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Pałac Sponza (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:52, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Schody w pobliżu Pałacu Rektora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 12:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John Fortress in Dubrovnik, Croatia. View from the Old Harbour..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sveti Stefan (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Widok ze starego portu na wybrzeże (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Fasada kościoła (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Mury miejskie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:08, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (A little bit noise, but OK.) --XRay 17:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please, good picture, but see the vertical lines, in my opinion they are a bit tilted CCW. A bit of noise. What you think?--Lmbuga 19:36, 2 December 2014 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 20:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Tank you--Lmbuga 22:34, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sveti Stefan (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, krajobraz pustyni (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It was shot at ISO 400 for some reason, but despite that it still looks good enough to me, even at 100%. --Ram-Man 04:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Abkhazia

Thank you for a lot of quality photos of Abkhazia (from Moscow)! --Brateevsky {talk} 14:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Re: Abkhazia

If you really know difference between de jure and de facto then why don't you appear those statuses in your descriptions? And what is more important I am changing not "on the basis of MY political vision", but on the basis of the MAIN ARTICLE in English Wikipedia about Abkhazia, which says that, at the moment Abkhazia is a disputed territory and partially recognised state controlled by a separatist government ! And not just "REPUBLIC OF ABKHAZIA" as you see on YOUR political vision. There is too much difference between Republic of Abkhazia and De facto Abkhazia. If you change your description and naming policy in response to the norms of naming and NPOV, then of course I won't edit your descriptions, but if don't be sure I won't be lazy to do it, even in case of hundreds of images. (Republic of Abkhazia ► De facto Abkhazia) --g. balaxaZe★ 18:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

1) If you really know difference between de jure and de facto then why don't you appear those statuses in your descriptions? - Because I do not want to complicate things and spending time on too long and complicated descriptions, especially for people who do not understand and do not necessarily want to understand matches any aspects of the whole complicated relations between Georgia and Abkhazia. Version de facto is simply easier because it shows what actually exists, and not what is only written on paper.

2) What is written on the English Wikipedia is not a determinant for me as a author of images uploaded to Wikimedia Commmons. Of course you can use my images on the Georgian, English or other Wikis with different descriptions but on the Wikimedia Commons they stay as I created them.

3) There is too much difference between Republic of Abkhazia and De facto Abkhazia. - no, there is no difference.

Halavar (talk) 19:37, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

• First of all I'll answer to the paragraph №3. Let me give you a good example to teach you what is difference between "De facto" and just "Republic of ...". Oh here is it! ► Republic of Ireland — a sovereign state in western Europe, so what will you say now? Still don't see difference between Republic of Abkhazia, just Abkhazia and De facto Abkhazia ? — Yes, there is a big difference! Don't get people in delusion, Abkhazia is post-soviet bloody russian-made puppet entity and only reason of its existence (in current form) is to hinder Georgia's promotion to the Western Organizations, after 2014 Ukrainian Crisis no one argue with this. So even after of all of this, my best advice to you for NPOV and correctness is to name Abkhazia in your descriptions as De facto Abkhazia and not Republic of Abkhazia.
• Second, what is not a determinant for you is determinant for others (including me). As an author of uploaded images, in Commons you are just uploader author and that's all, images' pages aren't your own property and everyone can edit them, and in this case NPOV and English Wikipedia is worth of attention --g. balaxaZe★ 22:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

1) Sorry, but I don't want to spend time here on the political debates with you. I've got thousands of images from Georgia, Abkhazia, Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh and I want to upload them on Commons. This is not a place for debates like this. 2) Sorry, but you don't understand law and political sciences and you don't understand the terms de facto and de iure. De iure, Abkhazia is a autonomous province of Georgia, but de facto Abkhazia is a independent state with name: Republic of Abkhazia. That's all. --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

:D It's very funny that you saying I don't understand law and political sciences and you don't understand the terms de facto and de iure. There is no political science which says occupied territory is a de facto independent state. It's occupied, it is under Russian army control, it's not member of UN and only four Russian money-allies recognize it. Well yes :D it's "independent" exactly as majority of the world countries. To reach consensus let's write in descriptions at least just Abkhazia, because you depicting land, nature, buildings and etc. but not political system. ok? --g. balaxaZe★ 23:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Loving Georgia

