Wikimedia Commons

Lucarelli

Latest comment: 2 years ago by SCP-2000 in topic Notification about possible deletion
Image deletion notification Image:Comunisti Italiani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Cnyborg 23:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image deletion notification Image:Lega Nord 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Cnyborg 23:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Squadristi.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Squadristi.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Phrood 20:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Alleanza Nazionale.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Alleanza Nazionale.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—xyzzyn 14:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Forza Italia 2006.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Forza Italia 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—xyzzyn 14:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Italia dei Valori.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Italia dei Valori.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—xyzzyn 14:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:L'Ulivo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:L'Ulivo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—xyzzyn 14:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Rifondazione comunista.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Rifondazione comunista.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—xyzzyn 14:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Rosa nel pugno.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Rosa nel pugno.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—xyzzyn 14:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Unione dei Democratici Cristiani.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Unione dei Democratici Cristiani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—xyzzyn 14:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Verdi Italiani.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image deletion warning Image:Verdi Italiani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—xyzzyn 14:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio edit

Image:Pooh italian music group.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Pay attention to copyright Image:Pooh italian music group.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Elitre 21:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Moby_Vincent.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 16:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have forgotten the tag, now resolved. -Lucarelli 17:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Livornp-Sinagoga.JPG edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Pay attention to copyright Image:Livornp-Sinagoga.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto 16:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Vecchiano_4.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 17:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC) Done. Thanks, -- LucarelliReply

Trippa edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Ciao, ho caricato l'immagine Trippa.jpg, ma commons non mi ha avvertito che c'era gia una altro file, quello che avevi caricato. Ho provato ripristinare ma l'immagine si è solo distorta. Non so più cosa fare per ripristinare.--Lissen 17:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Si adesso va bene, ma come mai sulla pagina appariva la mia immagine distorta, metre se invece la ingrandivi, veniva l'originale, nonostante abbia fatto anch'io il revert? Ma sopratutto perchè commons non mi ha avvertito del file già esistente (anche perchè ho riprovato dopo e me lo segnalava)? C'era un problema al server? Ah, l'ho (ri)caricata l'immagine e l'ho chiamata Trippa2.jpg, e l'ho anche proposta per il quality image, ma ho paura per i riflessi del flash...--Lissen 19:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Strano, anch'io ho visto una cosa del genere per la prima volta, e volevo già avvertire un admin; poi il revert è andato bene. Ora però ho quasi voglia di mangiare una bel piatto di trippa :-).- --Lucarelli 16:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Complimenti edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ciao, complimenti per le foto che hai caricato su Livorno: sono veramente molto belle e nitide. Le ho inserite qua e là nelle pagine di Wikipedia, alternandole con altre già presenti, così da creare un quadro d'insieme il più vario possibile. Ciao :) --Etienne (Li) 15:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Diritto di panorama edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Il cambiamento è stato proposto, ma non mi risulta che sia stato approvata causa caduta del governo. Se hai notizie diverse fammi sapere e mi comporterò di conseguenza. Come regola prudenziale al posto tuo io eviterei cmq opere di architetti contemporanei. Ma personalmente non intendo ricominciare un ulteriore ciclo di discussioni sul diritto di panorama o no. Ne sono esausto e non si arriva da nessuna parte. E' il lato che mi piace di meno di Wikedia... :-( --User:G.dallorto 22:47, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cappella Spedali Riuniti, Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments sharp and exact --Mbdortmund 17:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa Santa Madonna del Soccorso, Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The verticals are not exactly vertical (perhaps you can try to correct them with ShiftN), but acceptable quality for QI though. -- MJJR 20:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gelateria Lungomare Livono.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is sufficient for QI. Not a spectacular motif, but IMHO some people here need a reality check on what QI means... --Dschwen 15:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa Santa Caterina, Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For some reason in full size this image appears rotated 90deg CW to me. --Dschwen 17:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC) -- On my screen the image does not rotate. Acceptable quality IMO. -- MJJR 21:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
The white pixels in the lower right corner really lower the quality of any image. -- carol 14:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Oh yes, uploaded cropped version - --Lucarelli 15:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama Venezia Nuova, Livorno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lots of compression artifacts, maybe present in the source images. But high resolution compensates for that IMO. --Dschwen 00:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giorgio Vasari, Pala, Santa Caterina, Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments technically good --Mbdortmund 11:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Pisa, detail 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would you like to try to make it a little darker and invest a little more econtrast? I like the idea, but I think it looks a little bit faded. --Mbdortmund 16:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)I hope it's better now --Lucarelli 20:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
yes --Mbdortmund 20:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gatta randagia Livorno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good technical quality. --Aqwis 19:01, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Livorno, Panorama dalla Fortezza Vecchia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bitte porto Livorno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Illustrates subject well, good resolution. TimVickers 21:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Carovana Pisa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very beautiful photo and palace. --Lestath 22:33, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pisa Duomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mega Smeralda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta San Marco, dettaglio, Livorno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quite good --B.navez 02:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Containers Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality pic. Lycaon 22:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Non capisco per quale motivo... edit

