User talk:JLPC/Archive 4

-- 13:15, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

User talk:JLPC/Archive 4

Bug virtuel

Tout a bien marché, je pense que tu as du faire un retour arrière qui ta privé de la mise à jour qui s'est déroulé normalement. Pour ta fleur, très réussie, il est prévu de ne pas geocoder, si s'est pour préserver la vie privée des membres; mais çà va mieux en le disant, d'où mon intervention. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavot de Californie détail FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments

Au cas où tu ne l'aurais pas vu, l'une de tes photos fait parti de la sélection (10e) du jury français, félicitations! --PierreSelim (talk) 10:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour JLPC,

bravo! Réussir à placer sa seule photo dans les finalistes, le choix était le bon :) J'en profite pour te féliciter de tes autres images que je vois et de ton activité toujours pertinente sur les QI! Bonne continuation!
--Selbymay (talk) 14:17, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brux 86 Ancienne poste 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaysersberg 68 Enseigne Hassenforder 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 21:21, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris AlexandreIII détail 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bottom is unsharp, perhaps it should be cropped off. Mattbuck 08:52, 30 October 2012 (UTC)  Done Is it better now ? --JLPC 18:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC) Yes. Mattbuck 21:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

About "File:Virgen de Coromoto.jpg"

Hi, JLPC,

Yes, I didn't noticed that you upload it with a too small resolution. Myself accidentally damage the file. I'm beginner photographer and I try to learn from others.

thanks for recomendation.

--Rjcastillo (talk) 16:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Lauréat de Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 en France

Votre photo File:Angoulême_Obézine_Tympan_2012.jpg fait partie de la sélection du jury français pour participer au concours international et se classe 10e dans le concours en France. Vous avez gagné un chèque cadeau d'une valeur de 100€ pour acheter du matériel photographique et vous êtes invité à la cérémonie de remise des prix qui aura lieu de 30 novembre 2012 à Paris. Pour plus d’information n’hésitez pas à contacter Wikimédia France par e-mail à l'adresse info@wikimedia.fr.

--PierreSelim (talk) 19:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

WLM 2012

Salut JLPC,

Pour un coup d'essai, c'est un coup de maître ! Bravo pour ce succès !--Jebulon (talk) 00:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eschscholzia californica (stamens and pistil).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

I guess the lack of geocoding is related to the fact that this plant is in your garden.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC) -- Yes, it is... --JLPC (talk) 21:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 20:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barèges 64 Inscription Schleck Tourmalet 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but how do you know it's not just someone getting married? --Mattbuck 02:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC) -- Thanks. Answer to your question on your discussion page. --JLPC 08:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Church of Saint-Amant, Charente, France.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint-Amant, Charente, France.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Félicitations ! --Myrabella (talk) 23:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charmant 16 Portail Château 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Martin-l'Ars 86 Abbaye la Réau Vue du NO 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Etriac Église 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laprade 16 Château du Janvray 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 00:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Etriac 16 Portail église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft, but still OK. - A.Savin 10:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Musée vie romantique 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment dust spot remove --Rjcastillo 21:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)  Done --JLPC 10:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --Óðinn 16:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Portail rue de La Rochefoucauld 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pierre Véry('s house).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:23, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnolia Détail FR 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Stéphane Cloâtre 19:00, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tournesol FR 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 18:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris À louer R de Douai 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA --The Photographer 20:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)  Done Is it better now ? --JLPC 11:50, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Electr Cie Edison 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 22:00, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Port Tuileries 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 21:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blonde d'Aquitaine Vallée Campan 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 19:47, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

QI

Many thanks!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Saint-Simon (Angoulême) (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Planteur 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 19:06, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

RE: Congrats and thanks

Hi, JLPC. Thanks. I've been learning from Commonners most are good, excellent, but still does I not understand some things to make better pictures. Best regards. --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Allégorie Justice bourse 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good QI. --Selbymay 20:07, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteauneuf 16 Modillon a 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 19:38, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Caserne Petits pères COA 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximeg 20:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Plaque J'accuse 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. - A.Savin 20:33, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Hôtel Cronstadt 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 19:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteauneuf 16 Modillon b 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine Égl&cimet 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --DKrieger 19:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Ginkgo&passage 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:30, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Angoulême Monument Beaulieu détail 2012.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Monument Beaulieu détail 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Étriac (France), exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:16, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brux 86 Cour d'école 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 04:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Passerelle 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. - A.Savin 21:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais Brongniart (Justice allegory).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Borne 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and useful --DKrieger 22:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Nørre Vorupør Coast 2012-11-18.jpg

Bonsoir JLCP !

