User talk:Jean-no/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please Link Images
Hello - thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects - this is possible only if the images can be found by other people. To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should either place the images on topic pages (galleries), or put the images directly into a category, or do both. Which of those possibilities is preferred is however a matter of debate, see here.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now, see Commons:Really unused. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do! Thank you. -- Duesentrieb 16:02, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Format des Images
Bonjour Jean-no,
J'ai vu que tu as chargé une image au format gif (Jacques_callot_miseres_guerre.gif). Je pense qu'il serait préférable de charger ce type d'image au format png qui est plus moderne et plus performant. Med 14:41, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
Quend 18 plage.jpg
Thank you for uploading this beautiful photo. Do you mind uploading a high-resolution version with the same name? I would like to straighten it, correct the fisheye effect, and tone down the white blow-out in the clouds. I tried it with the current version and I like the effect, but I think a hi-res version could become a featured photo on Commons. --Tysto 00:51, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Klaus nomi ill artlibre jnl.png
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Klaus nomi ill artlibre jnl.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lyzzy 07:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Deleted image
Hi. I deleted Image:Ldlc affiche metro jnl.jpg. We think that the poster is a copyrighted work so photos of it isn't free. / Fred Chess 10:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Coup de main ?
Bonjour !
On a attiré mon attention sur ta page utilisateur, où je crois comprendre que tu es déconcerté par certaines décisions sur ce qui est acceptable et pas.
Les lois sur le copyright sont parfois contre-intuitives (il y a des images que tu pourrais produire toi-même mais qui ne seraient pas exemptes du copyright de tiers, par exemple). Aussi je comprends que tu puisses mal prendre des effacements qui te paraîtraient injustifiés.
D'autre part, sois certain que nous n'avons pas moins de considération pour un contributeur dont on doit ponctuellement supprimer certaines des images (ça m'arrive régulièrement, et je suis admin ici depuis quelques mois déjà).
Pour finir, je ne sais pas si tu es très à l'aise en anglais ; si ça n'est pas le cas, n'hésite pas à me poser des questions si je puis t'être utile. Commons est un projet très exigeant du point de vue des licences, et nous devons parfois sacrifier des images pour être en conformité avec la loi ; ça ne veut pas dire que nous sommes prêts à sacrifier des contributeurs bien intentionnés comme toi.
Bonne continuation, et n'hésite pas si je puis t'êtr utile ! Rama 19:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- L'image n'était a priori pas illégale, elle montrait un couloir du métro dans lequel se trouvait une affiche publicitaire : n'importe quel journal a le droit de montrer ce genre d'image (tandis qu'une reproduction de l'image seule n'irait pas et constituerait évidemment une contrefaçon du droit d'auteur). Je connais un peu le droit à l'image (un peu oublié, mais ça faisait partie de mon cursus de CAP photo...) et je m'étonne toujours du fait que sur wikipédia ou commons, seule la question du droit d'auteur pose problème, on ne parle pas du reste : l'interdiction de diffuser la photographie d'une personne ou d'un groupe de moins de quatre personnes sans leur accord écrit, l'interdiction de montrer un mineur de - de 18 ans hors d'un cadre très restrictif, etc. Et même sur le droit d'auteur, on oublie généralement que la facçade d'un immeuble appartient à son architecte, que l'éclairage de la tour eiffel (Image:Paris_Tower.jpg) n'est certainement pas libre de droit, etc. - enfin je parle du droit français mais des dispositions similaires existent partout. Mais bon ce n'est pas le problème : je supporte mal le manque de discussion sur commons, au lieu de mettre la question aux voix, l'image est effacée sans procès, alors qu'elle illustrait un article de fr.wikipedia et alors que, je le maintiens, son cas n'était pas si simple. Je trouve ça brutal. J'ai mis sur commons quelques images assez rares à vrai dire, dont certaines que j'avais précédemment publiées dans des livres (les tout premiers graffitis "hip hop" à Paris, par exemple, dont je suis apparemment le seul à avoir des photographies), j'ai eu l'impression de m'investir, de mettre quelque chose de moi-même dans Commons. Mais en même temps je ne peux pas y passer ma vie, et découvrir qu'une image a disparu en voyant, sur un article de wikipédia, l'affreuse mention "image manquante", ça m'embête, je trouve ça agressif, pénible, suffisamment pour me chasser. Jean-no 00:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
If you have left Commons, you probably won't get the message, but I replied at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Disputes. If you calm down, I'm sure we can talk about it. Fred Chess 17:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello Jean-no, aurais-tu cette même image en plus gros ? Merci a toi :) ~ bayo or talk 18:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Ldlc_affiche_metro_jnl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Fred Chess 18:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Masaccio chapelle Brancacci.png
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Masaccio chapelle Brancacci.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. G.dallorto 21:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Soeur sourire jnl.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've nominated the image above to speedy deletion because it is a derivative work from a copyrighted one. Best regards, Lugusto • ҉ 09:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- So rude, again and again. Jean-no
- I and FML have some disagreements on pt.wikipedia and he replied to you only to provoke. I don't know exactly what problems do you have here at Common; my english is poor, my message from 09:16, 21 February 2007 is only intended to send to you a small warn related to a very old image uploaded at 23 August 2005 containig a photograph from a poster. Only it ;). Sorry if speedy delete seens rude to you, this is the deletion policy here on Commons. Lugusto • ҉ 22:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Karl Haushofer.jpg
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Karl Haushofer.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.140.64 02:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I added an url which could be the source, but I am not sure. --Hardscarf 11:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Nisse_d_apres_nature_ill_jnl_fal.png
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Nisse_d_apres_nature_ill_jnl_fal.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yonatan talk 00:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, it's fine. ;) Yonatan talk 09:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Jurg_Kreienbühl_lisleadam_2007_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
