LPLT

English: Welcome to the Commons, LPLT!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Filnik 18:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Jardin des Arenes de Lutece.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Plaque des Arenes de Lutece.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Catégories

Merci beaucoup de charger vos images de Paris. Pourriez-vous ajouter des catégories à vos fichiers quand vous les chargez, s.v.p.? Et peut-être vous auriez même le temps d'y ajouter des coordonnées géographiques? C'est facile, il suffit d'aller chez Google Maps, entrer l'adresse (p.ex. "rue Victor-Cousin Panthéon Paris"), et puis zoomer sur l'endroit où vous avez fait l'image. Puis cliquez sur "Obtenir l’URL de cette page" (ou "Link to this page"), copier l'URL et y extraire la partie suivant "ll=". P.ex. pour la URL Google http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=rue+Victor-Cousin+Panth%C3%A9on+paris&sll=48.8479,2.343349&sspn=0.004709,0.006641&ie=UTF8&ll=48.847924,2.342397&spn=0.000589,0.00083&t=h&z=20 , on extrait "48.847924,2.342397". (Attention, ne pas extraire la partie après le "sll=", mais celle après "ll="!) Puis on ajoute à la page de l'image le modèle {{Location dec}} avec ces coordonnées: {{location dec|48.847924|2.342397}}. Si vous faites même une estimation de la direction de vue, vous pouvez l'ajouter également, p.ex. {{location dec|48.847924|2.342397|heading:30}} (comme je l'ai fait pour Image:Sorbonne, rue Victor-Cousin.jpg). (0 ou 360 = nord, 90 = est, 180 = sud, 270 = ouest). Vous pouvez entrer ce modèle {{Location dec}} aussi directement dans le formulaire de chargement dans le champ "Informations supplémentaires". De toute façon: keep up the good work, comme ils disent en anglais! Lupo 09:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Bonjour Lupo,

Pas de probleme je vais preter attention aux cat, en revanche la geolocalisation me semble un peu compliquée de manipulation. Cordialement.--LPLT (talk) 16:30, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

File:City_Life_Theme_Steve_Reich.gif

Image deletion warning

File:City_Life_Theme_Steve_Reich.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sylenius (talk) 22:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

c'est pas que j'aime pas, au contraire, c'est juste que j'ai fait une version plus lisible . Sylenius (talk) 22:37, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

OK ça roule--LPLT (talk) 19:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, LPLT!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Facade du théâtre des Gobelins à Paris.JPG is uncategorized since 23 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Rue Dante à Paris.JPG is uncategorized since 24 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Rue Tournefort à Paris.JPG is uncategorized since 24 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Intérieur de l'Église Sant'Alfonso all'Esquilino.JPG is uncategorized since 19 July 2009.
• Image:Wovenhand in 2009.jpg was uncategorized on 15 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Cinematheque francaise Paris.jpg

File:Cinematheque francaise Paris.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Tour Albert rue Croulebarbe.JPG

File:Tour Albert rue Croulebarbe.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Mobilier national.JPG

Salut. Juste un mot pour te dire que ce fichier ne peut pas rester sur Commons, vu que Perret est mort en 1954, et qu'il n'y a pas de liberté de point de vue en France. Tu peux le recharger sur WPfr avec le bandeau fr:modèle:fair use bâtiment récent en attendant les 70 ans après la date de décès de l'auteur pour que l'œuvre tombe dans le domaine public. Cordialement, --Coyau (talk) 05:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour Coyau,

Pas de problème, je vais faire le transfert dès que la page est supprimée de Commons. Bàt--LPLT (talk) 07:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Voila, c'est supprimé. N'oublie pas de mettre aussi la licence (libre) de la prise de vue. Bonne journée. --Coyau (talk) 09:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

IP Vandalism

Compare

http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=71.8.199.1&blocks=true

with

http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=71.8.197.170&blocks=true

Thanks Dave (talk) 01:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Pavillon noir

Bonjour, pas de problèmes, en fait il s'agit ni plus ni moins de [1] description comprise. Otourly (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:Reines de France et Femmes illustres

Merci et bravo pour tes photos. Le nom de la catégorie prête à confusion. Je propose de la renommer Statues of queens of France and famous women at the Jardin du Luxembourg ou, si tu préfères Statues des Reines de France et Femmes illustres au Jardin du Luxembourg. Un peu long mais plus explicite et un moyen sûr d'éviter le classement de toutes les reines et femmes célèbres françaises dans cette catégorie. Cordialement, --Bohème (talk) 10:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

fichier

Salut ! J'ai modifier un fichier que tu a s créer et je l'ai importé sur commons.

