Joachim Specht
This user page was nominated for deletion on 7 June 2012 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Tip: Categorizing images edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 06:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Bischof Msgr. Kilian Flasch.jpg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Dr. Albert Stöckl.jpg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Nicholas Cardinal Wiseman.jpg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Msgr. Charbonell.jpg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Barbara Pfister Sterbebild.jpg is uncategorized since 8 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Domkapitular Dr. Wilhelm Molitor.jpg is uncategorized since 8 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Barbara Pfister 1.jpg is uncategorized since 8 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Barbara Pfister Grab in Speyer 2008.JPG is uncategorized since 8 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Wilhelm Molitor als König Konrad III..jpg is uncategorized since 9 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Wilhelm Molitor als Student.jpg is uncategorized since 9 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Fürstbischof August von Limburg-Stirum.jpg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Fürstbischof Franz Christoph von Hutten.jpg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:August von Limburg-Stirum.jpg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Wilderich von Walderdorf.jpg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Ämilian Schöpfer Buchcover.jpg is uncategorized since 11 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Ämilian Schöpfer.jpg is uncategorized since 11 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Franz Xaver Schädler als Abgeordneter.jpg is uncategorized since 11 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Franz Xaver Schädler als Domkapitular.JPG is uncategorized since 11 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Ludwig Windthorst JS.jpg is uncategorized since 12 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Grabstein Catharina Heichemer in Goshenhoppen .JPG is uncategorized since 6 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Grabinschrift Rottmanner Speyer.JPG is uncategorized since 7 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Grabstein Rottmanner Speyer JS.JPG is uncategorized since 7 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Eduard Rottmanner.JPG is uncategorized since 7 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Orgelbuch Rottmanner 2 JS.jpg is uncategorized since 7 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Grabstein Dietrich BeckerJS.JPG is uncategorized since 7 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kriegsehrenkreuz Ehrenbund Vorderseite 2 JS.jpg is uncategorized since 20 June 2009.
- Image:Joseph Spillmann, Bucheinband, Jugendstil.jpg was uncategorized on 31 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Bischof_Dr._Ludwig_Sebastian_Sterbebildchen_JS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
sугсго 22:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- In addition to the above: If you add categories: try to find the best suitabale category. So not Category:Priests and Category:Germany but Category:Priests from Germany. I changed most of your images accordingly, but try to upload new images in the best suitable categories yourself. HenkvD (talk) 16:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I`ll try to categrize the Images as soon as possible. The most of them are my own made photos (tombstones and so on) and so I forgot it. If I took an photo from somethere else, mostly I cetegorized them. Only when I started to upload images I forgot it soemtimes. I did not know about the difference between Category:Priests and Category:Germany and Category:Priests from Germany. I`ll use the right category further. Sorry!! The file of Ludwig Sebastian is an own scan from my own funeral souvenir, which I received from my death grandmother. The photo is older than 70 years, but the souvenir itself is only from 1943. Do how you thing about. Best regards and thanks. --Joachim Specht (talk) 19:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Your uploads September 2009: Categorizing - "bad" and "good" example edit
Hi, please DO NOT categorize your pictures (an example of your uploads):
Please check BEFORE uploading your images the categories matching mcuh better, i.e. Category:Alois Benziger, and, please, do not add - in addition - the categories of the state/country, too.
Thank you for your assistance, --84.75.168.24 01:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Or use Category:Bishops from Switzerland and Category:Bishops from India instead. HenkvD (talk) 13:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Alban Haas.jpg edit
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alban Haas.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Alban Haas.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Polarlys (talk) 14:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Bayern_Pfalz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Bayern_Pfalz_2_JS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:41, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Mack_Nudeln_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Louis_Pinck,_Papa_GerneJS.jpg edit
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Louis_Pinck,_Papa_GerneJS.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Arnette_Buch_vorn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Logo_Karolina_Burger_Schule.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Erzabtei_St._Vincent_1930.jpg edit
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Erzabtei_St._Vincent_1930.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Erzabtei_St._Vincent_1930.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Bonifaz_Wimmer.gif edit
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bonifaz_Wimmer.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Bonifaz_Wimmer.gif]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 08:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bischof_Benziger_Quilon.jpg edit
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bischof_Benziger_Quilon.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Ämilian_Schöpfer_Buchcover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fürstbischof_Franz_Christoph_von_Hutten.jpg edit
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fürstbischof_Franz_Christoph_von_Hutten.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Nicholas_Cardinal_Wiseman.jpg edit
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Nicholas_Cardinal_Wiseman.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
High Contrast (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Gedenktafel Bechtolsheimer verbessert.jpg edit
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gedenktafel Bechtolsheimer verbessert.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Gedenktafel Bechtolsheimer verbessert.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Platonides (talk) 23:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Your uploads of March 22, 2010, referring to Category:Kollam (Kerala): Categorisation edit
Hi, please do not categorize your uploads (an example of your recent activity):
Please save time and capacity on commons by categorizing:
- Category:Kollam (and for example Category:Forts in Kerala)
Please use as far as possible the category of the regarding city/town/village or district (if there's no category), or, a localized better 'fitting' i.e. the 'most fitting"' category(ies), and, do not add - in addition - the categories of the city, state and country, too.
For further information on categories please read Commons:Categories referring to an accurate categorisation, simplifying your further uploads and categorisation in general. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the commons:help desk.
