User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2020/Q3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford February 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:03, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford February 2013 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:03, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford February 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Incompleted FPC

Hi, I see you close out FPCs, here are some incomplete FPCs that need closing or listing. Most are too low quality to even list.

1. Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Minto panel 31012016.jpg
2. Commons:Featured picture candidates/Antigua iglesia de Riolobos en El Campo de Peñaranda.jpg - File:Antigua iglesia de Riolobos en El Campo de Peñaranda.jpg
3. Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:American Fascism.jpg
4. Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Minto panel 31012016.jpg
5. Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Apatura ilia 07.JPG
6. Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Argynnis adippe 01.JPG
7. Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nile Croc eating AdF.pdf - File:Nile Croc eating AdF.jpg

--BevinKacon (talk) 09:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

They have never been transcluded onto the main FPC page, so I don't really see an urgent need to clean them out. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice light. -- Ikan Kekek 05:30, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:43, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but please remove the vertical line on the right in the air.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)  Done --King of Hearts 01:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just an idea: What about cropping the lower 1/3 of the image? It’s not that interesting, and the composition would still work … --Aristeas 08:43, 2 July 2020 (UTC)  Done --King of Hearts 01:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 10:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --EV Raudtee 14:27, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford February 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, especially considering this is from 2013. --Domob 16:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford February 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, especially considering this is from 2013. --Domob 16:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Anne Devereux-Mills

Dear King of Hearts, Could you perhaps have a look at this photo? Is this photo also covered by OTRS 2020062210010372 ? Vysotsky (talk) 23:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

No, the OTRS ticket does not mention it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weather conditions are far from optimnal, but quality is for me good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 05:23, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The house looks distorted but otherwise lovely --Podzemnik 02:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Google Art Project

hi Mr. King of Hearts, I am writing to you because I would like to ask you if you could kindly restore me these two portraits made in the 19th Century, found on google art project, could you restore them please??

• File:S.M. Re Umberto I.jpg
• File:Ritratto Vittorio Emanuele II (11).jpg

--Ałfred Moltke (talk) 19:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Such an amazing view --Harsh 2580 05:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:30th Street Station Philadelphia July 2016 002 edit.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely. -- Ikan Kekek 02:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Harsh 2580 09:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 HDR 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 HDR 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish February 2013 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Epic series. FP --Podzemnik 01:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Harsh 2580 13:34, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park December 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Why should this be an image of a national park? I can only see 80% of a road surface. --Palauenc05 21:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC) Sorry, edited the description. --King of Hearts 05:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)  Support --Palauenc05 11:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

US FOP check

Hi King of Hearts. I was wondering if you'd mind taking a peek at File:Monument honoring a Confederate Soldier located in the Garden of Honor at the Allendale Community Park..jpg and File:Slave Child kneeling at the feet of a Confederate soldier..jpg. If this story is correct, then it would seem that at least one of these and possibly both were installed well after 1978. -- Marchjuly (talk) 15:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, to me the story doesn't say anything about when they were constructed. SIRIS also turns up blank. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

I thought "About 22 years ago, a local Army veteran watched a memorial featuring life-size statues taking shape and deemed it 'impressive.' The Allendale resident told The Grand Rapids Press for a story in 1998 he hoped the site would encourage young people to ask questions." might indicate the installation date, but perhaps the statues had been previously installed somewhere else. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivy Lea Thousand Islands July 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivy Lea Thousand Islands July 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Phillips Academy Andover Coat of Arms.svg

File:Phillips Academy Andover Coat of Arms.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Non free logo. Fair use not allowed on commons Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 16:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1000 Islands Tower view July 2015 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1000 Islands Tower view July 2015 panorama 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivy Lea Thousand Islands July 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 12:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thousand Islands Bridge July 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 05:08, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thousand Islands Bridge July 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 05:08, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 panorama 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 panorama 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1000 Islands Tower view July 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:41, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright infringement info

Hello, have a look, please
Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Copyright infringement info
With best regards, George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:King of Hearts/Recent uploads/Stanford University

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:King of Hearts/Recent uploads/Stanford University, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 27865 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC))

@Magog the Ogre: This is my first time setting up the gallery updater, and it seems that on its first run it's trying to pull everything in Category:Stanford University instead of only the new uploads. Is there something I configured incorrectly? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, the tool didn't scale well and needs a rewrite for which I currently lack the patience. It looks to me like you want to exclude Category:Alumni of Stanford University. It brings in a host of people who lead organizations with content that has nothing to do with the university. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:41, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

