User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive4

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Jerzykowicach Wielkich, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Jerzykowicach Wielkich, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Jerzykowicach Wielkich, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Jerzykowicach Wielkich, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Jerzykowicach Wielkich, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 19:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lepszy byłby dokładniejszy opis, bo to jakaś kapliczka, ale jakość OK --Pudelek 08:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Starej Łomnicy, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 08:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Starej Łomnicy, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:35, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is near to overexposure but imho still ok. --Tuxyso 08:54, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:56, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Kudowie-Zdroju, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There are few black dots on the sky near the tower. --Halavar 11:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 12:04, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Kudowie-Zdroju, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zamek w Baranowie Sandomierskim, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, stare miasto 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:33, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Łężycach, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Łężycach, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:33, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Łężycach, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzygórze 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:07, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, barokowa brama 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Please, write diferent names in the proposals--Lmbuga 21:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego w Nowym Wielisławiu, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good light and quality. --JLPC 16:36, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Jerzykowicach Wielkich, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 13, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Dańczowie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Dust spot. I left a note. --Halavar 12:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 15:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Dańczowie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Dańczowie, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Dańczowie, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Dańczowie, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa Kłodzka i most żelazny w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. The right side is inclined to the left (look to the trees). --Halavar 19:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 10:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 11:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Baranowie Sandomierskim, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality. Still needs a perspective correction of the backgrouind elements (street lanterns are leaning in) --Cccefalon 12:00, 1 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 23:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Ratusz 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:29, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Ratusz 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Lots of black dots on the sky. They should be cloned out. --Halavar 09:28, 3 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 23:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:34, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 15, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica przydrożna w Starym Gierałtowie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 09:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica przydrożna w Starym Gierałtowie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. The right side is inclined to the left (look to the trees). --Halavar 19:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 10:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)  Comment Better now. But I think image is too dark. Can you add some light? --Halavar 11:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 18:12, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:36, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Crop could be better, more at the right and left. --XRay 07:36, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Równia pod Śnieżką, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment to put an english description is good however here your english description is not in english --Christian Ferrer 18:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 19:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, barokowa brama 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, barokowa brama 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality,nice. --Livioandronico2013 22:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:50, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but a more precise caption should be better.. --JLPC 18:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, stare miasto 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, wójtostwo 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, stare miasto 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper, but ok/ --Mattbuck 20:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, stare miasto 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Łężycach, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support looks fine for me --El Grafo 11:37, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Łężycach, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, QI for me --J. Lunau 13:33, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments in my opinion QI --J. Lunau 13:33, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Łężycach, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 18:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 20:12, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, stare miasto 11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, stare miasto 11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:40, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:40, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Brateevsky 11:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Brateevsky 11:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I propose to clone out the tree branch middle right border. --Cccefalon 05:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two dust spots. --Lewis Hulbert 14:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 22:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 23:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Kudowie-Zdroju, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 18:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Kudowie-Zdroju, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 18:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kanał Młynówka w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Zawiszy Czarnego.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 17:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Długopole Dolne, kościół św. Jerzego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 15:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Długopole Dolne, kościół św. Jerzego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Długopole Dolne, kościół św. Jerzego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Długopole Dolne, kościół św. Jerzego 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 22:09, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 20:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 20:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Brama Wodna 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:18, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:24, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:08, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:28, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, pieta 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Real good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality-- Llez 05:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (but brighter would be better imo). --JLPC 15:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but it seems a bit tilted CW--Lmbuga 22:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 23:18, 10 October 2014 (UTC) Goog quality, thanks--Lmbuga 16:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Wolany, kapliczka.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Wolany, kapliczka.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 19:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, dzwonnica 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, dzwonnica 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 19:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Stary Jerzy 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 16:23, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kościół śś. Szymona i Tadeusza 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but a few dustspots/birds in the sky.--ArildV 06:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 09:12, 8 September 2014 (UTC) Thank you.  Support--ArildV 18:45, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, plebania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Diana Ringo 12:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Anny 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 13:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, rynek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --MB-one 00:42, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

zespół pałacowy

Hey Jacek, you thanked me for my vote in favor of your image about zespół pałacowy of Tarnobrzeg. Anyway, let me thank you to back : I enjoy your picture, it is great :) Sincerely yours, Jiel (talk) 21:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ratusz 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Doroty 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 10:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 10:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ul. Piłsudskiego 2 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 10:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 10:45, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Czerwieńczycach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO perspective is not perfect. --Tuxyso 22:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 21:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC) Leaning clockwise. Mattbuck 09:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 13:34, 7 September 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 17:53, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 23:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 17:53, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
16 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 07:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 07:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ratusz 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good. Areas in shadow has a bit of noise, but good resolution--Lmbuga 21:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment please remove dustspot see noteVilly Fink Isaksen 13:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 13:22, 11 September 2014 (UTC) QI now Villy Fink Isaksen 13:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Raszkowie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:02, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Raszkowie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There disturbing branches and an english description is necessary. Please check your image.--XRay 17:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 17:32, 9 September 2014 (UTC) Good quality. OK now. Thanks. --XRay 16:21, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:32, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:02, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:32, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Scope in VI