You said that you love Georgia, I appreciate everyone who loves my country. Looking on your contributions and quality photos it could be great if you visited Georgia and took some great photos, but contradicting to your "love of Georgia" as I guess you visited Abkhazia from Russian side, and now according to the 4th Article of THE LAW OF GEORGIA ON OCCUPIED TERRITORIES, if you visit Georiga you will be punished under the Criminal Law of Georgia, and this is sad. --g. balaxaZe★ 18:55, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Wrong. You, as most of Georgian people don't know, that other citizens can enter to Abkhazia from Georgia. And i did it. I spent some time in Georgia, travelling and taking lots of images, and then I go to border (yes, there is a border between Georgia and Abkhazia) on the Ingur(i) River. And after spending some time in Georgian former province I've back to Georgia. And when I back, everywhere I go in Georgia, people didn't know, that there is normal border on the Ingur(i) river that other citizens can cross. And everytime people asked me hundreds of questions about Abkhazia, because none of them knew nothing about what looks life now in Abkhazia. Vision of Abkhazia is based either on memories of the old good Soviet times, or is based on unawareness. But - unlike you - they accept the facts about the status of Abkhazia. Of course, they they don't like it, and they are sad, because they lost big province, but they are accept fact, that Georgians loose the war and as the result - now Abkhazia is another country. The same situation is with the status of Kosovo and Nagorno-Karabach (where I've been also). Halavar (talk) 19:25, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok I didn't guess. Abkhazia is Russian puppet entity and that's all. Now about "they", I don't exclude maybe some of "them" accept it's ok people often make mistakes, Georgia include many many they, If you want to know what most of "they"-s think in Georgia, then you must held a referendum and you will see that, "they" who accept are vast minority and "they" who don't — vast majority. Maybe for you Abkhazia is another country, but be sure you won't be able to use Commons, for promotion of YOUR views. --g. balaxaZe★ 22:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobi, jaskinie (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sveti Stefan (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Góra Iwerska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. There a little bit noisy and it's a little bit unsharp. (May be the image would be better with ISO 100 and f/8.) --XRay 17:20, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Kaplica (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:44, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Park nadmorski (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:44, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (07).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (07).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:07, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Kaplica (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (02).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (05).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness is borderline, but OK. --JLPC 17:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 15:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel in New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments -- Good quality --Llez 13:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (08).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (03).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (04).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bus stop "Shell" in New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful (if there's no FOP problem in this country). --JLPC (talk) 15:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Poliklinika (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:55, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sveti Stefan (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. DoF could be better. The houses are sharp, the island could be sharper. --XRay 09:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway station in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from S-E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good picture, good caption: is a pleasure --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok z Góry Iwerskiej (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness at the border, just ok --Poco a poco 10:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (10).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:28, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Twierdza Anakopia (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfectly sharp but QI imo. --JLPC 17:09, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok ze szczytu Góry Iwerskiej (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok ze szczytu Góry Iwerskiej (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Twierdza Anakopia (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anacopia fortress in New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. View from S-E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (02).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Military Glory in New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. View from N-E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Park nadmorski (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. There is noise too. I don't know why -- ISO 200 should be OK. --XRay 11:59, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok na miasto z ulicy prowadzącej na Górę Iwerską.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:01, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok z Góry Iwerskiej (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:40, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Simon the Canaanite church in New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Simon the Canaanite church in New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Wodospad na rzece Psyrcha (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:45, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Królestwa Abchazji (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Overall good quality, but it would be even better if you could reduce the noise a little bit. --Code 20:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks, it's done. --Halavar 22:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Cerkiew św. Szymona Apostoła (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum i cerkiew św. Szymona Apostoła (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Twierdza Anakopia (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Wodospad na rzece Psyrcha (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Notable cyan fringe over the tree tops and in the water at the white water at the bottom as well as some slight magenta CA top right. The perspective correction is improvable but the top of the palm tree is already very unsharp. Alternatively, I was thinking about getting it first rectilinear and then change to a crop which is focussing on the waterfall (see note). But as this is a big change to your composition, I would not insist on that. --Cccefalon 12:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded with new crop and fixed CA. Hope it's good now. --Halavar 15:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Cerkiew św. Szymona Apostoła (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality. Two minor issues should be addressed, see note. --Cccefalon 16:25, 11 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hints. I uploaded new, fixed version. I think it's good now. --Halavar 22:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Twierdza Anakopia (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not very sharp at top but still QI IMO. --P e z i 22:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Twierdza Anakopia (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok na Monaster Nowy Athos (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok but can you clone out a little thing (see note)? --Christian Ferrer 19:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Yes. It's done. --Halavar 13:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 14:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sveti Stefan (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Halavar but how many photos you have of this island always at the same point? Now I know more than my house --Livioandronico2013 13:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)  Comment If you look to the category, you will see how many images I made. Also, you will se that almost all images of Sveti Stefan was made from that point, because from that point there is the best view. --Halavar 14:26, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Yes, but you will already have been promoted three (including 2 from me) I do not know .... I leave to others the choice --Livioandronico2013 14:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC) I think it is not a problem if someone loves to nominate a lot of photos from the same motif. I know someone with 64 shots of a bonfire in Wraxall where about 16 got promoted. Not a problem at all but of course it might become difficult to find promotors for the same motif after some time. Concerning this photo, I am not convinced about sharpness. The foreground is perfectly sharp but not the island. Moreover, it might be, that sharpness was achieved by overprocessing. I marked a small area with possible overprocessing. For me  Neutral Cheers, --Cccefalon 15:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)  Done I've added sharpness to the island, but I don't know what should I do with that place mentioned by Cccefalon. --Halavar 17:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)  Support All in all acceptable for QI, I think. --Code 14:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (wnętrze) (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Enough for QI even when its not the best possible composition --Hubertl 14:45, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (wnętrze) (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It´s a difficult scenery. --Hubertl 14:45, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. It's a little bit noisy but IMO good for QI. --XRay 17:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (04).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment - shadows very noisy; QI otherwise. --Óðinn 05:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC) It is lacking contrast to me, and possibly a bit red. Mattbuck 22:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded with reduced red colour and more contrast. --Halavar 13:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC) QI now, I think. --Óðinn 20:23, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (05).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Military Glory in New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:10, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:00, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:54, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (wnętrze) (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Its better now! --Hubertl 22:58, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (wnętrze) (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting but slightly tilted to the left and pincushion distorsion on each side (easy to fix). --JLPC 17:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)  Done You were right, thanks. I ploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 20:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC) Better now. --JLPC 15:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok z Twierdzy Anakopia (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 18:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok z Twierdzy Anakopia (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:09, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sveti Stefan (06).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sveti Stefan (06).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Kaplica (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:10, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Plaża i Góra Anakopia (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:05, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Pomnik przy wejściu do Jaskinii Nowoatońskiej (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but noise in the background is strong - can you reduce it? --Uoaei1 18:37, 9 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Yes, new version uploaded with reduced noise in the background. Hope it's good now. --Halavar 20:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Ram-Man 16:29, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Cerkiew św. Szymona Apostoła (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, but the sign is the main subject, can you improve a bit the description? I already added 2 categories. --Christian Ferrer 16:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Ok. It's done. --Halavar 17:33, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 17:54, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok ze szczytu Góry Iwerskiej (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lack of contrast, a bit too satured, the subject is a bit overexposed, and CAs at right (see note) --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC) I tried to fix the contrast and couldn't. It just looked artificial and overprocessed. Viewing the buildings at 100% indicates heat distortions or excessive noise reduction. Ram-Man 14:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)  Done New development from RAW using a different software. I think that new version of the image is better, without mentioned flaws. Please take a look again. --Halavar 15:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Good enough now. Ram-Man 18:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Park nadmorski (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Both sides are leaning out a bit, and the image is very bright (highlights must be decrease IMO) --Christian Ferrer 05:58, 19 December 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 13:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 17:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Opuszczony budynek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 00:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok ze szczytu Góry Iwerskiej (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. A little bit soft and noisy. --XRay 12:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new, fixed version without mentioned flaws. --Halavar 13:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok na Monaster Nowy Athos (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Stara motorówka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 15:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It´s better now. --Hubertl 16:34, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:10, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Tunel kolejowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:57, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ruiny antycznej Dioskurii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2015!

		* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:30, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Jaskinia Nowoatońska (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 2 noisy areas (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 21:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 22:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 17:29, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Park nadmorski (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 21:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 22:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 17:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 1/3 top a bit noisy --Christian Ferrer 04:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks, you were right. I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 01:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Xmas and happy new year

Merry Xmas and happy new year --LivioAndronico talk 11:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.png

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Plaża (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 13:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Park Pamięci (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Gagra, Park Pamięci (06).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Park Pamięci (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Plaża (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:12, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Park Pamięci (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 23:31, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Gagra, Park Pamięci (05).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Park Pamięci (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Plaża (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Plaża (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The ruins of the ancient Dioscuria in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from N-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 Comment It would be useful to have the direction of the camera in the scope and image description. Nev1 ([[User talk:Nev1|talk

•  Done Ok. I've added a direction. --Halavar (talk) 16:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC) ]]) 15:12, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Excellent! Nev1 (talk) 17:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

 Best in Scope. Good photo. Nev1 (talk) 17:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Plaża (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It need a more precise denoising at the junction sky/mountains --Christian Ferrer 07:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:00, 26 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 17:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Plaża (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:31, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Park Pamięci (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Hotel "Abchazja" w trakcie remontu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Park Pamięci (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:09, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway station in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Nev1 (talk) 15:22, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Impressive

Despite our different political views about conflict regions of Georgia, I can't hide your photo contributions value and I think it's impressive. Here, also I want to ask you, do you have some photos about other parts of Georgia ? And if you have, are you going to upload them here ? --g. balaxaZe★ 11:25, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