FYI I fixed the tool in case you're curious. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Cool, thanks. I actually modified my definition to restrict it to the parent cat only, as I really only am interested in catching when people don't properly diffuse into the subcats so that I can fix it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thousand Islands Bridge July 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 07:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivy Lea Thousand Islands July 2015 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 07:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1000 Islands Tower view July 2015 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 07:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1000 Islands Tower view July 2015 panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 07:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1000 Islands Tower view July 2015 panorama 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 07:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1000 Islands Tower view July 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok imo. --ArildV 08:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thousand Islands Bridge July 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 06:52, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:King of Hearts/Recent uploads/Stanford University

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:King of Hearts/Recent uploads/Stanford University, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 30135 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 01:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO a little bit too dark. --XRay 05:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Fixed --King of Hearts 06:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank you. --XRay 08:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)  Question Is it tilted? See the towers --Llez 05:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Is it tilted? See the towers --Llez 05:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:03, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would benefit from a perspective correction --Poco a poco 06:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Could you indicate what looks particularly distorted here? For landscape shots with no prominent verticals I typically prefer keeping it uncorrected as it looks more natural to me this way. -- King of Hearts 05:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC) I meant the houses on the right. I agree with you for nature landscapes, this one is rather a mix of both buildings and nature --Poco a poco 08:04, 25 July 2020 (UTC) Fixed --King of Hearts 04:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Thanks and yes, I know, I can but stubborn somethings :) --Poco a poco 09:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paulus Hook Monument Jersey City July 2020 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paulus Hook Monument Jersey City July 2020 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 00:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:55, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very high resolution --Basile Morin 03:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 009.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 009.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice. --Moroder 04:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapwi Trails Thousand Oaks May 2019 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 02:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support. QI. Interesting air perspective. Dmitry Ivanov 21:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

COM:UDR

Please, take into account that COM:UDR policy is to keep requests open for at least 24 hours. This time is intended to give the requesters chance to respond or ask further questions. Also, sometimes another undeletion (or deletion) rationale than provided by the requester may need to be considered (eg. something deleted per noFoP may be free for another reason).

The exceptions from this rule are rather obvious cases, like OTRS requests, procedural closures, or requests by blocked users. Ankry (talk) 09:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Longsheng Rice Terraces November 2017 014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Longsheng Rice Terraces November 2017 014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf from Thames London June 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Eye June 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millennium Bridge London June 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millwall London June 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millwall London June 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf from Limehouse London June 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf from Limehouse London June 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. If I want to be nitpicky, too bad we can't see every letter of "HSBC". But we know it's there. -- Ikan Kekek 01:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City of London June 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenwich London June 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf from Thames London June 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf from Thames London June 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millennium Bridge London June 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Millwall London June 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxo Tower London June 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hay's Galleria London June 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxo Tower London June 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotherhithe London June 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotherhithe London June 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tate Modern London June 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Broken Template

"File:November 3, 2013 Partial Eclipse in Ghana.jpg" was used on enwiki as the template image for that eclipse. Can you replace it? Sumanuil (talk) 07:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

What do you mean by template image? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Shard London June 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf from Limehouse London June 2016 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunrise Point Bryce Canyon November 2018 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Worldwide News Ukraine.jpg

Please explain your deletion of this file. There are thousands of logos of companies on Wikimedia. By the logic of the nominator, they would all need to be deleted. Which is the issue I brought up and it wasn't answered by anyone involved.--Sanya3 (talk) 06:35, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

See COM:TOO. If the logo is too simple, such as plain text or simple geometric shapes, then it is not copyrightable. However, this logo featured a globe so it is obviously complex enough to be copyrighted. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on September 26 and other stuff

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I've got a quick update for you, containing three items:

• I’d like to invite you to our group’s second Virtual Meeting on Saturday, September 26, 2020. As last time, this meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic. If you'd like to present, please add your name and the proposed topic to the list on the talk page.
• Also, I'd like to start a conversation about how we should be sharing responsibility for the user group going forward. I'd love to get some help when it comes to organizing things and I'm convinced that we can achieve more if a couple of people helped with coordinating stuff.
• Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has asked me to spread the word about their latest survey: Universal Code of Conduct Survey. The goal is to create a safer environment on Wikimedia projects and the Foundation gathers feedback prior to coming up with a first draft.