Thank you for your kind interest in my photo. I did notice (at least one of) the white spots. I actually think they are gulls (although I cannot rule out dirt on the sensor, even though would normally not be seen as a white spot), as there were quite a lot of gulls gliding on the rising winds over the dunes. Here is a contre jour version looking in the other direction some time later as the the sun was setting. You will notice quite a lot of gulls. I can easily clone them out, but I think they are for real. What do you think? Should I clone them out?

Best wishes, --Slaunger (talk) 20:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Speaking of wild life: Just a few kilometers away from where the photo was taken a dead gray wolf was found on the same day. The wolf has been extinct in Denmark since 1813, so it has been quite a sensation. But I will save the gulls! --Slaunger (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bréhat 22 Jardin Kéranroux 2010.jpg

Hi, JLPC.

The image Bréhat 22 Jardin Kéranroux 2010 I think without bicycle better for me, or intentional ?...Best regards. --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:07, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

RE:File:Bréhat 22 Jardin Kéranroux 2010.jpg

Hi, JLPC.

Thanks for the information, is very important. that place is nice. Best regards --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Statue Gavarni 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Martin-l'Ars 86 Abbaye la Réau communs 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 23:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Métro St-Georges 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, well-chosen crop. --Tuxyso 17:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salles-Lavalette 16 Ligne HT 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment see notes --Rjcastillo 19:59, 16 November 2012 (UTC) Thanks. Dusposts removed. --JLPC 22:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC) Comment It could be the weather conditions?. Slightly blurr but acceptable. Ok for me --Rjcastillo 12:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lancerf 22 Gare&quai 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:50, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bréhat 22 Jardin Kéranroux 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition. QI --Rjcastillo 13:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination on FP

Hello, I'm contacting you after quite sometime. I was watching some of your uploads and I've nominated this image for featured picture. Hope it will succeed in FP . Best regards. -- JDP90 (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Amant 16 Givre-1 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely picture and good quality --Dey.sandip 19:24, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paris, rue des Petits-Carreaux (enseigne "Au Planteur")..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:42, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electricity (Compagnie Edison).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nørre Vorupør Coast 2012-11-18.jpg

Bonjour JLCP !

Thank you for taking your time to vote on this FPC. An alternaitve is also available, and another reviewer has requested voters on the original to also consider the alternative. Thanks, --Slaunger (talk) 09:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

FP pour une blonde !

Salut JLPC,

As-tu vu que ta "Blonde d'Aquitaine" dans la Vallée de Campan est en bonne voie pour être promue "Image Remarquable" ?

Je regrette, pour ma part, que la qualité de l'herbe m'empêche de la soutenir (je trouve qu'elle est trop "pixellisée" et manque de netteté), mais je ne crois pas que la bestiole ait besoin de mon vote !

C'est une très originale et amusante composition, et le site est magnifique. --Jebulon (talk) 00:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Passage Barrault 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:47, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Parc de Bercy tulipes 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 19:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romagne 86 Châtaignes 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Nikolauskapelle Untermooweiler-7430.jpg

Thank you, I forgot it and did not notice it until you mentioned it ..... Kind regards from Lake Constance Dietrich --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 16:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
BTW: I like the image about the newsagent's, really nice! --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iteuil 86 Ligne Paris-Aus-Bordeaux-St-J 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice perspective. --JDP90 05:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delphinium FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JDP90 08:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kumquat vert FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Amant 16 Gelée blanche 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit strange, but OK for QI. - A.Savin 10:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Maison presse 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and useful.--Jebulon 16:27, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champagne-Vigny Chez Rulier D436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments "Bons Bois" ? "Fins Bois" ? "Grande Champagne" ? ;) Good picture.--Jebulon 16:32, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bréhat 22 Quai 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice. Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bréhat 22 Marcheurs Paon 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful for the lemma backpack --Moroder 22:37, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Enchantée !