• I've got images from Georgia too (or in other words from "other parts of Georgia"). I've planned to upload them, but now I don't know, I really feel that I wasting my time by edit topics related with Abkhazia (in other words fighting with you) instead of uploading my images. I want to show all the people in the world how the reality looks like. Objectively! And that is the main goal of Wikipedia and other Wikis projects. I think that you forget, that we are here not to promote our political views, dreams of how the world should look like, we are not a press office of any government or other political institutions. I'm interesting how you gonna react in the future when I decide to upload my images from Nagorno-Karabach... Maybe the same as with Abkhazia images and Wikipedia topics. I hope and I ask you please, to stop your political influence in my Wikipedia's edits and with my pictures. I hope to upload lots of great images of Caucasian countries for pleasure of lots people including you:) Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! --Halavar (talk) 17:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Halavar there is one important thing, without Russia there wouldn't be any conflict (as it wasn't in Crimea before Russians didn't decided so). I am not get tired repeating that we (Georgians) and Abkhaz people were living in peace for centuries and this is not only my point, it is our past. I am not trying to promote something, do you think I am glad, as you said, "fighting" with other users? I just want to show that what was in reality (in the past) and that current situation (de facto independence) is not so pink as some of editors think. I don't have problems with your will to show reality by photos, even more I think it's useful. I think you mixing commons contributions to English Wikipedia contributions, I didn't reverted none of your photo contributions, but changing article's map is different thing. You say that you want to be objective, but at the same time you think, that Abkhazia is an independent state after 90s war and ethnic cleansing of Georgians, meanwhile I am trying to show that Abkhazia is a conflict region (as it is in reality) and perhaps after several decades this conflict will be ended and within Georgia Abkhazia will become Autonomous Republic. In my own political view Abkhazia is just a puppet entity ruled by Kremlin and occupied by Russian troops, but I'm not trying to promote this, I just want to show real reality in neutral view and not allow some editors to promote pro-secessionist views, I am just preventing them as objectivity of Wikipedia and other Wiki projects needs it. Now about Nagorno-Karabakh, as citizen of Georgia first of all I am reacting on my country issues, but during surfing in Wikipedia if I see something wrong about Nagorno-Karabakh for example Country Nagorno-Karabkah or something else, of course as Wikipedian I'll edit it. However there is many thing unclear and wrong in Wikipedia, but I can't be everywhere.
  • Thank you if you upload other photos. Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku ☮ --g. balaxaZe★ 19:30, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Sorry, but I can't agree with you but also I don't want to starting here a political debate. I'm gonna tell you only one thing, that joining Georgia into NATO and European Union (personally I am a big supporter of that) will never happend, if Georgia does not have a normal state-borders. That is a principal rule of both organisations because we don't need a problem-making-countries. In the near future, the Georgian authorities (and Georgian nationalists like you) will be confronted in front of the same problem which now have a Serbia with Kosovo to choose: agree with de facto situation and starting a normalisation with so-called "state" and start accession negotiations with EU (and maybe with NATO) or denial of existance of Republic of Kosovo/Republic of Abkhazia, defending our national proud and retrive rebellious (in their opinion) provinces. As I sad you before I really love Georgia and I wish all the best to this country, so according to that, I suggest the first option. Strong, safe (military and economic), with high GDP level and modern Georgia, with strong ties with Europe but without Abkhazia and South Ossetia because they are "lost cause". Georgia has only to wait for the courageous politicians who gonna say that to the citizens clearly and lucidly, instead of telling fairy tales that Georgia "might have" both things. Because the hars true is that since the end of the war 21 years ago, Georgia and Abkhazia move away from each other and over the years have become increasingly different; alienation progress rising and this process will be continued in the future. When I've been in Abkhazia I saw that clearly, that they are different than Georgians. Some things started to rise and living in a political dream will not change that...Halavar (talk) 21:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
      • Germany was divided for 41 years. Example of Cyprus (EU member). In Kosovo, Serbs killed and tortured Kosovars, in Abkhazia, Russians/Abkhazians/North Caucasians killed and tortured Georgians, 200-250k IDPs this matters! We will fight for millennium, may will say no to NATO or to EU, but never recognize Abkhazia and S.O. they are integral part of Georgia!--g. balaxaZe★ 00:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You can remove bird left in the sky?--Famberhorst 05:47, 27 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Yes, it's done now. --Halavar 13:46, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:44, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 01:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Picunda, Rzeźba "Nurkowie dla perłowej muszli" (02).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Rzeźba "Nurkowie dla perłowej muszli" (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 01:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 11:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (kamienne mury) (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little bit to bright, but good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andrew the Apostle Cathedral in Pitsunda, Gagra District, Abkhazia. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:26, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Widok na Morze Czarne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 03:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sure whether tilted, but QI --Poco a poco 07:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Chmury nad miastem (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)