• 
  Orgiginal
• 
  Nouveau fichier

Bien sur j'ai respecté la liscence, j'ai cité ton non dans Auteur.

Pas de problème--LPLT (talk) 17:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposition d'un tour à Rome

Cela pourra t'émerveiller. Je vois que tu aime photographier les églises de Rome et de ses alentours. Moi aussi. Je viens te proposer un tour dans la commune de Rome, mais au dehors du G.R.A. J'ose te proposer ça parce que: 1) je suis empêché de le faire moi-même (demander l'aide de quelqu'un c'est difficile et pas toujours réalisable); 2) parce-que je pense que cela pourra attirer ton attention et ta curiosité. Bien sûr, cela uniquement si tu habite à Rome et si tu a une voiture à disposition. Le voyage commence par Cesano di Roma (15 km du GRA direction nord, sur la Cassia bis): là on pourra visiter diverses églises, parmi lesquelles l'église de San Nicola di Bari (XI siècle), l'église paroissiale de St Jean Baptiste et, près de la gare, l'église de St Sébastien. De Cesano on peut rejoindre la Cassia vecchia et par là descendre à Rome. Sur la route on passe par ces lieux en même temps historiques et artistiques:

• le vieux bourg de Isola Farnese (petite deviation de la via Cassia, sur la gauche) avec sa belle église de San Pancrazio (XV siècle);
• le centre de La Storta, avec la cathédral des Sacrées Coeurs de Jésus et Marie, cathédral du diocèse de Porto-Santa Rufina; et une petite chapelle dedié à St Pierre (si je ne me trompe pas!);
• encore, en arrivant à La Giustiniana on peut voir la moderne et haute église de la Vierge Immaculée (on la voit directement de la Cassia vecchia)
• après quoi, le tour est terminé; mais si tu veux continuer, on passe le G.R.A. et on entre dans Rome. Après une centaine de mètres, sur la gauche, on voit l'église de San Giuliano martire. Au carrefour (semaforo) suivant, la route à gauche mène (via di Grottarossa), après à peu près 500 mètres (n. 193), à l'église de San Filippo apostolo; les deux sont des églises modernes
• je ne sais pas combien après, toujours sur la via Cassia, on arrive à deux églises, sur la droite, les deux dediés à St André apôtre: S. Andrea (via Cassia 735) (fin XVIII siècle; elle est dedans d'une école religieuse, mais visible de la route) et la paroisse de St André (à côté de la précédente - première moitié du XX siècle).

Merci, et, j'espère, bon voyage. --Croberto68 (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Merci de cette proposition, mais mon temps et mes activités à Rome sont limités et chargés avec d'autres priorités pour être franc. Je ne pourrais t'aider ou t'accompagner dans ce tour en espérant que tu le réalises pour toi et pour Commons. Cdlt--LPLT (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Maison_Coilliot_Lille.JPG

File:Maison_Coilliot_Lille.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hektor (talk) 07:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Sala_Santa_Cecilia.JPG

File:Sala_Santa_Cecilia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

93.39.195.121 15:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Sophie_la_girafe.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sophie_la_girafe.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Sophie_la_girafe.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 22:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Ecole_nationale_supérieures_des_Arts_décoratifs_-_Rue_d'Ulm.JPG

File:Ecole_nationale_supérieures_des_Arts_décoratifs_-_Rue_d'Ulm.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 10:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old woman Scanno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting composition. Tilted to the right, and quite noisy at full size, but I think its fixable. --Avenue 07:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC) Image tilted on the left, noise reduced, better ?--LPLT 17:25, 3 March 2011 (UTC) Yes, QI IMO. Not entirely sharp, but okay viewed at QI minimum size. --Avenue 06:39, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Ticket à vérifier

Salut LPLT,

Pas de souci concernant les œuvres de Michiel Hendryckx : le ticket OTRS concerne bien, et de façon claire tous ses clichés versés sur Commons.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Gaston Gallimard

Tiens, tu étais présent à l'inauguration ? J'y étais aussi et ai créé [[Category:Inauguration of rue Gaston-Gallimard, Paris]]

Bonne soirée,

Remi Mathis (talk) 18:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Génial :-) Et non je n'étais pas ton compagnon, je suis passé en coup de vent, juste le temps de prendre la température et trois photos...