hai caricato foto di Livorno scattate da me (utente Shezarainbow di wikipedia) a tuo nome. Finora ne ho trovate almeno tre, 2 della fortezza vecchia ed 1 della terrazza Mascagni con gazebo. Caro concittadino, gradirei spiegazioni. Magari ci sono dei meccanismi che non conosco, visto che sono via da Wikipedia da un po'. Non so. Ovviamente non ho diritti da far valere, le foto erano di pubblico dominio, ma non capisco il perchè non lasciare il mio nome come autrice della foto. Una semplice curiosità. Shez, 15 ottobre 2008.

Uncategorized edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Lucarelli, ist ja nett was du einkategorisierst, aber möchtest du dann bitte auch die Zeile 'Uncategorized...' löschen, damit andere auch wissen, dass das Bild kategorisiert ist und das Bild auch nicht mehr in den unkat. auftaucht? Danke. --Ayacop (talk) 11:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tschuldigung, daran habe ich gar nicht gedacht, da ich dachte, ein Bot würde die dann entfernen. Werde die Zeile von nun an löschen. Grüße, ---Lucarelli (talk) 11:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


File:Carnevale_venezia_maschere_3.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File deletion warning File:Carnevale_venezia_maschere_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

~/w /Talk 20:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa Santa Caterina, Livorno, cupola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture. Quality looks good to me. --JuliusR 08:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pisa Arno Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good resolution --Dmottl 14:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
  Support A good picture of the subject. --Siipikarja 13:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
  Question How many pictures did you stitch together? Please add this information to the the information template of the picture. --Siipikarja 13:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have added the information. --Lucarelli 21:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Livorno Monumento Leopoldo II Piazza XX Settembre 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Livorno Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very informative and a very good quality --Böhringer 08:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moby Aki 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Arghh! But good quality. Lycaon 08:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calafuria Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks ok to me. --Eusebius 10:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Livorno Monumento Garibaldi, Piazza Garibaldi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. --Coyau 18:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Featured Picture Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Livorno Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Livorno Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

--Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 09:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paesaggio Parrana San Martino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Looks good. --High Contrast 22:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Lorenzo, Fauglia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments looks good --Mbdortmund 18:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

PH-3 edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello.

You can add it PH-3 in your babel box on your profile page.

--ComputerHotline (talk) 13:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your comment; but for the moment I will add only PH-2, I am still trying. Greetings, ---Lucarelli (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dead Squirrel 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Awesome composition. Excellent depth of field... --Karora 07:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pesce al mercato 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. I'd swear I could smell it when I was examining that full-screen! --Karora 00:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di Sant'Agata alla Fornace, Catania, interno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok. --Berthold Werner 06:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elefante, Catania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition. --Karora 10:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


Fiat 1100 edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
 

I have been trying to make sense of the pictures of the Fiat 1100 on commons. I think I may have wrongly named one (very fuzzy) one that I took myself. (I have been going through old anglophone motor magazines from the 1960s.)

But my purpose here concerns one of your pictures. This one. I THINK this is a Fiat 1100D (1962 - 1966). When you uploaded it, you thought it was an 1100 103 (<1962). Please, are you sure? or do you also think 'your' picture might have been of an 1100D? Any source info on why you believe what you believe?

Mit Dank im Voraus und best greetings. Charles01 (talk) 07:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

(Viele von deine Bilder sind fantastich, meine Meinung nach. Es tut mir Leid das war aber nicht meine Thema heirmit!) |

Dear Charles, I have to admit that I am not an expert of Fiat models. For me it looks like a 1100-103 "D", someone on the Italian Wikipedia has classified it as 1100-103 D, II Series, beginning '60 Fiat_1100. But maybe it could be cleared also on the Italian discussion site for Transport: Discussioni_progetto:Trasporti. Greetings, --Lucarelli (talk) 20:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks for your thoughts on this. I will wait and see if any kind Italian knows the answer more securely than I can manage! Regards Charles01 (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Proserpinus proserpina, Livorno 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 12:24, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiat truck blue.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the best quality but probably the best possible with the camera used. Good composition and colors. --Ianare 07:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neoscona adianta 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition. Maedin 19:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argiope bruennichi, Livorno 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Maedin 12:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argiope bruennichi Cornacchiaia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 23:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpi Apuane Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine. --Marcok 20:54, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre Guinigi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice image and interesting object --Sfu 09:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eriosoma lanuginosum 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Mbdortmund 19:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheiracanthium punctorium 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama Pisa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 11:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Chiesa San Giovanni al Gatano, Pisa.JPG edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Chiesa San Giovanni al Gatano, Pisa.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--User:G.dallorto (talk) 02:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Un petit plaisir edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