Hope to see you at the Zoom meeting in September!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford March 2013 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford March 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford March 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford March 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford March 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford March 2013 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:49, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:49, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:49, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 HDR 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely and a great moment. -- Ikan Kekek 02:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Doublemint TwinofSedona ?

User Talk:TwinofSedona claims to be Doublemint Twins ?

Oko5ekmi5 (talk) 09:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

PDM

Hi, FYI quite a few {{PDMark-owner}} audio files have been uploaded today as part of User talk:Fæ/IA audio. At this point I'm considering it non-controversial, though you may want to consider it as a test case. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 12:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford March 2013 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Dish March 2013 HDR 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Lagunita Stanford March 2013 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Question about a deletion request

Appreciated King of Hearts:

I have a question related with a deletion request about some files uploaded by me, which was opened 2 months ago.

I couldn't find this request in the list of active requests but the files involved still have the notice of being involved in the deletion request.

My question is: Is the said request officially opened or closed?

Thanks in advance, greetings from Colombia and God bless you.

--Babelia (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

The DR is not closed yet. DRs may be closed as soon as 1 week but may take as long as 6 months or more. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:15, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

update on File:Craig Campbell.png

Hello, King of Hearts! I hope you are doing good. I want to know exactly about the issue for Campbell.png? what I am getting the issue is " the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published". Do I need to send the email from my own email address? will you please guide me about this.i will be very thankful to you. Regards Cpl43 (talk) 12:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

@Cpl43: No, that is not the issue, please read the tag carefully, it is only listed as one of several reasons why the permission is insufficient. We must receive permission from the copyright holder, who is usually the photographer, not the subject, unless the copyright was transferred in writing. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:24, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

ok, I got your point. Many thanks Cpl43 (talk) 13:59, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Closing large DNs

In future when you close a large DN, please be sure that you actually closed and removed the deletion tags from the images. I am going through renominating dozens of images and having to remove prior DN tags as well. Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

I used MASS process, seems like it didn't succeed in removing all the tags. Do you know of a more reliable method? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

I'm unsure how to procede in accordance with policy

If you look at File:Norman Lear & Terrie Frankel at Producers Guild of America Awards 1998.jpg you will see that the {{delete}} is still there, but the discussion itself has been closed. I am sure that any rational person understands that it would not be vandalism for me to remove them, but the tensions seem to be high, so I am a little more cautious. If you tell me to help out and remove them, I will, alternatively if you have time, you can do that yourself. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:20, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I see that above this you have been informed about the problem. The question still remains, should I help or stay out of the way? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes, if you can help, that would be appreciated. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

 Done I believe I did everything right, I have been careful to leave the templates to those discussions that are still open, left edit summaries, etc. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:59, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

We need admin's help at MOTD

Can you please help out: Template talk:Motd/2020-08-23. Thanks ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 10:58, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

As you are on line

Hi. I did not notice the previous DR concerning Asiel Babastro. If this is a "deleted file re-uploaded" case, maybe you can take an SD decision. Best. --E4024 (talk) 02:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

It is not the same image, so it is ineligible for speedy deletion. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Jen_Perelman.jpg OTRS

King of Hearts, A notice at File:Jen_Perelman.jpg says

The (received email) message was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file. This may, among other reasons, be because there was no explicit release under a free license, or the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published.

I am the original uploader of the image. Can you please help me fix the license issue?

Stefania0 (talk) 12:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

We need the photographer, not the subject, to send in a release. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Examples of articles my content can be included

Hello, an example article that my work could be included in, would be 'Academic Music' or 'Contemporary Music', 'Harmony and Counterpoint'. My art work could be included in fantasy, fiction, poetry or novel literature. Also, it can be included in galleries containing illustrations. Please review.

Thank you

Mrepoulis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrepoulis (talk • contribs) 22:52, 25 August 2020‎ (UTC)

@Mrepoulis: Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request for undeletion - Content is in the academic area... is where you need to present your arguments. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Old M.I.T. Textbook

Hello again King of Hearts,

I've responded about the copyright notice. Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Advice_about_OTRS_request

I wonder whether to try to contact someone in the Physics Dept. or in the Edgerton Center or elsewhere at M.I.T. Suggestion? Thanks, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 15:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Sigh

Guess who made this mess: [1]... —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clark Center Stanford October 2019 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clark Center Stanford October 2019 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Please take a look