Remi Mathis (talk) 19:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci

pour ce photo :-) -- Blackcat (talk) 17:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Voguéo_BNF.JPG

File:Voguéo_BNF.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 16:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Cité_de_l'Armée_du_Salut.JPG

File:Cité_de_l'Armée_du_Salut.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 20:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Undeletion

Hello Bapti,

May I ask you to have a look on this request. Am I wrong asking this ? Thx--LPLT (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Je ne vois pas trop ce que je pourrais y dire de plus pertinent que n'importe quel contributeur ;)--Bapti ✉ 16:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Il me semblait que tu pouvais avoir, en tant que sysop, un point de vue sur la question. Peut-on s'inspirer ou non d'une photo pour faire un portrait d'une personne sachant que le résultat est radicalement différent si l'on compare l'œuvre utilisée et celle produite. Suis-je dans l'erreur de demander la restauration ou non, compte-tenu de la problématique bien spécifique ? Je te demande ton avis, pas d'intervenir et Martin H ne répond pas à la question--LPLT (talk) 18:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

En tant qu'administrateur, ça ne change pas grand chose sur ma capacité à m'exprimer sur la pertinence ou non d'une image. En l'occurrence, je trouve que l'argument développé sur Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juliogonzalez.jpg (c'est clairement une œuvre dérivée de la photo) est tout à fait recevable. Mais on peut faire un dessin sans le recalquer sur une photo.--Bapti ✉ 15:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

speedy deletion

Please don't forget to inform a user of a copyright violation. If you click on 'click here for further instructions' you can see the WikiText you aught to place on the uploaders talk page. --Vera (talk) 01:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Rome: Porta S. Giovanni

LPLT, Your photo of "Porta S. Giovanni" will be published in a book on Grand Central Terminal by the New York Transit Museum. We thank you for your contribution to Wikimedia Commons and our book.

Kind regards,

Brett72 (Wikipedia user name)

Thank you for this notification. I truely appreciate. Best regards.--LPLT (talk) 19:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Fichier:Plaques rue Croulebarbe.JPG

Bonjour,

Photo utilisée ici, je signale comme c'est demandé, j'espère que les mentions vont bien. Cordialement. FredoB (talk) 20:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Harpe de table.JPG

Salut. C'est quoi une « harpe de table »?--Phso2 (talk) 21:54, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Salut,

C'est comme cela que l'instrument est défini. Je ne sais quoi dire, j'ai lu l'étiquette.--LPLT (talk) 14:14, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

c'est curieux, pourquoi alors avoir précisé « (et non violon selon la description du musée) »? ça laisserait à entendre que selon la description du musée, il s'agirait d'un violon. Comment c'était, le nom en italien?--Phso2 (talk) 15:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC) PS : En cherchant, je pense que le nom sur l'étiquette de droite devait être "Cetre de tavolo" ou "Cetre a tavolo" = cithare sur table, non? Effectivement on en voit par transparence sur l'étagère d'en dessous.

Le « selon la description du musée » faisait référence à Harpe (cad harpe selon musée et non violon). Je dois bien avouer que je n'ai pas souvenir de la chose (l'eau à coulé sous les ponts) et du nom en italien utilisé, mais que si j'ai spécifié cela c'est que c'était paradoxal (on croirait un violon, mais ce n'en est pas un) et clairement indiqué (ce d'autant que j'avais pris à l'époque systématiquement les photos des étiquettes pour être sûr et que si j'ai pris cet instrument en particulier c'est qu'il était atypique et un faux-ami). Pour ce qui est de la transparence, les étiquettes n'étaient pas toujours en face des instruments... donc... Cdlt--LPLT (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

ah OK j'avais compris de travers...A mon avis l'étiquette ne concernait pas cet instrument, un truc à seulement quatre cordes avec un chevalet arrondi (pour pouvoir utiliser un archet) et un manche, ça ressemble quand même très très très fort à un violon (ou assimilé), et en tout cas ce n'est ni une cithare ni une harpe, par définition.--Phso2 (talk) 21:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue Saint-Frambourg Ivry-sur-Seine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting statue. A bit green and yellow IMO. The color balance should be checked.--Jebulon 08:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC) The improvements make it far much better, thank you.--Jebulon 22:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

50 ou 60 ? 42 ?