Bonsoir JLPC,
Je suis enchantée d'avoir fait votre connaissance. Bon retour, avec une amicale dédicace :) --Myrabella (talk) 21:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madiran 65 Porte XIXe 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 18:53, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Boulangerie 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chadurie Portail privé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Port de Tolbiac 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit "blue", but good for QI--Moroder 19:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci

Bonjour JLPC,

Merci pour ton gentil mot de la Charente. Ça m'avais fait un grand plaisir de te rencontrer à la cérémonie WLM. Je suis contente de pouvoir réchauffer (un peu) ces froides journées d'hiver avec le soleil d'Istanbul. Par ailleurs, tu a un excellent œil pour détecter le pixel "mort". J'ai vérifié, il est bien là sur presque toutes les photos, et apparemment c'est un pixel vert "chaud" qui ne s'éteint pas. Sais-tu, peut être, comment le remédier? Faut-il donner l'appareil en réparation ou existe-elle une autre méthode? Bien à toi et bonne continuation. --Moonik (talk) 13:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Merci pour tes conseils. Je regarderais la doc de mon appareil, en espérant d'y trouver la fonction en question. --Moonik (talk) 17:18, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Genouillé 86 Monument 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blanzac-Porcheresse 16 Noyers 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Ajepbah 20:29, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Eglise Saint-Pierre de Châteauneuf

Merci pour les superbes photos des pentures de mon ancêtre: Pentures détails --Roi.dagobert (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

C'est vrai, tu as raison, il suffit d'essayer de proposer des images de qualité, de temps en temps, avec quelques photos réussies et certaines finissent bien par être sélectionnées, c'est un encouragement. En tout cas j'admire tes photos et je ne manque pas de faire régulièrement un petit tour dans ta galerie. Bonne continuation et bonne année.--Roi.dagobert (talk) 07:10, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Nul besoin d'aller jusqu'en Normandie pour voir et photographier de belles choses. Il suffit de bien regarder tout autour de soi pour découvrir des merveilles. Merci de tes voeux, au plaisir! --Roi.dagobert (talk) 17:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulipes FR 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 19:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pivoines de Chine 2 FR 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good --Rjcastillo 19:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Head office building of La France (plaque).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:48, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fortunella margarita (Oval Kumquat), green fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good scoop, good quality. It would be interesting to know the area of origin without more precision because it seems to be the garden of the photographer (n'est-ce pas)? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:43, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 Done - Now improved, at least I hope so. (Since I discovered the Geolocator, in August, I geolocate all my files, except when the photos are taken in my garden... and this is a personal Kumquat. --JLPC (talk) 11:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Useful (Thank you for the explanation) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Payolle (Traditionnal leytés).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passage Barrault (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manuscripts of Alfred de Vigny (Carnet de 1827).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barèges 65 Aygat Midaou 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! --Moroder 18:47, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Amant-16 Chemin&neige 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 19:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Oberstaufen-7940.jpg

Hello JLPC,

thank you for your friendly comment. You are right, you can use the expressions rührend, anrührend, or as you did in english, bewegend. On that very day we, my wife, two friends and myself, were heading for a dry place, as I noticed the head of the old man with the drops on it. While everyone wondered about me and rushed away, I forgot about the rain and started to take pictures. This one I like best.

Thank you and kind regards from cold Lake Constance --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shoemaker's in Rue Bobillot (Paris), exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful for memory --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:25, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echebrune 17 Frise chapiteaux 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Jean Mabillon 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 00:42, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

:File:Puerta de madera.jpg

Hi JLPC, thanks for review. In the picture that's is sun, not problem, I go to shoot it again. Thanks again for the advices and recomendations, is the best way to improve and learn. Best regards.

Congratulations on achieving Wiki Loves Monuments in 2012 in France. Sorry, I did not know.

--Rjcastillo (talk) 21:31, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Gavarni, no FoP in France, but wait just a little....

salut cher JLPC.

tu vas rire, mais ton buste de Gavarni candidat en VI devrait être exclu de "Commons" !

son auteur est Denys Puech, comme tu l'as noté, et compte tenu de la date de sa mort, ses œuvres ne sont pas dans le domaine public...

...Pas encore...

...mais...

Mais il est mort en décembre 1942 !!!!! Donc, au 1er janvier prochain, dans moins d'un mois, c'est bon !

Je serais toi, si je puis me permettre ce modeste conseil, je retirerais cette proposition (pour l'heure illicite) sur la pointe des pieds, pour la représenter dès le 1er janvier, histoire de fêter cette accession au Domaine Public ! C'est un cas bien rare qui se présente là, et plutôt amusant, je trouve. Ce serait drôle de marquer le coup.

Puisque j'en suis aux conseils, je crois qu'une autre formulation du 'scope' serait meilleure. Je te suggère (Paul Gavarni bust, by Denys Puech), qui me parait plus conforme à nos usages. Peut-être aussi que la création d'une galerie regroupant les vues de ce buste serait adaptée dans la catégorie, pour différencier de ses propres œuvres cette représentation de l'artiste.

Juste une idée...

Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 00:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Vérification faite, j'ajoute qu'il y a déja, dans la Category:Denys Puech (taguée d'une mise en garde "non DP" que tu te feras un honneur de retirer le 1er janvier prochain...) , une sous-catégorie idoine bien incomplètement illustrée... Tu as du boulot de rangement à faire ! --Jebulon (talk) 00:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montboyer Vierge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

 Support ou  Oppose, mes excuses !

Bonjour JLPC

Pardon de t'envahir de nouveau.

En faisant le ménage dans les images en CR de QI, j'en ai vu une qui faisait l'objet d'un  Support sans  Oppose, mais qui était néanmoins en CR. J'en ai conclu, compte tenu de ton commentaire, que l'opposition non formellement exprimée venait de toi, et j'ai ajouté le petit  Oppose en préambule à ton commentaire. Je procède ainsi régulièrement, ça aide sérieusement à s'y retrouver quand il s'agit de faire les comptes, et on m'en sait généralement gré.

Par ailleurs, une image supportée sans opposition formelle n'a rien à faire en CR, elle est promue, point.

Mais visiblement, je suis allé trop loin dans mon interprétation de ton sentiment, et je te prie de m'excuser pour ce dérapage malencontreux, ainsi que je m'en suis expliqué dans les commentaires de l'image en question. Je suis toutefois heureux, si je puis dire, que ça "tombe" sur toi, ça me permet de rendre des comptes, en français, à un interlocuteur que je sais indulgent.

Ma contrition trouve toutefois ses limites dans le fait que désormais, l'image s'est améliorée, et que donc tout le monde y gagne, en premier lieu "Commons". "A quelque chose malheur est bon" dit la sagesse populaire...

Mais je suis désolé de t'avoir mis, malgré moi, en situation de malentendu avec l'auteur. J'espère que tout est réparé maintenant.

Peut-être, une prochaine fois, pourras tu assortir ta remarque d'un petit signe genre  Comment ou d'un  Question, ou même d'un  Request, qui m'empêcheront de faire des bêtises ? Dans ces cas-là, je m'abstiens de toute initiative pour qualifier plus avant la remarque d'un "reviewer".

De nouveau, reçois mes amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 16:08, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Nous avons un problème en VI

Nous avons l’émergence d’un intégriste, comme rencontré par le passé pour d’autre type d’image. Ce personnage exige pour les images de bâtiments, le nom de l’architecte, et l’année de construction. Ce n’ai pas, en soit, une mauvais idée, elle peut faire l’objet d’une remarque systématique, mais pas d’un vote négatif. En conscience voyez ce que vous pouvez faire pour éviter, comme ce fut le cas pour User:Velvet, de voir une image « tomber » injustement. Il serait bon qu’il la représente comme prévu par le règlement pour que nous puissions lui rendre justice. Je dépose ce message dans la page de discussion pour qu’il n’y ai pas d’équivoque sur un éventuel complot. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Church of Saint-Félix, Charente, France.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint-Félix, Charente, France.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Church of Poullignac, Charente, France.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Church of Poullignac, Charente, France.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Tout finit par arriver ! Bien cordialement, --Myrabella (talk) 14:45, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sain-Félix 16 Chapiteaux entrée 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Éguille 17 Bateau de pêche 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 21:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fusain d'Europe FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 09:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pensées FR 2011 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful image, for me no doubt QI --DKrieger 21:37, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Civray 86 Chapiteau Daniel 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture and QI to me --DKrieger 20:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blanzay 86 Église b 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romagne Saint-Laurent 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 00:02, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bréhat 22 Marée basse 2010 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:28, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Topkapi

Bonjour JL, Merci pour ton intervention sur cette image. J'avais essayé trois fois de redresser ces lignes, avec plus au moins (plutôt moins) du succès. Ils résistent à toutes mes tentatives de correction. Si tu avais réussi a le faire, le plus simple sera de télécharger directement ta version sur Commons. Peut-être ça mériterais de relancer le QI, qu'on pense-tu? Comme la fin du monde n'est pas encore arrivée, j'en profite pour souhaiter à toi et à tes proches, des excellentes fêtes et beaucoup de merveilleux cadeaux. Bien à toi, --Moonik (talk) 12:24, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Grand merci. Je pense que c'est mieux maintenant, donc j'ai remis l'image dans le QI en discussion (tant que le boot n'est pas passé apparemment on peut toujours intervenir!). Maintenant il ne reste qu'à attendre pour voir qu'en pensent les autres. Amitiés. --Moonik (talk) 14:08, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