Hi Jacek, littles problems of scope in VI :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Paczków, staw.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Paczków, staw.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Siennej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo --Lewis Hulbert 22:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Siennej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 22:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Raszkowie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Raszkowie 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:30, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Kłodzko, ratusz, wnętrze 07.JPG

File:2014 Kłodzko, ratusz, wnętrze 07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Halavar (talk) 11:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Siennej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Siennej 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościoł śś. Piotra i Pawła w Tłumaczowie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:30, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kościół śś. Szymona i Tadeusza 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There are a lot of dust spots.--XRay 08:42, 13 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 17:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 18:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Stary Jerzy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentThe image needs perspective correction.--XRay 08:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 17:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 18:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Stary Jerzy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Anny 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Anny 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, rynek 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 13:30, 13 September 2014 (UTC) Still a bit dark, but better. Mattbuck 13:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Nysa Kłodzka, wodospad 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 09:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC) Better, but I'm not sure about this, I ask for further comments. Mattbuck 17:53, 9 September 2014 (UTC) @Jacek Halicki: I think, Matt is right; all the railway masts are leaning in. You should rework it, it's really a nice motif with overall good quality. --Cccefalon 07:40, 12 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 23:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC) Ok now. --Cccefalon 14:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, dom nr 67 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me --DKrieger 21:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, dom nr 112 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and good photo -- Spurzem 22:05, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościoł śś. Piotra i Pawła w Tłumaczowie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościoł śś. Piotra i Pawła w Tłumaczowie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)  Comment Slight dust spot (see note)--Lmbuga 12:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 19:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Tłumaczowie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, dom nr 67 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, dom nr 67 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. I would prefer a composition in which the building was not in the center --Lmbuga 10:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ratusz 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add an english description. --XRay 08:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:25, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:25, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:25, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kościół śś. Szymona i Tadeusza 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it's tilted CW. Please have a look to the houses.--XRay 08:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 17:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC) Feels oversharpened to me. Mattbuck 18:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC) This and the two adjacent images developed using the same settings Camera Raw--Jacek Halicki 21:13, 13 September 2014 (UTC)  Support OK now.--XRay 07:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kościół śś. Szymona i Tadeusza 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it needs perspective correction.--XRay 08:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC) But how? IMO perspektive is OK --Jacek Halicki 17:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC) Some small dust spots at the top. Mattbuck 18:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 21:13, 13 September 2014 (UTC)  Support OK now.--XRay 07:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, rynek 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 21:26, 13 September 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 16:53, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 21:56, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Livioandronico2013 21:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, dzwonnica kościoła.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:54, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościoł śś. Piotra i Pawła w Tłumaczowie 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Two dust spots (see notes). The violet roof and the sky are a bit noisy. Good picture--Lmbuga 12:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 19:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Good quality--Lmbuga 22:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Ścinawce Dolnej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Though it is of good quality and QI, I pproposed another crop (not necessary to apply, just a possibility to enhance). --Cccefalon 04:08, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Ścinawce Dolnej 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Stanisława Kostki w Ścinawce Dolnej 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add English descriptions to your candidates. --Kadellar 22:39, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, pawilon przy dworze 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ for me--Johanning 06:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, pawilon przy dworze 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ for me--Johanning 06:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, dom nr 67 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It could be QI for me, but it seems too tilted CCW. The tree seems tilted also--Lmbuga 00:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 22:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)  Support A bit better. QI for me--Lmbuga 13:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:26, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:27, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 18:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:27, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 18:29, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Ścinawce Dolnej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Stanisława Kostki w Ścinawce Dolnej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Stanisława Kostki w Ścinawce Dolnej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gajów, park 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, staw w parku przy dworze 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image needs perspective correction and an english description.--XRay 07:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 19:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --XRay 16:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, dzwonnica 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image is too bright and it needs an english description.--XRay 07:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 19:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --XRay 16:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:25, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
24 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:25, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
26 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 21:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:07, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:07, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:07, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 13:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:08, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:32, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 3 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 4 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 5 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, staw w parku przy dworze 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, dom nr 112 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Lipowa 6, kawiarnia 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 17 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 17 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 17 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 17 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 17 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, muszla koncertowa 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 10 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 4 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:03, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Ścinawce Dolnej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Ratusz 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 00:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 00:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 01:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 01:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:29, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 11:23, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Lmbuga 23:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:57, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Ratusz 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:53, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Ratusz 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Ratusz 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:53, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Ratusz 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, starówka 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Please add an english description.) --XRay 16:09, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Siennej 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Please add an english description.) --XRay 16:09, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Raszkowie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: Please add an english description. --XRay 16:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Raszkowie 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: Please add an english description. --XRay 16:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Raszkowie 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Simple composition. Can't find the church. But technical OK. --XRay 16:29, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Raszkowie 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:30, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