Bonsoir !

Sur cette page de discussion d'un des fichiers que tu as téléversés, il y a un message pour toi. Litlok (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Auditorium Roma interno.JPG

And also:

• File:Da pacem Domine.JPG
• File:Da pacem Domine2.JPG
• File:Sala Petrassi.JPG
• File:Sala Santa Cecilia.JPG
• File:Sala Sinopoli del Parco della Musica.JPG

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mètre-étalon Paris.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and very useful (I know the street but never noticed this !--Jebulon 17:17, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ara Pacis à Rome.JPG

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 01:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Université La Sapienza.JPG

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque Square Louis-Gentil.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 18:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arches viaduc de Morlaix 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 16:33, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Antonine Maillet redux.jpg

Bonjour,

Le fichier File:Antonine Maillet redux.jpg, que vous avez téléversé, est proposé pour suppression immédiate. En effet, les images sous droits d'auteur provenant de la collection de Librairie et Archives Canada ne sont pas libres car elles ne peuvent pas être utilisées commercialement ni faire l'objet de modifications libres sans permission spéciale. Pour plus d'informations, vous pouvez consulter Category:Images from Library and Archives Canada, la lettre de BAC, Commons:Deletion requests/Library and Archives Canada non-PD images et les pages [2] et [3] du site de BAC. Cordialement, -- Asclepias (talk) 00:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ancienne mairie de Saint-Claude, Carrefour des Solidarités.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ancienne mairie de Saint-Claude, Carrefour des Solidarités.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 17:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Jardin Brassaï.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jardin Brassaï.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Cinéma du Panthéon.jpg

File:Cinéma du Panthéon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 13:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Pour la jolie photo du Château de Costaérès Aarp65 (talk) 04:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Pierre Michon redux.jpg

File:Pierre Michon redux.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Didier Pinson (talk) 15:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

conversation à effacer

Bonjour j aimerai effacer cette conversation qui est archivée mais n'y arrive pas. Pouvez vous l effacer ? Aussi j aimerai effecer ou bloquer mon compte wikipedia et wikicommons. Pouvez vous le faire ou m'indiquer comment le faire ? Merci bcp

http://wikipedia.orange.fr/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:LPLT/Archive_26

Gordes - musée du Verre et du vitrail[ ]

Bonjour,

Je travaille pour le musée du Verre et du Vitrail et ai créé une page wikipedia afin que les utilisateurs de wikipedia puissent venir découvrir notre musée et en apprendre plus sur notre musée. cette page a été supprimée. Nous avons tous les droits d'auteur. Pouvez vous la republier?

Je reste à votre entière disposition,

Albane de Caprona

Bonjour Monsieur, Merci de votre message. Je suis dans plusieurs discussions à propos de ce petit problème qui n'en est pas un. Serait-il possible de rassembler (regrouper) la discussion entre les différentes personnes qui effacent le contenu que j essaye d insérer? Dans le site du musée se trouve un monument historique"le moulin des bouillon", nous avons tous les accords de la commune et du Parc regional du Lubéron. Nous sommes dans le guide Michelin et beaucoup d autres guides.. Ce musée existe depuis 1975 donc ce n est ni une nouveauté ni une volonté de faire de la publicité mensongère.. Je pense qu il est important de le signaler car il est un des attraits majeur de Gordes.

Bonjour Monsieur, Merci de votre message. Le Médaillon est une Miniature. Verre technique "Millefiori". Levant - III e siecle apres J.C, Taille réelle 1cm de coté. Je vous invite à venir visiter notre musée qui contient une très belle collection d'objets anciens et modernes relatant l'épopée du verre afin de vous rendre compte par vous même de la véracité de l'information et de l'attrait majeur qu'il constitue pour la culture et le village de Gordes. Nous pourrons ensuite rajouter un paragraphe dans la page si cela vous convient. Je reste à votre entière disposition, Albane de Caprona Pouvons nous trouver une solution? Je reste à votre entière dispostion, albane de Caprona

Bonjour, Il est clairement indiqué, en bas de fenêtre d'édition, en contribuant ici → Ne copiez pas de texte, ni d'une page web, ni d'un autre support : respectez le droit d'auteur. Lire WP:COPY, pour ce qui est du droit d'auteur et des modalités de republication. La page ne peut être restaurée pour des raisons légales. J'attire votre attention sur le fait que WP n'est pas un espace promotionnel et n'a pas pour vocation à faire « venir découvrir notre musée  ». Ce musée est admissible, mais le contenu de la page doit respecter les règles encyclopédiques et les principes fondateurs de Wikipédia au premier lieu duquel la neutralité de point de vue. En d'autres termes, vos contributions doivent être : intégralement de votre plume sourcées (cf WP:Sources secondaires) et neutres dans la présentation et le fond (pas de promotion ou de publicité). Cdlt-- LPLT [discu] 18 juin 2013 à 13:31 (CEST)

File:Rue Rataud 2010.JPG

File:Rue Rataud 2010.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Aga (d) 07:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Rue Rataud 2010.JPG

File:Rue Rataud 2010.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 10:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:San Giovanni Bosco (Rome)

Category:San Giovanni Bosco (Rome) has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

by G.dallorto, but IMO correctly. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Chiesa dei Santi Antonio da Padova e Annibale Maria Roma.JPG

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:57, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Eglise San Gabriele dell'Addolorata.JPG

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 01:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Coupole vitraux basilique Don Bosco.JPG

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 21:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Passerelle Simone de Beauvoir à Bercy.JPG

Yours sincerely, —Wuzur 03:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Église Santissimo Nome di Maria.JPG

And also:

• File:Église Santissimo Nome di Maria2.JPG

Yours sincerely, José Luiz ^disc 01:46, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Mémorial de la déportation.JPG

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Port Douarnenez 2.JPG

Bonjour, la légende de cette phot est incorrecte, il ne s'agit pas du port de Tréboul à Douarnenez mais de celui du Rosmeur. Cordialement.--Lefringant (talk) 08:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Jasper Johns Grey Reception at the Met 20080205.SD850IS.2106 SML.jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Portrait de Zarca redux.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait de Zarca redux.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Portrait de Zarca redux.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 04:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

File:David Vann redux.jpg

File:David Vann redux.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Whaurelie (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

File:AGATHE BONITZER.jpg

File:AGATHE BONITZER.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.242.58.131 10:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Deletion request for File:Daphné Patakia.jpg and File:Maryne_Cayon.jpg

Could you please double-check your claims that thoses files are extracted from a "image under copyright extracted from a movie trailer" or that the source displays "no CC licence"? The video is provided on Vimeo by the film distributor, "Les Films du Losange", and you can access the CC license on page https://vimeo.com/218216693 by clicking on "Plus" and then reading the "Licence" field, clicking on the two icons to access the version of the CC licence. --George2etexte (talk) 10:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

OK on Vimeo (obviously not evident to find, and these licensing data must be imported on Commons too when the picture is uploaded - somebody did it after) BUT I'm dubious concerning such a licence for a movie. Production societies do not generally free such rights, even on a trailer, and directors are jealous with their copyright. Something's wrong here TMO. --LPLT (talk) 10:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

File:René Milan.jpg

Hello LPLT, should this file be renamed to File:Maurice Larrouy (writer).jpg or is there something down the road I am missing? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:20, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello Lotje, René Milan is the pseudonym as a writer of Maurice Larrouy (see fr:Maurice Larrouy (écrivain)), but it is the same person. I don't think renaming is necessary but explaining in the legend, yes probably. Sincerely--LPLT (talk) 19:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done Lotje (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Grande Mosquée de Rome 1.JPG

And also:

• File:Grande Mosquée de Rome.JPG
• File:Minaret Grande Mosquée de Rome.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Bas-relief Telecom ParisTech.JPG

File:Bas-relief Telecom ParisTech.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB00:A05:D100:DDAA:5F33:FE80:40EF 19:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Paul Hillier2.JPG

File:Paul Hillier2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Square Gabriel-Pierné.JPG

Yours sincerely, Achim55 (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Entrée du lycée Jules-Ferry.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Maison de Solene - Cochin.JPG

File:Maison de Solene - Cochin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)