La rue La Buyère

La porte de la rue La Buyére. Belle porte mais il nous faudrait un scope un peu plus spécifique. Car il sous entend que c’est la plus belle porte de la rue. Ce qui est probablement vrai, mais qui est difficile à apprécier pour ceux qui n’habitent pas cette ville. Si tu pouvais rajouter le nom de l’architecte, ce serait parfait. Pour une fois "cmadler" aurait raison. Nous pourrions aussi nous faire aider par un habitant du cru qui a peut être une idée de la façon de tourner la difficulté. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

• Je suis désolé de mettre mal exprimé. Le but étant de la faire passer sans friction. Et pour ce de réfléchir à une tournure du scope. Pas de l’enlever. Comme elle n’a pas laissé de trace tu es à même de la représenter dans quelques temps. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For your tireless work in assessing Quality Images plus your many uploaded Quality and Valued Images. Tupungato (talk) 19:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ploëzal 22 La Roche-Jagu 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very well --Rjcastillo 19:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)very well

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Amant 16 IVe Station CDC 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very well --Rjcastillo 19:19, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Sauve Majeure 33 Chapiteau Daniel 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:27, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Amant 16 Route D143 Hiver 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments yes, its blue! --Ralf Roletschek 22:21, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royan 17 Bateaux pêche 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Mascaron Rue Henner 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 21:48, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villebois-Lavalette 16 Tour de l'ouest. 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 21:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villebois-Lavalette 16 Vue vers l'est. 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the composition.--ArildV 20:33, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villebois site.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Merry Christmas !!!

 Merry Christmas !!!...Best regards, --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:01, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montboyer 16 Ancienne boucherie 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Couronne 16 Chapiteau 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very very happy new year. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

2013!

		* * * 2013 !!! * * *
		Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année ! Respectueusement, Georges -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Couronne 16 Église façade 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality. --Tupungato 19:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas to you, too. The e-mail is marek@wyprawa___.info (please type it without _ characters). Keep up the good contributions. --Tupungato (talk) 23:27, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brouage 17 Marais 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If you ask me, I would add a little more saturation. But anyway - it is a quality image. --Tupungato 19:08, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Civray 86 Lac Tibériade 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image, nice. --Tupungato 19:08, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Top flop fop: bof

Bonjour mon Camarade,

Hélas, je n'ai aucun doute... L'exception américaine dite "de minimis" (ces termes de Droit Romain n'ont pas le même sens ici qu'en Droit français, c'est un autre sujet) ne me parait pas pouvoir s'appliquer, et on est hélas en plein "dedans". J'ai écris "en petit" juste pour attirer ton attention et t'amener douuuuucement vers la dure réalité...

Quant à la procédure, tu as raison, mais ça m'ennuie de solliciter moi-même la destruction d'une contribution, c'est très désagréable. Je sens bien qu'il va falloir pourtant, que je fasse preuve de courage, et que je demande ce sabrage. Tel le bourreau devant Anne Boleyn, je te demande pardon pour ce que je vais te faire...

Mon Dieu que cette réglementation est stupide !

Toutes mes amitiés quand même !--Jebulon (talk) 10:53, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chalais 16 Façades 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:40, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

la tache bleue

Wow quel oeil de lynx! Merci j'ai corrigé. J'essai une nouvelle méthode de prise de vue sur fond noir. Les couleurs sont meilleures les bords sont plus net. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:56, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

WLM Barnstar

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Félicitations pour ces magnifiques photos, des rayons de soleil dans le ciel gris de Normandie! Roi.dagobert (talk) 07:58, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of La Couronne (Charente, France) (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope. cmadler (talk) 14:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:36, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Jenny

Les Set sont Morts.S'est un travail trop lourds que nous imposons à nos administrateurs. Attendons une nouvelle évolution pour les réactiver. Le but c'est surtout de vous monter Jenny! On l'a retrouvé dans nos réserves alors que nous ne savions pas que nous l'avions. Il y a eu 48H de flottement avant que notre Zoologiste ne trouve qui était le monstre. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

fin de 2012

Cher JLPC

Quelques soucis personnels m'ont contraint à différer récemment la suite de nos échanges particuliers.

Je ne t'oublie pas toutefois, évidemment (d'ailleurs je t'embête encore sur le FoP en QI, c'est dire !)

Cette année aura eu notamment ceci de positif qu'elle t'aura fait entrer dans mon paysage, et j'en suis ravi !

Je te souhaite une bonne soirée, et te promets un prochain message un peu plus élaboré, ne serait-ce que pour t'offrir mes voeux.

Bien cordialement,--Jebulon (talk) 17:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Euh...on s'est croisés, non ? --Jebulon (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2012 (UTC)