27 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
28 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
29 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of John of Nepomuk in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Statue of John of Nepomuk in Lądek-Zdrój is a better category as a link to the scope. Image also should be moved there. --Halavar (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 Support Good now. All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 00:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzygórze, kościół św. Józefa 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 21:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzygórze, kościół Krzyża Świętego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 17:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)  Comment Right, but it is slightly tilted cw, please change! --Uoaei1 17:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzygórze, kościół Krzyża Świętego 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościoł śś. Piotra i Pawła w Tłumaczowie 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Please add an english description.) --XRay 08:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Tłumaczowie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Please add an english description.) --XRay 08:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Nysa, Bazylika św. Jakuba i św. Agnieszki, witraż.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Nysa, Bazylika św. Jakuba i św. Agnieszki, witraż.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:50, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzygórze, kościół św. Józefa 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:30, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:18, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzygórze, kościół Krzyża Świętego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but there is a CA on the left side of image. I added a note. --Halavar 23:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 09:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)  Support OK. Looks better. --Halavar 09:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, pawilon przy dworze 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 01:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, dom nr 112 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 00:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentIMO there CAs (soee note).--XRay 11:50, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 09:10, 22 September 2014 (UTC)  Support OK.--XRay 15:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, View from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 12:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including slightly different view direction) too narrow for a not too exceptional building. --Hagman (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. -- Jiel (talk) 21:33, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, View from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 12:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including slightly different view direction) too narrow for a not too exceptional building. --Hagman (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Kłodzka Street in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:06, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:59, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: Please add an english description. --XRay 15:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 18:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 17:01, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:45, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Lipowa 6, kawiarnia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Orla 7, dom zdrojowy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Stanisława Kostki w Ścinawce Dolnej 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:31, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Stanisława Kostki w Ścinawce Dolnej 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:31, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 18:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:07, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC ( talk) 15:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 18:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:07, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. -- Hagman (talk) 01:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 18:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  
•  Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Schronisko "Dom Śląski", 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 16:56, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Schronisko "Dom Śląski", 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Równia pod Śnieżką, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, Old Jerzy, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 17:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, Old Jerzy, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 17:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, New Jerzy, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 17:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, New Jerzy, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 17:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 19:45, 25 September 2014 (UTC)I think so many pictures of the same object from the same place is just flooding, and disrespectful for reviewers.--Jebulon 20:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC) I agree with Jebulon. Nothing wrong with uploading multiple pictures, but what is the point of them all getting QI? This is imo meant for the best of a series. --DXR 21:27, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Sorry, I'm new here and I did not know that you can not do that. In the future, I'll keep that in mind --Jacek Halicki 21:43, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:25, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. For me the best of eight. -- Spurzem 19:43, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 4 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 4 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support It is not a "simple building", it is a church with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support It is not a "simple building", it is a church with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support It is not a "simple building", it is a church with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Oops, sorry. I made my first reviews here today and was unaware of local customs – all I had thoroughly read was merely the documented guidelines. This church looks a lot smaller than a cathedral to me, but certainly has relevance beyond local, justifying a scope of its own. Directional scopes look to me like something that should be justified by the fourth bullet point exceptionally if something remarkable is particularly worth of iunterest – I didn't really see that apply here. It may not be relevant to the point, but one may note that the category is large only because a single photographer spent a day or two there and adding view direction as restriction is close to turning "most valuable" into "only matching".--Hagman (talk) 10:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • I agree. While I appreciate that the cathedral criterion was silently dropped, I dislike the directional scopes. They appeared only lately. Before, the required scope was exterior, and additional scopes like façade or apsis were accepted only if these views were relevant on their own. --Ikar.us (talk) 00:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, barokowa brama 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:00, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, barokowa brama 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:00, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, barokowa brama 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, barokowa brama 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:22, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, barokowa brama 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:59, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, barokowa brama 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:59, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jean11 20:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 15:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 17 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:39, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice idea. Good quality. --XRay 11:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But I would crop out the left part. --XRay 11:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 13 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)