Greetings: COM:PRP request review of this diff [2]. I am concerned when stories change and edits change. Thank you for all you do for the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Apologies, this is my mistake for misapplying what she told me over email; she didn't mention any specific images, but rather said that the USO photos from Vietnam were taken by a military photographer. Her specific statement at the DR obviously overrides that. I have updated my !vote. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clark Center Stanford October 2019 HDR 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clark Center Stanford October 2019 HDR 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Wow --Basile Morin 01:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church October 2019 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Despite HDR the chancel is quite soft. Can this be improved? --Ermell 06:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC) @Ermell: More highlight recovery could always be done, but at the cost of realism; the windows were much, much brighter than the interior of the church and I don't want to compress the range too much. I think the image currently strikes a reasonable balance. --King of Hearts 14:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Longsheng Rice Terraces November 2017 021.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Longsheng Rice Terraces November 2017 021.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Boston skyline from Longfellow Bridge September 2017 panorama 2.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

A DR you closed

Hi. Can you revert the recent disruptive edits on File:Yemen. Girl.jpg and protect it, please? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 12:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

I don't see what's disruptive? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Nothing (now :). All reverted already. Thanks all the same. --E4024 (talk) 17:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sunrise Point Bryce Canyon November 2018 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunrise Point Bryce Canyon November 2018 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

OTRS Rafael Caldera

Dear King, Please, could you take a look to see if the OTRS here apply to here too. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 17:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Yes, the publicly available license statement applies to the entire website. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Please, I`m not OTRS member, could you add the template to this result? --Wilfredor (talk) 18:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

You are a license reviewer. When the evidence is present on a public website rather than a private email message, the correct procedure is to add a {{LicenseReview}} template rather than an {{OTRS}} template. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:47, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Dear King. Thanks for clarifying it, because I was thinking that there was some additional information on the OTRS. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 03:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

關於User talk:Pbdragonwang

您好，由於Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_87#User:Pbdragonwang此案沒有管理員處理，於是我去找Minorax管理員，但是他也不願處理，最後只好打擾您的清靜。此案要處理的是Pbdragonwang，他的做法有三個問題：

• 第一，最早他是在User talk:Pbdragonwang留下「基於過去發生的種種不愉快，本人拒絕再與User:Kai3952互動」此話，如此有敵意的言論是充滿挑釁，令我相當不悅，懇請管理員前往制止他這種行為。
• 第二，現在他更改成「基於過去發生的各種事件，本人認為必須與User:Kai3952避免有任何互動」此話，但問題是此話題（請看special:diff/447248065）是他發起的，並非是我找他，他將責任歸究於我，我認為他不負責任的行為是難以與別人一起合作為commons.wikimedia貢獻，所以我懇請管理員向他溝通，以改進他的態度，若管理員覺得有必要封禁他，那麼我沒異議。
• 第三，是他自己要討論分類問題，結果他半途脫離原本的話題，造成他有理由指控我曲解他的話，進而達到他留下「基於過去發生的各種事件，本人認為必須與User:Kai3952避免有任何互動」此話的目的，他如此不良的溝通方式和不肯面對自己的態度，我認為這只是在製造事端，因此懇請管理員動用權力，強烈要求他改進，若管理員覺得有必要封禁他，那麼我沒異議。
  

至於他原本討論的分類問題（請看special:diff/447248065），由於他抗拒我建議，不願去找社群討論，然後他當時不斷找我糾纏，於是我只好暫時按照他說的去做，採用Republic of China做為主分類，因此先處理Historic buildings (historic monuments) in Taiwan此分類，並保留住他建立的Historic Buildings of the Republic of China分類頁，最後我將Historic buildings (historic monuments) in Taiwan重定向。我認為此做法仍需要經過社群討論，不能貿然全部更改或移動，所以Pbdragonwang無論糾纏我什麼，我都會按照他一開始提出的分類問題去找社群討論，以確定我們該如何遵照什麼樣的方式以及如何判斷什麼樣情況，去使用Taiwan或是Republic of China。最近我會找時間去討論，為了我能專心處理正事，還是需要管理員處理他說「基於過去發生的各種事件，本人認為必須與User:Kai3952避免有任何互動」此話。謝謝--Kai3952 (talk) 14:37, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City September 2020 HDR 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City September 2020 HDR 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City September 2020 HDR 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paulus Hook Pier Jersey City September 2020 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot in advance!

Hey Tony, this is just a quick reminder that our user group meeting will take place next Saturday. Thanks a lot in advance for your part in the agenda. I'm really looking forward to seeing you soon! Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)