S'il te plais : un petit plaisir. Toi qui fait de si belles photos, mets la légende aussi en Italien, pour tout les italophiles. Amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Alberto.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Archaeodontosaurus 06:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papilio machaon, Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for "in vivo" -- Archaeodontosaurus 06:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pisa ponte ferrovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 06:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araneus diadematus, Livorno 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Archaeodontosaurus 06:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argiope bruennichi detail spinneret.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 06:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Grazia On.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Agostini, Pisa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image. --Cayambe 16:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sympetrum fonscolombii, female 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 16:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampascioni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Smial 23:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolomedes fimbriatus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomisus onustus, female, Livorrno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zerynthia cassandra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Mbdortmund 02:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melanargia galathea 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Mbdortmund 02:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poggio a Caiano Fregio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Unusual aspect ratio. Good and valuable documentation. --Iotatau 21:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Podarcis muralis, Livorno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI.--Elekhh 01:10, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Poggio_a_Caiano_Fregio.jpg edit

 
File:Poggio_a_Caiano_Fregio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pratoprovincia 22:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you for your work on my birth places! (Pisa and province) DnaX (talk) 10:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

URV durch Straubinger Wochenblatt? edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Das Bild https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Araneus_diadematus,_Livorno_1.JPG wurde in der Ausgabe 35 vom 29. August 2012 im Straubinger Wochenblatt auf Seite 2 verwendet mit dem Zusatz "Lucarelli/wikipedia". Da ich nicht weiß, ob die Redakteure des Straubinger Wochenblatts eine gesonderte Vereinbarung mit dir haben und das Bild sonst ja CC-BY-SA ist, melde ich das mal lieber. Falls erwünscht, kann ich dazu auch noch eine Kopie anlegen und dir zukommen lassen. --Kreuvf (talk) 10:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

User:Lucarelli edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
User:Lucarelli has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.152.112.228 15:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Agip.jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Agip.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Incontro a Cascina (PI) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ciao, vedo dai tuoi contributi che eri in qualche modo legato alla zona della Toscana. Non so se tu vivi in zona o ci passi, ma sperando che tu legga in tempo volevo informarti che con Kaspo (coordinatore regionale WMI per la Toscana) abbiamo finito di impostare it:Wikipedia:Raduni/WikiGita all'abbazia di San Savino. Si tratta di un edificio normalmente chiuso al pubblico. Ne saranno fatte altre in zona toscana di gite soprattutto nel mese di Wiki Loves Monument quindi se si è interessati all'idea si accetta con piacere ogni feedback. Stiamo preparando una Mailing List per future escursioni. Contatta pure Kaspo se o quando vedrai questo messaggio.--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana - preparazione edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Stiamo organizzando Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2019.

Il concorso si tiene a settembre ma ci muoviamo con largo anticipo. Puoi consultare in questa pagina il lavoro in corso.

Ci sono monumenti (o intere amministrazioni) che mancano vicino alla tua zona di interesse?

Fallo presente e vedremo di fare il possibile!

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

  toscana wikimedia.it

  #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments

  Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

  toscanawiki

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

La tua foto su Repubblica edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

La tua foto File:Nada Malanima.JPG è stata usata in https://www.repubblica.it/spettacoli/people/2014/01/16/foto/nada-76105680/1/#8 senza attribuzione. Nemo 19:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana sta per iniziare edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'organizzazione di Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2019 ha proseguito e qua potete consultare il lavoro dei volontari.

Qui potete valutare quanto è stato liberato finora. Nuove liberatorie arriveranno nei prossimi giorni.

Il primo settembre inizia il concorso, ti preghiamo di informare le persone interessate vicino a te e, se puoi, anche di condividere i post sui vari canali sociali.

Qui e qui e qui è possibile scaricare il volantino di promozione regionale in alcune delle lingue più comuni per i turisti.

messaggio discusso qui. Per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

  toscana wikimedia.it

  @WikiToscana

  Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

  toscanawiki

#WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments2019

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--23:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Toscana sta per finire edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Fra poco si chiuderà l'edizione 2021 di Wiki Loves Monuments.

Ci teniamo a segnalare a chi avesse scorso le liste in precedenza, che negli ultimi giorni sono stati concessi a tempo indefinito nuovi beni da fotografare a Pontremoli, Volterra e San Giovanni Valdarno.

Se hai delle foto di archivio da condividere, il bottone blu di caricamento su ogni riga in tabella sarà attivo fino alla mezzanotte di oggi.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

  toscana wikimedia.it

  WikiToscana

  Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

  toscanawiki

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2021 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2021 #WLM2021

Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, SCP-2000 10:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lucarelli&oldid=643386305"