Thank you for your assistance, Roland 23:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Please stop to categorize Category:Kollam + Category:Kerala + Category:India (reasons please see above) ! Thx, Roland 00:15, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- I`ll try to do my best. Excuse if it was not right by categories. --Joachim Specht (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for your feedback. Some simple rules (if city, then not state and country ;-)). I'm glad to read that, and please feel free to contact commons:help desk. Best regards, Roland 00:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC) PS: "Churches in Kerala" added, perfect, you've got it :-)
Füg doch bitte den Weblink dazu, vielleicht kann ein anderer Benutzer aus dem Kontext nähere Information herausfinden. --Martin H. (talk) 01:52, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Gerne, schon geschehen. Im Artikel habe ich beide Seiten auch schon als Weblinks aufgeführt. --Joachim Specht (talk) 02:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Danke! --Martin H. (talk) 02:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Leopold_von_Bayern2JS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Bischof_Dr._Ludwig_Sebastian_JS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Bischof_Ludwig_Sebastian_1934_JS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Pilgerkalender_Speyer_JS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Bischof_Dr._Ludwig_Sebastian_JS.jpg edit
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bischof_Dr._Ludwig_Sebastian_JS.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bischof_Dr._Ludwig_Sebastian_JS.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:Bischof_Dr._Ludwig_Sebastian_JS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Kronprinz_Rupprecht_Ehrenzeichen_1929.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Georgstaler edit
N'abend, die Georgstaler passen wegen fehlendem Jahr und Land irgendwo nirgends rein. Ich habe eine category Georgsthaler eröffnet, die zu anderen historischen Thalern leitet. Da sind die Amulette am besten aufgehoben. Ist das ok so? mfg --Drdoht 00:03, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- Das ist sehr gut, ich denke auch, dass das so am besten ist. Gruss--Joachim Specht (talk) 09:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
|
File:Bischof_Punnakottil_Portrait.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
...Captain......Tälk tö me 18:32, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, it is my own photo, taken by me myself in India, and I put it also to my page http://salve-regina.npage.de/bischof_george_punnakottil_ein_unterstützer_25910743.html --Joachim Specht (talk) 13:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Joachim Specht. You have new messages at Captainofhope's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
File:Bischof_Punnakottil_Portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Hl._Castor_1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Augustine_Kandatil_coloriert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Alexander_Chulaparambil_1923.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Pauline_Koenig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Devasahayam_Pillai_4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Georg Heim 1931.jpg edit
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Georg Heim 1931.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Georg Heim 1931.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Hallo Joachim Specht, der Lizenzstatus dieses Bildes ist auf dem Forum infrage gestellt worden. Ist das aus einer normalen zeitung oder was genau war die Quelle. Diese Angaben solltest du auf jeden Fall vervollständigen (Verlag, Ort, Seite, Jahrgang, Erscheinungsjahr). Falls du die ganze Seite zur Verfügung hast, dann schau bitte nach, ob es dort irgendeine Autorenangabe, insbesondere für das Foto, gibt. Falls nicht, könnte das Bild als PD-anonymous durchgehen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Bischof_Weber_und_Pfälzer_Missionare_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saibo (Δ) 23:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Your uploads on January 7, 2012, and many more before, referring to India : Categorisation edit
Hi, please use useful categories and don't over-categorize your images, i.e. please do not categorize your uploads (an example of your recent activity):
or p.e.
You'll help to save time and capacity on commons by categorizing:
- Category:Cemeteries in Kerala or much more specific
or
- Category:Bishops from Kerala or much more specific
Please use as far as possible the category of the regarding city/town/village or district (if there's no category) etc., or, a localized better 'fitting' i.e. the 'most fitting"' category(ies). Do not add - in addition - the categories of the "parent category", among them cities, states and countries etc.
For further information on categories please read Commons:Categories referring to an accurate categorisation, simplifying your further uploads and categorisation in general. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the commons:help desk.
Thank you for your assistance, Roland 18:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes OK, sorry. Next time I`ll try to do it in that way. Thank you.--Joachim Specht (talk) 18:54, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Carl von Lothringen Kardinal.jpg : Louis III de Guise ? edit
Guten Tag Joachim. Bist du sicher das ist Charles, Cardinal of Lorraine (1524-1574) ? Ich habe ein andere Image mit sein Vorname :
-
Charles, Cardinal of Lorraine (1524-1574)
-
Louis III, Cardinal of Guise (1575-1621)
--Jimmy44 (talk) 08:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo, ich hatte das Bild vom web runtergeladen und es war so beschrieben, dass es der Bischof von Straßburg sei. Aber Du hast recht, Dein Bild ist eindeutig, denn es hat eine zeitgenössische Beschriftung. Ich werde es in der Bildbeschreibung abändern. Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe aber auch noch einen Stich von dem Strassburger Bischof Charles de Lorraine, den stelle ich im Artikel ein. Gruss --Joachim Specht (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion edit
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Coonan Cross oath.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Fr. Matthew Kadalikattil.jpg edit
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fr. Matthew Kadalikattil.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Fr. Matthew Kadalikattil.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File:Erzdiakon Thomas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Nayar Pillai.jpg edit
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nayar Pillai.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nayar Pillai.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:Erzdiakon Thomas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Fuerst Loewenstein mit Gattin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Fürst NW Ausschnitt2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Mueller Josef.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion edit
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 23:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Patrona Spirensis Einholung JS.jpg edit
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Patrona Spirensis Einholung JS.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Patrona Spirensis Einholung JS.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File:Patrona Spirensis Einholung JS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:John sulaqa.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Pierre-Jean De Smet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Money of India edit
Hi, I have restored all money of India: Commons:Deletion requests/Money of India. Please use {{GODL-India}} as a dual license. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:17, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Erzbischof Conrad Gröber.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Cordula Wöhler, Gedenkbild, 1916.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |